Radical innovation in a small firm: A hybrid electric vehicle development project at Volvo Cars

R and D Management

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 372-382

  Pohl, Hans ^a   Elmquist, Maria ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955930702     PISSN: 00336807     EISSN: 14679310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00608.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Alvesson M, Sköldberg K. Tolkning och reflection 1994, Lund, Sweden, Studentlitteratur
2. Assink M. The inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: a conceptual model. European Journal of Innovation Management 2006, 9(2):215-233.
3. Backman M, Börjesson S, Setterberg S. Working with concepts in the fuzzy front end: exploring the context for innovation for different types of concepts at Volvo Cars. R&D Management 2007, 37(1):17-28.
4. Birkinshaw J, Gibson C. Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review 2004, 45(4):47-55.
5. Chesbrough H. The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review 2003, 44(3):35-41.
6. Christensen CM. The Innovator's Dilemma 1997, Boston, MA, USA, Harvard Business Review Press
7. Christensen CM, Bower JL. Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal 1996, 17:197-218.
8. Cusumano MA, Nobeoka K. Thinking Beyond Lean - How Multi-Project Management is Transforming Product Development at Toyota and Other Companies 1998, New York, NY, USA, the Free Press
9. Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy 1982, 11:147-162.
10. Dubois A, Gadde L-E. Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research 2002, 55:553-560.
11. Eisenhart KM. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 1989, 14(4):532-550.
12. Eisenhart KM, Graebner ME. Theory building from cases: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Academy of Management 2007, 50(1):25-32.
13. Eisenhart KM, Tabrizi BN. Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global computer Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 1995, 40(1):84-110.
14. Elmquist M. Vehicles for innovation: the case of a neglected concept car project at Volvo Cars. Knowledge and Process Management 2007a, 14(1):1-14.
15. Elmquist M. 2007b, Enabling innovation: Exploring the prerequisites for innovative concepts in R&D. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg
16. Geels F. Technological transition as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case study. Research Policy 2002, 31:1257-1274.
17. Govindarajan V, Trimble C. Building breakthrough businesses within established organizations. Harvard Business Review 2005, 83(5):58-68.
18. Gwynne P. Skunk works, 1990s-style. Research Technology Management 1997, 40(4):18-23.
19. Hatchuel A, Le Masson P, Weil B. Building innovation capabilities: the development of design-oriented organizations. Innovation, Learning and Macro-Institutional Change: Patterns of Knowledge Changes 2003, 294-312. Hage JT, (ed.), Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp
20. Hill CWL, Rothaermel FT. The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. The Academy of Management Review 2003, 28(2):257-274.
21. 2009, Honda, Honda reaches 300,000 units in cumulative global sales of hybrid vehicles. Press release from Honda Motor Co., 18 February 2009
22. 2007, http://hybridcars.com, Hybrid Market Dashboard, December 2006 Dashboard, published 8 January 2007. Available at, (accessed 20 July 2009)
23. 2008, http://hybridcars.com, Hybrid Market Dashboard, December 2007 Dashboard, published 25 January 2008. Available at, (accessed 20 July 2009)
24. 2009, http://hybridcars.com, Hybrid Market Dashboard, December 2008 Dashboard: the key is production numbers, published 13 January 2009. Available at, (accessed 20 July 2009)
25. Kalhammer FR, Kopf BM, Swan DH, Roan VP, Walsh MP. 2007, Status and prospects for zero emissions vehicle technology. Final report of the ARB independent expert panel 13 April 2007, prepared for state of California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA
26. Itazaki H. The Prius that Shook the World 1999, (translation Yamada A. and Ishikawa M.), Tokyo, Japan, Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun
27. Leifer R, McDermott CM, O'Connor GC, Veryzer RW, Peters LS, Rice M. Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts 2000, Boston, MA, USA, Harvard Business School Press
28. Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal 1992, 13:111-125.
29. Magnusson T, Berggren C. Environmental innovation in auto development: managing technological uncertainty within strict time limits. International Journal of Vehicle Design 2001, 26(2/3):101-115.
30. McDermott CM, O'Connor GC. Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issues. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2002, 19(6):424-438.
31. Moss-Kanter R. Innovation: the classic traps. Harvard Business Review 2006, 84(6):73-83.
32. Nonaka I, Peltokorpi V. Knowledge-based view of radical innovation: Toyota prius CASE. Innovation, Science and Institutional Change: A Research Handbook 2006, 88-104. Hage J, Meeus M. (eds), Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp.
33. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The Knowledge Creating Company - How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation 1995, New York, Oxford University Press
34. O'Connor GC, De Martino R. Organizing for radical innovation: an exploratory study of the structural aspects of RI management systems in large firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2006, 23:475-497.
35. Olleros F. Emergent industries and the burnout of pioneers. Journal of Product Innovation Management 1986, 1:5-8.
36. O'Reilly CA, Tushman ML. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review 2004, 82(4):74-81.
37. Pohl H. Interparadigmatic hybrids - a new theoretical concept when addressing paradigmatic shifts in technology. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 2010, forthcoming
38. Sharma A. Central dilemmas of managing innovation in large firms. California Management Review 1999, 41(3):146-164.
39. Takeishi A. Knowledge partitioning in the interfirm division of labor: the case of automotive product development. Organization Science 2002, 13(3):321-338.
40. 2006, The Detroit News, "Ford bails out on hybrid promise"
41. Tidd J, Bessant J, Pavitt K. Managing Innovation, Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change 2005, 3rd edn, Haddington, UK, John Wiley & Sons Ltd
42. 2009, Toyota, Hybrid electric vehicle development display at Amlux, Ikebukuro, Tokyo, Japan, visited 8 July
43. Review of the Research Program of the PNGV: Sixth Report. Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems 2000, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, National Academy Press
44. Tripsas M, Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia - evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal 2000, 21(10/11):1147-1161.
45. Tushman ML, Andersson P, O'Reilly CA. Technology cycles, innovation streams and ambidextrous organizations: organization renewal through innovation streams and strategic change. Managing Strategic Innovation and Change 1997, 3-23. Tushman M, Anderson P, (eds), New York, Oxford University Press, pp
46. Tushman ML, O'Reilly CA. Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review 1996, 38(4):8-30.
47. Tushman ML, O'Reilly CA. Winning Through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal 1997, Boston, MA, USA, Harvard Business School Press
48. Veryzer RW. Discontinuous innovation and the new product development. Journal of Innovation Management 1998, 15(4):304-321.
49. Williander M. 2006, On green innovation inertia - an insider researcher perspective on the automotive industry. PhD thesis, Department for Project Management, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden
50. Williander M. Absorptive capacity and interpretations system's impact when 'going green': an empirical study of Ford, Volvo Cars and Toyota. Business Strategy and the Environment 2007, 16(3):202-213.