Action at an attentional distance: A study of children's reasoning about causes and effects involving spatial and attentional discontinuity

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 52, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 1003-1030

  Grotzer, Tina A ^a   Solis, S Lynneth ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

causal mechanisms; causal reasoning; ecosystems; scale; spatial gaps; systems thinking

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; EDUCATION; RESEARCH;

CAUSAL EXPLANATIONS; CAUSAL REASONING; DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY; INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNS; REASONING ABOUT ACTIONS; SCALE; SPATIAL GAPS; SYSTEMS THINKING;

ECOLOGY;

EID: 84939269139     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.21233     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Ahn, W., &, Kalish, C. W., (2000). The role of mechanism beliefs in causal reasoning. In, F. C. Keil, &, R. A. Wilson, (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 199-227). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
2. Astington, J. W., &, Hughes, C., (2013). Theory of mind: Self-reflection and social understanding. In, P. D. Zelazo, (Ed.), Oxford handbook of developmental psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3. Atran, S., (1995). Causal constraints on categories and categorical constraints on biological reasoning across cultures. In, D. Sperber, D. Premack, &, A. J. Premack, (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 205-233). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
4. Bar, V., Zinn, B., &, Rubin, E., (1997). Children's ideas about action at a distance. International Journal of Science Education, 19 (10), 1137-1157.
5. Barker, M., &, Carr, M., (1989). Teaching and learning about photosynthesis. International Journal of Science Education, 11 (1), 48-56.
6. Bechtold, H. A., Duran, J., Strayer, D. L., Weathers, K. C., Alvarado, A. P., Bettez, N. D.,.., Rodriguez, A., (2013). Frontiers in ecosystem science. In, K. Weathers, D. Strayer, &, G. Likens, (Eds.), Fundamentals of ecosystem science. Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
7. Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., &, Orion, N., (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42 (5), 518-560.
8. Berland, L. K., &, Reiser, B., (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93, 26-55.
9. Braaten, M., &, Windschitl, M., (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95 (4), 639-669. doi: 10.1002/sce.20449
10. Bullock, M., &, Gelman, R., (1979). Preschool children's assumptions about cause and effect: Temporal ordering. Child Development, 50, 89-96.
11. Bullock, M., Gelman, R., &, Baillargeon, R., (1982). The development of causal reasoning. In, W.J. Friedman, (Ed.) The developmental psychology of time. (pp. 209-254). NY: Academic.
12. Carey, S., (1995). On the origin of causal understanding. In, D. Sperber, D. Premack, &, A. J. Premack, (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 268-302). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
13. Charmaz, K., (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, UK: Sage.
14. Chen, E.E., Corriveau, K.H., &, Harris, P., (2011). Children as sociologists. Anales de Psicologia 27, 625-630.
15. Cohen, B., (Ed.) (1978). Issac Newton's papers and letters on natural philosophy and related documents. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Collins, A., Joseph, D., &, Bielaczyc, K., (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (1), 15-42.
17. Corriveau, K.H., &, Harris, P.L., (2009). Choosing your informant: Weighing familiarity and past accuracy. Developmental Science, 12, 426-437.
18. Donaldson Gramling, M. D., Solis, S. L., Derbiszewska, K. M., &, Grotzer, T. A., (2014, March). Testing a curriculum for teaching action at a distance to sixth graders. Pittsburgh, PA: National Association for Research in Science Teaching Conference.
19. Einhorn, H., &, Hogarth, R., (1986). Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin, 99 (1), 3-19.
20. Engle, R. A., Lam, D. P., Meyer, X. S., &, Nix, S. E., (2012). How does expansive framing promote transfer? Several proposed explanations and a research agenda for investigating them. Educational Psychologist, 47 (3), 215-231.
21. Gelman, S., &, Gottfried, G. M., (1996). Children's causal explanations of animate and inanimate motion. Child Development, 67, 1970-1987.
22. Ginns, P., (2006). Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learning and Instruction, 16 (6), 511-525.
23. Gopnik, A., &, Schulz, L., (2007). Introduction. In, A. Gopnik, &, L. Schulz, (Eds.), Causal learning. New York, NY: Oxford Press.
24. Grotzer, T. A., Duhaylongsod, L., &, Tutwiler, M. S., (2011a, April). Developing explicit understanding of probabilistic causation: Patterns and variation in young children's reasoning. New Orleans, LA: American Educational Research Association Conference.
25. Grotzer, T.A., Kamarainen, A., Tutwiler, M.S., Metcalf, S., &, Dede, C., (2013). Learning to reason about ecosystems dynamics over time: The challenges of an event-based causal focus. BioScience, 63 (4), 288-296.
26. Grotzer, T. A., Powell, M., Kamarainen, A. K., Courter, C., Tutwiler, M. S., Metcalf, S., &, Dede, C., (2014). Turning transfer inside out: The affordances of virtual worlds and mobile devices in real world contexts for teaching about causality across time and distance in ecosystems. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 19 (3), Available on-line, Dec. 24, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s10758-014-9241-5
27. Grotzer, T. A., &, Tutwiler, M. S., (2014). Simplifying causal complexity: How interactions between modes of causal induction and information availability lead to heuristic driven reasoning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 8 (3), 97-114.
28. Grotzer, T., Tutwiler, M., Dede, C., Kamarainen, A., &, Metcalf, S., (2011b, April). Helping students learn more expert framing of complex causal dynamics in ecosystems using EcoMUVE. Orlando, FL: National Association of Research in Science Teaching Conference.
29. Gunckel, K. L., Covitt, B. A., Salinas, I., &, Anderson, C. W., (2012). A learning progression for water in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 49 (7), 843-868. doi: 10.1002/tea.21024
30. Harris, P. L., (2012). Trusting what you're told: How children learn from others. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Hagmayer, Y., Sloman, S., Lagnado, D., &, Waldmann, M. R., (2007). Causal reasoning through intervention In, A. Gopnik, &, L. Schulz, (Eds.) Causal learning (pp. 86-101). New York, NY: Oxford Press.
32. Heywood, D., Parker, J., &, Rowlands, M., (2013). Exploring the visuospatial challenge of learning about day and night and the sun's path. Science Education, 97 (5), 772-796.
33. Hill, A. B., (1965). The environment and disease: Association or causation ? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58 (5), 295-300. PMC 1898525. PMID 14283879.
34. Kali, Y., Orion, N., &, Eylon, B., (2003). Effect of knowledge integration activities on students' perception of the earth's crust as a cyclic system. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (6), 545-565.
35. Kalish, C., (1996). Causes and symptoms in preschoolers' conceptions of illness. Child Development, 67, 1647-1670.
36. Kalish, C., (1997). Preschooler's understanding of mental and bodily reactions to contamination: What you don't know can hurt you, but cannot sadden you. Developmental Psychology, 33 (1), 79-91.
37. Kastens, K., Manduca, C. A., Cervato, C., Froderman, R., Goodwin, C., Liben, L. S.,.., Titus, S., (2009). How geoscientists think and learn. EOS trans. American Geographical Union, 90 (31), 265-269.
38. Keil, F. C., (1994). The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains. In, L. A. Hirschfield, &, S. A. Gelman, (Eds.), Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 234-254). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
39. Keil, F., &, Wilson, R. A., (2000). Explaining explanation. In, F. C. Keil, &, R. A. Wilson, (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 1-18). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., &, O'Loughlin, M., (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
41. Kushnir, T., &, Gopnik, A., (2007). Conditional probability versus spatial contiguity in causal learning: Preschoolers use new contingency evidence to overcome prior spatial assumptions. Developmental Psychology, 43 (1), 186-196.
42. Leslie, A. M., (1995). A theory of agency. In, D. Sperber, D. Premack, &, A. J. Premack, (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 121-141). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
43. Leslie, A. M., &, Keeble, S., (1987). Do sixth month old infants perceive causality ? Cognition, 25, 265-288.
44. Lesser, H., (1977). The growth of perceived causality in children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 130, 142-152.
45. Linn, M. C., Songer, N., &, Eylon, B., (1996). Shifts and convergences in science learning and instruction. In, R. Calfee, &, D. Berliner, (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. Riverside, NJ: Macmillian.
46. Mascalzoni, E., Regolin, L., Vallortigara, G., &, Simion, F., (2013). The cradle of causal reasoning: Newborns' preference for physical causality. Developmental Science, 16 (3), 327-335. doi: 10.1111/desc.12018
47. Mendelson, R., &, Shultz, T., (1976). Covariation and temporal contiguity as principles of causal inference in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 408-412.
48. Mohan, L., Chen, J., &, Anderson, C. W., (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (6), 675-698. doi: 10.1002/tea.20314
49. Nazzi, T., &, Gopnik, A., (2000). A shift in children's use of perceptual and causal cues to categorization. Developmental Science, 3, 389-396.
50. Pazzani, M., (1991). A computational theory of learning causal relationships. Cognitive Science, 15, 401-424.
51. Perkins, D., &, Grotzer, T.A., (2005). Dimensions of causal understanding: The role of complex causal models in students' understanding of science. Studies in Science Education 41, 117-165.
52. Perkins, D. N., &, Salomon, G., (1988). Teaching for transfer. Educational Leadership, 46, 22-32.
53. Perkins, D.N., Tishman, S., &, Jay, E., (1995). The Thinking Classroom. New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.
54. Raia, F., (2008). Causality in complex dynamic systems: A challenge in earth systems science education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 56 (1), 81-94.
55. Russ, R., Scherr, R., Hammer, D., &, Mikeska, J., (2008). Recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific inquiry: A framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science. Science Education, 92, 499-525.
56. Sandoval, W.A., (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634-656.
57. Sandoval, W., &, Cam, A., (2011). Elementary children's judgments of the epistemic status of sources of justification. Science Education, 95, 383-406.
58. Schlottmann, A., (1999). Seeing it happen and knowing how it works: How children understand the relation between perceptual causality and underlying mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 35 (5), 303-317.
59. Schlottmann, A., Ray, E. D., &, Surian, L., (2012). Emerging perception of causality in action-and-reaction sequences from 4 to 6 months of age: Is it domain-specific ? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112 (2), 208-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.10.011
60. Schulz, L., &, Sommerville, J., (2006). God does not play dice: Causal determinism and preschoolers' causal inferences. Child Development, 77 (2), 427-442.
61. Shepardson, D. P., Wee, B., Priddy, M., Schellenberger, L., &, Harbor, J., (2007). What is a watershed? Implications of student conceptions for environmental science education and the National Science Education Standards. Science Education, 91, 544-578.
62. Sobel, D., (2004). Exploring the coherence of young children's explanatory abilities: Evidence from generating counterfactuals. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 37-58.
63. Sobel, D., &, Buchanan, D., (2009). Bridging the gap: Causality-at-a-distance in children's cate-gorization and inferences about internal properties. Cognitive Development, 24, 274-283.
64. Sobel, D., Yoachim, C., Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A., &, Blumenthal, E., (2007). The blicket within: Preschoolers' inferences about insides and causes. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8 (2), 159-182.
65. Spelke, E. S., Phillips, A., &, Woodward, A. L., (1995). Infants' knowledge of object motion and human action. In, D. Sperber, D. Premack, &, A. J. Premack, (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 44-78). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
66. Springer, K., &, Keil, F. C., (1991). Early differentiation of causal mechanismsappropriate to biological and nonbiological kinds. Child Development, 62, 767-781.
67. Subbotsky, E., (2001). Causal explanations of events by children and adults: Can alternative modes coexist in one mind ? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 23-46.
68. Thagard, P., (2000). Explaining disease: Correlation, causes and mechanisms. In, F. C. Keil, &, R. A. Wilson, (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 255-276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69. Tretter, T. R., Jones, M. G., &, Minogue, J., (2006). Accuracy of scale conceptions in science: Mental maneuverings across many order of spatial magnitude. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43 (10), 1040-1060.
70. Van de Walle, G., &, Spelke, E. S., (1993, March). Integrating information over time: Infant perception of partly occluded objects. New Orleans, LA: The Society for Research in Child Development.
71. Van de Walle, G., Woodward, A. L., &, Spelke, E. S., (1994, June). Infants' inferences about contact relations in a causal event. The IXth Biennial Meeting of the International Conference for Infant Studies, Paris.
72. Weathers, K., Strayer, D., &, Likens, G., (2013). Fundamentals of ecosystem science. Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
73. Wilensky, U., &, Resnick, M., (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8 (1), 3-19.
74. Woodward, A. L., Phillips, A., &, Spelke, E., (1993, June). Infants' expectations about the motion of animate versus inanimate objects. Boulder, CO: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.