Susceptibility of native French elm clones to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi

Annals of Forest Science

Volumn 62, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 689-696

  Pinon, Jean ^a   Husson, Claude ^a   Collin, Eric ^b  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b Cemagref   (France)

Author keywords

Clone; Ophiostoma novo ulmi; Species; Susceptibility; Ulmus

Indexed keywords

DISEASE RESISTANCE; INOCULATION; MORTALITY; RESTORATION ECOLOGY;

OPHIOSTOMA NOVO-ULMI; ULMUS; ULMUS GLABRA; ULMUS LAEVIS; ULMUS MINOR;

EID: 28544434378     PISSN: 12864560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/forest:2005066     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Brasier C.M., Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. nov., causative agent of current Dutch elm disease pandemics, Mycopathologia 115 (1991) 151-161.
2. Collin E., Orme, in: Teissier du Cros E. (Ed.), Conserver les ressources génétiques forestières en France, Min. Agriculture, Bureau des Ressources Génétiques, CRGF, INRA-DIC, 1999, pp. 46-47.
3. Collin E., Elm, in: Teissier du Cros E. (Ed.), Forest Genetic Resources Management and Conservation: France as a Case Study, Min. Agriculture, Bureau des Ressources Génétiques, CRGF, INRA-DIC, 2001, pp. 38-39.
4. Gibbs J.N., Heybroek H.M., Holmes F.W., Aggressive strain of Ceratocystis ulmi in Britain, Nature 5342 (1972) 121-122.
5. Goodall-Copestake W.P., Hollingsworth M.L., Hollingsworth P.M., Jenkins G.I., Collin E., Molecular markers and ex situ conservation of the European elms (Ulmus spp.), Biol. Conserv. 122 (2005) 537-546.
6. Heybroek H.M., The development of forest tree breeding in The Netherlands, Gov. For. Exp. Sta., Tokyo, Japan, 1974, pp. 30-39.
7. Heybroek H.M., The Dutch elm breeding program, in: Sticklen M.B., Sherald J.L. (Eds.), Dutch elm disease research: cellular and molecular approaches, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1993, pp. 16-25.
8. Lester D.T., Smalley E.B., Polk R.B., Interspecific hybridization for commercial production of disease-resistant elms, Proc. 8th Cent. For. Tree Improv. Conf., October 11-13, 1972, Columbia, Missouri, 1974, pp. 73-75.
9. Mittempergher L., La Porta N., Hybridization studies in the Eurasian species of elm (Ulmus spp.), Silvae Genet. 40 (1991) 237-243.
10. Mittempergher L., Santini A., The history of elm breeding, Invest. Agrar., Sist. Rec. For. 13 (2004) 161-178.
11. Neely D., Himelick E.B., Rootgraft transmission of dutch elm disease in municipalities, Plant Dis. Rep. (1963) 83-85.
12. Pinon J. (Ed.), La Graphiose de l'orme, Doss. Envir. INRA, 1993, no 7, 60 p.
13. Pinon J., Feugey L., La Graphiose de l'Orme : une maladie à causes bien identifiées, Rev. For. Fr. 5 (1994) 422-430.
14. Pinon J., Lohou C., Cadic A., Hybrid elms, adaptability in Paris and behaviour towards Dutch elm disease, in: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Urban Tree Health, 22-26 September 1997, Paris, Acta Hortic. 496 (1998) 107-114.
15. Shigo A., Tippett J.T., Compartimentalization of American elm tissues infected by Ceratocystis ulmi, Plant Dis. 65 (1981) 715-718.
16. Smalley E.B., Guries R.P., Breeding elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease, Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 31 (1993) 325-352.
17. Smalley E.B., Kais A.G., Seasonal variations in the resistance of various elm species to Dutch elm disease, in: Breeding pest-resistant trees, Pergamon Press, 1966, pp. 279-292.
18. Smalley E.B., Lester D.T., 'Sapporo Autumn Gold' elm, HortScience 8 (1973) 514-515.
19. Solla A., Gil L., Influence of water stress on Dutch elm disease symptoms in Ulmus minor, Can. J. Bot. 80 (2002) 810-817.
20. Tchernoff V., Methods for screening and for the rapid selection of elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease, Acta Bot. Neerl. 14 (1965) 409-452.
21. Webber J.F., Kirby S.G., Host feeding preference of Scolytus scolytus, For. Com. Bull. 60 (1983) 47-49.