The anatomy of Z′ and Z with flavour changing neutral currents in the flavour precision era

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Buras, Andrzej J ^a   De Fazio, Fulvia ^b   Girrbach, Jennifer ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b INFN SEZIONE DI BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

B Physics; Beyond Standard Model; CP violation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880381766     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2013)116     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. S. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos and L. Maiani, Weak interactions with lepton-hadron symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 2 (1970) 1285 [INSPIRE].
2. A. Buras, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, S. Jager and L. Silvestrini, Universal unitarity triangle and physics beyond the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 500 (2001) 161 [hep-ph/0007085] [INSPIRE].
3. A.J. Buras, Minimal flavor violation, Acta Phys. Polon. B 34 (2003) 5615 [hep-ph/0310208] [INSPIRE].
4. -, JHEP 10 (2006) 003 [hep-ph/0604057] [INSPIRE].
5. G. D'Ambrosio, G. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: an effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036] [INSPIRE].
6. G. Isidori, Y. Nir and G. Perez, Flavor physics constraints for physics beyond the standard model, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 355 [arXiv:1002.0900] [INSPIRE].
7. A.J. Buras and J. Girrbach, BSM models facing the recent LHCb data: a first look, Acta Phys. Polon. B 43 (2012) 1427 [arXiv:1204.5064] [INSPIRE].
8. P. Langacker and M. Plümacher, Flavor changing effects in theories with a heavy Z′ boson with family nonuniversal couplings, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 013006 [hep-ph/0001204] [INSPIRE].
9. G. Buchalla, G. Hiller and G. Isidori, Phenomenology of nonstandard Z couplings in exclusive semileptonic b → s transitions, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2000) 014015 [hep-ph/0006136] [INSPIRE].
10. F. del Aguila, M. Pérez-Victoria and J. Santiago, Observable contributions of new exotic quarks to quark mixing, JHEP 09 (2000) 011 [hep-ph/0007316] [INSPIRE].
11. V. Barger, C.-W. Chiang, P. Langacker and H.-S. Lee, Z′ mediated flavor changing neutral currents in B meson decays, Phys. Lett. B 580 (2004) 186 [hep-ph/0310073] [INSPIRE].
12. s mixing in Z′ models with flavor-changing neutral currents, Phys. Lett. B 596 (2004) 229 [hep-ph/0405108] [INSPIRE].
13. C.-W. Chiang, N. Deshpande and J. Jiang, Flavor changing effects in family nonuniversal Z′ models, JHEP 08 (2006) 075 [hep-ph/0606122] [INSPIRE].
14. 0 mixing in leptophobic Z̄ model, Phys. Lett. B 641 (2006) 183 [hep-ph/0607113] [INSPIRE].
15. -, Phys. Lett. B 652 (2007) 285 [hep-ph/0604223] [INSPIRE].
16. 0 mixing constraints on FCNC and a non-universal Z′, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 013011 [hep-ph/0605202] [INSPIRE].
17. V. Barger et al., b → s transitions in family-dependent U(1)′ models, JHEP 12 (2009) 048 [arXiv:0906.3745] [INSPIRE].
18. F. del Aguila, J. de Blas, P. Langacker and M. Pérez-Victoria, Impact of extra particles on indirect Z′ limits, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 015015 [arXiv:1104.5512] [INSPIRE].
19. 0 mixing in a family non-universal Z′ model revisited, JHEP 05 (2012) 049 [arXiv:1204.5250] [INSPIRE].
20. - decays in a family non-universal Z′ model, JHEP 04 (2010) 052 [arXiv:1002.2758] [INSPIRE].
21. - decays, JHEP 02 (2010) 082 [arXiv:0907.4408] [INSPIRE].
22. P. Langacker, The physics of heavy Z′ gauge bosons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 1199 [arXiv:0801.1345] [INSPIRE].
23. R. Barbieri, G. Isidori, J. Jones-Perez, P. Lodone and D.M. Straub, U(2) and minimal flavour violation in supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1725 [arXiv:1105.2296] [INSPIRE].
24. 3 flavour symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1812 [arXiv:1108.5125] [INSPIRE].
25. 3 symmetry, JHEP 07 (2012) 181 [arXiv:1203.4218] [INSPIRE].
26. R. Barbieri, D. Buttazzo, F. Sala and D.M. Straub, Less minimal flavour violation, JHEP 10 (2012) 040 [arXiv:1206.1327] [INSPIRE].
27. 3 flavor symmetry, PoS(EPS-HEP2011)145 [arXiv:1111.0246] [INSPIRE].
28. A. Crivellin, L. Hofer, U. Nierste and D. Scherer, Phenomenological consequences of radiative flavor violation in the MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 035030 [arXiv:1105.2818] [INSPIRE].
29. A. Crivellin and U. Nierste, Supersymmetric renormalisation of the CKM matrix and new constraints on the squark mass matrices, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 035018 [arXiv:0810.1613] [INSPIRE].
30. 3 models, JHEP 01 (2013) 007 [arXiv:1206.3878] [INSPIRE].
31. - parity, JHEP 01 (2007) 066 [hep-ph/0610298] [INSPIRE].
32. M. Blanke, A.J. Buras, B. Duling, S. Recksiegel and C. Tarantino, FCNC processes in the littlest Higgs model with T-parity: a 2009 look, Acta Phys. Polon. B 41 (2010) 657 [arXiv:0906.5454] [INSPIRE].
33. M. Blanke, A.J. Buras, B. Duling, K. Gemmler and S. Gori, Rare K and B decays in a warped extra dimension with custodial protection, JHEP 03 (2009) 108 [arXiv:0812.3803] [INSPIRE].
34. K on the new physics flavour structure, Acta Phys. Polon. B 41 (2010) 127 [arXiv:0904.2528] [INSPIRE].
35. A.J. Buras, F. De Fazio, J. Girrbach and M.V. Carlucci, The anatomy of quark flavour observables in 331 models in the flavour precision era, JHEP 02 (2013) 023 [arXiv:1211.1237] [INSPIRE].
36. W. Altmannshofer and D.M. Straub, Cornering new physics in b → s transitions, JHEP 08 (2012) 121 [arXiv:1206.0273] [INSPIRE].
37. F. Beaujean, C. Bobeth, D. van Dyk and C. Wacker, Bayesian fit of exclusive b → sℓℓ decays: the standard model operator basis, JHEP 08 (2012) 030 [arXiv:1205.1838] [INSPIRE].
38. W. Altmannshofer, A.J. Buras, S. Gori, P. Paradisi and D.M. Straub, Anatomy and phenomenology of FCNC and CPV effects in SUSY theories, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 17 [arXiv:0909.1333] [INSPIRE].
39. W. Altmannshofer, P. Paradisi and D.M. Straub, Model-independent constraints on new physics in b → s transitions, JHEP 04 (2012) 008 [arXiv:1111.1257] [INSPIRE].
40. qγ decays in the left-right model: Higgs particles striking back, JHEP 03 (2012) 024 [arXiv:1111.5014] [INSPIRE].
41. s decays, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 014027 [arXiv:1204.1735] [INSPIRE].
42. - effective lifetime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 041801 [arXiv:1204.1737] [INSPIRE].
43. -, Nucl. Phys. B 546 (1999) 299 [hep-ph/9811471] [INSPIRE].
44. A. Buras, G. Colangelo, G. Isidori, A. Romanino and L. Silvestrini, Connections between ε′ / ε and rare kaon decays in supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 566 (2000) 3 [hep-ph/9908371] [INSPIRE].
45. M. Blanke, A.J. Buras, S. Recksiegel, C. Tarantino and S. Uhlig, Correlations between ε′ / ε and rare K decays in the littlest Higgs model with T-parity, JHEP 06 (2007) 082 [arXiv:0704.3329] [INSPIRE].
46. A.J. Buras, S. Jager and J. Urban, Master formulae for ΔF = 2 NLO QCD factors in the standard model and beyond, Nucl. Phys. B 605 (2001) 600 [hep-ph/0102316] [INSPIRE].
47. A.J. Buras and J. Girrbach, Complete NLO QCD corrections for tree level ΔF = 2 FCNC processes, JHEP 03 (2012) 052 [arXiv:1201.1302] [INSPIRE].
48. f = 2 + 1 chiral fermions, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 054028 [arXiv:1206.5737] [INSPIRE].
49. f = 2 tmQCD and model independent constraints from the UTA, arXiv:1207.1287 [INSPIRE].
50. C. Bouchard et al., Neutral B mixing from 2+1 flavor lattice-QCD: the standard model and beyond, PoS(LATTICE 2011)274 [arXiv:1112.5642] [INSPIRE].
51. -: an update, Nucl. Phys. B 548 (1999) 309 [hep-ph/9901288] [INSPIRE].
52. M. Misiak and J. Urban, QCD corrections to FCNC decays mediated by Z penguins and W boxes, Phys. Lett. B 451 (1999) 161 [hep-ph/9901278] [INSPIRE].
53. s,dγ in the littlest Higgs model with T-parity, JHEP 12 (2006) 003 [hep-ph/0605214] [INSPIRE].
54. S mass difference by short distance QCD corrections beyond leading logarithms, Nucl. Phys. B 419 (1994) 292 [hep-ph/9310311] [INSPIRE].
55. S. Herrlich and U. Nierste, Indirect CP-violation in the neutral kaon system beyond leading logarithms, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 6505 [hep-ph/9507262] [INSPIRE].
56. S. Herrlich and U. Nierste, The complete |ΔS| = 2 Hamiltonian in the next-to-leading order, Nucl. Phys. B 476 (1996) 27 [hep-ph/9604330] [INSPIRE].
57. 0 mixing in the presence of a heavy top quark, Nucl. Phys. B 347 (1990) 491 [INSPIRE].
58. 0 mixing with an extended Higgs sector, Nucl. Phys. B 523 (1998) 40 [hep-ph/9710245] [INSPIRE].
59. K at next-to-next-to-leading order: the charm-top-quark contribution, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 094026 [arXiv:1007.0684] [INSPIRE].
60. K, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 121801 [arXiv:1108.2036] [INSPIRE].
61. A.J. Buras and D. Guadagnoli, Correlations among new CP-violating effects in ΔF = 2 observables, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 033005 [arXiv:0805.3887] [INSPIRE].
62. K beyond lowest order in the operator product expansion, Phys. Lett. B 688 (2010) 309 [arXiv:1002.3612] [INSPIRE].
63. 0*, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 034010 [arXiv:1111.4882] [INSPIRE].
64. -, arXiv:1208.2843 [INSPIRE].
65. -, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 231801 [arXiv:1203.4493] [INSPIRE].
66. -, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 021801 [arXiv:1211.2674] [INSPIRE].
67. -) , Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2172 [arXiv:1208.0934] [INSPIRE].
68. A.J. Buras, R. Fleischer, S. Recksiegel and F. Schwab, Anatomy of prominent B and K decays and signatures of CP-violating new physics in the electroweak penguin sector, Nucl. Phys. B 697 (2004) 133 [hep-ph/0402112] [INSPIRE].
69. - at next-to-next-to-leading, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 122002 [hep-ph/0605203] [INSPIRE].
70. -, JHEP 01 (2004) 009 [hep-ph/0311084] [INSPIRE].
71. 0νν, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 (2008) 965 [hep-ph/0405132] [INSPIRE].
72. G. Isidori, Flavor physics with light quarks and leptons, eConf C 060409 (2006) 035 [hep-ph/0606047] [INSPIRE].
73. C. Smith, Theory review on rare K decays: standard model and beyond, hep-ph/0608343 [INSPIRE].
74. ℓ3 decays, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 034017 [arXiv:0705.2025] [INSPIRE].
75. +νν at the next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 261805 [hep-ph/0508165] [INSPIRE].
76. +νν at next-to-next-to-leading order, JHEP 11 (2006) 002 [Erratum ibid. 11 (2012) 167] [hep-ph/0603079] [INSPIRE].
77. +νν, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 034006 [arXiv:0805.4119] [INSPIRE].
78. G. Isidori, F. Mescia and C. Smith, Light-quark loops in K → πνν, Nucl. Phys. B 718 (2005) 319 [hep-ph/0503107] [INSPIRE].
79. +νν branching ratio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 191802 [arXiv:0808.2459] [INSPIRE].
80. 0νν, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 072004 [arXiv:0911.4789] [INSPIRE].
81. J. Brod, M. Gorbahn and E. Stamou, Two-loop electroweak corrections for the K → πνnu decays, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 034030 [arXiv:1009.0947] [INSPIRE].
82. sνν decays, JHEP 04 (2009) 022 [arXiv:0902.0160] [INSPIRE].
83. +νν in the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 680 (2009) 471 [arXiv:0908.1174] [INSPIRE].
84. -, JHEP 11 (2009) 011 [arXiv:0909.1512] [INSPIRE].
85. τ) and BR(b → sνν), Eur. Phys. J. C 19 (2001) 213 [hep-ex/0010022] [INSPIRE].
86. *)νν decays at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 221802 [arXiv:0707.0138] [INSPIRE].
87. BABAR collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Search for B → K*νν decays, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 072007 [arXiv:0808.1338] [INSPIRE].
88. -: a binary star on the stage of flavor physics, JHEP 08 (2006) 088 [hep-ph/0606081] [INSPIRE].
89. J. Prades, ChPT progress on non-leptonic and radiative kaon decays, PoS(KAON)022 [arXiv:0707.1789] [INSPIRE].
90. - within the SM, Eur. Phys. J. C 36 (2004) 57 [hep-ph/0404127] [INSPIRE].
91. S. Friot, D. Greynat and E. De Rafael, Rare kaon decays revisited, Phys. Lett. B 595 (2004) 301 [hep-ph/0404136] [INSPIRE].
92. c expansion, Z. Phys. C 57 (1993) 585 [hep-ph/9209231] [INSPIRE].
93. -, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 021805 [hep-ex/0309072] [INSPIRE].
94. -, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 5279 [hep-ex/0001006] [INSPIRE].
95. s mixing, arXiv:0805.4393 [INSPIRE].
96. - decays, Nucl. Phys. B 672 (2003) 387 [hep-ph/0308008] [INSPIRE].
97. - beyond leading logarithms, Nucl. Phys. B 423 (1994) 349 [hep-ph/9402347] [INSPIRE].
98. sγ, JHEP 08 (2011) 124 [arXiv:1105.5146] [INSPIRE].
99. R × U(1) extensions of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 5894 [hep-ph/9310332] [INSPIRE].
100. G. Ricciardi, Brief review on semileptonic B decays, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 27 (2012) 1230037 [arXiv:1209.1407] [INSPIRE].
101. τ with a hadronic tagging method using the full data sample of Belle, arXiv:1208.4678 [INSPIRE].
102. C. Tarantino, Flavor lattice QCD in the precision era, arXiv:1210.0474 [INSPIRE].
103. M. Antonelli et al., Flavor physics in the quark sector, Phys. Rept. 494 (2010) 197 [arXiv:0907.5386] [INSPIRE].
104. LHCB collaboration, Implications of LHCb measurements and future prospects, arXiv:1208.3355 [INSPIRE].
105. PARTICLE DATA GROUP collaboration, K. Nakamura et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 075021 [INSPIRE].
106. J. Laiho, E. Lunghi and R.S. Van de Water, Lattice QCD inputs to the CKM unitarity triangle analysis, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 034503 [arXiv:0910.2928] [INSPIRE].
107. K. Chetyrkin et al., Charm and bottom quark masses: an update, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 074010 [arXiv:0907.2110] [INSPIRE].
108. HPQCD collaboration, I. Allison et al., High-precision charm-quark mass from current-current correlators in lattice and continuum QCD, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 054513 [arXiv:0805.2999] [INSPIRE].
109. 0 oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 242003 [hep-ex/0609040] [INSPIRE].
110. - (3)π decays, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012) 177 [arXiv:1112.4311] [INSPIRE].
111. s Mixing, LHCb-TALK-2012-029, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2012).
112. CMS collaboration, Search for narrow resonances in dilepton mass spectra in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 714 (2012) 158 [arXiv:1206.1849] [INSPIRE].
113. 0νν beyond the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 398 (1997) 163 [hep-ph/9701313] [INSPIRE].
114. A.J. Buras, K. Gemmler and G. Isidori, Quark flavour mixing with right-handed currents: an effective theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 843 (2011) 107 [arXiv:1007.1993] [INSPIRE].
115. - in models with minimal flavor violation, Phys. Lett. B 566 (2003) 115 [hep-ph/0303060] [INSPIRE].
116. A.J. Buras, B. Duling and S. Gori, The impact of Kaluza-Klein fermions on standard model fermion couplings in a RS model with custodial protection, JHEP 09 (2009) 076 [arXiv:0905.2318] [INSPIRE].
117. F. Botella, G. Branco and M. Nebot, The hunt for new physics in the flavour sector with up vector-like quarks, JHEP 12 (2012) 040 [arXiv:1207.4440] [INSPIRE].
118. T. Blum et al., K → ππ decay amplitudes from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 114503 [arXiv:1106.2714] [INSPIRE].
119. I=2 decay amplitude from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 141601 [arXiv:1111.1699] [INSPIRE].
120. 2, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 074513 [arXiv:1206.5142] [INSPIRE].