TMalphaDB and TMbetaDB: Web servers to study the structural role of sequence motifs in aα-helix and β-barrel domains of membrane proteins

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Perea, Marc ^a   Lugtenburg, Ivar ^a   Mayol, Eduardo ^a   Cordomí, Arnau ^a   Deupí, Xavier ^a,c   Pardo, Leonardo ^a   Olivella, Mireia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIC CENTRAL UNIVERSITY OF CATALONIA   (Spain)

^c PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Membrane proteins; Sequence motifs; Structural distortion; Transmembrane segments

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MEMBRANES; DIHEDRAL ANGLE; MEMBRANES; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); WEB SERVICES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

EXTRACELLULAR ENVIRONMENTS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE MOTIFS; SPECIFIC SEQUENCES; STRUCTURAL DISTORTIONS; STRUCTURAL INFORMATION; STRUCTURAL PARAMETER; TRANSMEMBRANE SEGMENTS;

PROTEINS;

MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; INTERNET; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; INTERNET; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

EID: 84939489458     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-015-0699-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Fagerberg L, Jonasson K, von Heijne G, Uhlen M, Berglund L. Prediction of the human membrane proteome. Proteomics. 2010;10:1141-9.
2. Overington JP, Al-Lazikani B, Hopkins AL. How many drug targets are there? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:993-6.
3. Arinaminpathy Y, Khurana E, Engelman DM, Gerstein MB. Computational analysis of membrane proteins: the largest class of drug targets. Drug Discov Today. 2009;14:1130-5.
4. Bakheet TM, Doig AJ. Properties and identification of human protein drug targets. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:451-7.
5. Bill RM, Henderson PJ, Iwata S, Kunji ER, Michel H, Neutze H, et al. Overcoming barriers to membrane protein structure determination. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:335-40.
6. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissing H, et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:235-42.
7. Kozma D, Simon I, Tusnady GE. PDBTM: Protein Data Bank of transmembrane proteins after 8years. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D524-529.
8. Olivella M, Gonzalez A, Pardo L, Deupi X. Relation between sequence and structure in membrane proteins. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1589-92.
9. Donnelly D, Overington JP, Ruffle SV, Nugent JH, Blundell TL. Modeling alpha-helical transmembrane domains: the calculation and use of substitution tables for lipid-facing residues. Protein Sci. 1993;2:55-70.
10. Jones DT. De novo protein design using pairwise potentials and a genetic algorithm. Protein Sci. 1994;3:567-74.
11. Li SC, Deber CM. A measure of helical propensity for amino acids in membrane environments. Nat Struct Biol. 1994;1:368-73.
12. Rasmussen SG, DeVree BT, Zou Y, Kruse AC, Chung KY, Kobilka TS, et al. Crystal structure of the beta2 adrenergic receptor-Gs protein complex. Nature. 2011;477:549-55.
13. Masureel M, Martens C, Stein RA, Mishra S, Ruysschaert JM, Mchaourab HS, et al. Protonation drives the conformational switch in the multidrug transporter LmrP. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10:149-55.
14. Deupi X, Olivella M, Sanz A, Dolker N, Campillo M, Pardo L. Influence of the g- conformation of Ser and Thr on the structure of transmembrane helices. J Struct Biol. 2010;169:116-23.
15. Deupi X, Olivella M, Govaerts C, Ballesteros JA, Campillo M, Pardo L. Ser and Thr residues modulate the conformation of pro-kinked transmembrane alpha-helices. Biophys J. 2004;86:105-15.
16. Sansuk K, Deupi X, Torrecillas IR, Jongejan A, Nijmeijer S, Bakker RA, et al. A structural insight into the reorientation of transmembrane domains 3 and 5 during family A G protein-coupled receptor activation. Mol Pharmacol. 2011;79:262-9.
17. Boiteux C, Vorobyov I, Allen TW. Ion conduction and conformational flexibility of a bacterial voltage-gated sodium channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:3454-9.
18. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJ, Meyer Jr EF, Brice MD, Rodgers JR, et al. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol. 1977;112:535-42.
19. UniProt. Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D191-198.
20. Lomize MA, Pogozheva ID, Joo H, Mosberg HI, Lomize AL. OPM database and PPM web server: resources for positioning of proteins in membranes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D370-376.
21. Tusnady GE, Dosztanyi Z, Simon I. PDB_TM: selection and membrane localization of transmembrane proteins in the protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:D275-278.
22. Bansal M, Kumar S, Velavan R. HELANAL: a program to characterize helix geometry in proteins. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2000;17:811-9.
23. Hanson RM, Prilusky J, Renjian Z, Nakane T, Sussman JL. JSmol and the next-generation Web-based representation of 3D molecular structure as applied to proteopedia. Isr J Chem. 2013;53:207-16.
24. Gonzalez A, Cordomí A, Caltabiano G, Campillo M, Pardo L. Impact of helix irregularities on sequence alignment and homology modelling of G protein-coupled receptors. Chembiochem. 2012;13:1393-9.
25. O'Neil KT, DeGrado WF. A thermodynamic scale for the helix-forming tendencies of the commonly occurring amino acids. Science. 1990;250:646-51.
26. Senes A, Gerstein M, Engelman DM. Statistical analysis of amino acid patterns in transmembrane helices: the GxxxG motif occurs frequently and in association with b-branched residues at neighboring positions. J Mol Biol. 2000;296:921-36.
27. Rey J, Deville J, Chabbert M. Structural determinants stabilizing helical distortions related to proline. J Struct Biol. 2010;171:266-76.