Planning for the unexpected: The value of reserve capacity for public transport network robustness

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 81, Issue , 2015, Pages 47-61

  Cats, Oded ^a,b   Jenelius, Erik ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Capacity; Disruption; Dynamic assignment; Mitigation; Public transport; Robustness

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; ECONOMICS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); STOCHASTIC MODELS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES;

CAPACITY; DISRUPTION; DYNAMIC ASSIGNMENT; MITIGATION; PUBLIC TRANSPORT;

NETWORK SECURITY;

MODELING; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; STOCHASTICITY; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

STOCKHOLM [SWEDEN]; SWEDEN;

EID: 84939563858     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.013     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Angeloudis P., Fisk D. Large subway systems as complex networks. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 2006, 3:553-558.
2. Ash J., Newth D. Optimizing complex networks for resilience against cascading failure. Physica A 2007, 380:673-683.
3. Beirão G., Sarsfield Cabral J.A. Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: a qualitative study. Transp. Policy 2007, 14:478-489.
4. Cats O. Multi-agent transit operations and assignment model. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2013, 19:809-814. The 2nd International Workshop on Agent-based Mobility, Traffic and Transportation Models, Methodologies and Applications (ABMTRANS).
5. Cats O., Jenelius E. Dynamic vulnerability analysis of public transport networks: Mitigation effects of real-time information. Networks Spat. Econ. 2014, 14:435-463.
6. Cats O., Koutsopoulos H.N., Burghout W., Toledo T. Effect of real-time transit information on dynamic passenger path choice. Transp. Res. Rec. 2011, 2217:46-54.
7. Cats O., Larijani A.N., Ólafsdóttir A., Burghout W., Andreasson I., Koutsopoulos H.N. Holding control strategies: a simulation-based evaluation and guidelines for implementation. Transp. Res. Rec. 2012, 2274:100-108.
8. Cats, O., West, J., Eliasson, J., 2015. Appraisal of Increased Public Transport Capacity. CTS Working Paper.
9. Colak, S., Lus, H., Atligan, A.R., 2010. Vulnerability of Networks Against Critical Links Failure. http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.5961v2.
10. Criado R., Hernández-Bermejo B., Romance M. Efficiency, vulnerability and cost: an overview with applications to subway networks worldwide. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 2007, 17:2289-2301.
11. De-Los-Santos A., Laporte G., Mesa J.A., Perea F. Evaluating passenger robustness in a rail transit network. Transp. Res. Part C 2012, 20:34-46.
12. Derrible S., Kennedy C. Characterizing metro networks: state, form and structure. Transportation 2010, 37:275-297.
13. El-Rashidy R.A., Grant-Muller S.M. An assessment method of highway network vulnerability. J. Transp. Geogr. 2014, 34:34-43.
14. European Council, 2006. Renewed EU sustainable development strategy. Note 10917/06. http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/06/st10/st10917.en06.pdf.
15. Friman M., Edvardsson B., Gärling T. Frequency of negative critical incidents and satisfaction with public transport services. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2001, 8:95-104.
16. He X., Liu H. Modeling the day-to-day traffic evolution process after an unexpected network disruption. Transp. Res. Part B 2012, 46(1):50-71.
17. Jenelius E., Mattsson L.-G. Road network vulnerability analysis: conceptualization, implementation and application. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2015, 49:136-147.
18. Jenelius E., Petersen T., Mattsson L.-G. Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis. Transp. Res. Part A 2006, 40:537-560.
19. Knoop V.L., Snelder M., van Zuylen H.J., Hoogendoorn S.P. Link-level vulnerability indicators for real-world networks. Transp. Res. Part A 2012, 46:843-854.
20. Rodriguez-Nunez E., Garcia-Palomares J.C. Measuring the vulnerability of public transport networks. J. Transp. Geogr. 2014, 35:50-63.
21. Snelder M., van Zuylen H.J., Immers L.H. A framework for robustness analysis of road networks for short term variations in supply. Transp. Res. Part A 2012, 46:828-842.
22. Sullivan J.L., Novak D.C., Aultman-Hall L., Scott D.M. Identifying critical road segments and measuring system-wide robustness in transportation networks with isolating links: a link-based capacity-reduction approach. Transp. Res. Part A 2010, 44:323-336.
23. Sumalee A., Watling D. Travel time reliability in a network with dependent link modes and partial driver response. J. Eastern Asia Soc. Transport. Stud. 2003, 5:1686-1701.
24. Toledo T., Cats O., Burghout W., Koutsopoulos H.N. Mesoscopic simulation for transit operations. Transp. Res. Part C 2010, 18:896-908.
25. von Ferber C., Berche B., Holovatch T., Holovatch Y. A tale of two cities: vulnerabilities of the London and Paris transit networks. J. Transport. Secur. 2012, 5(3):199-216.
26. von Ferber C., Holovatch T., Holovatch Y., Palchykov V. Public transport networks: empirical analysis and modeling. Europ. Phys. J. B 2009, 68:261-275.