Electroweak constraints on flavorful effective theories

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 7, 2015, Pages

  Efrati, Aielet ^a   Falkowski, Adam ^b   Soreq, Yotam ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

Author keywords

Hadronic Colliders; Phenomenological Models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937552626     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2015)018     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys.B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
2. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
3. Z. Han and W. Skiba, Effective theory analysis of precision electroweak data, Phys. Rev.D 71 (2005) 075009 [hep-ph/0412166] [INSPIRE].
4. Z. Han, Electroweak constraints on effective theories with U(2) × (1) flavor symmetry, Phys. Rev.D 73 (2006) 015005 [hep-ph/0510125] [INSPIRE].
5. R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi and A. Strumia, Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2, Nucl. Phys.B 703 (2004) 127 [hep-ph/0405040] [INSPIRE].
6. C. Grojean, W. Skiba and J. Terning, Disguising the oblique parameters, Phys. Rev.D 73 (2006) 075008 [hep-ph/0602154] [INSPIRE].
7. G. Cacciapaglia, C. Csáki, G. Marandella and A. Strumia, The Minimal Set of Electroweak Precision Parameters, Phys. Rev.D 74 (2006) 033011 [hep-ph/0604111] [INSPIRE].
8. A. Pomarol and F. Riva, Towards the Ultimate SM Fit to Close in on Higgs Physics, JHEP01 (2014) 151 [arXiv:1308.2803] [INSPIRE].
9. J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol, Higgs windows to new physics through D = 6 operators: constraints and one-loop anomalous dimensions, JHEP11 (2013) 066 [arXiv:1308.1879] [INSPIRE].
10. B. Dumont, S. Fichet and G. von Gersdorff, A Bayesian view of the Higgs sector with higher dimensional operators, JHEP07 (2013) 065 [arXiv:1304.3369] [INSPIRE].
11. C.-Y. Chen, S. Dawson and C. Zhang, Electroweak Effective Operators and Higgs Physics, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 015016 [arXiv:1311.3107] [INSPIRE].
12. S. Willenbrock and C. Zhang, Effective Field Theory Beyond the Standard Model, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.64 (2014) 83 [arXiv:1401.0470] [INSPIRE].
13. R.S. Gupta, A. Pomarol and F. Riva, BSM Primary Effects, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 035001 [arXiv:1405.0181] [INSPIRE].
14. E. Masso, An Effective Guide to Beyond the Standard Model Physics, JHEP10 (2014) 128 [arXiv:1406.6376] [INSPIRE].
15. J. de Blas et al., Global Bayesian Analysis of the Higgs-boson Couplings, arXiv:1410.4204 [INSPIRE].
16. M. Ciuchini et al., Update of the electroweak precision fit, interplay with Higgs-boson signal strengths and model-independent constraints on new physics, arXiv:1410.6940 [INSPIRE].
17. J. Ellis, V. Sanz and T. You, The Effective Standard Model after LHC Run I, JHEP03 (2015) 157 [arXiv:1410.7703] [INSPIRE].
18. A. Falkowski and F. Riva, Model-independent precision constraints on dimension-6 operators, JHEP02 (2015) 039 [arXiv:1411.0669] [INSPIRE].
19. L. Berthier and M. Trott, Towards consistent Electroweak Precision Data constraints in the SMEFT, arXiv:1502.02570 [INSPIRE].
20. R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators III: Gauge Coupling Dependence and Phenomenology, JHEP04 (2014) 159 [arXiv:1312.2014] [INSPIRE].
21. A. Pomarol, Higgs Physics, arXiv:1412.4410 [INSPIRE].
22. LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group 2 collaboration, Higgs Basis: Proposal for an EFT basis choice for LHC HXSWG, LHCHXSWG-INT-2015-001 (2015).
23. Y. Nir and N. Seiberg, Should squarks be degenerate?, Phys. Lett.B 309 (1993) 337 [hep-ph/9304307] [INSPIRE].
24. M. Leurer, Y. Nir and N. Seiberg, Mass matrix models: The Sequel, Nucl. Phys.B 420 (1994) 468[hep-ph/9310320] [INSPIRE].
25. G. D’Ambrosio, G.F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: An Effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys.B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036] [INSPIRE].
26. L.J. Hall and L. Randall, Weak scale effective supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.65 (1990) 2939 [INSPIRE].
27. R.S. Chivukula and H. Georgi, Composite Technicolor Standard Model, Phys. Lett.B 188 (1987) 99 [INSPIRE].
28. A.J. Buras, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, S. Jager and L. Silvestrini, Universal unitarity triangle and physics beyond the standard model, Phys. Lett.B 500 (2001) 161 [hep-ph/0007085] [INSPIRE].
29. N. Arkani-Hamed and M. Schmaltz, Hierarchies without symmetries from extra dimensions, Phys. Rev.D 61 (2000) 033005 [hep-ph/9903417] [INSPIRE].
30. T. Gherghetta and A. Pomarol, Bulk fields and supersymmetry in a slice of AdS, Nucl. Phys.B 586 (2000) 141 [hep-ph/0003129] [INSPIRE].
31. S.J. Huber and Q. Shafi, Fermion masses, mixings and proton decay in a Randall-Sundrum model, Phys. Lett.B 498 (2001) 256 [hep-ph/0010195] [INSPIRE].
32. K. Agashe, G. Perez and A. Soni, Flavor structure of warped extra dimension models, Phys. Rev.D 71 (2005) 016002 [hep-ph/0408134] [INSPIRE].
33. K. Agashe, T. Okui and R. Sundrum, A Common Origin for Neutrino Anarchy and Charged Hierarchies, Phys. Rev. Lett.102 (2009) 101801 [arXiv:0810.1277] [INSPIRE].
34. R. Contino, T. Kramer, M. Son and R. Sundrum, Warped/composite phenomenology simplified, JHEP05 (2007) 074 [hep-ph/0612180] [INSPIRE].
35. B. Keren-Zur et al., On Partial Compositeness and the CP asymmetry in charm decays, Nucl. Phys.B 867 (2013) 394 [arXiv:1205.5803] [INSPIRE].
36. A. Falkowski, D.M. Straub and A. Vicente, Vector-like leptons: Higgs decays and collider phenomenology, JHEP05 (2014) 092 [arXiv:1312.5329] [INSPIRE].
37. K. Blum, R.T. D’Agnolo and J. Fan, Vacuum stability bounds on Higgs coupling deviations, arXiv:1502.01045 [INSPIRE].
38. O. Gedalia, L. Mannelli and G. Perez, Covariant Description of Flavor Violation at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 693 (2010) 301 [arXiv:1002.0778] [INSPIRE].
39. O. Gedalia, L. Mannelli and G. Perez, Covariant Description of Flavor Conversion at the LHC Era, JHEP10 (2010) 046 [arXiv:1003.3869] [INSPIRE].
40. O. Gedalia, J.F. Kamenik, Z. Ligeti and G. Perez, On the Universality of CP-violation in ΔF = 1 Processes, Phys. Lett.B 714 (2012) 55 [arXiv:1202.5038] [INSPIRE].
41. H.K. Dreiner, H.E. Haber and S.P. Martin, Two-component spinor techniques and Feynman rules for quantum field theory and supersymmetry, Phys. Rept.494 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0812.1594] [INSPIRE].
42. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators I: Formalism and lambda Dependence, JHEP10 (2013) 087 [arXiv:1308.2627] [INSPIRE].
43. Gfitter Group collaboration, M. Baak et al., The global electroweak fit at NNLO and prospects for the LHC and ILC, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 3046 [arXiv:1407.3792] [INSPIRE].
44. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of Particle Physics (RPP), Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 010001 [INSPIRE].
45. H. Burkhardt and B. Pietrzyk, Recent BES measurements and the hadronic contribution to the QED vacuum polarization, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 037502 [arXiv:1106.2991] [INSPIRE].
46. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group and SLD Heavy Flavour Group collaborations, Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rept.427 (2006) 257 [hep-ex/0509008] [INSPIRE].
47. SLD collaboration, K. Abe et al., First direct measurement of the parity violating coupling of the Z0 to the s quark, Phys. Rev. Lett.85 (2000) 5059 [hep-ex/0006019] [INSPIRE].
48. − 1ats=1.96$$ \sqrt{s}=1.96 $$TeV, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 012007 [arXiv:1104.4590] [INSPIRE].
49. CDF and D0 collaborations, T.E.W. Group, 2012 Update of the Combination of CDF and D0 Results for the Mass of the W Boson, arXiv:1204.0042 [INSPIRE].
50. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL and LEP Electroweak collaborations, Electroweak Measurements in Electron-Positron Collisions at W-Boson-Pair Energies at LEP, Phys. Rept.532 (2013) 119 [arXiv:1302.3415] [INSPIRE].
51. tb| CKM matrix element in pp collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV, JHEP06 (2014) 090 [arXiv:1403.7366] [INSPIRE].
52. ATLAS collaboration, Search for the lepton flavor violating decay Z → eμ in pp collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 072010 [arXiv:1408.5774] [INSPIRE].
53. OPAL collaboration, R. Akers et al., A Search for lepton flavor violating Z0 decays, Z. Phys.C 67 (1995) 555 [INSPIRE].
54. DELPHI collaboration, P. Abreu et al., Search for lepton flavor number violating Z0 decays, Z. Phys.C 73 (1997) 243 [INSPIRE].
55. CMS collaboration, Search for Flavor-Changing Neutral Currents in Top-Quark Decays t→Zq in pp Collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 171802 [arXiv:1312.4194] [INSPIRE].
56. M. Jezabek and J.H. Kuhn, QCD Corrections to Semileptonic Decays of Heavy Quarks, Nucl. Phys.B 314 (1989) 1 [INSPIRE].
57. Z.-z. Xing, H. Zhang and S. Zhou, Impacts of the Higgs mass on vacuum stability, running fermion masses and two-body Higgs decays, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 013013 [arXiv:1112.3112] [INSPIRE].
58. A.L. Kagan, G. Perez, T. Volansky and J. Zupan, General Minimal Flavor Violation, Phys. Rev.D 80 (2009) 076002 [arXiv:0903.1794] [INSPIRE].
59. K. Agashe, G. Perez and A. Soni, Collider Signals of Top Quark Flavor Violation from a Warped Extra Dimension, Phys. Rev.D 75 (2007) 015002 [hep-ph/0606293] [INSPIRE].
60. K. Agashe, G. Perez and A. Soni, B-factory signals for a warped extra dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.93 (2004) 201804 [hep-ph/0406101] [INSPIRE].
61. S. Davidson, G. Isidori and S. Uhlig, Solving the flavour problem with hierarchical fermion wave functions, Phys. Lett.B 663 (2008) 73 [arXiv:0711.3376] [INSPIRE].
62. K. Agashe and R. Contino, The Minimal composite Higgs model and electroweak precision tests, Nucl. Phys.B 742 (2006) 59 [hep-ph/0510164] [INSPIRE].
63. K. Agashe, R. Contino, L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, A Custodial symmetry forZbb¯$$ Zb\overline{b} $$, Phys. Lett.B 641 (2006) 62 [hep-ph/0605341] [INSPIRE].
64. M. Blanke, A.J. Buras, B. Duling, K. Gemmler and S. Gori, Rare K and B Decays in a Warped Extra Dimension with Custodial Protection, JHEP03 (2009) 108 [arXiv:0812.3803] [INSPIRE].
65. A. Azatov, G. Panico, G. Perez and Y. Soreq, On the Flavor Structure of Natural Composite Higgs Models & Top Flavor Violation, JHEP12 (2014) 082 [arXiv:1408.4525] [INSPIRE].
66. C. Csáki, A. Falkowski and A. Weiler, The Flavor of the Composite Pseudo-Goldstone Higgs, JHEP09 (2008) 008 [arXiv:0804.1954] [INSPIRE].
67. J. Brod, A. Greljo, E. Stamou and P. Uttayarat, Probing anomaloustt¯Z$$ t\overline{t}Z $$interactions with rare meson decays, JHEP02 (2015) 141 [arXiv:1408.0792] [INSPIRE].
68. J.F. Kamenik, M. Papucci and A. Weiler, Constraining the dipole moments of the top quark, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 071501 [arXiv:1107.3143] [INSPIRE].
69. M.S. Amjad et al., A precise determination of top quark electro-weak couplings at the ILC operating ats=500$$ \sqrt{s}=500 $$GeV, arXiv:1307.8102 [INSPIRE].
70. F. Richard, Present and future constraints on top EW couplings, arXiv:1403.2893 [INSPIRE].
71. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the weak mixing angle with the Drell-Yan process in proton-proton collisions at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 112002 [arXiv:1110.2682] [INSPIRE].
72. D0 collaboration, V.M. Abazov et al., Measurement of the effective weak mixing angle inpp¯→Z/γ*→e+e−$$ p\overline{p}\to Z/{\gamma}^{*}\to {e}^{+}{e}^{-} $$events, arXiv:1408.5016 [INSPIRE].
73. O. Gedalia, Y. Grossman, Y. Nir and G. Perez, Lessons from Recent Measurements ofD0−D¯0$$ {D}^{{}^0}-{\overline{D}}^0 $$Mixing, Phys. Rev.D 80 (2009) 055024 [arXiv:0906.1879] [INSPIRE].
74. A.J. Buras, F. De Fazio and J. Girrbach, The Anatomy of Z’ and Z with Flavour Changing Neutral Currents in the Flavour Precision Era, JHEP02 (2013) 116 [arXiv:1211.1896] [INSPIRE].
75. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFAG) collaboration, Y. Amhis et al., Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron and τ -lepton properties as of summer 2014, arXiv:1412.7515 [INSPIRE].