School meal acceptance depends on the dish, student, and context

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 46, Issue , 2016, Pages 126-136

  Tuorila, Hely ^a   Palmujoki, Ingela ^a   Kytö, Elina ^a   Törnwall, Outi ^a   Vehkalahti, Kimmo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Acceptance; CATA; School meal; Sensory attributes; Teenage

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938341495     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.07.013     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Andersen B.V., Hyldig G. Food satisfaction: Integrating feelings before, during and after food intake. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 43:126-134.
2. Ares G., Jaeger S. Check-all-that-apply questions: Influence of attribute order on sensory product characterization. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 28:141-163.
3. Bell R., Meiselman H.L., Pierson B.J., Reeve R.W.G. Effects of adding an Italian theme to a restaurant on the perceived ethnicity, acceptability, and selection of foods. Appetite 1994, 22:11-24.
4. Benn J., Carlsson M. Learning through school meals?. Appetite 2014, 78:23-31.
5. Cabanac M. Sensory pleasure. Quarterly Review of Biology 1979, 54:1-29.
6. Caporale G., Policastro S., Tuorila H., Monteleone E. Hedonic ratings and consumption of school lunch among preschool children. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:482-489.
7. Cardello A.V., Meiselman H.L., Schutz H.G., Craig C., Given Z., Lesher L.L., et al. Measuring emotional responses to foods and food names using questionnaires. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24:243-250.
8. Chen A.W., Resurrection A.V.A., Paguio L.P. Age appropriate hedonic scales to measure food preferences of young children. Journal of Sensory Studies 1996, 11:141-163.
9. Cohen J.F.W., Richardson S., Parker E., Catalano P.J., Rimm E.B. Impact of the new U.S. Department of Agriculture school meal standards on food selection, consumption, and waste. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2014, 46:388-394.
10. Edwards J.S.E., Hartwell H.J. Institutional meals. Meals in science and practice. Interdisciplinary research and business applications 2009, 102-127. Woodhead, Cambridge. H.L. Meiselman (Ed.).
11. Finnish National Board of Education. (2014). School Meals in Finland. http://www.oph.fi/download/155535_School_meals_in_finland.pdf.
12. Gmuer A., Nuessli Guth J., Runte M., Siegrist M. From emotion to language: Application of a systematic, linguistic-based approach to design a food-associated emotion lexicon. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 40:77-86.
13. Greenacre Michael Correspondence analysis in practice 2007, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL. 2nd ed.
14. Guinard J.-X. Sensory and consumer testing with children. Trends in Food Science and Technology 2001, 11:273-283.
15. Hewstone M. Attribution theory. Social and functional extensions 1983, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
16. Hill A.J., Magson L.D., Blundell J.E. Hunger and palatability: Tracking ratings of subjective experience before, during and after the consumption of preferred and less preferred food. Appetite 1984, 5:361-371.
17. Hummel T., Rosenheim K., Konnerth C.-G., Kobal G. Screening of olfactory function with a four-minute odor identification test: Reliability, normative data, and investigations in patients with olfactory loss. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 2001, 110:976-981.
18. James C.E., Laing D.G., Oram N. A comparison of the ability of 8-9-year-old children and adults to detect taste stimuli. Physiology & Behavior 1997, 62:193-197.
19. Kainulainen K., Benn J., Fjellström C., Palojoki P. Nordic adolescents' school lunch patterns and their suggestions for making healthy choices at school easier. Appetite 2012, 59:53-62.
20. King E.S., Hopfer H., Haug M.T., Orsi J.D., Heymann H., Crisosto G.M., et al. Describing the appearance and flavor profiles of fresh figs (Ficus carica L.) cultivars. Journal of Food Science 2012, 77:419-429.
21. Knaapila A., Silventoinen K., Broms U., Rose R.J., Perola M., Kaprio J., et al. Food neophobia in young adults: Genetic architecture and relation to personality, pleasantness and use frequency of foods, and body mass index - A twin study. Behavior Genetics 2011, 41:512-521.
22. Laureati M., Bergamaschi V., Pagliarini E. Assessing childhood food neophobia: Validation of a scale in Italian primary school children. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 40:8-15.
23. Laureati M., Morin-Audebrand L., Pagliarini E., Sulmont-Rosse C., Köster E.P., Mojet J. Food memory and its relation with age and liking: An incidental learning experiment with children, young and elderly people. Appetite 2008, 51:273-282.
24. Lawless H.T., Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food. Principles and practices 2010, Springer, New York. 2nd ed.
25. Marcelino A.S., Adam A.S., Couronne T., Köster E.P., Sieffermann J.M. Internal and external determinants of eating initiations in humans. Appetite 2001, 36:9-14.
26. Marlette M.A., Templeton S.B., Panemangalore M. Food type, food preparation, and competitive food purchases impact school lunch plate waste by sixth-grade students. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2005, 105:1779-1782.
27. Meals in science and practice. Interdisciplinary research and business applications 2009, Woodhead, Cambridge. H.L. Meiselman (Ed.).
28. Millimet D.L., Tchernis R., Husain M. School nutrition programs and the incidence of childhood obesity. Journal of Human Resources 2010, 45:640-654.
29. Monteleone E., Dinnella C. Italian meals. Meals in science and practice. Interdisciplinary research and business applications 2009, 359-376. Woodhead, Cambridge. H.L. Meiselman (Ed.).
30. Mustonen S., Oerlemans P., Tuorila H. Familiarity with and affective responses to foods in 8-11-year-old children. The role of food neophobia and parental education. Appetite 2012, 58:777-780.
31. Mustonen S., Rantanen R., Tuorila H. Effect of sensory education on school children's food perception: A 2-year follow-up study. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:230-240.
32. Noble C., Corney M., Eves A., Kipps M., Lumbers M. Food choice and school meals: Primary school children's perceptions of the healthiness of foods and nutritional implications of food choices. Hospitality Management 2000, 19. 413-332.
33. Nu C.T., MacLeod P., Barthelemy J. Effects of age and gender on adolescents' food habits and preferences. Food Quality and Preference 1996, 7:251-262.
34. Pagliarini E., Gabbiadini N., Ratti S. Consumer testing with children on food combinations for school lunch. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16:131-138.
35. Pliner P., Hobden K. Development of a scale to measure the trait food neophobia in humans. Appetite 1992, 19:105-120.
36. Pliner P., Salvy S.-J. Food neophobia in humans. The psychology of food choice 2006, 75-92. CABI, Oxfordshire. R. Shepherd, M. Raats (Eds.).
37. Persson Osowski C., Göranzon H., Fjellström C. Teachers' interaction with children in the school meal situation: The example of pedagogic meals in Sweden. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 2013, 45:420-427.
38. R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
39. Ryynänen S., Tuorila H., Hyvönen L. Perceived temperature effects on microwave heated meals and meal components. Food Service Technology 2001, 1:141-148.
40. Salter, C. A., Sherman, D., Adams, S., & Rock, K. L. (1990). Feeding concept, military vs civilian system. Technical Report, Natick/TR-91/011.
41. School lunch standards in Europe. (2012). Food Today, No. 83. European Food Information Council. http://www.eufic.org/page/en/page/FTARCHIVE.
42. School Meal Recommendation (2008). National Nutrition Council. in Finnish. http://www.mmm.fi/ravitsemusneuvottelukunta.
43. Spence C., Piqueras-Fiszman B. The perfect meal. The multisensory science of food and dining 2014, Wiley Blackwell, Oxford.
44. Tikkanen I., Urho U.-M. Free school meals, the plate model and food choices in Finland. British Food Journal 2009, 111:102-119.
45. Tilles-Tirkkonen T., Pentikäinen S., Lappi J., Karhunen L., Poutanen K., Mykkänen H. The quality of school lunch consumed reflects overall eating patterns in 11-16-year-old schoolchildren in Finland. Public Health Nutrition 2011, 14:2092-2098.
46. Valentin D., Chollet S., Lelievre M., Abdi H. Quick and dirty but still pretty good: A review of new descriptive methods in food science. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2012, 47:1563-1578.
47. Varela P., Ares G. Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization. Food Research International 2012, 48:893-908.
48. Williamson D.A., Han H., Johnson W.D., Martin C.K., Newton R.L. Modification of the school cafeteria environment can impact childhood nutrition. Results from the Wise Mind and LA Health studies. Appetite 2013, 61:77-84.