Microbial communities associated with human decomposition and their potential use as postmortem clocks

International Journal of Legal Medicine

Volumn 129, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 623-632

  Finley, Sheree J ^a   Benbow, M Eric ^b   Javan, Gulnaz T ^a  

^a ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Human decomposition; Microbial communities; Postmortem microbial clocks

Indexed keywords

AUTOPSY; BACTERIAL COUNT; HUMAN; MICROBIOLOGY; POSTMORTEM CHANGE; PROCEDURES; TIME;

AUTOPSY; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; HUMANS; POSTMORTEM CHANGES; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84939886582     PISSN: 09379827     EISSN: 14371596     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-014-1059-0     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Pechal J et al (2013) Microbial community functional change during vertebrate carrion decomposition. PLoS One 8:e79035
2. Hyde E et al (2013) The living dead: bacterial community structure of a cadaver at the onset and end of bloat stage of decomposition. PLoS ONE 8:e77733
3. Metcalf J et al (2013) A microbial clock provides an accurate estimate of the postmortem interval in a mouse model system. eLife 2:e01104
4. Pechal J et al (2013) The potential use of bacterial community succession in forensics as described by high throughput metagenomic sequencing. Int J Legal Med 128:193–205
5. Carter D, Yellowlees D, Tibbett M (2008) Temperature affects microbial decomposition of cadavers (Rattus rattus) in contrasting soils. Appl Soil Ecol 40:129–137
6. Benninger L, Carter D, Forbes S (2008) The biochemical alterations of soil beneath a decomposing carcass. Forensic Sci Int 180:70–75
7. Carter D, Yellowlees D, Tibbett M (2007) Cadaver decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Naturwissenschaften 94:12–24
8. Forbes S, Stuart B, Dadour I, Dent B (2004) A preliminary investigation of the stages of adipocere formation. J Forensic Sci 49:1–9
9. The Human Microbiome Consortium (2012) Structure, function and diversity of human microbiome in an adult reference population. Nature 486:207–214
10. Gilbert JA et al (2010) Meeting report. The terabase metagenomics workshop and the vision of an earth microbiome project. Stand Genomic Sci 3:249–253
11. Payne J (1965) A summer carrion study of the baby pig Sus scrofa Linnaeus. Ecology 46:592–602
12. Tomberlin J et al (2011) A roadmap for bridging basic and applied research in forensic entomology. Annu Rev Entomol 56:401–421
13. Matuszewski S, Bajerlein D, Konwerski S, Szpila K (2010) Insect succession and carrion decomposition in selected forests of Central Europe. Part 1: pattern and rate of decomposition. Forensic Sci Int 194:85–93
14. Centeno N, Maldonado M, Oliva A (2002) Seasonal patterns of arthropods occuring on sheltered and unsheltered pig carcasses in Buenos Aires Province (Argentina). Forensic Sci Int 126:63–70
15. Hewadikaram K, Goff M (1991) Effect of carcass size on rate of decomposition and arthropod succession patterns. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 12:235–240
16. Scholenly K, Reid W (1987) Dynamics of heterotrophic succession in carrion arthropod assemblages: discrete series of a continuum of change? Oceologia (Berlin) 73:192–202
17. Houck M, Siegel J (2006) Soil and glass. In: Fundamentals of forensic science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 409–430
18. Baldrian P et al (2012) Active and total microbial communities in forest soil are largely differenct and highly stratified during decomposition. ISME J 6:248–258
19. Roesch L et al (2007) Pyrosequencing enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity. ISME J 1:283–290
20. Vaninsberghe D, Hartmann M, Stewart G, Mohn W (2013) Isolation of a substantial proportion of forest soil bacterial communities detected via pyrotag sequencing. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:2096–2098
21. Peterson J et al (2009) The NIH human microbiome project. Genome Res 19:2317–2323
22. Seo S et al (2013) Improvement of short tandem repeat analysis of samples highly contaminated by humic acid. J Forensic Legal Med 20:922–928
23. Antony-Babu A et al (2013) An improved method compatible with metagenomic analyses to extract genomic DNA form soil in Tuber melanosporum orchards. J Appl Microbiol 115:163–170
24. Knauth S, Schmidt H, Tippkotter R (2012) Comparison of commercial kits for the extraction of DNA from paddy soils. Lett Appl Microbiol 56:222–228
25. Sagova-Mareckova M et al (2008) Innovative methods for soil DNA purification tested in soils with widely differing characteristics. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:2902–2907
26. Griffiths R, Whiteley A, O’Donnell A, Bailey M (2000) Rapid method of coextraction of DNA and RNA from natural environments for analysis of ribosomal DNA- and rRNA-based microbial community composition. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:5488–5491
27. Moreira D (1998) Efficient removal of PCR inhibitors using agarose-embedded DNA preparations. Nucleic Acid Res 26:3309–3310
28. Monroe C, Grier C, Kemp B (2013) Evaluating the efficacy of various thermo-stable polymerases against co-extracted PCR inhibitors in ancient DNA samples. Forensic Sci Int 228:142–153
29. Kermekchiev M, Kirilova L, Vail E, Barnes W (2009) Mutants of Taq DNA polymerases resistant to PCR inhibitors allow DNA amplification from whole blood and crude soil samples. Nucleic Acids Res 37:e40
30. Paulin M et al (2013) Improving Griffith’s protocol for co-extraction of microbial DNA and RNA in adsorptive soils. Soil Biol Biochem 63:37–49
31. Janda J, Abbott S (2007) 16S rRNA gene secquencing for bacterial identification in the diagnostic laboratory: pluses, perils, and pitfalls. J Clin Microbiol 45:2761–2764
32. Wooley J, Godzik A, Friedberg I (2010) A primer on metagenomics. PLoS Comput Biol 6:e1000667
33. Lane D et al (1985) Rapid determination o f16S ribosomal RNA sequences for phylogenetic analyses. PNAS 82:6955–6959
34. Schloss P, Gevers S, Westcott S (2011) Reducing the effects of PCR amplicfication and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA-based studies. PLoS ONE 6:e27310
35. Haas B et al (2011) Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res 21:494–504
36. Chakravorty S et al (2007) A detailed analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene segments for the diagnosis of pathogenic bacteria. J Microbiol Methods 69:330–339
37. El-Metwally S, Hamza T, Zakaria M, Helmy M (2013) Next-generation sequence assembly: four stages for data processing and computational challenges. PLoS Comput Biol 9:e1003345
38. Margulies M et al (2005) Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picoliter reactors. Nature 437:376–380
39. Kosugi S et al (2013) Coval: improving alignment quality and variant calling accuracy for next-generation sequencing data. PLoS ONE 8:e75402
40. Drancourt M et al (2000) 16S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis of a large collection of environmental and clinical unidentifiable bacterial isolates. J Clin Microbiol 38:3623–3630
41. Cline J, Braman J, Hogrefe H (1996) PCR fidelity of Pfu DNA polymerase and other thermostable DNA polymerases. Nucleic Acids Res 24:3546–3551
42. Kunkel T (1992) DNA replication fidelity. J Biol Chem 267:18251–18254
43. Teeling H, Glockner F (2012) Current opportunities and challenges in microbial metagenome analysis—a bioinformatic perspective. Brief Bioinform 13:728–742
44. Turnbaugh P et al (2007) The human microbiome project. Nature 449:804–810
45. Qin J et al (2010) A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464:59–65
46. Carter D, Yellowlees D, Tibbett M (2010) Moisture can be the dominant environmental parameter governing cadaver decomposition in soil. Forensic Sci Int 200:60–66
47. Delmont T et al (2011) Metagenomic comparison of direct and indirect soil DNA extraction approaches. J Microbiol Methods 86:397–400
48. Caporaso J et al (2012) Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J 6:1621–1624
49. Vass A et al (1992) Time since death determinations of human cadavers using soil solution. J Forensic Sci 37:1236–1253
50. Vass A (2001) Beyond the grave—understanding human decomposition. Microbiol Today 28:190–192
51. Gunn A, Pitt S (2012) Microbes as forensic indicators. Trop Biomed 29:311–330
52. Fiedler S, Graw M (2003) Decomposition of buried corpses, with special reference to the formation of adipocere. Naturwissenschaften 90:291–300
53. Teo C, Pawita AKO, Atiah Ayunni A, Noor Hazfalinda H (2013) Post mortem changes in relation to different types of clothing. Malyasian J Pathol 35:77–85
54. Hawksworth D, Wiltshire P (2011) Forensic mycology: the use of fungi in criminal investigations. Forensic Sci Int 206:1–11
55. Tabaac B et al (2013) Bacteria detected on surfaces of formalin fixed anatomy cadavers. Ital J Anat Embryol 118:1–5
56. Ritchie N, Schutter M, Dick R, Myrold D (2000) Use of length heterogeneity PCR and fatty acid methyl ester profiles to characterize microbial communities in soil. Appl Environ Mircrobiol 66:1668–1675
57. Hill G et al (2000) Methods for assessing the composition and diversity of soil microbial communities. Appl Soil Ecol 15:25–36
58. Buyer J, Sasser M (2012) High throughput phospholipid fatty acid analysis of soils. Appl Soil Ecol 61:127–130
59. Moreno L et al (2011) The application of amplicon length heterogeneity PCR (LH-PCR) for monitoring the dynamics of soil microbial communities associated with cadaver decomposition. J Microbiol Methods 84:388–393
60. Heath L, Saunders B (2006) Assessing the potential of bacterial DNA profiling for forensic soil comparisons. J Forensic Sci 51:1062–1068
61. Moreno L et al (2006) Microbial metagenome profiling using amplicon length heterogeneity-polymerase chain reaction proves more effective than elemental analysis in discriminating soil specimens. J Forensic Sci 51:1315–1322
62. Osborne C, Rees G, Bernstein Y, Janssen P (2006) New threshold and confidence estimates for terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of complex bacterial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1270–1278
63. Dunbar J, Ticknor L, Kuske C (2001) Phylogenetic specificity and reproducibility and new method for analysis of terminal restriction fragment profiles of 16S rRNA genes from bacterial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:190–197
64. Martiny J et al (2006) Microbial biogeography; putting microorganisms on the map. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:102–112
65. Muyzer G, DeWaal E, Uitterlinden A (1993) Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:695–700
66. Daniel R (2005) The metagenomics of soil. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:470–478
67. Tringe S, Rubin E (2005) Metagenomics: DNA sequencing of environmental samples. Nat Rev Genet 6:805–814
68. Quail M et al (2012) A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers. BMC Genomics 13:341
69. Mizrahi-Man O, Davenport E, Gilad Y (2013) Taxonomic classification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes using short sequencing reads: evaluation of effective study designs. PLoS ONE 8:e53608
70. Liu L et al (2012) Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems. J Biomed Biotechnol. doi:10.1155/2012/251364
71. Chandra J, Sabharwal K (1968) Determination of time since death from a study of various postmortem changes. J Indian Med Assoc 51:336–341
72. Campobasso C, DiVella G, Introna F (2001) Factors affecting decomposition and Diptera colonization. Forensic Sci Int 120:18–27
73. Woese C (2000) Interpreting the universal phylogenetic tree. PNAS 97:8392–8396