Effects of Action Relations on the Configural Coding Between Objects

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 580-587

  Riddoch, M J ^a   Pippard, B ^a   Booth, L ^a   Rickell, J ^a   Summers, J ^a   Brownson, A ^a   Humphreys, G W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action relations; Configural coding; Visual extinction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION; REINFORCEMENT;

CUES; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 79954519683     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020745     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Baylis G.C., Driver J., Rafal R.D. Visual extinction and stimulus repetition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1993, 5:453-466.
2. Baylis G.C., Gore C.L., Rodriguez P.D., Shisler R.J. Visual extinction and awareness: The importance of binding dorsal and ventral visual pathways. Visual Cognition 2001, 8:359-379.
3. Biederman I., Kalocsai P. Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 1997, B352:1203-1220.
4. Diamond R., Carey S. Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1986, 115:107-117.
5. Duncan J. Converging levels of analysis in the cognitive neuroscience of visual attention. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 1998, 353:1307-1318.
6. Gado M., Hanaway J., Frank R. Functional anatomy of the cerebral cortex by computer tomography. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 3 1979, 1-19.
7. Gauthier I., Bukach C.M. Should we reject the expertise hypothesis?. Cognition 2007, 103:322-330.
8. Gauthier I., Skudlarski P., Gore C.L., Andersen R.A. Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3:191-197.
9. Gauthier I., Tarr M.J. Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: Bridging brain activity and behaviour. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:431-446.
10. Gilchrist D., Humphreys G.W., Riddoch M.J. Grouping and extinction: Evidence for low-level modulation of visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1996, 13:1223-1249.
11. Green C., Hummel J.E. Familiar interacting pairs of objects are perceptually grouped. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:1107-1119.
12. Humphreys G.W. The representation of objects in space. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 1998, 1341-1351.
13. Humphreys G.W., Riddoch M.J. How to define an object: The effects of action on perception and attention. Mind and Language 2007, 5:534-547.
14. Humphreys G.W., Riddoch M.J., Fortt H. Action relations, semantic relations and familiarity of spatial position in Balint's syndrome: Cross-over effects on perceptual report and localisation. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioural Neuroscience 2006, 6:236-245.
15. Jolicoeur P. The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory and Cognition 1985, 13:289-303.
16. Karnath H.-O., Himmelbach M., Kûuker W. The cortical substrate of visual extinction. NeuroReport 2003, 14:437-442.
17. Lawson R., Humphreys G.W., Jolicoeur P. The combined effects of plane disorientation and foreshortening on picture naming: One manipulation or two?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:568-581.
18. Mattingley J.B., Davis G., Driver J. Pre-attentive filling in of visual surfaces in parietal extinction. Science 1997, 275:671-674.
19. Maurer D., Le Grand R., Mondloch C.J. The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:255-260.
20. Reed C.L., Stone V.E., Bozova S., Tanaka J. The body inversion effect. Psychological Science 2003, 14:302-306.
21. Reed C.L., Stone V.E., Grubb J.D., McGoldric J.E. Turning configural processing upside down: Part and whole body postures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:73-87.
22. Riddoch M.J., Humphreys G.W., Edwards S., Baker T., Willson K. Seeing the action: Neuropsychologial evidence for multiple object selection. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:82-89.
23. Riddoch M.J., Humphreys G.W., Hinkman M., Clift J., Daly A., Collin J. I can see what you are doing: Action familiarity and affordance promote recovery from extinction. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2006, 23:583-605.
24. Slaughter V., Stone V.E., Reed C.L. Perception of faces and bodies: Similar or different?. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2004, 13:219-223.
25. Thompson P. Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion. Perception 1980, 9:483-484.
26. Tucker M., Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:830-846.
27. Yoon E.-Y., Humphreys G.W. Dissociative effects of viewpoint and semantic priming on action and semantic decisions: Evidence for dual routes to action from vision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60:601-623.