Student perception of assessment practices: towards ‘no loser’ classrooms for all students in the ethnic minority schools in Hong Kong

Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 253-273

  Hue, Ming Tak ^a   Leung, Chi Hung ^a   Kennedy, Kerry Johon ^a  

^a THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Assessment practices; Ethnic minority; Student centred learning; Teacher student interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938962356     PISSN: 18748597     EISSN: 18748600     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11092-014-9205-2     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Atkinson, P. (2003). Assessment 5–14: what do pupils and parents think? Edinburgh, UK: The SCRE Centre, University of Glasgow.
2. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.88.3.588.
3. Berry, R., & Adamson, B. (Eds.). (2011). Assessment reform in education: policy and practice (pp. 3–14). Dordrecht: Springer.
4. Bhowmik, M. K. (2013). Looking outside the school: ‘out of school’ ethnic minority children in Hong Kong. Comparative Education Bulletin, 15, 34–46. Retrieved from http://www.fe.hku.hk/cerc/ceshk/doc/CEB2013_15.pdf.
5. Bhowmik, M. (2014). Out of school ethnic minority children in Hong Kong. Unpublished PhD thesis, Hong Kong Institute of Education.
6. Bhowmik, M. K., & Kennedy, K. J. (2012). ‘No child left behind’: does it apply to ethnic minority students in Hong Kong? Paper presented at the comparative education society of Hong Kong annual conference 2012. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong.
7. Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102.
8. Bloxham, S., & West, A. (2004). Understanding the rules of the game: marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students’ conception of assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 721–733. doi:10.1080/0260293042000227254.
9. Boekaerts, M., & Cascallar, E. (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation? Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 199–210. doi:10.1007/s10648–006–9013–4.
10. Bowling, A. (1997). Research methods in health. Buckingham: Open University Press.
11. Brauer, B. A. (1993). Adequacy of a translation of the MMPI into American sign language for use with deaf individuals: linguistic equivalency issues. Rehabilitation Psychology, 38(4), 247–260. doi:10.1037/h0080302.
12. Brown, G. T. (2002). Student beliefs about learning: New Zealand students in year 11. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 6(1), 110–114.
13. Brown, G. T. (2006). Secondary school students’ conceptions of assessment: a survey of four schools. Auckland: University of Auckland.
14. Brown, G. T., & Hirschfeld, G. H. (2007). Students’ conceptions of assessment and mathematics: self-regulation raises achievement. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 7, 63–74. Retrieved from http://www-cms.newcastle.edu.au/Resources/Research%20Centres/SORTI/Journals/AJEDP/Vol%207/v7-brown-hirschfeld.pdf.
15. Brown, G. T., & Hirschfeld, G. H. (2008). Students’ conceptions of assessment: links to outcomes. Assessment in Education Principles Policy & Practice, 15(1), 3–17. doi:10.1080/09695940701876003.
16. Brown, G. T., Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E. (2009a). Beliefs that make a difference: adaptive and maladaptive self-regulation in students’ conceptions of assessment. In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment: what students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 159–186). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
17. Brown, G. T., Irving, S. E., Peterson, E. R., & Hirschfeld, G. H. (2009b). Use of interactive-informal assessment practices: New Zealand secondary students’ conceptions of assessment. Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 97–111. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.02.003.
18. Brown, G., Kennedy, K., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S., & Yu, W. M. (2009c). Assessment for student improvement: understanding Hong Kong teachers’ conceptions and practices of assessment. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice, 16(3), 361–377.
19. Brown, G., Hui, S. F. K., Yu, W. M., & Kennedy, K. (2011). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment in Chinese contexts: a tripartite model of accountability, improvement and relevance. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(5–6), 307–320.
20. Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (1997). The practice of nursing research conduct, critique, & utilization. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders and Co.
21. Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Byrne, M.B. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Carless, D. (2005). Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education, 12(1), 39–54.
24. Carless, D. (2011). From testing to productive student learning: implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings. New York: Routledge.
25. Census and Statistics Department. (2007). 2006 thematic report: ethnic minorities. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department.
26. Cheng, S., & Hamid, P. N. (1995). An error in the use of translated scales: the Rosenberg self-esteem scale for Chinese. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81(2), 431–434. doi:10.2466/pms.1995.81.2.431.
27. Crooks, T. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438–481. doi:10.3102/00346543058004438.
28. Daugherty, R. (1995). National curriculum assessment: a review of policy, 1987–1994 London: Falmer Press.
29. Duffield, K. E., & Spencer, J. A. (2002). A survey of medical students’ views about the purposes and fairness of assessment. Medical Education, 36(9), 879–886. doi:10.1046/j.1365–2923.2002.01291.x.
30. Education Bureau. (2012). School education statistics. Hong Kong: Education Bureau.
31. Education Commission. (2000). Learning for life, learning through life: reform proposals for the education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. Retrieved from http://www.e-c.edu.hk/eng/reform/annex/Edu-reform-eng.pdf.
32. Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: what can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1(1), 3–14. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2005.11.001.
33. Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395–430. doi:10.3102/00346543059004395.
34. Gibbs, G., Simpson, C., & McDonald, R. (2003). Improving student learning through changing assessment—a conceptual and practical framework. European Association for Research into Learning and Instruction Conference. Padova, Aug 2003.
35. Harlen, W. (2007). Assessment of learning. Los Angeles: Sage.
36. Hawe, E. M. (2002). Assessment in a pre-service teacher education programme: the rhetoric and the practice of standards-based assessment. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 30(1), 93–106. doi:10.1080/13598660120115002.
37. Hue, M. T., & Kennedy, K. J. (2012). Creation of culturally responsive classrooms: teachers’ conceptualization of a new rationale for cultural responsiveness and management of diversity in Hong Kong secondary schools. Intercultural Education, 23(2), 119–132. doi:10.1080/14675986.2012.686021.
38. Hue, M. T., & Kennedy, K. J. (2013a). Building a connected classroom: teachers’ narratives about managing the cultural diversity of ethnic minority students in Hong Kong secondary schools. Pastoral Care in Education, 34(4), 292–308.
39. Hue, M. T., & Kennedy, J. K. (2013b). Creating culturally responsive environments: ethnic minority teachers’ constructs of the cultural diversity of students in Hong Kong secondary schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(3), 273–287.
40. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
41. Kennedy, K. J. (2011). The ‘no loser’ principle as policy in Hong Kong’s education reform: does it apply to ethnic minority students? Keynote paper presented at the curriculum and instruction conference. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Institute of Education.
42. Kennedy, K. J. (2012). The ‘no loser’ principle in Hong Kong’s education reform: does it apply to ethnic minority students? Hong Kong Teachers’ Centre Journal, 11, 1–23. Retrieved from http://edb.org.hk/HKTC/download/journal/j11/HKTCJv11_05-A01.pdf.
43. Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(1), 53–76. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr32013.
44. Maclellan, E. (2001). Assessment for learning: the differing perceptions of tutors and students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4), 307–318. Retrieved from http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/2427/1/strathprints002427.pdf.
45. Mason, T. C. (2005). Cross-cultural instrument translation: assessment, translation, and statistical applications. American Annals of the Deaf, 150(1), 67–72. doi:10.1353/aad.2005.0020.
46. Nunnally J C.(1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
47. Olsen, L., & Moore, M. (1984). Voices from the classroom: students and teachers speak out on the quality of teaching in our schools. Oakland: Students for Quality Teaching Project/Citizens Policy Center.
48. Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v10n7a.pdf.
49. Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E. (2008). Secondary school students’ conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 238–250. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.05.001.
50. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: the role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544–555. doi:10.1037/0022–0663.92.3.544.
51. Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: the role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation—a volume in the educational psychology series (pp. 249–284). San Diego: Academic.
52. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Segers, M., & Dochy, F. (2001). New assessment forms in problem-based learning: the value-added of the students’ perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 327–343. doi:10.1080/03075070120076291.
54. Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(4), 293–302. doi:10.1016/S0883–0355(97)90011–2.
55. Trusell-Cullen, A. (1998). Assessment in the Learner-Centered Classroom. CA: Dominie Elementary.
56. van Grinsven, L., & Tillema, H. (2006). Learning opportunities to support student self-regulation: comparing different instructional formats. Educational Research, 48(1), 77–91. doi:10.1080/00131880500498495.
57. Watkins, D., & Biggs, J. (Eds.). (1996). The Chinese learner: cultural, psychological and cultural influences. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre/ Australian Council for Educational Research.
58. Weeden, P., Winter, J., & Broad-foot, P. (2002). Assessment: what’s in it for schools? London: RoutledgeFalmer.
59. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. doi:10.3102/0002831207312909.