Improving homology modeling of G-protein coupled receptors through multiple-template derived conserved inter-residue interactions

Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 413-420

  Chaudhari, Rajan ^a   Heim, Andrew J ^a   Li, Zhijun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Conserved interactions; G protein coupled receptors; Homology modeling; Multiple templates

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS;

CONSERVED INTERACTION; G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTORS; HOMOLOGY MODELING; INTER-RESIDUE INTERACTIONS; MODEL METHOD; MODELING APPROACH; MULTIPLE TEMPLATES; SEQUENCE IDENTITY; TRANS-MEMBRANE PROTEINS; TRANSMEMBRANE PROTEINS;

PROTEINS;

BETA 2 ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR; G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; PROTEINASE ACTIVATED RECEPTOR 1; RHODOPSIN;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; BOVINE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; RECEPTOR, PAR-1; RECEPTORS, ADRENERGIC, BETA-2; RECEPTORS, G-PROTEIN-COUPLED; RHODOPSIN; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

EID: 84939962097     PISSN: 0920654X     EISSN: 15734951     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9823-2     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Lin HH (2013) G-protein-coupled receptors and their (Bio) chemical significance win 2012 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Biomed J 36:118-124
2. Foord SM, Bonner TI, Neubig RR, Rosser EM, Pin JP, Davenport AP, Spedding M, Harmar AJ (2005) International Union of Pharmacology. XLVI. G protein-coupled receptor list. Pharmacol Rev 57:279-288
3. Overington JP, Al-Lazikani B, Hopkins AL (2006) How many drug targets are there? Nat Rev Drug Discov 5:993-996
4. Lagerstrom MC, Schioth HB (2008) Structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors and significance for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 7:339-357
5. Siu FY, He M, de Graaf C, Han GW, Yang D, Zhang Z, Zhou C, Xu Q, Wacker D, Joseph JS, Liu W, Lau J, Cherezov V, Katritch V, Wang MW, Stevens RC (2013) Structure of the human glucagon class B G-protein-coupled receptor. Nature 499:444-449
6. Hollenstein K, Kean J, Bortolato A, Cheng RK, Dore AS, Jazayeri A, Cooke RM, Weir M, Marshall FH (2013) Structure of class B GPCR corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1. Nature 499:438-443
7. Wu H, Wang C, Gregory KJ, Han GW, Cho HP, Xia Y, Niswender CM, Katritch V, Meiler J, Cherezov V, Conn PJ, Stevens RC (2014) Structure of a class C GPCR metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 bound to an allosteric modulator. Science 344:58-64
8. Wang C, Wu H, Katritch V, Han GW, Huang XP, Liu W, Siu FY, Roth BL, Cherezov V, Stevens RC (2013) Structure of the human smoothened receptor bound to an antitumour agent. Nature 497:338-343
9. Levit A, Barak D, Behrens M, Meyerhof W, Niv MY (2012) Homology model-assisted elucidation of binding sites in GPCRs. Methods Mol Biol 914:179-205
10. Katritch V, Rueda M, Lam PC, Yeager M, Abagyan R (2010) GPCR 3D homology models for ligand screening: lessons learned from blind predictions of adenosine A2a receptor complex. Proteins 78:197-211
11. Baldwin JM, Schertler GF, Unger VM (1997) An alpha-carbon template for the transmembrane helices in the rhodopsin family of G-protein-coupled receptors. J Mol Biol 272:144-164
12. Ballesteros JA, Shi L, Javitch JA (2001) Structural mimicry in G protein-coupled receptors: implications of the high-resolution structure of rhodopsin for structure-function analysis of rhodopsin-like receptors. Mol Pharmacol 60:1-19
13. Subbotina J, Yarov-Yarovoy V, Lees-Miller J, Durdagi S, Guo J, Duff HJ, Noskov SY (2010) Structural refinement of the hERG1 pore and voltage-sensing domains with ROSETTA-membrane and molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 78:2922-2934
14. Abrol R, Bray JK, Goddard WA 3rd (2011) Bihelix: towards de novo structure prediction of an ensemble of G-protein coupled receptor conformations. Proteins 80:505-518
15. Michel M, Hayat S, Skwark MJ, Sander C, Marks DS, Elofsson A (2014) PconsFold: improved contact predictions improve protein models. Bioinformatics 30:i482-i488
16. Yang J, Jang R, Zhang Y, Shen HB (2013) High-accuracy prediction of transmembrane inter-helix contacts and application to GPCR 3D structure modeling. Bioinformatics 29:2579-2587
17. Kelm S, Shi J, Deane CM (2010) MEDELLER: homology-based coordinate generation for membrane proteins. Bioinformatics 26:2833-2840
18. Michino M, Chen J, Stevens RC, Brooks CL 3rd (2010) FoldGPCR: structure prediction protocol for the transmembrane domain of G protein-coupled receptors from class A. Proteins 78:2189-2201
19. Bhattacharya S, Lam AR, Li H, Balaraman G, Niesen MJ, Vaidehi N (2013) Critical analysis of the successes and failures of homology models of G protein-coupled receptors. Proteins 81:729-739
20. Obiol-Pardo C, Lopez L, Pastor M, Selent J (2011) Progress in the structural prediction of G protein-coupled receptors: D3 receptor in complex with eticlopride. Proteins 79:1695-1703
21. Malo M, Persson R, Svensson P, Luthman K, Brive L (2013) Development of 7TM receptor-ligand complex models using ligand-biased, semi-empirical helix-bundle repacking in torsion space: application to the agonist interaction of the human dopamine D2 receptor. J Comput Aided Mol Des 27:277-291
22. Michino M, Abola E, GPCR Dock 2008 Participants, Brooks CL 3rd, Dixon JS, Moult J, Stevens RC (2009) Community-wide assessment of GPCR structure modelling and ligand docking: GPCR Dock 2008. Nat Rev Drug Discov 8:455-463
23. Kufareva I, Rueda M, Katritch V, Stevens RC, Abagyan R, GPCR Dock 2010 Participants (2010) Status of GPCR modeling and docking as reflected by community-wide GPCR Dock 2010 assessment. Structure 19:1108-1126
24. Venkatakrishnan AJ, Deupi X, Lebon G, Tate CG, Schertler GF, Babu MM (2013) Molecular signatures of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature 494:185-194
25. Larsson P, Wallner B, Lindahl E, Elofsson A (2008) Using multiple templates to improve quality of homology models in automated homology modeling. Protein Sci 17:990-1002
26. Ballesteros JA, Weinstein H (1995) Integrated methods for the construction of three dimensional models and computational probing of structure function relations in G protein-coupled receptors. In: Sealfon SC, Conn PM (eds) Methods in neurosciences. Academic Press, San Diego, p 428
27. Kozma D, Simon I, Tusnady GE (2013) PDBTM: protein data bank of transmembrane proteins after 8 years. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D524-D529
28. Webb B, Sali A (2014) Protein structure modeling with MODELLER. Methods Mol Biol 1137:1-15
29. Kufareva I, Katritch V, Participants of GPCR Dock, Stevens RC, Abagyan R (2013) Advances in GPCR modeling evaluated by the GPCR Dock 2013 assessment: meeting new challenges. Structure 22:1120-1139
30. Vehlow C, Stehr H, Winkelmann M, Duarte JM, Petzold L, Dinse J, Lappe M (2011) CMview: interactive contact map visualization and analysis. Bioinformatics 27:1573-1574
31. del Sol A, Fujihashi H, Amoros D, Nussinov R (2006) Residue centrality, functionally important residues, and active site shape: analysis of enzyme and non-enzyme families. Protein Sci 15:2120-2128
32. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W et al (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acid Res 25(17):3389-3402
33. Heim AJ, Li Z (2012) Developing a high-quality scoring function for membrane protein structures based on specific inter-residue interactions. J Comput Aided Mol Des 26:301-309
34. Chen K-YM, Sun J, Salvo JS, Baker D, Barth P (2014) High-resolution modeling of transmembrane helical protein structures from distant homologues. PLoS Comput Biol 10(5):e1003636
35. Venclovas C (2003) Comparative modeling in CASP5: progress is evident, but alignment errors remain a significant hindrance. Proteins 53(Suppl 6):380-388
36. Kukic P, Mirabello C, Tradigo G, Walsh I, Veltri P, Pollastri G (2014) Toward an accurate prediction of inter-residue distances in proteins using 2D recursive neural networks. BMC Bioinformatics 15:6
37. Mai TL, Chen CM (2014) Computational prediction of kink properties of helices in membrane proteins. J Comput Aided Mol Des 28:99-109
38. Ray A, Lindahl E, Wallner B (2010) Model quality assessment for membrane proteins. Bioinformatics 26:3067-3074
39. Valdar WS (2002) Scoring residue conservation. Proteins 48:227-241