Seven ulmus minor clones tolerant to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi registered as forest reproductive material in Spain

IForest

Volumn 8, Issue , 2014, Pages 172-180

  Martín, Juan Antonio ^a   Solla, Alejandro ^b   Venturas, Martin ^a   Collada, Carmen ^a   Domínguez, Jorge ^a   Miranda, Eva ^a   Fuentes, Pablo ^c   Burón, Margarita ^a   Iglesias, Salustiano ^d   Gil, Luis ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^d Dirección General de Desarrollo Rural y Política Forestal   (Spain)

Author keywords

Breeding; Dutch Elm Disease; Invasive Species; Plant Release; Resistance

Indexed keywords

CORDIA ALLIODORA; OPHIOSTOMA NOVO-ULMI; ULMUS; ULMUS MINOR;

EID: 84925297413     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19717458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3832/ifor1224-008     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allue-Andrade JL (1990). Atlas fitoclimatico de Espana. Taxonomias [Phytoclimatic atlas of Spain. Taxonomy]. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias, Ministerio de Agricultura Pesca y Alimentacion, Madrid, Spain. [in Spanish]
2. Aoun M, Jacobi V, Boyle B, Bernier L (2010). Identification and monitoring of Ulmus Americana transcripts during in vitro interactions with the Dutch elm disease pathogen Ophiostoma novo- ulmi. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 74: 254-266. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2010.04.003
3. Brasier CM, Kirk SA (2010). Rapid emergence of hybrids between two subspecies of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi with a high level of pathogenic fitness. Plant Pathology 59: 186-199. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02157.x
4. Buiteveld J, van der Werf B, Hiemstra JA (2014). Comparison of commercial elm cultivars and promising unreleased Dutch clones for resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. iForest (early view). doi: 10.3832/ifor1209-008
5. Cogolludo-Agustin MA, Agundez D, Gil L (2000). Identification of native and hybrid elms in Spain using isozyme gene markers. Heredity 85: 157-166. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00740.x
6. Collada C, Fuentes-Utrilla P, Gil L, Cervera MT (2004). Characterization of microsatellite loci in Ulmus minor Miller and cross-amplification in U. glabra Hudson and U. laevis Pall. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 731-732. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00798.x
7. Ghelardini L, Santini A, Black-Samuelsson S, Myking T, Falusi M (2010). Bud dormancy release in elm (Ulmus spp.) clones - a case study of photoperiod and temperature responses. Tree Physiology 30: 264-74. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpp110
8. Gil L, Fuentes-Utrilla P, Soto A, Cervera MT, Collada C (2004). English elm (Ulmus procera) is a 2000-year-old Roman clone. Nature 431: 1053. doi: 10.1038/4311053a
9. Guries RP, Smalley EB (2000). Once and future elms: classical and molecular approaches to Dutch elm disease resistance. In: “The elms: breeding, conservation and disease management” (Dunn CP ed), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, USA, pp. 231-248.
10. Heybroek HM (1993). The Dutch elm breeding program. In: “Dutch Elm Disease Research: Cellular and Molecular Approaches” (Sticklen MB, Sherald JL eds). Springer Verlag, New York, USA, pp. 16-25.
11. Iglesias S (2005). Normativa de comercializacion de material forestal de reproduccion [Marketing regulations for forest reproductive material]. In: “Manual para la Comercializacion y Produccion de Semillas y Plantas Forestales. Materiales de Base y Reproduccion” (Alia A, Alba N, Agundez D, Iglesias S eds), Organismo Autonomo Parques Nacionales, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, Spain, pp. 39-58. [in Spanish]
12. Ipinza R (1990). Algunos aspectos relevantes sobre la taxonomia de los olmos ibericos [Some relevant aspects of the taxonomy of Iberian elms]. In: “Los olmos y la grafiosis en Espana” (Gil L ed). ICONA, Madrid, pp. 69-98. [in Spanish]
13. Jeffers J, Richens R (1970). Multivariate analysis of the English elm population. Silvae Genetica 19: 31-38. [online] URL: http://sauerlaender-verlag.com/fileadmin/content/dokument/archiv/silvaegenetica/19_1970/19-1-31.pdf
14. Martin JA, Solla A, Woodward S, Gil L (2005). Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy as a new method for evaluating host resistance in the Dutch elm disease complex. Tree Physiology 25: 1331-1338. doi: 10.1093/treephys/25.10.1331
15. Martin JA, Solla A, Woodward S, Gil L (2007). Detection of differential changes in lignin composition of elm xylem tissues inoculated with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Forest Pathology 37: 187-191. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2007.00495.x
16. Martin JA, Solla A, Coimbra MA, Gil L (2008a). Metabolic fingerprinting allows discrimination between Ulmus pumila and U. minor and between U. minor clones of different susceptibility to Dutch elm disease. Forest Pathology 38: 244-256. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2007.00542.x
17. Martin JA, Solla A, Domingues MR, Coimbra MA, Gil L (2008b). Exogenous phenol increase resistance of Ulmus minor to Dutch elm disease through formation of suberin-like compounds on xylem tissues. Environmental and Experimental Botany 64: 97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.05.004
18. Martin JA, Solla A, Esteban LG, de Palacios P, Gil L (2009). Bordered pit and ray morphology involvement in elm resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39: 420-429. doi: 10.1139/X08-183
19. Martin JA, Solla A, Gil L, Garcia-Vallejo MC (2010a). Phenological and histochemical changes of Ulmus minor due to root absorption of phenol: implications for resistance to DED. Environmental and Experimental Botany 69: 175-182. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.04.001
20. Martin JA, Solla A, Witzell J, Gil L, Garcia- Vallejo MC (2010b). Antifungal effect and reduction of Ulmus minor symptoms to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi by carvacrol and salicylic acid. European Journal of Plant Pathology 127: 21-32. doi: 10.1007/s10658-009-9567-3
21. Martin JA, Solla A, Garcia-Vallejo MC, Gil L (2012). Chemical changes in Ulmus minor xylem tissue after salicylic acid or carvacrol treatments are associated with enhanced resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Phytochemistry 83: 104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.07.017
22. Martin JA, Solla A, Ruiz-Villar M, Gil L (2013). Vessel length and conductivity of Ulmus branches: ontogenetic changes and relation to resistance to Dutch elm disease. Trees 27: 1239-1248. doi: 10.1007/s00468-013-0872-2
23. Mittempergher L, Santini A (2004). The history of elm breeding. Forest Systems 13: 161-177. [online] URL: http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/fs/article/view/821
24. Richens RH (1955). Studies on Ulmus. I. The range of variation of East Anglian elms. Watsonia 3: 138-153. [online] URL: http://www.archive. bsbi.org.uk/Wats3p138.pdf
25. Santini A, Fagnani A, Ferrini F, Mittempergher L, Brunetti M, Crivellaro A, Macchioni N (2004). Elm breeding for DED resistance: the Italian clones and their wood properties. Forest Systems 13: 179-184. [online] URL: http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/fs/article/view/822
26. Santini A, Fagnani A, Ferrini F, Ghelardini L, Mittempergher L (2005). Variation among Italian and French elm clones in their response to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi inoculation. Forest Pathology 35: 183-193. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-03 29.2005.00401.x
27. Santini A, Pecori F, Pepori A, Brookes A (2011). “Morfeo” elm: a new variety resistant to Dutch elm disease. Forest Pathology 42:171-176. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2011.00737.x
28. Smalley EB (1963). Seasonal fluctuations in susceptibility of young elm seedlings to Dutch elm disease. Phytopathology 53: 846-853.
29. Smalley EB, Guries RP (2000). Asian elms: sources of disease and insect resistance. In: “The elms: breeding, conservation and disease management” (Dunn CP ed). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, USA, pp. 215-230.
30. Smalley EB, Lester DT (1973). “Sapporo autumn gold” elm. Horticultural Science 8: 514-515.
31. Solla A, Gil L (2002). Influence of water stress on Dutch elm disease symptoms in Ulmus minor Miller. Canadian Journal of Botany 80: 810-817. doi: 10.1139/b02-067
32. Solla A, Gil L (2003). Evaluating Verticillium dahliae for biological control of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi in Ulmus minor. Plant Pathology 52: 579-585. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2003.00 921.x
33. Solla A, Buron M, Iglesias S, Gil L (2000). Spanish program for the conservation and breeding of elms against DED. In: “The Elms: Breeding, Conservation and Disease Management” (Dunn CP ed), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 295-303.
34. Solla A, Bohnens J, Collin E, Diamandis S, Franke A, Gil L, Buron M, Santini A, Mittempergher L, Pinon J, van den Broeck A (2005a). Screening European elms for resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Forest Science 51: 134-141.
35. Solla A, Martin JA, Corral P, Gil L (2005b). Seasonal changes in wood formation of Ulmus pumila and U. minor and its relation with Dutch elm disease. New Phytologist 166:1025-1034. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01384.x
36. Solla A, Martin JA, Ouellette G, Gil L (2005c). Influence of plant age on symptom development in Ulmus minor following inoculation by Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Plant Disease 89:1035-1040. doi: 10.1094/PD-89-1035
37. Solla A, Lopez-Almansa JC, Martin JA, Gil L (2014). Genetic variation and heritability estimates of Ulmus minor and U. pumila hybrids for budburst, growth and tolerance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. iForest [submitted].
38. Sutherland ML, Pearson S, Brasier CM (1997). The influence of temperature and light on defoliation levels of elm by Dutch elm disease. Phytopathology 87: 576-581. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.6.576
39. Tchernoff V (1965). Methods for screening and for the rapid selection of elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 14: 409-452. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1965.tb00204.x
40. Townsend AM (2000). USDA genetic research on elms. In: “The Elms: Breeding, Conservation and Disease Management” (Dunn CP ed). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, USA, pp. 271-278.
41. Venturas M, Lopez R, Martin JA, Gasco A, Gil L (2014). Heritability of Ulmus minor resistance to Dutch elm disease and its relationship to vessel size, but not to xylem vulnerability to drought. Plant Pathology. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12115.
42. Vivas M, Martin JA, Gil L, Solla A (2012). Evaluating methyl jasmonate for induction of resistance to Fusarium oxysporum, F. Circinatum and Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Forest Systems 21: 289-299. doi: 10.5424/fs/2012212-02172
43. Webber JF (2000). Insect vector behavior and the evolution of Dutch elm disease. In: “The Elms: Breeding, Conservation and Disease Management” (Dunn CP ed). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MS, USA, pp. 47-60.
44. Weising K, Gardner RC (1999). A set of conserved PCR primers for the analysis of simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in chloroplast genomes of dicotyledonous angiosperms. Genome 42: 9-19. doi: 10.1139/g98-104
45. Whiteley RE, Black-Samuelsson S, Clapham D (2003). Development of microsatellite markers for the European white elm (Ulmus laevis Pall.) and cross-species amplification within the genus Ulmus. Molecular Ecology Notes 3: 598-600. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00525.x
46. Zalapa JE, Brunet J, Guries RP (2008). Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers for red elm (Ulmus rubra Muhl.) and cross-species amplification with Siberian elm (Ulmus pumila L.). Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 109-112. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01805.x