Disciplinary differences in the use of educational technology

Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Learning, ICEL

Volumn 2007-January, Issue , 2007, Pages 117-129

  Czerniewicz, Laura ^a   Brown, Cheryl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Disciplinary differences; Higher education; Information and communication technologies (ICTs)

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; E-LEARNING; EDUCATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION USE; STUDENTS; SURVEYS; TEACHING;

CONVERSATIONAL FRAMEWORKS; DISCIPLINARY DIFFERENCES; ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES; HIGHER EDUCATION; HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; INFORMATION SEEKING BEHAVIORS; TEACHING AND LEARNING;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 84938688145     PISSN: 20488882     EISSN: 20488890     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Baillie, C. & Percoco, G. (2001). A Study of Present Use and Usefulness of Computer Based Learning at a Technical University. European Journal of Engineering Education. 25(1): pp 33-43.
2. Becher, T. (1994). The Significance of Disciplinary Difference. Studies in Higher Education. 19(2): pp 151-162.
3. Biglan, A. (1973a). Relationships between Subject Matter Characteristics and the Structure and Output of University Departments. Journal of Applied Psychology. 57(3): pp 204-213.
4. Biglan, A. (1973b). The Characteristics of Subject Matter in Different Academic Areas. Journal of Applied Psychology. 57(3): pp 195-203.
5. Brown, C. & Czerniewicz, L. (2005). Access for All? Unpacking the Complexities of Access to ICTs for Diverse South African Higher Education Students. World Forum on Information Society. Tunis. International Research Foundation for Development.
6. Cantoni, V., Cellario, M. & Porta, M. (2004). Perspectives and Challenges in E-Learning: Towards Natural Interaction Paradigms. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing. 15: pp 333-345.
7. Czerniewicz, L., & Brown, C. (2006). The Virtual Möbius Strip. Centre for Educational Technology Research Report Series 1. University of Cape Town. [online]. Available: http://www.cet.uct.ac.za/projects/virtualmobius, [22 March 2007].
8. Czerniewicz, L. & Brown, C. (2005). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Use in Teaching and Learning Practices in Western Cape Higher Education Institutions. Perspectives in Education. 23(4): pp 1-18.
9. Freed, G. (2004). Accessible Multimedia in E-Books. Technology And Persons With Disabilities Conference. California State University Northridge. [online]. Available: http://www.csun.edu/cod/conf/2004/proceedings/csun04.htm, [12 June 2006].
10. Fry, J. (2004). The Cultural Shaping of ICTs within Academic Fields: Corpus Based Linguistics as a Case Study. Literary and Linguistic Computing. 19(3):303-320.
11. Fry, J. (2006). Scholarly Research and Information Practices: A Domain Analytical Approach. Information Processing and Management. 42(1): pp 299-316.
12. Greenhalgh, T. (2006). Computer Assisted Learning in Undergraduate Medical Education. British Medical Journal. 322: pp 40-44.
13. Hammond, N. & Bennett, C. (2002). Discipline Differences in Role and Use of ICT to Support Group-Based Learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 18: pp 55-63.
14. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching. 2nd Edition. Routledge Falmer Taylor & Francis Group: London.
15. Neumann, R. (2001). Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching. Studies in Higher Education. 26(2): pp 135-147.
16. Neumann, R. & Becher, T. (2002). Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Context: A Conceptual Analysis. Studies in Higher Education. 27(4): pp 405-417.
17. Sayed, Y. (1998). The Segregated Information Highway: Information Literacy in Higher Education. University of Cape Town Press: Cape Town.
18. Smeby, J. (1996). Disciplinary Difference in University Teaching. Studies in Higher Education. 21(1):69-79.
19. Urquhart, C., Thomas, R., Armstrong, C., Fenton, R., Lonsdale, R., Spink, S. & Yeoman, A. (2003). Uptake and Use of Electronic Information Services: Trends in UK Higher Education. Electronic Library and Information Systems 37(3): pp 168-180.
20. Ward, J., Gordon, J., Field, M. & Lehmann, H. (2001). Communication and Information Technology in Medical Education. Medical Education Quartet. 357: pp 792-796.
21. Whitmire, E. (2002). Disciplinary Difference and Undergraduates Information Seeking Behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(8): pp 631-638.
22. Williams, D., Coles, L., Wilson, K., Richardson, A. & Tuson, J. (2000). Teachers and ICT: Current and Future Trends. British Journal of Educational Technology. 31(4): pp 307-320.