The benefit of object interactions arises in the lateral occipital cortex independent of attentional modulation from the intraparietal sulcus: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 31, Issue 22, 2011, Pages 8320-8324

  Kim, Jiye G ^a   Biederman, Irving ^a   Juan, Chi Hung ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACILITATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; LATERAL OCCIPITAL CORTEX; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79958050634     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 15292401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6450-10.2011     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Biederman I (1972) Perceiving real-world scenes. Science 177:77-80.
2. Biederman I, Rabinowitz JC, Glass AL, Stacy EW Jr (1974) On the information extracted from a glance at a scene. J Exp Psychol 103:597-600.
3. Biederman I, Mezzanotte RJ, Rabinowitz JC (1982) Scene perception: detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cogn Psychol 14:l43-l77.
4. Chao CM, Tseng P, Hsu TY, Su JH, Tzeng OJ, Hung DL, Muggleton NG, Juan CH (2011) Predictability of saccadic behaviors and the human posterior parietal cortex. Hum Brain Mapp. Advance online publication. Retrieved Dec. 10, 2010. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21162.
5. Chouinard PA, Whitwell RL, Goodale MA (2009) The lateral- occipital and the inferior-frontal cortex play different roles during the naming of visually presented objects. Hum Brain Mapp 30:3851-3864.
6. Culham JC, Valyear KF (2006) Human parietal cortex in action. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16:205-212.
7. Denys K, Vanduffel W, Fize D, Nelissen K, Peuskens H, Van Essen D, Orban GA (2004) The processing of visual shape in the cerebral cortex of human and nonhuman primates: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 24:2551-2565.
8. Epstein W, Rock I, Zuckerman CB (1960) Meaning and familiarity in associative learning. Psychol Monog Gen Appl 74:1-22.
9. Green C, Hummel JE (2004) Functional interactions affect object detection in non-scene displays. In: Proceedings of the 26 th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Forbus K, Gentner D, Reiger T, eds), pp 488-493. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Green C, Hummel JE (2006) Familiar interacting object pairs are perceptually grouped. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32:1107-1119.
11. Grezes J, Decety J (2002) Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia 40:212-222.
12. Grill-Spector K, Kushnir T, Hendler T, Edelman S, Itzchak Y, Malach R (1998) A sequence of object-processing stages revealed by fMRI in the human occipital lobe. Hum Brain Mapp 6:316-328.
13. Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC (2005) Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 45:201-206.
14. James TW, Culham J, Humphrey GK, Milner AD, Goodale MA (2003) Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study. Brain 126:2463-2475.
15. Kanwisher N, Wojciulik E (2000) Visual attention: insights from brain imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci 1:91-100.
16. Kastner S, Pinsk MA, De Weerd P, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG (1999) Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron 22:751-761.
17. Kim JG, Biederman I (2010) Where do objects become scenes? Cereb Cortex. Advance online publication. Retrieved Dec. 8, 2010. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq240.
18. Kim JG, Biederman I, Lescroart MD, Hayworth KJ (2009) Adaptation to objects in the lateral occipital complex (LOC): shape or semantics? Vision Res 49:2297-2305.
19. Liu CL, Tseng P, Chiau HY, Liang WK, Hung DL, Tzeng OJL, Muggleton NG, Juan CH (2010) The location probability effects of saccade reaction times are modulated in the frontal eye fields but not in the supplementary eye field. Cereb Cortex. Advance online publication. Retrieved Dec. 10, 2010. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq222.
20. Malach R, Reppas JB, Benson RR, Kwong KK, Jiang H, Kennedy WA, Ledden PJ, Brady TJ, Rosen BR, Tootell RB (1995) Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:8135-8139.
21. Martínez A, Anllo-Vento L, Sereno MI, Frank LR, Buxton RB, Dubowitz DJ, Wong EC, Hinrichs H, Heinze HJ, Hillyard SA (1999) Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention. Nat Neurosci 2:364-369.
22. Milner B (1958) Psychological deficits produced by temporal-lobe excision. Proc Assoc Res Nerv Mental Dis 36:244-257.
23. Nyffeler T, Wurtz P, Lüscher HR, Hess CW, Senn W, Pflugshaupt T, von Wartburg R, Lüthi M, Müri RM (2006) Repetitive TMS over the human oculomotor cortex: comparison of 1Hz and theta burst stimulation. Neurosci Lett 409:57-60.
24. Palmer SE (1975) The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Mem Cognit 3:519-526.
25. Pitcher D, Charles L, Devlin JT, Walsh V, Duchaine B (2009) Triple dissociation of faces, bodies, and object in extrastriate cortex. Curr Biol 19:319-324.
26. Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW, Edwards S, Baker T, Willson K (2003) Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection. Nat Neurosci 6:82- 89.
27. Riddoch MJ, Bodley Scott S, Humphreys GW (2010) No direction home: extinction is affected by implicit motion. Cortex 46:678-684.
28. Roberts KL, Humphreys GW (2010) Action relationships concatenate representations of separate objects in the ventral visual system. Neuroimage 52:1541-1548.
29. Sakata H, Taira M, Murata A, Mine S (1995) Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Cereb Cortex 5:429-438.
30. Smith MC, Magee LE (1980) Tracing the time course of picture-word processing. J Exp Psychol Gen 109:373-392.
31. Stewart LM, Walsh V, Rothwell JC (2001) Motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation correlation study. Neuropsychologia 39:415-419.
32. Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988) Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme.
33. Tootell RB, Mendola JD, Hadjikhani NK, Liu AK, Dale AM (1998) The representation of the ipsilateral visual field in human cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:818-824.
34. Vallesi A, Shallice T, Walsh V (2007) Role of the prefrontal cortex in the foreperiod effect: TMS evidence for dual mechanisms in temporal preparation. Cereb Cortex 17:466-474.
35. Wojciulik E, Kanwisher N (1999) The generality of parietal involvement in visual attention. Neuron 23:747-764.
36. Xu Y (2008) Representing connected and disconnected shapes in human inferior intraparietal sulcus. Neuroimage 40:1849-1856.
37. Xu Y, Chun MM (2006) Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. Nature 440:91-95.