How stupid not to have thought of that: Post-copulatory sexual selection

Journal of Zoology

Volumn 281, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 78-93

  Birkhead, T R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cryptic female choice; Darwin; Huxley; Individual selection; Mechanisms of post copulatory sexual selection; Sperm competition

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; SEXUAL REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPERM COMPETITION; SURVIVAL;

EID: 77954170313     PISSN: 09528369     EISSN: 14697998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2010.00701.x     Document Type: Article

References (122)

1. Alcock J. The triumph of sociobiology 2001, Oxford, Oxford University Press
2. Allyn D. Make love not war: the sexual revolution, an unfettered history 2000, New York, Little, Brown and Co
3. Amann R. Sperm production rates. The testis 1970, 433-482. Johnson PWGomes WRVandermark NL. In, (Eds), New York, Academic Press
4. Arnold SJ, Duvall D. Animal mating systems: a synthesis based on selection theory. Am. Nat. 1994, 143:317-348.
5. von Baër K. 1847, Bulletin de la Classe Physico-Mathématique de l'Academie Impériale des Sciences de St. Pétersbourg
6. von Baër KE. De ovi mammalium et hominis genesi 1827, Leipzig, Epistola. Leopoldi Vossi
7. Baker RJ, Makova KD, Chesser RK. Microsatellites indicate a high frequency of multiple paternity in Apodemus. Mol. Ecol. 1999, 8:107-111.
8. Barrett PH, Gautrey PJ, Herbert S, Kohn D, Smith SA. Charles Darwin's notebooks, 1836-1844 1987, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
9. Bartley MM. Courtship and continued progress: Julian Huxley's studies on bird behavior. J. History Biol. 1995, 28:91-108.
10. Bateman AJ. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 1948, 2:349-368.
11. Birkhead TR. Darwin on sex. Biologist 1997, 44:397-399.
12. Birkhead TR. Cryptic female choice: criteria for establishing female sperm choice. Evolution 1998, 52:1212-1218.
13. Birkhead TR. The wisdom of birds - an illustrated history of ornithology 2008, London, Bloomsbury
14. Birkhead TR, Biggins JD. Sperm competition mechanisms in birds: models and data. Behav. Ecol. 1998, 9:253-260.
15. Birkhead TR, Brillard J-P. Postcopulatory prezygotic reproductive isolation in birds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:266-272.
16. Birkhead TR, Chaline N, Biggins JD, Burke TA, Pizzari T. Nontransitivity of paternity in a bird. Evolution 2004, 58:416-420.
17. Birkhead TR, Hall J, Schut E, Hemmings N. Unhatched eggs: methods for discriminating between infertility and early embryo mortality. Ibis 2008, 150:508-517.
18. Birkhead TR, Martinez JG, Burke T, Froman DP. Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 1999, 266:1759-1764.
19. Birkhead TR, Monaghan P. Ingenious ideas: the history of behavioral ecology. Evolutionary behavioral ecology 2010, 3-15. Westneat DF, Fox C. In, (Eds), Oxford, Oxford University Press
20. Birkhead TR, Montgomerie R. Three centuries of sperm studies. Sperm Biology, an evolutionary perspective 2009, 1-42. Birkhead TR, Hosken DPitnick S. In, (Eds), London, Academic Press
21. Birkhead TR, Møller AP. Sperm competition in birds: evolutionary causes and consequences 1992, London, Academic Press
22. Birkhead TR, Møller AP. Sperm competition and sexual selection 1998, London, Academic Press
23. Birkhead TR, Wishart GJ, Biggins JD. Sperm precedence in the domestic fowl. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 1995, 261:285-292.
24. Brennan PL, Clark CJ, Prum RO. Explosive eversion and functional morphology of the duck penis supports sexual conflict in waterfowl. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 2009, 277:1309-1314.
25. Brennan PL, Prum RO, McCracken KG, Sorenson MD, Wilson RE, Birkhead TR. Coevolution of male and female genital morphology in waterfowl. PLoS One 2007, 5:e418.
26. Burke T, Bruford MW. DNA fingerprinting in birds. Nature 1987, 327:149-152.
27. Cohen IB. Three notes on the reception of Darwin's ideas on natural selection (Henry Baker Tristram, Alfred Newton, Samuel Wilberforce). The Darwinian heritage 1985, 589-607. Kohn D. In, (Ed.), Princeton, Princeton University Press
28. Coker CR, McKinney F, Hays H, Briggs S, Cheng K. Intromittent organ size in relation to mating system in waterfowl. Auk 2002, 119:403-413.
29. Colegrave N, Birkhead TR, Lessells CM. Sperm precedence in zebra finches does not require special mechanisms of sperm competition. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 1995, 259:223-228.
30. Compton MM, Van Krey HP, Siegel PB. The filling and emptying of the uterovaginal sperm-host glands in the domestic hen. Poult. Sci. 1978, 57:1696-1700.
31. Cornwallis CK, Birkhead TR. Social status and availability of females determine patterns of sperm allocation in the fowl. Evolution 2006, 60:1486-1493.
32. Crudgington HS, Siva-Jothy MT. Genital damage, kicking and early death. Nature 2000, 407:855-856.
33. Darwin C. On the origin of species 1859, London, John Murray
34. Darwin C. The variation of animals and plants under domestication 1868, London, Murray
35. Darwin C. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex 1871, London, John Murray
36. De Beer G. Charles Darwin; Thomas Henry Huxley: autobiographies 1974, London, Oxford University Press
37. Desmond A. Huxley: the devil's disciple 1994, London, Michael Joseph
38. Desmond A. Huxley: evolution's high priest 1997, London, Michael Joseph
39. Eberhard WG. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice 1996, Princeton, Princeton University Press
40. Emlen ST, Oring LW. Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 1977, 197:215-223.
41. Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE. Discriminating sperm: how competition drives cooperation among related sperm of Peromyscus mice. Nature 2010, 463:801-893.
42. Fisher RA. The genetical theory of natural selection 1930, Oxford, Clarendon Press
43. Gack C, Peschke K. Spermathecal morphology, sperm transfer and a novel mechanism of sperm displacement in the rove beetle, Aleochara curtula (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). Zoomorphology 1994, 114:227-237.
44. Ginsberg JR, Huck UW. Sperm competition in mammals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1989, 4:74-79.
45. Girton D. The new and complete pigeon fancier: or, a modern treatise on domestic pigeons 1765, London
46. Gomendio M, Martin-Coello J, Magana C, Roldan E. Sperm competition enhances functional capacity of mammalian spermatozoa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:15113-15117.
47. Gould SJ, Lewontin RC. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 1979, 205:581-598.
48. Gray EM. Female control of offspring paternity in a western population of red-winged blackbirds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1996, 38:267-278.
49. Gregorio MA. Charles Darwin's Marginialia 1990, New York, Garland
50. Griffith SC. Intra- and extrapair paternity. Reproductive biology and phylogeny of Aves (birds) 2007, 271-294. Jamieson BGM. In, (Ed.), Enfield, Science Publishers
51. Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA. Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol. Ecol. 2002, 11:2195-2212.
52. Hamilton WD, Zuk M. Heritable true fitness bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 1982, 218:384-387.
53. Hatch SA. Mechanism and ecological significance of sperm storage in the northern fulmar with reference to its occurrence in other birds. Auk 1983, 100:593-600.
54. Hertwig O. Beitrage zur kenntniss der bildung, befruchtung und theilung des thierischen eies. Morphol. Jahrbücher 1876, 1:347-452.
55. Houle D. Comparing evolvability of quantitative traits. Genetics 1992, 130:195-204.
56. Huxley JS. A 'disharmony' in the reproductive habits of the wild duck (Anas boschas L.). Biologisch. Zentralbl. 1912, 32:621-623.
57. Huxley JS. The present standing of the theory of sexual selection. Evolution 1938, 11-42. Beer DG. In, (Ed.), Oxford, Oxford University Press
58. Huxley L. The life and letters of Thomas Henry Huxley 1900, London, Macmillan
59. Huxley TH. Man's place in nature and other anthropological essays 1894, London, Macmillan
60. Immler S, Moore HDM, Breed WG, Birkhead TR. By hook or by crook? Morphometry, competition and cooperation in rodent sperm. PLoS One 2007, 2:e170.
61. Jequier AM. Non-therapy related pregnancies in the consorts of a group of men with obstructive azoospermia. Andrologia 1985, 17:6-8.
62. Kølliker A. Manual of human histology 1853, London, Sydenham Society
63. Kölliker RA. Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Geschlechtsverhaltnisse und der samenflüssigkeit wirbelloser Thiere, nebst einem Versuch über das Wesen und die Bedeutung der sogenannten Sanebthiere 1841, Berlin, W. Logier
64. Kempenaers B, Verheyen GR, Broeck Mvd, Burke T, Broeckhoven CV, Dhondt AA. Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high quality males in the blue tit. Nature 1992, 357:494-496.
65. Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 1991, 350:33-38.
66. Krebs JR, Davies NB. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach 1978, 1st edn, Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications
67. Lack D. Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds 1968, London, Chapman Hall
68. Lessells CM, Birkhead TR. Mechanisms of sperm competition in birds: mathematical models. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1990, 27:325-337.
69. MacLeod CD, MacLeod RC. The relationship between body mass and relative investment in testes mass in amniotes and other vertebrates. Oikos 2009, 118:903-916.
70. Manier MK, Belote JM, Berben KS, Novikov D, Stuart WT, Pitnick S. Resolving mechanisms of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2010, Published Online March 18, 2010 Science doi, 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.07.020
71. McKinney F, Derrickson SR, Mineau P. Forced copulations in waterfowl. Behaviour 1983, 86:250-294.
72. Miller GT, Pitnick S. Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila. Science 2002, 298:1230-1233.
73. Montgomerie R, Briskie JV. The evolution of the intromittent organ. Reproductive biology and phylogeny of Aves (birds) 2007, 513-551. Jamieson BGM, In, (Ed.), Enfield, Science Publ Inc
74. Moore HDM, Dvorakova K, Jenkins N, Breed WG. Exceptional sperm cooperation in the wood mouse. Nature 2002, 418:174-177.
75. Newport G. On the impregnation of the ovum in amphibia (first series). Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. 1851, 141:169-242.
76. Newport G. Researches on the impregnation of the ovum in the amphibia; and on the early stages of the development of the embryo (Third series). Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. 1854, 144:229-244.
77. Nørrevang A. On the breeding biology of the guillemot Uria aalge (Pont.). Dan. Ornithol. Foren. Tidsskr. 1958, 52:48-74.
78. Nyhart LK. Biology takes form: animal morphology and German Universities, 1800-1900 1995, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
79. Paley W. Natural theology; or evidence of the existence and attributes of the deity, collected from the Appearances of Nature 1802, London, R. Fauldner
80. Parker GA. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 1970, 45:525-567.
81. Parker GA. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating strategies. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems 1984, 1-60. Smith RL. In, (Ed.), London, Academic Press
82. Parker GA. Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. Sperm competition and sexual selection 1998, 3-54. Birkhead TRMøller AP. In, (Ed.), London, Academic Press
83. Parker GA. Behavioural ecology: the science of natural history. Essays on animal behaviour: celebrating 50 years of animal behaviour 2006, 23-56. Lucas JRSimmons LW. In, (Eds), Burlington, Elsevier
84. Pitnick S, Wolfner M, Suarez S. Ejaculate-female and sperm-female interactions. Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective 2009, 247-304. Birkhead TR, Hosken D, Pitnick S. In, (Eds), London, Academic Press
85. Pizzari T, Birkhead TR. Female fowl eject sperm of subdominant males. Nature (London) 2000, 405:787-789.
86. Prevost JL, Dumas JA. Essai sur les animalcules spermatiques de divers animaux. Mem. Soc. Phys. Nat. Geneve. 1821, 1:180-207.
87. Prevost JL, Dumas JA. Rapports de l'oeuf avec la liqueur fécondante. Phénomènes appreciables résultant de leir action mutuelle. Development de l'oeuf des batraciens. Ann. Sci. Nat. 1824, T2:100-121.
88. Raven CE. John ray, naturalist: his life and works 1942, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
89. Ray J. The ornithology of Francis Willughby [1676] 1678, London, John Martyn
90. Ray J. The wisdom of God manifested in the works of creation 1691, London, Smith
91. Ray J. Synopsis Quadrupedum 1693, London, Smith
92. Richards RJ. The tragic sense of life: Ernst Haeckel and the struggle over evolutionary thought 2008, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
93. Rodrigo-Rueda FJ, Rodriguez-Teijeiro JD, Puigcerver M, Gallego S. Mate switching in a non-monogamous species? The case of the common quail (Coturnix coturnix). Ethology 1997, 103:355-364.
94. Romanoff AL. The Avian Embryo: structural and functional development 1960, New York, Macmillan
95. Röon J, Katvala M, Arnqvist G. Coevolution between harmful genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:10921-10925.
96. Rowe L, Houle D. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 1996, 263:1415-1421.
97. Segerstråle U. Defenders of the truth: the battle for science in the sociobiology debate and beyond 2000, Oxford, Oxford University Press
98. Short RV. Sexual selection and its component parts, somatic and genital selection, as illustrated by man and the great apes. Adv. Study Behav. 1979, 9:131-158.
99. Short RV. Sexual selection in man and great apes. Reproductive biology of the great apes 1981, 319-341. Graham CE. In, (Ed.), London, Academic Press
100. Schuster A, Shipley AE. Britain's Heritage of Science 1917, London, Constable and Co. Ltd
101. Siebold CTE. On true parthenogenesis in moths and bees: a contribution to the history of reproduction in animals 1857, London, Van Voorst
102. Simmons LW. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects 2001, Princeton, Princeton University Press
103. Simmons LW, Parker GA, Stockley P. Sperm displacement in the yellow dungfly Scatophaga stercoraria: an investigation of male and female processes. Am. Natt 1999, 153:302-314.
104. Smellie W. The philosophy of natural history 1790, London, Elliot
105. Smith RL. Repeated copulation and sperm precedence: paternity assurance for a male brooding water bug. Science 1979, 205:1029-1031.
106. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems 1984, xvii-xix. Smith RL. (Ed.), London, Academic Press
107. Smith RL. Foreword. Sperm competition and sexual selection 1998, xv-xxiii. Birkhead TRMøller AP. In, (Eds), London, Academic Press
108. Smith SA. Extra-pair copulations in black-capped chickadees: the role of the female. Behaviour 1988, 107:15-23.
109. Snyder BF, Gowaty PA. A reappraisal of Bateman's classic study of intrasexual selection. Evolution 2007, 61:2457-2468.
110. Spallanzani L. An essay on animal reproduction 1769, London
111. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:T.H.Huxley(Woodburytype).jpg, Thomas Henry Huxley Woodbury type print, Wikimedia commons. Available at, accessed 15 February 2010)
112. Thornhill R. Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. Am. Nat. 1983, 122:765-788.
113. Thornhill R. The jungle fowl hen's cackle incites male competition. Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 1988, 81:145-154.
114. Trivers RL. Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871-1971 1972, 136-179. Campbell B. In, (Ed.), Chicago, Aldine-Atherton
115. Trivers R. Natural selection and social theory 2002, Oxford, Oxford University Press
116. Waage JK. Dual function of the damselfly penis: sperm removal and transfer. Science (Washington) 1979, 203:916-918.
117. Wagner R. Fragmente zur Physiologie der Zeugung, vorzüglich zur mikroskopischen Analyse des Sperma 1837, München, Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaft
118. Westneat DF, Stewart IRK. Extra-pair paternity in birds: causes, correlates and conflict. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2003, 34:365-396.
119. Whitman CO. The posthumous works of Charles Otis Whitman 1919, Washington, Carnegie Institution
120. Williams GC. Adaptation and natural selection 1966, Princeton, Princeton University Press
121. Winterbottom M, Burke T, Birkhead TR. The phalloid organ, orgasm and sperm competition in a polygynandrous bird: the red-billed buffalo weaver (Bubalornis niger). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2001, 50:474-482.
122. Wynne-Edwards VC. Animal dispersion in relation to social behaviour 1962, Edinburgh, Oliver and Boyd