Molecular basis for 5-carboxycytosine recognition by RNA polymerase II elongation complex

Nature

Volumn 523, Issue 7562, 2015, Pages 621-625

  Wang, Lanfeng ^a   Zhou, Yu ^b   Xu, Liang ^a   Xiao, Rui ^b   Lu, Xingyu ^c   Chen, Liang ^b   Chong, Jenny ^a   Li, Hairi ^b   He, Chuan ^c   Fu, Xiang Dong ^b   Wang, Dong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

5 CARBOXYCYTOSINE; CARBOXYL GROUP; NUCLEOSIDE TRIPHOSPHATE; RNA POLYMERASE II; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; 5-CARBOXYLCYTOSINE; 5-FORMYLCYTOSINE; 5-HYDROXYMETHYLCYTOSINE; CYTOSINE; THYMINE DNA GLYCOSYLASE;

CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DNA; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; RNA; X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY; YEAST;

ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DNA MODIFICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; HYDROGEN BOND; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRANSCRIPTION ELONGATION; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; CHEMISTRY; DNA METHYLATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA TEMPLATE; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; KINETICS; METABOLISM; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; CYTOSINE; DNA METHYLATION; DNA REPAIR; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; HYDROGEN BONDING; KINETICS; RNA POLYMERASE II; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; TEMPLATES, GENETIC; THYMINE DNA GLYCOSYLASE; TRANSCRIPTION ELONGATION, GENETIC;

EID: 84938411464     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature14482     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Pastor, W. A., Aravind, L. & Rao, A. TETonic shift: biological roles of TET proteins in DNA demethylation and transcription. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 341-356 (2013).
2. Wu, H. & Zhang, Y. Reversing DNA methylation: mechanisms, genomics, and biological functions. Cell 156, 45-68 (2014).
3. Tahiliani, M., et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science 324, 930-935 (2009).
4. Pfaffeneder, T., et al. The discovery of5-formylcytosineinembryonic stemcellDNA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 50, 7008-7012 (2011).
5. Ito, S., et al. Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science 333, 1300-1303 (2011).
6. He, Y. F., et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science 333, 1303-1307 (2011).
7. Song, C. X., et al. Genome-wide profiling of 5-formylcytosine reveals its roles in epigenetic priming. Cell 153, 678-691 (2013).
8. Shen, L., et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals TET- and TDG-dependent 5-methylcytosine oxidation dynamics. Cell 153, 692-706 (2013).
9. Klose, R. J. & Bird, A. P. Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31, 89-97 (2006).
10. Moore, L. D., Le, T. & Fan, G. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology 38, 23-38 (2013).
11. Spruijt, C. G., et al. Dynamic readers for 5-(hydroxy)methylcytosine and its oxidized derivatives. Cell 152, 1146-1159 (2013).
12. Iurlaro, M., et al. A screen for hydroxymethylcytosine and formylcytosine binding proteins suggests functions in transcription and chromatin regulation. Genome Biol. 14, R119 (2013).
13. Hashimoto, H., et al. Wilms tumor protein recognizes 5-carboxylcytosine within a specific DNA sequence. Genes Dev. 28, 2304-2313 (2014).
14. Kellinger, M. W., et al. 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine reduce the rate and substrate specificity ofRNA polymerase II transcription. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 831-833 (2012).
15. Huang, Y. &Rao, A. Newfunctions forDNAmodifications byTET-JBP. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1061-1064 (2012).
16. Cramer, P., Bushnell, D. A. & Kornberg, R. D. Structural basis of transcription: RNA polymerase II at 2. 8A° ngstrom resolution. Science 292, 1863-1876 (2001).
17. Wang, D., Bushnell, D. A., Westover, K. D., Kaplan, C. D. & Kornberg, R. D. Structural basis of transcription: role of the trigger loop in substrate specificity and catalysis. Cell 127, 941-954 (2006).
18. Brueckner, F. & Cramer, P. Structural basis of transcription inhibition by a-amanitin and implications for RNA polymerase II translocation. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 811-818 (2008).
19. van Luenen, H. G., et al. Glucosylated hydroxymethyluracil, DNA base J, prevents transcriptional readthrough in Leishmania. Cell 150, 909-921 (2012).
20. Iyer, L. M., et al. Lineage-specific expansions of TET/JBP genes and a new class of DNA transposons shape fungal genomic and epigenetic landscapes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1676-1683 (2014).
21. Korzheva, N., et al. A structural model of transcription elongation. Science 289, 619-625 (2000).
22. Silva, D. A., et al. Milliseconddynamics ofRNA polymerase II translocation at atomic resolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7665-7670 (2014).
23. Wang, D., Zhu, G. Y., Huang, X. H. & Lippard, S. J. X-ray structure and mechanismof RNA polymerase II stalled at an antineoplastic monofunctional platinum-DNA adduct. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9584-9589 (2010).
24. Walmacq, C., et al. Mechanism of translesion transcription by RNA polymerase II and its role in cellular resistance to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 46, 18-29 (2012).
25. Weixlbaumer, A., Leon, K., Landick, R. & Darst, S. A. Structural basis of transcriptional pausing in bacteria. Cell 152, 431-441 (2013).
26. Lindsey-Boltz, L. A. & Sancar, A. RNA polymerase: the most specific damage recognition protein in cellular responses toDNAdamage? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13213-13214 (2007).
27. Hanawalt, P. C. & Spivak, G. Transcription-coupled DNA repair: two decades of progress and surprises. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 958-970 (2008).
28. Zhang, L., et al. Thymine DNA glycosylase specifically recognizes 5-carboxylcytosine-modified DNA. Nature Chem. Biol. 8, 328-330 (2012).
29. Polymenidou, M., et al. Long pre-mRNA depletion and RNA missplicing contribute to neuronal vulnerability from loss of TDP-43. Nature Neurosci. 14, 459-468 (2011).
30. Sarker, A. H., et al. Recognition of RNA polymerase II and transcription bubbles by XPG, CSB, and TFIIH: insights for transcription-coupled repair and Cockayne syndrome. Mol. Cell 20, 187-198 (2005).
31. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326 (1997).
32. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126-2132 (2004).
33. Adams, P. D., et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213-221 (2010).
34. DeLano, W. L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (DeLano Scientific, 2002).
35. Core, L. J., Waterfall, J. J. & Lis, J. T. Nascent RNA sequencing reveals widespread pausing and divergent initiation at human promoters. Science 322, 1845-1848 (2008).
36. Wang, D., et al. Reprogramming transcription by distinct classes of enhancers functionally defined by eRNA. Nature 474, 390-394 (2011).
37. Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. &Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast andmemory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
38. Karolchik, D., et al. The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2014 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D764-D770 (2014).