Evolution of dosage compensation under sexual selection differs between X and Z chromosomes

Nature Communications

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Mullon, Charles ^a,b   Wright, Alison E ^a,c   Reuter, Max ^a   Pomiankowski, Andrew ^a   Mank, Judith E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTOME;

BIRD; CHROMOSOME; GAMETE; GENE EXPRESSION; MUTATION; RNA; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ALLELE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC MODEL; GENOTYPE; MALE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PURIFYING SELECTION; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEX CHROMOSOME; SEXUAL SELECTION; X CHROMOSOME; ANIMAL; CHICKEN; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; DOSAGE COMPENSATION, GENETIC; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MALE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX CHROMOSOMES; X CHROMOSOME; X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION;

EID: 84938379720     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8720     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Bachtrog, D. Y-chromosome evolution: emerging insights into processes of Y-chromosome degeneration. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 113-124 (2013).
2. Pollack, J. R. et al. Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12963-12968 (2002).
3. Torres, E. M., Williams, B. R. & Amon, A. Aneuploidy cells losing their balance. Genetics 179, 737-746 (2008).
4. Ohno, S. Sex Chromosomes and Sex Linked Genes (Springer-Verlag, 1967).
5. Charlesworth, B. Model for the evolution of Y chromosomes and dosage compensation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 75, 5618-5622 (1978).
6. Gelbart, M. E. & Kuroda, M. I. Drosophila dosage compensation: a complex voyage to the X chromosome. Development 136, 1399-1410 (2009).
7. Straub, T. & Becker, P. B. Dosage compensation: the beginning and end of generalization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 47-57 (2007).
8. Reinke, V., Gil, I. S., Ward, S. & Kazmer, K. Genome-wide germline-enriched and sex-biased expression profiles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 131, 311-323 (2004).
9. Ercan, S. et al. X chromosome repression by localization of the C elegans dosage compensation machinery to sites of transcription initiation. Nat. Genet. 39, 403-408 (2007).
10. Smith, G., Chen, Y.-R., Blissard, G. W. & Briscoe, A. D. Complete dosage compensation and sex-biased gene expression in the moth Manduca sexta. Genome Biol. Evol. 6, 526-537 (2014).
11. Bachtrog, D. et al. Sex determination: why so many ways of doing it? PLoS Biol. 12, e1001899 (2014).
12. Marín, I., Siegal, M. L. & Baker, B. S. The evolution of dosage-compensation mechanisms. Bioessays 22, 1106-1114 (2000).
13. Griffin, R. M., Dean, R., Grace, J. L., Rydén, P. & Friberg, U. The shared genome is a pervasive constraint on the evolution of sex-biased gene expression. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2168-2176 (2013).
14. Innocenti, P. & Chenoweth, S. F. Interspecific divergence of transcription networks along lines of genetic variance in Drosophila: dimensionality, evolvability, and constraint. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 1358-1367 (2013).
15. Rice, W. R. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38, 735-742 (1984).
16. Mullon, C., Pomiankowski, A. & Reuter, M. The effects of selection and genetic drift on the genomic distribution of sexually antagonistic alleles. Evolution 66, 3743-3753 (2012).
17. Mank, J. E. The W, X, Y and Z of sex chromosome dosage compensation. Trends Genet. 25, 226-233 (2009).
18. Clutton-Brock, T. H. The Evolution of Parental Care (Princeton Univ. Press, 1991).
19. Andersson, M. Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ. Press, 1994).
20. Charlesworth, B., Coyne, J. A. & Barton, N. H. The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. Am. Nat. 130, 113-146 (1987).
21. Mank, J. E., Vicoso, B., Berlin, S. & Charlesworth, B. Effective population size and the Faster-X Effect: Empirical results and their interpretation. Evolution 64, 663-674 (2010).
22. Mank, J. E., Nam, K., Brunström, B. & Ellegren, H. Ontogenetic complexity of sexual dimorphism and sex-specific selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 1570-1578 (2010).
23. Brawand, D. et al. The evolution of gene expression levels in mammalian organs. Nature 478, 343-348 (2011).
24. Nunney, L. The influence of mating system and overlapping generations on effective population size. Evolution 47, 1329-1341 (1993).
25. Arnold, S. J. & Wade, M. J. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38, 720-734 (1984).
26. Agrawal, A. F. Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction. Nature 411, 692-695 (2001).
27. Rowe, L. & Houle, D. The Lek Paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263, 1415-1421 (1996).
28. Cotton, S., Fowler, K. & Pomiankowski, A. Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? Proc. R Soc. Lond. Ser. B 271, 771-783 (2004).
29. Nomura, T. Effective size of populations with unequal sex ratio and variation in mating success. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 119, 297-310 (2002).
30. Arnold, A. P., Itoh, Y. & Melamed, E. A bird's-eye view of sex chromosome dosage compensation. Ann. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 9, 109-127 (2008).
31. Romero, I. G., Ruvinsky, I. & Gilad, Y. Comparative studies of gene expression and the evolution of gene regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 505-516 (2012).
32. Moghadam, H. K., Pointer, M. A., Wright, A. E., Berlin, S. & Mank, J. E. W chromosome expression responds to female-specific selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8207-8211 (2012).
33. Nuzhdin, S. V., Wayne, M. L., Harmon, K. L. & McIntyre, L. M. Common pattern of evolution of gene expression level and protein sequence in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1308-1317 (2004).
34. Ometto, L., Shoemaker, D., Ross, K. G. & Keller, L. Evolution of gene expression in fire ants: the effects of developmental stage, caste, and species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 1381-1392 (2011).
35. Harrison, P. W. et al. Sexual selection drives evolution and rapid turnover of male gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4393-4398 (2015).
36. Gout, J.-F., Kahn, D., Duret, L. & Paramecium Post-Genomics Consortium. The relationship among gene expression, the evolution of gene dosage, and the rate of protein evolution. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000944 (2010).
37. Jordan, I. K., Mariño-Ramírez, L. & Koonin, E. V. Evolutionary significance of gene expression divergence. Gene 345, 119-126 (2005).
38. Khaitovich, P. et al. Parallel patterns of evolution in the genomes and transcriptomes of humans and chimpanzees. Science 309, 1850-1854 (2005).
39. Blekhman, R., Oshlack, A., Chabot, A. E., Smyth, G. K. & Gilad, Y. Gene regulation in primates evolves under tissue-specific selection pressures. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000271 (2008).
40. Lemos, B., Bettencourt, B. R., Meiklejohn, C. D. & Hartl, D. L. Evolution of proteins and gene expression levels are coupled in Drosophila and are independently associated with mRNA abundance, protein length, and number of protein-protein interactions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1345-1354 (2005).
41. Hunt, B. G., Ometto, L., Keller, L. & Goodisman, M. A. D. Evolution at two levels in fire ants: the relationship between patterns of gene expression and protein sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 263-271 (2012).
42. Drummond, D. A., Bloom, J. D., Adami, C., Wilke, C. O. & Arnold, F. H. Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 14338-14343 (2005).
43. Wright, A. E., Moghadam, H. K. & Mank, J. E. Trade-off between selection for dosage compensation and masculinization on the avian Z chromosome. Genetics 192, 1433-1445 (2012).
44. Pomiankowski, A. & Moller, A. P. A resolution of the Lek Paradox. Proc. R Soc. Lond. Ser. B 260, 21-29 (1995).
45. Sharp, N. P. & Agrawal, A. F. Male-biased fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 67, 1189-1195 (2013).
46. Connallon, T. & Clark, A. G. Association between sex-biased gene expression and mutations with sex-specific phenotypic consequences in Drosophila. Genome Biol. Evol. 3, 151-155 (2011).
47. Prince, E. G., Kirkland, D. & Demuth, J. P. Hyperexpression of the X chromosome in both sexes results in extensive female bias of X-linked genes in the Flour Beetle. Genome Biol. Evol. 2, 336-346 (2010).
48. Pessia, E., Makino, T., Bailly-Bechet, M., McLysaght, A. & Marais, G. A. B. Mammalian X chromosome inactivation evolved as a dosage-compensation mechanism for dosage-sensitive genes on the X chromosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 5346-5351 (2012).
49. Chuang, P.-T., Lieb, J. D. & Meyer, B. J. Sex-specific assembly of a dosage compensation complex on the nematode X chromosome. Science 274, 1736-1739 (1996).
50. Gladstein, N., McKeon, M. N. & Horabin, J. I. Requirement of male-specific dosage compensation in Drosophila females - implications of early X chromosome gene expression. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001041 (2010).
51. Vicoso, B. & Charlesworth, B. Effective population size and the faster-X effect: an extended model. Evolution 63, 2413-2426 (2009).
52. Champagnat, N. & Lambert, A. Evolution of discrete populations and the canonical diffusion of adaptive dynamics. Ann. Appl. Prob. 17, 102-155 (2007).
53. Lehmann, L. The stationary distribution of a continuously varying strategy in a class-structured population under mutation-selection-drift balance. J. Evol. Biol. 25, 770-787 (2012).
54. Hughes, K. A. et al. Segregating variation in the transcriptome: cis regulation and additivity of effects. Genetics 173, 1347-1355 (2006).
55. Kelley, R. L. et al. Epigenetic spreading of the Drosophila dosage compensation complex from roX RNA genes into flanking chromatin. Cell 98, 513-522 (1999).
56. Bachtrog, D. Positive selection at the binding sites of the male-specific lethal complex involved in dosage compensation in Drosophila. Genetics 180, 1123-1129 (2008).
57. Ewens, W. J. Mathematical Population Genetics: I. Theoretical Introduction (Springer, 2004).
58. Gardiner, C. Stochastic Methods: A Handbook for the Natural and Social Sciences (Springer, 2009).
59. Andrew, S. Babraham Bioinformatics http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
60. Lohse, M. et al. RobiNA: a user-friendly, integrated software solution for RNA-Seq-based transcriptomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, W622-W627 (2012).
61. Trapnell, C., Pachter, L. & Salzberg, S. L. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25, 1105-1111 (2009).
62. Kim, D. et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14, 1-13 (2013).
63. Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, 1-10 (2009).
64. Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079 (2009).
65. Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139-140 (2010).
66. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410 (1990).
67. Löytynoja, A. & Goldman, N. An algorithm for progressive multiple alignment of sequences with insertions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10557-10562 (2005).
68. Yang, Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586-1591 (2007).
69. Axelsson, E. et al. Natural selection in avian protein-coding genes expressed in brain. Mol. Ecol. 17, 3008-3017 (2008).