The neural basis of perceiving person interactions

Cortex

Volumn 70, Issue , 2015, Pages 5-20

  Quadflieg, Susanne ^a,b   Gentile, Francesco ^c,d   Rossion, Bruno ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY ABU DHABI   (United Arab Emirates)

^c UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Person perception; Social dyad; Social interaction; Social relation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; EXTRASTRIATE BODY AREA; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE TEMPORAL GYRUS; PERCEPTION; POSTERIOR INSULA; RESPONSE TIME; SOCIAL INTERACTION; VISUAL CORTEX; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN RELATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TEMPORAL LOBE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LINEAR MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OCCIPITAL LOBE; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84939530649     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.12.020     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Ames D.L., Fiske S.T., Todorov A. Impression formation: a focus on others' intents. The Oxford handbook of social neuroscience 2011, 419-433. Oxford University Press. J. Decety, J. Cacioppo (Eds.).
2. Andrews T.J., Davies-Thompson J., Kingstone A., Young A.W. Internal and external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective regions of visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:3544-3552.
3. Baeck A., Wagemans J., Op de Beeck H.P. The distributed representation of random and meaningful object pairs in human occipitotemporal cortex: the weighted average as a general rule. NeuroImage 2013, 70:37-47.
4. Bar M. Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2004, 5:617-629.
5. Barton J.J., Press D.Z., Keenan J.P., O'Connor M. Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia. Neurology 2002, 58:71-78.
6. Bentin S., Allison T., Puce A., Perez E., McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1996, 8:551-565.
7. Biederman I., Mezzanotte R.J., Rabinowitz J.C. Scene perception: detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology 1982, 14:143-177.
8. Bolognini N., Rossetti A., Convento S., Vallar G. Understanding others' feelings: the role of the right primary somatosensory cortex in encoding the affective valence of others' touch. The Journal of Neuroscience 2013, 33:4201-4205.
9. Boyce S.J., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. Effect of background information on object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989, 15:556-566.
10. Centelles L., Assaiante C., Nazarian B., Anton J.-L., Schmitz C. Recruitment of both the mirror and the mentalizing networks when observing social interactions depicted by point-lights: a neuroimaging study. PLoS One 2011, 6:e15749.
11. Costanzo M., Archer D. Interpreting the expressive behavior of others: the interpersonal perception task. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 1989, 13:225-244.
12. De Graef P. Scene-context effects and models of real-world perception. Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading 1992, 243-259. Springer, New York. K. Rayner (Ed.).
13. Downing P.E., Chan A.W.-Y., Peelen M.V., Dodds C.M., Kanwisher N. Domain specificity in visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 16:1453-1461.
14. Downing P.E., Peelen M.V. The role of occipitotemporal body-selective regions in person perception. Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 2:186-226.
15. Dumoulin S.O., Bittar R.G., Kabanai N.J., Baker C.L., Le Goualher G., Pike G.B., et al. A new anatomical landmark for reliable identification of human area V5/MT: a quantitative analysis of sulcul patterning. Cerebral Cortex 2000, 10:454-463.
16. Egner T., Monti J.M., Summerfield C. Expectation and surprise determine neural population responses in the ventral visual stream. The Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:16601-16608.
17. Engell A.D., McCarthy G. fMRI activation by face and biological motion perception: comparison of response maps and creation of probabilistic atlases. NeuroImage 2013, 74:140-151.
18. Etzel J.A., Gazzola V., Keysers C. An introduction to anatomical ROI-based fMRI classification analysis. Brain Research 2009, 1282:114-125.
19. Ferri S., Kolster H., Jastorff J., Orban G.A. The overlap of the EBA and the MT/V5 cluster. NeuroImage 2013, 66:412-425.
20. Formisano E., De Martino F., Valente G. Multivariate analysis of fMRI time series: classification and regression of brain responses using machine learning. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2008, 26:921-934.
21. Freeman J.B., Johnson K.L., Adams R.B., Ambady N. The social-sensory interface: category interactions in person perception. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 2012, 10.3389/fnint.2012.00081.
22. Friston K.J., Fletcher P., Josephs O., Holmes A.P., Rugg M.D., Turner R. Event-related fMRI: characterizing differential responses. NeuroImage 1998, 7:30-40.
23. Frühholz S., Fehr T., Herrmann M. Interference control during recognition of facial affect enhances the processing of expression specific properties - an event-related fMRI study. Brain Research 2009, 1269:143-157.
24. Gilbert C.D., Li W. Top-down influences on visual processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2013, 14:350-363.
25. Gobbini M.I., Haxby J.V. Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:32-41.
26. Goebel R., Esposito F., Formisano E. Analysis of FIAC data with BrainVoyager QX. Human Brain Mapping 2006, 27:392-401.
27. Green C., Hummel J.E. Familiar interacting object pairs are perceptually grouped. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:1107-1119.
28. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Edelman S., Avidan G., Itzchak Y., Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 1999, 24:187-203.
29. Grosbras M.-H., Beaton S., Eickhoff S.B. Brain regions involved in human movement perception: a quantitative voxel-based meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping 2012, 33:431-454.
30. Grossman E.D., Battelli L., Pascual-Leone A. Repetitive TMS over STSp disrupts perception of biological motion. Vision Research 2005, 45:2847-2853.
31. Hamm J.P., Johnson B.W., Kirk I.J. Comparison of the N300 and N400 ERPs to picture stimuli in congruent and incongruent contexts. Clinical Neurophysiology 2002, 113:1339-1350.
32. Hampson M., Olson I.R., Leung H.-C., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C. Changes in functional connectivity of human MT/V5 with visual motion input. NeuroReport 2004, 15:1315-1319.
33. Heydrich L., Blanke O. Distinct illusory own-body perceptions caused by damage to posterior insula and extrastriate cortex. Brain 2013, 136:790-803.
34. Hirai M., Kakigi R. Differential orientation effect in the neural response to interacting biological motion of two agents. BMC Neuroscience 2009, 10. 10.1186/1471-2202-10-39.
35. Hollingworth A., Henderson J.M. Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1998, 127:398-415.
36. Hooker C.I., Verosky S.C., Germine L.T., Knight R.T., D'Esposito M. Neural activity during social signal perception correlates with self-reported empathy. Brain Research 2010, 1308:100-113.
37. Iacoboni M., Lieberman M.D., Knowlton B.J., Molnar-Szakacs I., Moritz M., Throop C.J., et al. Watching social interactions produces dorsomedial prefrontal and medial parietal BOLD fMRI signal increases compared to a resting baseline. NeuroImage 2004, 21:1167-1173.
38. Jonas J., Descoins M., Koessler L., Colnat-Coulbois S., Sauvée M., Guye M., et al. Focal electrical intracerebral stimulation of a face-sensitive area causes transient prosopagnosia. Neuroscience 2012, 222:281-288.
39. Kim J.B., Biederman I. Where do objects become scenes?. Cerebral Cortex 2011, 21:1738-1746.
40. Kim J.G., Biederman I., Juan C.-H. The benefit of object interactions arises in the lateral occipital cortex independent of attentional modulation from the intraparietal sulcus: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. The Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31:8320-8324.
41. Kolster H., Peeters R., Orban G.A. The retinotopic organization of the human middle temporal area MT/V5 and its cortical neighbors. The Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:9801-9820.
42. Kosslyn S.M. Image and brain 1994, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
43. Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science 2001, 293:1506-1509.
44. Kühn S., Müller B.C.N., van Baaren R.B., Wietzker A., Dijksterhuis A., Brass M. Why do I like you when you behave like me? Neural mechanisms mediating positive consequences of observing someone being imitated. Social Neuroscience 2010, 5:384-392.
45. Kujala M.V., Carlson S., Hari R. Engagement of the amygdala in third-person view of face-to-face interaction. Human Brain Mapping 2011, 10.1002/hbm.21317.
46. Leising D., Borkenau P. Person perception, disopositional inferences, and social judgment. The handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions 2010, 157-170. Wiley, New York. 1st ed. L.M. Horowitz, S. Strack (Eds.).
47. Macrae C.N., Quadflieg S. Perceiving people. The handbook of social psychology 2010, 428-463. McGraw-Hill, New York. 5th ed. S. Fiske, D.T. Gilbert, G. Lindzey (Eds.).
48. Malach R., Reppas J.B., Benson R.R., Kwong K.K., Jlang H., Kennedy W.A., et al. Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America 1995, 92:8135-8139.
49. Meeren H.K.M., van Heijnsbergen C.C.R., de Gelder B. Rapid perceptual integration of facial expression and emotional body language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America 2005, 102:16518-16523.
50. Mudrik L., Breska A., Lamy D., Deouell L.Y. Integration without awareness: expanding the limits of unconscious processing. Psychological Science 2011, 22:764-770.
51. Mudrik L., Lamy D., Deouell L.Y. ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object-scene processing. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:507-517.
52. Mudrik L., Shalgi S., Lamy D., Deouell L.Y. Synchronous contextual irregularities affect early scene processing: replication and extension. Neuropsychologia 2014, 56:447-458.
53. Neri P. Semantic control of feature extraction from natural scenes. Journal of Neuroscience 2014, 34:2374-2388.
54. Neri P., Luu J.Y., Levi D.M. Meaningful interactions can enhance visual discrimination of human agents. Nature Neuroscience 2006, 9:1186-1192.
55. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
56. Overwalle van F., Baetens K. Understanding others' actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: a meta-analysis. NeuroImage 2009, 48:564-584.
57. Palmer S.E. Effects of contextual scenes on identification of objects. Memory and Cognition 1975, 3:519-526.
58. Pavlova M.A. Biological motion processing as a hallmark of social cognition. Cerebral Cortex 2012, 22:981-995.
59. Peelen M.V., Atkinson A.P., Andersson F., Vuilleumier P. Emotional modulation of body-selective visual areas. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2007, 2:274-283.
60. Peelen M.V., Downing P.E. The neural basis of visual body perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2007, 8:636-648.
61. Pitcher D., Garrido L., Walsh V., Duchaine B.C. Triple dissociation of faces, bodies, and objects in extrastriate cortex. Current Biology 2009, 19:319-324.
62. Pourtois G., Peelen M., Spinelli L., Seeck M., Vuilleumier P. Direct intracranial recording of body-selective responses in human extrastriate visual cortex. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:2621-2625.
63. Proverbio A.M., Riva F., Paganelli L., Cappa S.F., Canessa N., Perani D., et al. Neural coding of cooperative vs. affective human interactions. PLoS One 2011, 6:e22026.
64. Quadflieg S., Flannigan N., Waiter G.D., Rossion B., Wig G.S., Turk D.J., et al. Stereotype-based modulation of person perception. NeuroImage 2011, 57:549-557.
65. Quadflieg S., Rossion B. When perception and attention collide: neural processing in EBA and FBA. Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 2:209-210.
66. Riddoch M.J., Humphreys G.W., Edwards T., Willson K. Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:82-89.
67. Riddoch M.J., Pippard B., Booth L., Rickell J., Summers J., Brownson A., et al. Effects of action relations on the configural coding between objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2011, 37:580-587.
68. Roberts K.L., Humphreys G.W. Action relationships concatenate representations of separate objects in the ventral visual system. NeuroImage 2010, 52:1541-1548.
69. Roberts K.L., Humphreys G.W. Action relations facilitate the identification of briefly-presented objects. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 2011, 73:597-612.
70. Romaiguère P., Nazarian B., Roth M., Anton J.-L., Felician O. Lateral occipitotemporal cortex and action representation. Neuropsychologia 2014, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.01.006.
71. Rossion B., Caldara R., Seghier M., Schuller A.M., Lazeyras F., Mayer E. A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas beside the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. Brain 2003, 126:2381-2395.
72. Rossion B., Hanseeuw B., Dricot L. Defining face perception areas in the human brain: a large-scale factorial fMRI face localizer analysis. Brain & Cognition 2012, 79:138-157.
73. Rossion B., Jacques C. The N170: understanding the time-course of face perception in the human brain. The Oxford handbook of ERP components 2011, 115-142. University Press, Oxford. S. Luck, E. Kappenman (Eds.).
74. Rossion B., Schiltz C., Crommelinck M. The functionally defined 'face areas' are sensitive to long-term visual familiarity. NeuroImage 2003, 19:877-883.
75. Sadr J., Sinha P. Object recognition and random image structure evolution. Cognitive Sciences 2004, 28:259-287.
76. Sinke C.B.A., Sorger B., Goebel R., de Gelder B. Tease or threat? Judging social interactions from bodily expressions. NeuroImage 2010, 49:1717-1727.
77. Sorger B., Goebel R., Schiltz C., Rossion B. Understanding the functional neuroanatomy of prosopagnosia. NeuroImage 2007, 35:836-852.
78. Soria Bauser D., Suchan B. Behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of intact and scrambled body perception. Clinical Neurophysiology 2013, 124:686-696.
79. Spunt R.P., Lieberman M.D. Dissociating modality-specific and supramodel neural systems for action understanding. The Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 32:3575-3583.
80. Spunt R.P., Satpute A.B., Lieberman Identifying the what, why, and how of an observed action: an fMRI study of mentalizing and mechanizing during action observation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23:63-74.
81. Talairach G., Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain 1988, Thieme Verlag, New York.
82. Teufel C., Fletcher P.C., Davis G. Seeing other minds: attributed mental states influence perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2011, 14:376-382.
83. Tsakiris M. My body in the brain: a neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:703-712.
84. Urgesi C., Candidi M., Ionta S., Aglioti S.M. Representation of body identity and body actions in extrastriate body area and ventral premotor cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2007, 10:30-31.
85. Wagner D.D., Kelley W.M., Heatherton T.F. Individual differences in the spontaneous recruitment of brain regions supporting mental state understanding when viewing natural social scenes. Cerebral Cortex 2011, 21:2788-2796.
86. Walter H., Adenzato M., Ciaramidaro A., Enrici I., Pia L., Bara B.G. Understanding intentions in social interaction: the role of the anterior paracingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16:1854-1863.
87. Watanabe R., Watanabe S., Kuruma H., Murakami Y., Seno A., Matsuda T. Neural activation during imitation of movements presented from four different perspectives: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience Letters 2011, 503:100-104.
88. Weiner K.S., Grill-Spector K. Sparsely-distributed organization of face and limb activations in human ventral temporal cortex. NeuroImage 2010, 52:1559-1573.
89. Wiggett A.J., Downing P.E. Representation of action in occipito-temporal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23:1765-1780.
90. Wulff M., Humphreys G. Visual responses to action between unfamiliar object pairs modulate extinction. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:622-632.
91. Zaki J. Cue integration: a common framework for social cognition and physical perception. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2013, 8:296-312.