The uses of information and communication (ICT) in teaching and learning in South African higher education practices in the Western Cape

Perspectives in Education

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 1-18

  Czerniewicz, Laura ^a   Brown, Cheryl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645687221     PISSN: 02582236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Baillie C & Percoco G 2001. A study of present use and usefulness of computer based learning at a technical university. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 33-43.
2. Benjamin P 2000. Telecentres 2000, Report 2: International Case Studies, DRA Development and Link Centre, Johannesburg.
3. Bernstein B 2001. Official knowledge and pedagogic identities: The politics of recontextualisation in pedagogic symbolic control and identity - theory, research, critique. Revised Edition. New York: Rownman and Littlefield Publishers.
4. Brown C & Czerniewicz L 2004. Access to computers: Factors hindering and encouraging use of computers for teaching and e-learning in five regional higher education institutions in South Africa. In Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2004. 1800-1805. Norfolk, VA: AACE.
5. Bonk C, Cummings J, Hara N, Fischler N & Lee S 2000. A Ten Level Web Integration Continuum for higher education. In B Abbey (ed.), Instructional and cognitive impacts of web-based education. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
6. Burbules N & Callister T 2000. Watch IT: The risks and promises of information technology for education. Colorado: Westview Press.
7. Britain S & Liber O 2004. A framework for the pedagogical evaluation of e-learning environments. Available at http://www.cetis.ac.uk/members/ pedagogy/files/4thMeet_framework/VLEfullReport Accessed [20 October 2005].
8. Cantoni V, Cellario M & Porta M 2004. Perspectives and challenges in e-learning: Towards natural interaction paradigms. Journal of visual languages and computing, 15, 333-345.
9. Castells M, Flecha R, Freire P, Giroux HA, Macedo D & Willis P 1999. Critical education in the new information age. New York and Oxford: Bowman and Littlefield Publishers.
10. Collis B, Peters O & Pals N 2001. A model for predicting the educational use of information and communication technologies. Instructional Science, 29, 95-125.
11. Conole G, Dyke M, Oliver M & Seale J 2004. Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers and Education, 43, 17-33.
12. Czerniewicz L & Brown C 2005. Access to ICTs for teaching and learning - from single artefact to interrelated resources. IJEDICT, 1(2), 42-56.
13. Czerniewicz L, Ravjee N & Mlitwa N 2005. Mapping the landscape of ICTs in higher education in South Africa, Report for the Council for Higher Education.
14. Department of Arts, Culture, Science and Technology 2002. South Africa's National Research and Development (R&D) Strategy, August 2002. Republic of South Africa, Pretoria: Government Printers.
15. Department of Education 2001. National Plan for Higher Education. Government of South Africa, Pretoria: Government Printers.
16. Department of Education 2003b. White Paper on e-Education: Transforming learning and teaching through ICT. Pretoria: Government Printers.
17. Department of Science and Technology 2002. National research and technology foresight ICT report. http://www.dst.gov.za/reports/forsight_reports. htm Accessed [9 May 2005]
18. Derbyshire. H (2003) Gender Issues in the Use of Computers in Education in Africa, Imfundo, available at http://imfundo.digitalbrain.com/imfundo/web/ learn/documents/Gender%20Report.pdf Accessed [20 October 2005]
19. Freed G 2004. Accessible multimedia in e-books. Technology and persons with eisabilities conference. California State University Northridge., available at http://www.csun.edu/cod/conf/2004/proceedings/csun04.htm Accessed [20 October 2005].
20. Henning,E & van der Westhuizen D 2004. Crossing the digital divide safely and trustingly: How ecologies of learning scaffold the journey. Computers & Education, 42(4), 333-352.
21. Garrison DR & Anderson T 2002. E-Learning in the 21st Century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge Falmer Taylor &. Francis Group.
22. Hammond N & Bennett C 2002. Discipline difference in role and use of ICT to support group-based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18 (1), 55-63.
23. Issroff K & Scanlon E 2002. Using technology in higher education: An Activity Theory perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18 (1), 77-83.
24. Johnson S & Aragon S 2003. An instructional Strategy framework for online learning environments. In SA Aragon (ed.), Facilitating learning in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 10, 31-44. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Kling R 2000. Learning about Information Technologies and social change: The contribution of social informatics. The Information Society, 16(3), 217-232.
26. Lamb R & Johnston S 2004. Social aspects of digital information in perspective. Journal of Digital Information, 5(4). Available at http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v05/i04/editorial Accessed [20 October 2005].
27. Laurillard D 2000. Mainstreaming learning technologies: The role of practice, policy and partnership. Keynote address at ALT-C 2000 Conference.
28. nd Edition. London: Routledge/Falmer.
29. Laurillard D 2005. Harnessing technology to improve the learning experience. HEA Conference June 2005.
30. Lim CP 2002. A theoretical framework for the study of ICT in schools: a proposal. British Journal of Educational technology, 33(4), 411-421.
31. Loveless A, DeVoogd G & Bohlin R 2001. Something old, something new: Is pedagogy affected by ICT. In A Loveless and V Ellis (eds), ICT, pedagogy and the curriculum. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
32. Lusted D 1986. Why pedagogy? Screen, 27(5), 2-14. Accessed at http://www2.newpaltz.edu/kaufmanp/
33. Mason R 1998. Models of online courses. ALN Magazine 2.2. Available at http://www.aln.org/publications/magazine/v2n2/mason.asp. Accessed [20 October 2005].
34. Mwanza D & Engestrom Y 2003. Pedagogical adeptness in the design of e-learning environments: Experiences from the Lab@Future Project. In Rossett A (ed.) Proceedings of E-Learn 2003 International Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education. Phoenix, USA, 1344-1347. Available at http://www.edu.helsinki.fi/activity/pages/files/ research/lab/Daisy-Yrjo-Elearn03.pdf Accesssed [20 October 2005].
35. Norris C, Sullivan T & Poirot J 2003. No access, no use, no impact: snapshot surveys of educational technology in K-12. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 23(1), 15-27.
36. Oliver M (n.d.). What's the purpose of theory in learning technology? Available at http://homepages.unl.ac.uk/cookj/alt_lt/Oliver.htm Accessed [20 October 2005].
37. Paterson A 2004. The impact of institutional mergers on information systems and blended learning provision in Southern African higher education. Presented at Emerge2004 online conference, http://www.emerge2004.net. Accessed [14 September 2004].
38. st century: Revisiting and rethinking the role of theory. European Journal of Education, 36(2), 133-156.
39. Sawyer S & Crowston K 2004 Information systems in organizations and society: Speculating on the next 25 years. In Bonnie K, Truex D, Wastell D & Wood-Harper T (eds). Relevant theory and informed practice: Looking forward from a 20-year perspective on IS research. London: Kluwer, 35-52.
40. Sayed Y 1998. The segregated information highway: Information literacy in higher education. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.
41. Sewell WH 1992. A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1-29.
42. Snyder I 1998. New literacies for the Twenty-First Century from page to screen paper delivered at the learning technologies in schools. Conference, Melbourne.
43. Tolmie A 2001. Examining learning in relation to the contexts of use in ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 235-241.
44. Van der Westhuizen D 2004. Online learning in the South African context: A meta-analysis of research trends, issues and topics. Proceedings of the 2002 SASE conference. South African Society for Education, Pretoria.
45. Warschauer M 2002. Reconceptualising the digital divide [online]. Available at http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue7_7/warschauer/ First Monday 7(7). Accessed on [17 June 2004].
46. Warschauer M 2003a. Demystifying the digital divide. Scientific American. August. 289(2), 42-47. Available at http://www.gse.uci.edu/markw/papers.html Accessed on [17 June 2004].
47. Warschauer M 2003b. Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
48. Williams D, Coles L, Wilson K, Richardson A & Tuson J 2000. Teachers and ICT: Current and future trends. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 307-320.