A STORY of BREAKTHROUGH. The CASE of COMMON RAIL DEVELOPMENT

International Journal of Innovation Management

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Petruzzelli, Antonio Messeni ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Breakthrough innovation; case study; common rail technology; individual, organisational, and contextual dynamics; multiple perspective

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940452073     PISSN: 13639196     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S1363919615500346     Document Type: Article

References (209)

1. Abernathy, WJ and JM Utterback (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review 80, 40-47.
2. Abernathy, WJ and KB Clark (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14, 3-22.
3. Adner, R and D Levinthal (2002). The emergence of emerging technologies. California Management Review, 45, 50-66.
4. Ahuja, G (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 425-455.
5. Ahuja, G and CM Lampert (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 521-543.
6. Albino, V, N Carbonara, A Messeni Petruzzelli (2007). Proximity as a communication resource for competitiveness: A rationale for technology clusters. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 4, 430-452.
7. Aldrich, H (2000). Organizations Evolving. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Almeida, P and B Kogut (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45, 905-917.
9. Amabile, TM (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In Research in Organizational Behavior. BM Staw and LL Cummings (eds.), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
10. Amabile, TM (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
11. Ancona, DG and DF Caldwell (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634-655.
12. Ardito, L, A Messeni Petruzzelli, RM Dangelico and V Albino (2014). Understanding the development trends of low-carbon energy technologies: A patent analysis. Journal of Applied Energy, 135, 836-854.
13. Arora, A and M Ceccagnoli (2006). Patent protection, complementary assets, and firms' incentives for technology licensing. Management Science, 52, 293-308.
14. Arrow, K (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, RR Nelson (ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15. Audia, PG and JA Goncalo (2007). Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Science, 53, 1-15.
16. Audretsch, BA and MP Feldman (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86, 630-640.
17. Baba, Y and JP Walsh (2010). Embeddedness, social epistemology and breakthrough innovation: The case of the development of statins. Research Policy, 39, 511-522.
18. Barney, J (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-121.
19. Bartholomew, S (1997). National systems of biotechnology innovation: Complex interdependence in the global system. Journal of International Business Studies, 28, 241-266.
20. Bartlett, CA and S Ghoshal (1989). Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
21. Basalla, G (1988). The Evolution of Technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Ben-David, J (1960). Roles and innovations in medicine. The American Journal of Sociology, 65, 557-558.
23. Benner, MJ and M Tushman (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 676-707.
24. Berardinis, LA (1990). Mechatronics: A new design strategy. Machine Design, 628, 50-58.
25. Bijker, W (1995). Of Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Birkinshaw, JM (1997). Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 207-229.
27. Bonaccorsi, A and G Thoma (2007). Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology. Research Policy, 36, 813-831.
28. Bosch, R (1993). Automotive Handbook. Stuttgart: Bosch Group.
29. Bosch, R (2010). Annual Report 2010. Stuttgart: Bosch Group.
30. Boschma, RA (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61-74.
31. Breschi, S and C Catalini (2010). Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists' and inventors' networks. Research Policy, 39, 14-26.
32. Brundtland, G (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33. Burgelman, RA (1983). A process model of internal corporate venturing in a diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 223-244.
34. Burt, RS (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349-399.
35. Callon, M (1980). The state and technical innovation: A case study of the electrical vehicle in France. Research Policy, 9, 358-376.
36. Cantwell, J (1989). Technological Innovations and Multinational Corporations. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.
37. Cao, Q, E Gedajlovic and H Zhang (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20, 781-796.
38. Capaldo, A (2007). Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 585-608.
39. Capaldo, A and A Messeni Petruzzelli (2011). In search of alliance-level relational capabilities: Balancing innovation value creation and appropriability in R&D alliances. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27, 273-286.
40. Capaldo, A and A Messeni Petruzzelli (2014). Partner geographic and organizational proximity and the innovative performance of knowledge-creating alliances. European Management Review, 11, 63-84.
41. Capaldo, A, D Lavie and A Messeni Petruzzelli (2014). Knowledge maturity and the scientific value of innovations: The roles of knowledge distance and adoption. Journal of Management, in press.
42. Cattani, G (2005). Preadaptation, firm heterogeneity, and technological performance: A study on the evolution of fiber optics, 1970-1995. Organization Science, 16, 563-580.
43. Cattani, G (2006). Technological pre-adaptation, speciation, and emergence of new technologies: How Corning invented and developed fiber optics. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15, 285-318.
44. Christensen, CM (1997). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
45. Christensen, CM and J Bower (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 197-218.
46. Christensen, CM and ME Raynor (2003). The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Chubin, DE (1976). The Conceptualization of scientific specialties. The Sociological Quarterly, 17, 448-476.
48. Chung, W and J Alcacer (2002). Knowledge seeking and location choice of foreign direct investment in the united states. Management Science, 48, 1534-1554.
49. Cohen, LR and RG Noll (1991). The Technology Pork Barrel. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
50. Cohen, WM and D Levinthal (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
51. Coleman, JS (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
52. Coleman, JS, E Katz and H Menzel (1957). The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry, 20, 253-270.
53. D'Este, P and S Iammarino (2010). The spatial profile of university-business research partnerships. Papers in Regional Science, 89, 335-350.
54. Dahlander, L and L Frederiksen (2012). The core and cosmopolitans: A relational view of innovation in user communities. Organization Science, 23, 988-1007.
55. Dasgupta, P and PA David (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23, 487-521.
56. David, PA, BH Hall and AA Toole (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29, 497-529.
57. Dingle, PJG and M-CD Lai (2005). Diesel Common Rail and Advanced Fuel Injection Systems. Warrendale, USA: SAE International.
58. Dogan, M and R Pahre (1990). Creative Marginality: Innovation at the Intersection of Social Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
59. Dosi, G (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11, 147-162.
60. Dougherty, D (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3, 179-202.
61. Dunlap-Hinkler, D, M Kotabe and R Mudambi (2010). A story of breakthrough versus incremental innovation: Corporate entrepreneurship in the global pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4, 106-127.
62. Edmondson, AC (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
63. Edmondson, AC (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1419-1452.
64. Edmondson, AC, RMJ Bohmer and G Pisano (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 685-716.
65. Eisenhardt, KM (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
66. Eisenhardt, KM (2002). Building theories from case study research. In The Qualitative Researchers' Companion, AM Huberman and MB Miles (eds.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
67. Erjavec, J (2010). Automotive Technology: A Systems Approach. New York: Delmar.
68. Fabrizio, K (2006). The use of university research in firm innovation, In Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. H Chesbrough, W Vanhaverbeke and J West (eds.), London: Oxford University Press.
69. Fabrizio, KR (2009). Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research Policy, 38, 255-267.
70. Faiz, A (1993). Automotive emissions in developing countries-relative implications for global warming, acidification and urban air quality. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 27, 167-186.
71. Ferriani, S, G Cattani and C Baden-Fuller (2009). The relational antecedents of project entrepreneurship: Network centrality, team composition and project performance. Research Policy, 38, 1545-1558.
72. Fleck, L (1935). The genesis and development of a scientific fact. In Foreword by Thomas Kuhn, TJ Trenn, and KR Merton (eds.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73. Fleming, L (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47, 117-132.
74. Fleming, L (2002). Finding the organizational sources of technological breakthroughs: The story of Hewlett-Packard's thermal ink jet. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 1059-1094.
75. Fleming, L (2007). Breakthroughs and the "Long Tail" of innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49, 68-74.
76. Fleming, L and O Sorenson (2004). Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 909-928.
77. Freddi, D (2009). The integration of old and new technological paradigms in low-and medium-tech sectors: The case of mechatronics. Research Policy, 38, 548-558.
78. Frohman, AL (1978). The performance of innovation: Managerial roles. California Management Review, 20, 5-12.
79. Frost, T (2001). The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries' innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 101-123.
80. Frost, TS, J Birkinshaw and P Ensign (2002). Centers of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 997-1018.
81. Funk, JL (2009). The co-evolution of technology and methods of standard setting: The case of the mobile phone industry. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19, 73-93.
82. Geels, FW (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case study. Research Policy, 31, 1257-1264.
83. Geels, FW (2005). Technological Transitions and System Innovations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
84. Geels, FW (2006). Co-evolutionary and multi-level dynamics in transitions: The transformation of aviation systems and the shift from propeller to turbojet (1930-1970). Technovation, 26, 999-1016.
85. Geels, FW (2007). Analysing the breakthrough of rock 'n' roll (1930-1970): Multi-regime interaction and reconfiguration in the multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 1411-1431.
86. Geels, FW (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multilevel perspective. Research Policy, 39, 495-510.
87. Gibbons, M and D Littler (1979). The development of an innovation: The case of porvair. Research Policy, 8, 2-25.
88. Gibson, CB and JL Gibbs (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 451-495.
89. Gieryn, TF and HF Hirsh (1983). Marginality and innovation in science. Social Studies of Science, 13, 87-106.
90. Gilbert, BA (2012). Creative destruction: Identifying its geographic origins. Research Policy, 41, 734-742.
91. Gilbert, BA, DB Audretsch and PP McDougall (2004). The emergence of entrepreneurship policy. Small Business Economics, 22, 313-323.
92. Giuri, P, M Mariani, S Brusconi, G Crespi et al. (2007). Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey. Research Policy, 36, 1107-1127.
93. Glaser, B and A Strauss (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies in Qualitative Research. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson.
94. Granovetter, M (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
95. Green, SG, MB Gavin and L Aiman-Smith (1995). Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42, 203-214.
96. Gupta, AK, PE Tesluk and MS Taylor (2007). Innovation at and across multiple levels of analysis. Organization Science, 18, 885-897.
97. Haas, MR (2006). Acquiring and applying knowledge in transnational teams: The roles of cosmopolitans and locals. Organization Science, 17, 367-384.
98. Hall, J and R Kerr (2003). Innovation dynamics and environmental technologies: The emergence of fuel cell technology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 459-471.
99. Hansen, MT (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111.
100. Hargadon, AB (2003). How Breakthroughs Happen: Technology Brokering and The Pursuit of Innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
101. Hargadon, AB and RI Sutton (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 716-749.
102. Hargadon, AB and Y Douglas (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 476-501.
103. He, ZL and P-K Wong (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481-494.
104. Hedlund, G (1994). A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 73-90.
105. Heeley, MB and R Jacobson (2008). The recency of technological inputs and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 723-744.
106. Helfat, CE and MA Petaraf (2000). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 997-1010.
107. Henderson, R (1993). Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. RAND Journal of Economics, 24, 248-270.
108. Henderson, RM (2006). The innovator's dilemma as a problem of organizational competence. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 5-11.
109. Henderson, RM and KB Clark (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9-30.
110. Heneric, O, G Licht and W Sofka (2005). Europe's Automotive Industry on the Move: Competitiveness in a Changing World. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.
111. Hill, CWL and FT Rothaermel (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28, 257-274.
112. Horwitz, SH and IB Horwitz (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33, 987-1015.
113. Howe, J (2008). Crowdsourcing. New York: Crown Business.
114. Hughes, TP (1987). The evolution of large technological systems. In The Social Construction of Technological Systems, W Bijker, T Hughes and T Pinch (eds.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
115. Jackson, SE, A Joshi and LN Erhardt (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801-830.
116. Jansen, JJP, MP Tempeelar, FAJ van den Bosh and HW Volberda (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20, 797-811.
117. Jeppesen, LB and KR Lakhani (2010). Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organization Science, 21, 1016-1033.
118. Jick, TD (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
119. Katila, R (2002). New product search over time: Past ideas in their prime? Academy of Management Journal, 45, 995-1010.
120. Kieser, A (1994). Why organization theory needs historical analyses - and how this should be performed. Organization Science, 5, 608-620.
121. Klevorick, AK, RC Levin, RR Nelson and SG Winter (1995). On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24, 185-205.
122. Kogut, B and U Zander (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383-397.
123. Kogut, B and U Zander (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24, 625-645.
124. Lane, PJ and L Lunatkin (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461-477.
125. Lavie, D, U Stettner and ML Tushman (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 109-155.
126. Lawrence, BS (1984). Historical perspective: Using the past to study the present. Academy of Management Review, 9, 307-312.
127. Lei, D, MA Hitt and R Bettis (1996). Dynamic core competences through meta-learning and strategic context. Journal of Management, 22, 549-569.
128. Leifer, R, CM McDermott, GC O'Connor, LS Peters, MP Rice and RW Veryzer (2000). Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
129. Levinthal, D and J March (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95-113.
130. Liebeskind, J (1996). Knowledge, strategy and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 93-108.
131. Link, AN and JT Scott (1998). Public Accountability: Evaluating Technology-Based Institutions. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
132. Lissoni, F (2010). Academic inventors as brokers. Research Policy, 39, 843-857.
133. Maidique, MA (1980). Entrepreneurs, champions and technological innovation. Sloan Management Review, 21, 59-76.
134. Malerba, F and L Orsenigo (1993). Technological regimes and firm behaviour. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2, 45-71.
135. Mansfield, E (1995). Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing. Review of Economics & Statistics, 77, 55-65.
136. March, J (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
137. McGrath, RN (1998). Technological discontinuities and media patterns: Assessing electric vehicle batteries. Technovation, 18, 677-687.
138. Mello, AS and ME Ruckes (2006). Team composition. Journal of Business, 79, 1019-1039.
139. Messeni Petruzzelli, A (2008). Proximity and knowledge gatekeepers: The case of the polytechnic University of Turin. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12, 34-51.
140. Messeni Petruzzelli, A (2011). The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university-industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis. Technovation, 31, 309-319.
141. Messeni Petruzzelli, A, D Rotolo and V Albino (2012). The impact of old technologies on innovation: The case of the US biotechnology industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24, 453-466.
142. Meyer, M (2006a). Are patenting scientists the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nanoscience and technology. Research Policy, 35, 1646-1662.
143. Meyer, M (2006b). Knowledge integrators or weak links? An exploratory comparison of patenting researchers with their non-inventing peers in nanoscience and technology. Scientometrics, 68, 545-560.
144. Miles, MB and AM Huberman (1984). Analyzing Qualitative Data: A Source Book for New Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
145. Miller, DJ, MJ Fern and LB Cardinal (2007). The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 307-326.
146. Miron-Spektor, E, M Erez and E Naveh (2006). The effect of conformist and attentive-todetail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 740-760.
147. Mollenhauer, K and H Tschöke (2010). Handbook of Diesel Engines. Berlin: Springer.
148. Mowery, DC (1999). The computer software industry. In Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries. Mowery, DC and RR Nelson (eds.), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
149. Mulkay, M (1972). Social Process of Innovation (Studies in Sociology). London: Macmillan.
150. Murmann, JP and K Fremken (2006). Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change. Research Policy, 35, 925-952.
151. Nelson, R and S Winter (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
152. Nemet, GF (2009). Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Research Policy, 38, 700-709.
153. Nerkar, A (2003). Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Science, 49, 211-229.
154. Oliver, C (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13, 563-588.
155. Patel, P and K Pavitt (1997). The technological competencies of the world's largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy, 26, 141-156.
156. Peretti, F and G Negro (2007). Mixing genres and matching people: A study in innovation and team composition in Hollywood. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 563-586.
157. Pettigrew, AM (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1, 267-292.
158. Phene, A, K Fladmoe-Lindquist and L Marsh (2006). Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: The effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 369-388.
159. Pistroius, CWI and JM Utterback (1997). Multi-mode interaction among technologies. Research Policy, 26, 67-84.
160. Pohl, H and M Elmquist (2012). Radical innovation in a small firm: A hybrid electric vehicle development project at Volvo Cars. R&D Management, 40, 372-382.
161. Ponds, R, F van Oort and K Frenken (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 86, 423-443.
162. Raisch, S and J Birkinshaw (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34, 375-409.
163. Rip, A, T Misa and J Schot (1995). Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. London/New York: Pinter.
164. Roberts, EB (1968). Entrepreneurship and technology. Research Management, 11, 249-266.
165. Rodan, S and C Galunic (2004). More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 541-562.
166. Rosenberg, N (1982). Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
167. Rosenberg, N and R Nelson (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23, 323-348.
168. Rosenkopf, L and A Nerkar (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disc industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 287-306.
169. Rosenkopf, L and P Almeida (2003). Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49, 751-766.
170. Rothaermel, FT (2000). Technological discontinuities and the nature of competition. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 12, 149-160.
171. Rothaermel, FT (2001). Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 687-699.
172. Rothaermel, FT and DN Ku (2008). Intercluster innovation differentials: The role of research universities. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55, 9-22.
173. Scherer, FM and D Harhoff (2000). Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes. Research Policy, 29, 559-566.
174. Schilling, MA (2005). A "small-world" network model of cognitive insight. Creativity Research Journal, 2-3, 131-154.
175. Schilling, MA and C Phelps (2007). Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation, Management Science, 53, 113-126.
176. Schumpeter, J (1934). Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
177. Schumpeter, JA (1939). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of The Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
178. Schumpeter, JA (1950). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.
179. Scotti, G (2003). Fiat auto e non solo: i dilemma strategic degli Agnelli dale origini alla crisi di oggi. Rome, Italy: Donzelli Editore.
180. Sidhu, JS, HR Commandeur and HW Volberda (2007). The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation. Organization Science, 18, 20-38.
181. Sine, WD, HA Haveman and PS Tolbert (2005). Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent power sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 200-232.
182. Singh, J (2008). Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Research Policy, 37, 77-96.
183. Singh, J and A Agrawal (2011). Recruiting for ideas: How firms exploit the prior inventions of new hires. Management Science, 57, 129-150.
184. Singh, J and L Fleming (2010). Lone Inventors as source of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Science, 56, 41-56.
185. Smil, V (2010). Prime Movers of Globalization: The History and Impact of Diesel Engines and Gas Turbines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
186. Smith, DJ (2001). The politics of innovation: Why innovations need a godfather. Technovation, 27, 95-104.
187. Stajano, A (2009). Research, Quality, Competitiveness: European Union Technology Policy for the Knowledge-Based Society. New York, USA: Springer.
188. Strauss, A and J Corbin (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
189. Suarez, FF and G Lanzolla (2007). The role of environmental dynamics in building a first mover advantage theory. Academy of Management Review, 32, 377-392.
190. Taylor, A and HR Greve (2006). Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 723-740.
191. Teece, DJ (1980). Economics of scope and the scope of an enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 223-247.
192. Teece, DJ (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285-305.
193. Trajtenberg, M (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 172-187.
194. Tripsas, M and G Gavetti (2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1147-1161.
195. Tsai, KH and JC Wang (2005). Does R&D performance decline with firm size? - A re-examination in terms of elasticity. Research Policy, 34, 966-976.
196. Tushman, MJ and P Anderson (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439-465.
197. Tushman, ML and CA O'Reilly III (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 8-30.
198. Tushman, ML and CA O'Reilly III (2002). Winning through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
199. Tyre, MJ and O Hauptman (1992). Effectiveness of organizational response mechanisms to technological change in the production process. Organization Science, 3, 301-320.
200. Utterback, JM (1994). Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
201. Van de Ven, A and MSM Poole (2002). Field research methods. In Companion to Organizations. JAC Baum (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
202. van den Hoed, R (2007). Sources of radical technological innovation: The emergence of fuel cell technology in the automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1014-1021.
203. Van der Vegt, GS and O Janssen (2003). Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29, 729-751.
204. Vergragt, PJ (1988). The social shaping of industrial innovations. Social Studies of Science, 18, 483-513.
205. Watson, WE, K Kumar and LK Michaelson (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590-602.
206. West, MA (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology, 51, 355-387.
207. Wezel, FC, G Cattani and M Pennings (2006). Competitive implications of interfirm mobility. Organization Science, 17, 691-709.
208. Williamson, OE (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 548-577.
209. Yin, RK (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.