Screening European elms for resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi

Forest Science

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 134-141

  Solla, Alejandro ^a   Bohnens, Jürgen ^b   Collin, Eric ^c   Diamandis, Stephanos ^d   Franke, Albrecht ^e   Gil, Luis ^f   Burón, Margarita ^f   Santini, Alberto ^g   Mittempergher, Lorenzo ^g   Pinon, Jean ^c   Broeck, An Vanden ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

^b Versuchswesen ^*  (Germany)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

^d FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Greece)

^e Forstliche Versuchs Forsch Anst   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^g CNR   (Italy)

^h RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND FOREST INBO   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Ophiostoma ulmi; Plant breeding; Ulmus

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; DISEASE CONTROL; STATISTICAL METHODS;

DISEASE SEVERITY; DUTCH ELM DISEASE; HEDGES; RESISTANCE BREEDING;

FORESTRY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIODIVERSITY; CLONES; CONSERVATION; DISEASES; FORESTRY; INOCULATION; WILTING;

ACRONICTA LEPORINA; FUNGI; OPHIOSTOMA NOVO; OPHIOSTOMA NOVO-ULMI; OPHIOSTOMA ULMI; ULMACEAE; ULMUS; ULMUS GLABRA; ULMUS LAEVIS; ULMUS MINOR; ULMUS PUMILA;

EID: 18044370858     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. BRASIER, C.M. 1977. Inheritance of pathogenicity and cultural characteristics in Ceratocystis ulmi. Hybridisation of protoperithecial and non-aggressive strains. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 68:45-52.
2. BRASIER, C.M. 2000. Intercontinental spread and continuing evolution of the Dutch elm disease pathogens. P. 61-72 in The elms: Breeding, conservation and disease management, Dunn, C.P. (ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
3. COGOLLUDO-AGUSTÍN, M.A., D. AGÚNDEZ, AND L. GIL. 2000. Identification of native and hybrid elms in Spain using isozyme gene markers. Heredity 85:157-166.
4. COGOLLUDO-AGUSTÍN, M.A., R.A. LÓPEZ, D. AGÚNDEZ, AND L. GIL. 2003. Caracterización de los olmos ibéricos mediante marcadores moleculares y caracteres morfológicos. P. 159-183 in Los olmos ibéricos: Conservación y mejora frente a la grafiosis, Gil L., A. Solla, and S. Iglesias (eds.). Organismo Autónomo Parques Nacionales, Madrid, Spain.
5. COLLIN, E., I. BILGER, G. ERIKSON, AND J. TUROK. 2000. The conservation of elm genetic resources in Europe. P. 281-293 in The elms: Breeding, conservation and disease management, Dunn, C.P. (ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
6. GIL, L., R.A. LÓPEZ, AND M.E. GARCÍA-NIETO. 2003. Historia de los olmos en la Península Ibérica. P. 69-114 in Los olmos ibéricos: Conservación y mejora frente a la grafiosis, Gil L., A. Solla, and S. Iglesias (eds.). Organismo Autónomo Parques Nacionales, Madrid, Spain.
7. GREEN, C.E., AND R.P. GURIES. 1985. Early screening of elms for resistance to Ceratocystis ulmi. Plant Dis. 69:60-63.
8. HEYBROEK, H.M. 1957. Elm breeding in the Netherlands. Silvae Genet. 6:112-117.
9. HEYBROEK, H.M. 1961. De Iep "Commelin." Ned. Bosb. Tijdschr. 33:325-328.
10. HEYBROEK, H.M. 1976. Drie Nieawe Iepeklonen. Ned. Bosb. Tijdschr. 48:117-123.
11. HEYBROEK, H.M. 1983. Resistant elms for Europe. P. 108-113 in Research on Dutch elm disease in Europe, Burdekin, D.A. (ed.). Forestry Commission Bulletin 60, HMSO, UK.
12. HEYBROEK, H.M. 1993. The Dutch elm breeding program. P. 16-25 in Dutch elm disease research: Cellular and molecular approaches, Sticklen, M.B. and J.L. Sherald (eds.). Springer-Verlag, NY.
13. LESTER, D.T., AND E.B. SMALLEY. 1972a. Improvement of elms through interspecific hybridization with Asian species. P. 1-10 in Proc. of IUFRO-SABRAO Symposium For. Tree Breed. Gov. Exp. Stn. Japan.
14. LESTER, D.T., AND E.B. SMALLEY. 1972b. Response of backcross hybrids and three-species combinations of Ulmus pumila, Ulmus japonica, and U. rubra to inoculation with Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 62:845-848.
15. LESTER, D.T., AND E.B. SMALLEY. 1972c. Response of Ulmus pumila and Ulmus pumila x rubra hybrids to inoculation with Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 62:848-852.
16. MITTEMPERGHER, L., G. BARTOLINI, F. FERRINI, AND M. PANICUCCI. 1991. Aspects of elm propagation by soft and hardwood cuttings. Suelo y Planta 2:129-137.
17. MITTEMPERGHER, L., AND N. LA PORTA. 1993. Ophiostoma ulmi/Olmo. P. 412-432 in Miglioramento genetico delle piante per resistenza a patogeni e parassiti. Crino P., A. Sonnino, F. Saccardo, M. Buiatti, A. Porta-Puglia, and G. Surico (eds.). Edagricole, Bologne, Italy.
18. QUELLET, C.E., AND R. POMERLEAU. 1965. Recherches sur la resistance de l'orme d'amerique au Ceratocystis ulmi. Can. J. Bot. 43:85-96.
19. PINON, J., C. LOHOU, AND A. CADIC. 1999. Hybrid elms (Ulmus sp.): Adaptability in Paris and behaviour towards Dutch elm disease. Acta Hortic. 496:107-114.
20. SANTAMOUR, P.S. JR. 1973. Resistance to Dutch elm disease in Chinese elm hybrids. Plant Dis. Rep. 57:997-999.
21. SANTINI, A., A. FAGNANI, F. FERINI, AND L. MITTEMPERGHER. 2002. 'San Zanobi' and 'Plinio' elm trees. HortScience 37:1139-1141.
22. SINCLAIR, W.A., AND A.O. LARSEN. 1980. Localization of Dutch elm disease in 10-year-old white elm clones from resistant parents. Plant Dis. 64:203-205.
23. SMALLEY, E.B. 1963. Seasonal fluctuations in susceptibility of young elm seedlings to Dutch elm disease. Phytopathology 53:846-853.
24. SMALLEY, E.B., AND A.G. KAIS. 1966. Seasonal variations in the resistance of various elm species to Dutch elm disease. P. 279-287 in Proc. of conf. on breeding pest-resistant trees, Gerhold, H.D., E.J. Schreiner, R.E. McDermott, and J.A. Winieski (eds.). Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY.
25. SMALLEY, E.B., AND D.T. LESTER. 1973. 'Sapporo autumn gold' elm. HortScience 8:514-515.
26. SMUCKER, S.J. 1941. Comparison of susceptibility of American elm and several exotic elms to Ceratostomella ulmi. Phytopathology. 31:758-759.
27. SOKAL, R.R., AND F.J. ROHLF. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
28. SOLLA, A., AND L. GIL. 2002. Influence of water stress on Dutch elm disease symptoms in Ulmus minor Miller. Can. J. Bot. 80:810-817.
29. SOLLA, A., M. BURÓN, S. IGLESIAS, AND L. GIL. 2000. Spanish program for the conservation and breeding of elms against DED. P. 295-303 in The elms: Breeding, conservation and disease management, Dunn, C.P. (ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
30. SUTHERLAND, M.L., S. PEARSON, AND C.M. BRASIER. 1997. The influence of temperature and light on defoliation levels of elm by Dutch elm disease. Phytopathology 87:576-581.
31. TCHERNOFF, V. 1963. Vegetative propagation of elms by means of shoots cut from callused roots. Acta Bot. Neerl. 12:40-50.
32. TCHERNOFF, V. 1965. Methods for screening and for the rapid selection of elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Acta Bot. Neerl. 14:409-452.
33. TOWNSEND, A.M. 1971. Relative resistance of diploid Ulmus species to Ceratocystis ulmi. Plant Dis. Rep. 55:980-982.
34. TOWNSEND, A.M., S.E. BENTZ, AND G.R. JOHNSON. 1995. Variation in response of selected American elm clones to Ophiostoma ulmi. J. Environ. Hort. 13:126-128.
35. TOWNSEND, A.M., AND L.W. DOUGLASS. 2001. Variation among American elm clones in long-term dieback, growth, and survival following Ophiostoma inoculation. J. Environ. Hort. 19:100-103.
36. WARE, G.H. 1992. Elm breeding and improvement at the Morton Arboretum. The Morton Arboretum Quarterly 28:846-849.
37. WENT, J.C. 1938. Compilation of the investigations on the susceptibility of different elms to Ceratostomella ulmi Buisman in the Netherlands. Phytopathol. Z. 11:181-201.