Multimedia educative curriculum materials: Designing digital supports for learning to teach scientific argumentation

Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS

Volumn 2, Issue January, 2014, Pages 1117-1121

  Loper, Suzanna ^a   McNeill, Katherine L ^b   Peck, Raphaela ^a   Price, Jeremy ^c   Barber, Jacqueline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

^c FAIRMONT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; EDUCATION;

DESIGN FRAMEWORKS; EDUCATIVE CURRICULUMS; FOCUS GROUPS; ITERATIVE DESIGN; MIDDLE SCHOOL SCIENCE; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS; WORK IN PROGRESS;

TEACHING;

EID: 84937699987     PISSN: 18149316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Berland, L. K. & Reiser, B. J. (2011). Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95, 191-216.
2. Cervetti, G. N., Kulikowich, J., Drummond, M., & Billman, A. (2013). Influence of educative curriculum materials on teachers' learning and teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA.
3. Charmaz, K. (1994). Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Doyle, W., & Ponder, G. (1978). The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making. Interchange, 8(3), 1-12.
5. Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3-14.
6. Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43-76.
7. Ford, M. J. (2012). A dialogic account of sense-making in scientific argumentation and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 30(3), 207-245.
8. Lieberman, A. & Mace, D. P. (2010). Making practice public: Teacher learning in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 77-88.
9. McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on k-12 teachers. Science Education, 97, 937-972.
10. McNeill, K. L., Katsh-Singer, R., Gonzalez-Howard, M., Price, J. F., & Loper, S. (2013). Factors that impact teachers' argumentation instruction in their classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA.
11. McNeill, K. L., Gonzalez-Howard, M. Katsh-Singer, R., Price, J. F. & Loper, S. (2013). Teachers' beliefs and practices around argumentation during a curriculum enactment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Rio Grande, Puerto Rico.
12. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
14. Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328, 463-466.
15. Roth, K. J., Garnier, H. E., Chen, C., Lemmens, M., Schwille, K., & Wickler, N. I. Z. (2011). Videobased lesson analysis: Effective science PD for teacher and student learning. Journal of research in science teaching, 48(2), 117-148.
16. Sampson, V. & Blanchard, M. (2012). Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1122-1148.
17. Sandoval, W. A. (2004). Developing learning theory by refining conjectures embodied in educational designs. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 213-223.
18. van den Berg, E., Wallace, J., & Pedretti, E. (2008). Multimedia cases, teacher education and teacher learning. In Voogt, J. & Knezek, G. (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. (pp. 475-487). New York, NY: Springer, LLC.
19. Zembal-Saul, C. (2009). Learning to teach elementary school science as argument. Science Education, 93, 687-719.
20. Zohar, A. (2008). Science teacher education and professional development in argumentation. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroombased research. (pp. 245-268), Dordrecht: Springer.