Uncertainty based modeling of rainfall-runoff: Combined differential evolution adaptive Metropolis (DREAM) and K-means clustering

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 83, Issue , 2015, Pages 405-420

  Zahmatkesh, Zahra ^a   Karamouz, Mohammad ^a   Nazif, Sara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

Rainfall runoff simulation; Real time rainfall prediction; Runoff modeling uncertainty

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE MODELS; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; FLOODS; FORECASTING; HAZARDS; MARKOV PROCESSES; MONTE CARLO METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RUNOFF; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATERSHEDS; WEATHER FORECASTING;

ADAPTIVE MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO; LARGE SCALE CLIMATE SIGNALS; RAINFALL PREDICTION; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; RAINFALL-RUNOFF PROCESS; RAINFALL-RUNOFF SIMULATIONS; RUNOFF MODEL; SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION;

RAIN;

FLOODING; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; MARKOV CHAIN; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; REAL TIME; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BRONX RIVER; NEW YORK [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84938694371     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.06.012     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Aghakouchak A., Habib E. Application of a Conceptual hydrologic model in teaching hydrologic processes. Int J Eng Ed 2010, 26(4):1-11. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3sv066q5.
2. Ajami N.K., Duan Q., Sorooshian S. An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multi-model combination framework: confronting input, parameter and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction. Water Resour Res 2007, 43:W01403. 10.1029/2005WR004745.
3. Bates J., Granger C. The combination of forecasts. Oper Res Quart 2004, 20:451-468.
4. Beck M.B. Water quality modeling: a review of the analysis of uncertainty. Water Resour Res 1987, 23(8):1393-1442. 10.1029/WR023i008p01393.
5. Bergström, S. (1990), Parameter values for the HBV model in Sweden (in Swedish). Technical report no. 28. Norrköping: Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI). http://www.smhi.se/polopoly_fs/1.1813!Hydrologi_106_webb%5B1%5D.pdf.
6. Bergström S. The HBV model. Contribution to: Computer models of watershed hydrology 1995, 443-476. Water Resources Publications, Littleton.
7. Bergström S., Harlin J., Lindström G. Spillway design floods in Sweden. I: New guidelines. Hydrol Sci J 1992, 37(5):505-519. 10.1080/02626669209492615.
8. Beven K., Binley A. The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol Process (Special Issue: Future of Distributed Modelling) 1992, 6(3):279-298. 10.1002/hyp.3360060305.
9. Blaney, H.F., Criddle, W.D. (1962), Determining consumptive use and irrigation water requirements. Technical bulletin. Agricultural Research Service. U.S.D.A. No. 1275, Washington. p. 63. http://naldc.nal.usda.gov/naldc/download.xhtml?id=CAT87201264&content=PDF.
10. Boyle, D.P. (2001), Multicriteria calibration of hydrologic models. Doctoral Dissertation. Tucson: Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona.
11. Center for Watershed Protection. (2006), Bronx river watershed baseline assessment. Prepared for: Westchester County Department of Planning.
12. Center for Watershed Protection and Biohabitats, Incs. (2007), Bronx river watershed assessment and management report. Prepared for: Westchester County Department of Planning, White Plains, NY. http://www.westchestergov.com/Planning/environmental/BronxRiver/Bronx%20River%20Watershed%20Assessment%20and%20Management%20Report/BronxRiverPlan.pdf.
13. Chaloulakou A., Saisana M., Spyrellis N. Comparative assessment of neural networks and regression models for forecasting summertime ozone in Athens. Sci Total Environ 2003, 313(1-3):1-13. 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00335-8.
14. Diks C.G.H., Vrugt J.A. Comparison of point forecast accuracy of model averaging methods in hydrologic applications. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 2010, 24(6):809-820. 10.1007/s00477-010-0378-z.
15. Evenson G. Using the extended Kalman filter with a multi-layer quasi geostrophic ocean model. J Geophys Res 1992, 97(C11):17905-17924. 10.1029/92JC01972.
16. Fallah Ghalhari G.H.A., Khoshhal J. Spring rainfall prediction of Khorasan-e Razavi Province, based upon climatic large scale signals by using artificial neural network (in Persian). Phys Geogr Res Q 2012, 41(69):115-133. http://www.magiran.com/view.asp?Type=pdf&ID=685655&l=en.
17. Gardner M.W., Dorling S.R. Statistical surface ozone models: an improved methodology to account for non-linear behavior. Atmos Environ 2000, 34(1):21-34. 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00359-3.
18. Gelman A, Carlin J.B., Stern H.S., Dunson D.B., Vehtari A, Rubin D.B. Bayesian data analysis 2004, Chapman & Hall, London, https://www.crcpress.com/Bayesian-Data-Analysis-Third-Edition/Gelman-Carlin-Stern-Dunson-Vehtari-Rubin/9781439840955.
19. Gelman A., Rubin D.B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci 1992, 7:457-472.
20. Gill J. Bayesian methods: a social and behavioral sciences approach 2002, Chapman & Hall, London, http://www.amazon.com/Bayesian-Methods-Behavioral-Sciences-Statistics/dp/1439862486.
21. Harlin J., Kung C.S. Parameter uncertainty and simulation of design floods in Sweden. J hydrol 1992, 137(1-4):209-230. 10.1016/0022-1694(92)90057-3.
22. Hoeting J.A., Madigan D., Raftery A.E., Volinsky C.T. Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial. Stat Sci 1999, 14(4):382-417. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2676803.
23. Huber W.C. BMP simulation using the U.S. EPA storm water management model (SWMM). Paper presented at 7th international conference on urban storm drainage 1996, 1629-1634. Hanover, Germany, http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19961904782.html;jsessionid=52855E4D31C503967C51609D6944E0DB.
24. Hwang C.L, Lai Y.J., Liu T.Y. A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Comput Oper Res 1993, 20:889-899. 10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-v.
25. Iliadis L., Spartalis S., Tachos S. An innovative artificial neural network evaluation model: application in industry. Proceedings of the 10th EANN conference 2007.
26. Karamouz M., Ahmadi A., Nazif S., Noori N. Long-lead forecasting of monthly rainfall using large scale climate signals and statistical desegregation models. Paper presented at world environmental and water resources congress 2009.
27. Karamouz M., Fallahi M., Nazif S., Rahimi Farahani M. Long lead rainfall prediction using statistical downscaling and artificial neural network modeling. Sharif Univ Technol Trans A: Civil Eng 2009, 16(2)):165-172.
28. Kavetski D., Franks S.W., Kuczera G., et al. Confronting input uncertainty in environmental modeling. Calibration of watershed models 2003, vol. 6:49-68. AGU, Washington, DC, Water Sci. Appl. 10.1029/WS006p0049. Q. Duan (Ed.).
29. Kavetski D., Kuczera G., Franks S.W. Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory. Water Resour Res 2006, 42:W03407. 10.1029/2005WR004368.
30. Kavetski D., Kuczera G., Franks S.W. Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 2. Application. Water Resour Res 2006, 42:W03408. 10.1029/2005WR004376.
31. Kitanidis P.K., Bras R.L. Real-time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model: 2. Application and results. Water Resour Res 1980, 16(6):1034-1044. 10.1029/WR016i006p01034.
32. Kuczera G., Parent E. Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm. J Hydrol 1998, 211(1-4):69-85. 10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00198-X.
33. Lin G.F., Chen L.H. A non-linear rainfall-runoff model using radial basis function network. J Hydrol 2004, 289(1-4):1-8. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.10.015.
34. Lin Z.D., Lu R.Y. The ENSO's effect on eastern China rainfall in the following early summer. Adv Atmos Sci 2009, 26(2):333-342. 10.1007/s00376-009-0333-4.
35. Storm drainage and flood control needs Bronx River Basin 1975, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc, Westchester County, New York.
36. Mariotti A., Zeng N., Lau K.M. Euro-Mediterranean rainfall and ENSO_a seasonally varying relationship. Geophys Res Lett 2002, 29(12):59-1-59-4. 10.1029/2001GL014248.
37. Miller R.N., Ghil M., Ghautiez F. Advanced data assimilation in strongly nonlinear dynamical system. J Atmos Sci 1994, 51:1037-1055. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<1037:ADAISN>2.0.CO;2.
38. Moradkhani H., Hsu K.L., Gupta H., Sorooshian S. Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: sequential data assimilation using the particle filter. Water Resour Res 2005, 41:W05012. Washington, D.C.: AGU. 10.1029/2004WR003604.
39. Moradkhani H., Sorooshian S., Gupta H.V., Hauser P.R. Dual state-parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter. Adv Water Resour 2005, 28(2):135-147. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.09.002.
40. Moriasi D.N., Arnold J.G., Van Liew M.W, Bingner R.L., Harmel R.D., Veith T.L. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE 2007, 50(3):885-900.
41. Mason R.K., Price A., Tem Me. A neural network model of rainfall-runoff using radial basis functions. J Hydraul Res 1996, 34(4):537-548.
42. Nicholson S.E., Selato J.C. The influence of La Nina on African rainfall. Int J Climatol 2000, 20(14):1761-1776. 10.1002/1097-0088(20001130)20:14<1761::AID-JOC580>3.0.CO;2-W.
43. Peng H., Long F., Ding C. Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2005, 27(8):1226-1238.
44. Rohrer C.A., Roesner L.A. Matching the critical portion of the flow duration curve to minimize changes in modeled excess shear. Paper presented at 10th international conference on urban drainage 2005.
45. Rossman L.A. Storm water management model user's manual 2007, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, EPA/600/R-05/040.
46. Rousseeuw P.J. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Comput Appl Math 1987, 20:53-65. 10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7.
47. Shamseldin A.Y., O'Connor K.M., Liang G.C. Methods for combining the outputs of different rainfall-runoff models. J Hydrol 1997, 197:203-229. 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03259-3.
48. Shaw R.K., Reinhardt L., Isleib J. Bronx River watershed soil survey 2007, USDA-NRCS NYC Soil Survey, Bronx, New York.
49. She N., Chase A., Pang J. Evaluation of low impact development models for storm water flow reduction and demand management in Downtown Seattle. Paper presented at world environmental and water resources congress 2008, 10.1061/40976(316)54.
50. Singh J., Knapp H.V., Demissie M. Hydrologic modeling of the Iroquois River watershed using HSPF and SWAT, ISWS CR 2004-08. Champaign, Ill.: Illinois State Water Survey; 2004, Available at: www.sws.uiuc.edu/pubdoc/CR/ISWSCR2004-08.pdf.
51. Sousa S.I.V., Martins F.G., Alvim-Ferraz M.C.M., Pereira M.C. Multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks based on principal components to predict ozone concentrations. Environ Model Softw 2007, 22(1):97-103. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.002.
52. Spearman, J.R., Baugh, J., McCoy, M.J. (2004), Use of sub-grid approaches in the modeling of estuaries with salt marsh systems, Defra/Environment Agency Flood and Coastal Defence R&D Programme. Report TR138. HR Wallingford, CT. 64 pp.
53. Steinhaus H. Sur la division des corps matériels en parties (in French). Bull Acad Polon Sci 1957, 4(12):801-804. MR 0090073, Zbl 0079.16403.
54. Ter Braak C.J.F. A Markov Chain Monte Carlo version of the genetic algorithm differential evolution: easy Bayesian computing for real parameter spaces. Stat Comput 2006, 16(3):239-249. 10.1007/s11222-006-8769-1.
55. Ter Braak C.J.F., Vrugt J.A. Differential evolution Markov chain with snooker updater and fewer chains. Stat Comput 2008, 18(4):435-446. 10.1007/s11222-008-9104-9.
56. Theodoridis S., Koutroumbas K. Pattern recognition 1999, 482-483. Academic Press, New York.
57. Thomas L., John S.J. Bayesian methods: an analysis for statisticians and interdisciplinary 1999, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
58. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers New York District. (2010), Environmental assessment. Yonkers Avenue, Village of Tuckahoe. NY Section 14. Emergency Stream-bank Protection, New York.
59. Vrugt J.A., Gupta H.V., Bouten W., Sorooshian S. A shuffled complex evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters. Water Resour Res 2003, 39(8):1-1-1-14. 1201. 10.1029/2002WR001642.
60. Vrugt J.A., ter Braak C.J.F., Clark M.P., Hyman J.M., Robinson B.A. Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: doing hydrology backward with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. Water Resour Res 2008, 44(12):W00B09. 15 pp. 10.1029/2007WR006720.
61. Vrugt J.A., ter Braak C.J.F., Diks C.G.H., Schoups G. Hydrologic data assimilation using particle Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation: Theory, concepts and applications. Adv Water Resour 2012, 51:457-478. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.04.002.
62. Vrugt J.A., ter Braak C.J.F., Diks C.G.H., Robinson B.A., Hyman J.M. Accelerating Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomized subspace sampling. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 2008, 10(3):273-290. 10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.3.273.
63. Vrugt J.A., ter Braak C.F.F., Gupta H.V., Robinson B.A. Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 2008, 23(7):1011-1026. 10.1007/s00477-008-0274-y.
64. Wagener T., Boyle D.P., Lees M.J., Wheater H.S., Gupta H.V., Sorooshian S. A framework for development and application of hydrologic models. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2001, 5(1):13-26. 10.5194/hess-5-13-2001.
65. Wenhong L., Li L., Fu R., Deng Y., Wang H. Changes to the North Atlantic subtropical high and its role in the intensification of summer rainfall variability in the southeastern United States. Am Meteorol Soc 2010, 24(5):1499-1506. 10.1175/2010JCLI3829.1.
66. Willmott C.J., Ackleson S.G., Davis R.E., Feddema J.J., Klink K.M., Legates D.R., et al. Statistics for the evaluation of model performance. J Geophys Res 1985, 90(C5):8995-9005. 10.1029/JC090iC05p08995.
67. Xiong L., Shamseldin A.Y., O'Connor K.M. A non-linear combination of the forecasts of rainfall-runoff models by the first-order Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy system. J Hydrol 2001, 245(1-4):196-217. 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00349-3.