The effective Standard Model after LHC Run I

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Ellis, John ^a,b   Sanz, Verónica ^c   You, Tevong ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b CERN   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Effective field theories; Higgs Physics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926442916     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2015)157     Document Type: Article

References (134)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
2. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
3. M. Baak et al., Updated Status of the Global Electroweak Fit and Constraints on New Physics, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 2003 [arXiv:1107.0975] [INSPIRE].
4. D. Carmi, A. Falkowski, E. Kuflik and T. Volansky, Interpreting LHC Higgs Results from Natural New Physics Perspective, JHEP07 (2012) 136 [arXiv:1202.3144] [INSPIRE].
5. A. Azatov, R. Contino and J. Galloway, Model-Independent Bounds on a Light Higgs, JHEP04 (2012) 127 [Erratum ibid.1304 (2013) 140] [arXiv:1202.3415] [INSPIRE].
6. J.R. Espinosa, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Trott, Fingerprinting Higgs Suspects at the LHC, JHEP05 (2012) 097 [arXiv:1202.3697] [INSPIRE].
7. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, Reconstructing Higgs boson properties from the LHC and Tevatron data, JHEP06 (2012) 117 [arXiv:1203.4254] [INSPIRE].
8. T. Li, X. Wan, Y.-k. Wang and S.-h. Zhu, Constraints on the Universal Varying Yukawa Couplings: from SM-like to Fermiophobic, JHEP09 (2012) 086 [arXiv:1203.5083] [INSPIRE].
9. M. Rauch, Determination of Higgs-boson couplings (SFitter), arXiv:1203.6826 [INSPIRE].
10. J. Ellis and T. You, Global Analysis of Experimental Constraints on a Possible Higgs-Like Particle with Mass ∼ 125 GeV, JHEP06 (2012) 140 [arXiv:1204.0464] [INSPIRE].
11. A. Azatov, R. Contino, D. Del Re, J. Galloway, M. Grassi and S. Rahatlou, Determining Higgs couplings with a model-independent analysis of h → γγ, JHEP06 (2012) 134 [arXiv:1204.4817] [INSPIRE].
12. M. Klute, R. Lafaye, T. Plehn, M. Rauch and D. Zerwas, Measuring Higgs Couplings from LHC Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 101801 [arXiv:1205.2699] [INSPIRE].
13. L. Wang and X.-F. Han, The recent Higgs boson data and Higgs triplet model with vector-like quark, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 095007 [arXiv:1206.1673] [INSPIRE].
14. D. Carmi, A. Falkowski, E. Kuflik and T. Volansky, Interpreting the 125 GeV Higgs, Nuovo Cim.C 035 (2012) 315 [arXiv:1206.4201] [INSPIRE].
15. M.J. Dolan, C. Englert and M. Spannowsky, Higgs self-coupling measurements at the LHC, JHEP10 (2012) 112 [arXiv:1206.5001] [INSPIRE].
16. J. Chang, K. Cheung, P.-Y. Tseng and T.-C. Yuan, Distinguishing Various Models of the 125 GeV Boson in Vector Boson Fusion, JHEP12 (2012) 058 [arXiv:1206.5853] [INSPIRE].
17. S. Chang, C.A. Newby, N. Raj and C. Wanotayaroj, Revisiting Theories with Enhanced Higgs Couplings to Weak Gauge Bosons, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 095015 [arXiv:1207.0493] [INSPIRE].
18. I. Low, J. Lykken and G. Shaughnessy, Have We Observed the Higgs (Imposter)?, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 093012 [arXiv:1207.1093] [INSPIRE].
19. J. Ellis and T. You, Global Analysis of the Higgs Candidate with Mass ∼ 125 GeV, JHEP09 (2012) 123 [arXiv:1207.1693] [INSPIRE].
20. M. Montull and F. Riva, Higgs discovery: the beginning or the end of natural EWSB?, JHEP11 (2012) 018 [arXiv:1207.1716] [INSPIRE].
21. J.R. Espinosa, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Trott, First Glimpses at Higgs’ face, JHEP12 (2012) 045 [arXiv:1207.1717] [INSPIRE].
22. D. Carmi, A. Falkowski, E. Kuflik, T. Volansky and J. Zupan, Higgs After the Discovery: A Status Report, JHEP10 (2012) 196 [arXiv:1207.1718] [INSPIRE].
23. S. Banerjee, S. Mukhopadhyay and B. Mukhopadhyaya, New Higgs interactions and recent data from the LHC and the Tevatron, JHEP10 (2012) 062 [arXiv:1207.3588] [INSPIRE].
24. F. Bonnet, T. Ota, M. Rauch and W. Winter, Interpretation of precision tests in the Higgs sector in terms of physics beyond the Standard Model, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 093014 [arXiv:1207.4599] [INSPIRE].
25. T. Plehn and M. Rauch, Higgs Couplings after the Discovery, Europhys. Lett.100 (2012) 11002 [arXiv:1207.6108] [INSPIRE].
26. A. Djouadi, Precision Higgs coupling measurements at the LHC through ratios of production cross sections, Eur. Phys. J.C 73 (2013) 2498 [arXiv:1208.3436] [INSPIRE].
27. B. Batell, S. Gori and L.-T. Wang, Higgs Couplings and Precision Electroweak Data, JHEP01 (2013) 139 [arXiv:1209.6382] [INSPIRE].
28. G. Moreau, Constraining extra-fermion(s) from the Higgs boson data, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 015027 [arXiv:1210.3977] [INSPIRE].
29. G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, G.D. La Rochelle and J.-B. Flament, Higgs couplings beyond the Standard Model, JHEP03 (2013) 029 [arXiv:1210.8120] [INSPIRE].
30. E. Massó and V. Sanz, Limits on anomalous couplings of the Higgs boson to electroweak gauge bosons from LEP and the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 033001 [arXiv:1211.1320] [INSPIRE].
31. R.T. D’Agnolo, E. Kuflik and M. Zanetti, Fitting the Higgs to Natural SUSY, JHEP03 (2013) 043 [arXiv:1212.1165] [INSPIRE].
32. A. Azatov and J. Galloway, Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and the Higgs Boson: Confronting Theories at Colliders, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 28 (2013) 1330004 [arXiv:1212.1380] [INSPIRE].
33. G. Bhattacharyya, D. Das and P.B. Pal, Modified Higgs couplings and unitarity violation, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 011702 [arXiv:1212.4651] [INSPIRE].
34. D. Choudhury, R. Islam and A. Kundu, Anomalous Higgs Couplings as a Window to New Physics, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 013014 [arXiv:1212.4652] [INSPIRE].
35. R.S. Gupta, M. Montull and F. Riva, SUSY Faces its Higgs Couplings, JHEP04 (2013) 132 [arXiv:1212.5240] [INSPIRE].
36. G. Bélanger, B. Dumont, U. Ellwanger, J.F. Gunion and S. Kraml, Higgs Couplings at the End of 2012, JHEP02 (2013) 053 [arXiv:1212.5244] [INSPIRE].
37. K. Cheung, J.S. Lee and P.-Y. Tseng, Higgs Precision (Higgcision) Era begins, JHEP05 (2013) 134 [arXiv:1302.3794] [INSPIRE].
38. A. Falkowski, F. Riva and A. Urbano, Higgs at last, JHEP11 (2013) 111 [arXiv:1303.1812] [INSPIRE].
39. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, I. Masina, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, The universal Higgs fit, JHEP05 (2014) 046 [arXiv:1303.3570] [INSPIRE].
40. J. Ellis and T. You, Updated Global Analysis of Higgs Couplings, JHEP06 (2013) 103 [arXiv:1303.3879] [INSPIRE].
41. J. Bernon, B. Dumont and S. Kraml, Status of Higgs couplings after run 1 of the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 071301 [arXiv:1409.1588] [INSPIRE].
42. T. Appelquist and J. Carazzone, Infrared Singularities and Massive Fields, Phys. Rev.D 11 (1975) 2856 [INSPIRE].
43. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys.B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
44. H.D. Politzer, Power Corrections at Short Distances, Nucl. Phys.B 172 (1980) 349 [INSPIRE].
45. H. Kluberg-Stern and J.B. Zuber, Renormalization of Nonabelian Gauge Theories in a Background Field Gauge. 2. Gauge Invariant Operators, Phys. Rev.D 12 (1975) 3159 [INSPIRE].
46. C. Grosse-Knetter, Effective Lagrangians with higher derivatives and equations of motion, Phys. Rev.D 49 (1994) 6709 [hep-ph/9306321] [INSPIRE].
47. C. Arzt, Reduced effective Lagrangians, Phys. Lett.B 342 (1995) 189 [hep-ph/9304230] [INSPIRE].
48. H. Simma, Equations of motion for effective Lagrangians and penguins in rare B decays, Z. Phys.C 61 (1994) 67 [hep-ph/9307274] [INSPIRE].
49. J. Wudka, Electroweak effective Lagrangians, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 9 (1994) 2301 [hep-ph/9406205] [INSPIRE].
50. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
51. K. Hagiwara, S. Ishihara, R. Szalapski and D. Zeppenfeld, Low-energy effects of new interactions in the electroweak boson sector, Phys. Rev.D 48 (1993) 2182 [INSPIRE].
52. K. Hagiwara, R. Szalapski and D. Zeppenfeld, Anomalous Higgs boson production and decay, Phys. Lett.B 318 (1993) 155 [hep-ph/9308347] [INSPIRE].
53. F. Bonnet, M.B. Gavela, T. Ota and W. Winter, Anomalous Higgs couplings at the LHC and their theoretical interpretation, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 035016 [arXiv:1105.5140] [INSPIRE].
54. T. Corbett, O.J.P. Eboli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile and M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Constraining anomalous Higgs interactions, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 075013 [arXiv:1207.1344] [INSPIRE].
55. R. Contino, M. Ghezzi, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Spira, Effective Lagrangian for a light Higgs-like scalar, JHEP07 (2013) 035 [arXiv:1303.3876] [INSPIRE].
56. W.-F. Chang, W.-P. Pan and F. Xu, Effective gauge-Higgs operators analysis of new physics associated with the Higgs boson, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 033004 [arXiv:1303.7035] [INSPIRE].
57. T. Corbett, O.J.P. Éboli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile and M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Determining Triple Gauge Boson Couplings from Higgs Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 011801 [arXiv:1304.1151] [INSPIRE].
58. A. Hayreter and G. Valencia, Constraints on anomalous color dipole operators from Higgs boson production at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 034033 [arXiv:1304.6976] [INSPIRE].
59. H. Mebane, N. Greiner, C. Zhang and S. Willenbrock, Constraints on Electroweak Effective Operators at One Loop, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 015028 [arXiv:1306.3380] [INSPIRE].
60. M.B. Einhorn and J. Wudka, The Bases of Effective Field Theories, Nucl. Phys.B 876 (2013) 556 [arXiv:1307.0478] [INSPIRE].
61. J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol, Higgs windows to new physics through D = 6 operators: constraints and one-loop anomalous dimensions, JHEP11 (2013) 066 [arXiv:1308.1879] [INSPIRE].
62. S. Banerjee, S. Mukhopadhyay and B. Mukhopadhyaya, Higher dimensional operators and the LHC Higgs data: The role of modified kinematics, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 053010 [arXiv:1308.4860] [INSPIRE].
63. E. Boos, V. Bunichev, M. Dubinin and Y. Kurihara, Higgs boson signal at complete tree level in the SM extension by dimension-six operators, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 035001 [arXiv:1309.5410] [INSPIRE].
64. B. Gripaios and D. Sutherland, Searches for CP -violating dimension-6 electroweak gauge boson operators, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 076004 [arXiv:1309.7822] [INSPIRE].
65. C.-Y. Chen, S. Dawson and C. Zhang, Electroweak Effective Operators and Higgs Physics, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 015016 [arXiv:1311.3107] [INSPIRE].
66. M. Dahiya, S. Dutta and R. Islam, Unitarizing V V Scattering in Light Higgs Scenarios, arXiv:1311.4523 [INSPIRE].
67. C. Grojean, E. Salvioni, M. Schlaffer and A. Weiler, Very boosted Higgs in gluon fusion, JHEP05 (2014) 022 [arXiv:1312.3317] [INSPIRE].
68. J. Bramante, A. Delgado and A. Martin, Cornering a hyper Higgs boson: Angular kinematics for boosted Higgs bosons with top pairs, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 093006 [arXiv:1402.5985] [INSPIRE].
69. J.S. Gainer, J. Lykken, K.T. Matchev, S. Mrenna and M. Park, Beyond Geolocating: Constraining Higher Dimensional Operators in H → 4ℓ with Off-Shell Production and More, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 035011 [arXiv:1403.4951] [INSPIRE].
70. S. Bar-Shalom, A. Soni and J. Wudka, EFT naturalness: an effective field theory analysis of Higgs naturalness, arXiv:1405.2924 [INSPIRE].
71. G. Amar et al., Exploration of the tensor structure of the Higgs boson coupling to weak bosons in e+e−collisions, JHEP02 (2015) 128 [arXiv:1405.3957] [INSPIRE].
72. A. Azatov, C. Grojean, A. Paul and E. Salvioni, Taming the off-shell Higgs boson, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.147 (2015) 410 [arXiv:1406.6338] [INSPIRE].
73. E. Masso, An Effective Guide to Beyond the Standard Model Physics, JHEP10 (2014) 128 [arXiv:1406.6376] [INSPIRE].
74. R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins and A.V. Manohar, Holomorphy without Supersymmetry in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, Phys. Lett.B 739 (2014) 95 [arXiv:1409.0868] [INSPIRE].
75. R.M. Godbole, D.J. Miller, K.A. Mohan and C.D. White, Jet substructure and probes of CP-violation in Vh production, arXiv:1409.5449 [INSPIRE].
76. F. Goertz, A. Papaefstathiou, L.L. Yang and J. Zurita, Higgs boson pair production in the D=6 extension of the SM,arXiv:1410.3471[INSPIRE].
77. L. Lehman, Extending the Standard Model Effective Field Theory with the Complete Set of Dimension-7 Operators, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 125023 [arXiv:1410.4193] [INSPIRE].
78. C. Englert, Y. Soreq and M. Spannowsky, Off-Shell Higgs Coupling Measurements in BSM scenarios, arXiv:1410.5440 [INSPIRE].
79. A. Devastato, F. Lizzi, C.V. Flores and D. Vassilevich, Unification of Coupling Constants, Dimension six Operators and the Spectral Action, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 30 (2015) 1550033 [arXiv:1410.6624] [INSPIRE].
80. S. Willenbrock and C. Zhang, Effective Field Theory Beyond the Standard Model, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.64 (2014) 83 [arXiv:1401.0470] [INSPIRE].
81. F. del Aguila and J. de Blas, Electroweak constraints on new physics, Fortsch. Phys.59 (2011) 1036 [arXiv:1105.6103] [INSPIRE].
82. J. de Blas, Electroweak limits on physics beyond the Standard Model, EPJ Web Conf.60 (2013) 19008 [arXiv:1307.6173] [INSPIRE].
83. J. de Blas et al., Global Bayesian Analysis of the Higgs-boson Couplings, arXiv:1410.4204 [INSPIRE].
84. T. Corbett, O.J.P. Eboli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile and M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Robust Determination of the Higgs Couplings: Power to the Data, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 015022 [arXiv:1211.4580] [INSPIRE].
85. B. Dumont, S. Fichet and G. von Gersdorff, A Bayesian view of the Higgs sector with higher dimensional operators, JHEP07 (2013) 065 [arXiv:1304.3369] [INSPIRE].
86. Z. Han and W. Skiba, Effective theory analysis of precision electroweak data, Phys. Rev.D 71 (2005) 075009 [hep-ph/0412166] [INSPIRE].
87. M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, S. Mishima and L. Silvestrini, Electroweak Precision Observables, New Physics and the Nature of a 126 GeV Higgs Boson, JHEP08 (2013) 106 [arXiv:1306.4644] [INSPIRE].
88. A. Pomarol and F. Riva, Towards the Ultimate SM Fit to Close in on Higgs Physics, JHEP01 (2014) 151 [arXiv:1308.2803] [INSPIRE].
89. J. Ellis, V. Sanz and T. You, Complete Higgs Sector Constraints on Dimension-6 Operators, JHEP07 (2014) 036 [arXiv:1404.3667] [INSPIRE].
90. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD collaborations, the LEP Electroweak Working Group, the SLD Electroweak Group, the SLD Heavy Flavour Group, S. Schael et al., Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rept.427 (2006) 257 [hep-ex/0509008] [INSPIRE].
91. D0 collaboration, V.M. Abazov et al., Combined search for the standard model Higgs boson decaying tobb¯$$ b\overline{b} $$using the D0 Run II data set, Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 121802 [arXiv:1207.6631] [INSPIRE].
92. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions ats=7$$ \sqrt{s}=7 $$and 8 TeV, JHEP06 (2013) 081 [arXiv:1303.4571] [INSPIRE].
93. ATLAS collaboration, Constraints on New Phenomena via Higgs Coupling Measurements with the ATLAS Detector, ATLAS-CONF-2014-010 (2014).
94. ATLAS collaboration, Search for the bb decay of the Standard Model Higgs boson in associated W/ZH production with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2013-079 (2013).
95. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the W+W−Cross section in pp Collisions ats=7$$ \sqrt{s}=7 $$TeV and Limits on Anomalous WWγ and WWZ couplings, Eur. Phys. J.C 73 (2013) 2610 [arXiv:1306.1126] [INSPIRE].
96. CMS collaboration, Measurement of W+W−and ZZ production cross sections in pp collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV, Phys. Lett.B 721 (2013) 190 [arXiv:1301.4698] [INSPIRE].
97. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the W+W−production cross section in proton-proton collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2014-033 (2014).
98. A. Falkowski, S. Fichet, K. Mohan, F. Riva and V. Sanz, Triple gauge couplings revisited, to appear.
99. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, A new constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector, Phys. Rev. Lett.65 (1990) 964 [INSPIRE].
100. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev.D 46 (1992) 381 [INSPIRE].
101. I. Maksymyk, C.P. Burgess and D. London, Beyond S, T and U, Phys. Rev.D 50 (1994) 529 [hep-ph/9306267] [INSPIRE].
102. R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi and A. Strumia, Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2, Nucl. Phys.B 703 (2004) 127 [hep-ph/0405040] [INSPIRE].
103. G. Altarelli and R. Barbieri, Vacuum polarization effects of new physics on electroweak processes, Phys. Lett.B 253 (1991) 161 [INSPIRE].
104. R. Barbieri and A. Strumia, What is the limit on the Higgs mass?, Phys. Lett.B 462 (1999) 144 [hep-ph/9905281] [INSPIRE].
105. R. Contino, M. Ghezzi, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Spira, Effective Lagrangian for a light Higgs-like scalar, JHEP07 (2013) 035 [arXiv:1303.3876] [INSPIRE].
106. J.D. Wells and Z. Zhang, Precision Electroweak Analysis after the Higgs Boson Discovery, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 033006 [arXiv:1406.6070] [INSPIRE].
107. R.S. Gupta, A. Pomarol and F. Riva, BSM Primary Effects, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 035001 [arXiv:1405.0181] [INSPIRE].
108. D.Y. Bardin et al., ZFITTER v.6.21: A semianalytical program for fermion pair production in e+e−annihilation, Comput. Phys. Commun.133 (2001) 229 [hep-ph/9908433] [INSPIRE].
109. M. Baak et al., The Electroweak Fit of the Standard Model after the Discovery of a New Boson at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 2205 [arXiv:1209.2716] [INSPIRE].
110. C. Grojean, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Scaling of Higgs Operators and Γ(h → γγ), JHEP04 (2013) 016 [arXiv:1301.2588] [INSPIRE].
111. J. Elias-Miró, J.R. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol, Renormalization of dimension-six operators relevant for the Higgs decays h → γγ, γZ, JHEP08 (2013) 033 [arXiv:1302.5661] [INSPIRE].
112. J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol, Higgs windows to new physics through D = 6 operators: constraints and one-loop anomalous dimensions, JHEP11 (2013) 066 [arXiv:1308.1879] [INSPIRE].
113. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators I: Formalism and lambda Dependence, JHEP10 (2013) 087 [arXiv:1308.2627] [INSPIRE].
114. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators II: Yukawa Dependence, JHEP01 (2014) 035 [arXiv:1310.4838] [INSPIRE].
115. R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators III: Gauge Coupling Dependence and Phenomenology, JHEP04 (2014) 159 [arXiv:1312.2014] [INSPIRE].
116. J. Elias-Miró, C. Grojean, R.S. Gupta and D. Marzocca, Scaling and tuning of EW and Higgs observables, JHEP05 (2014) 019 [arXiv:1312.2928] [INSPIRE].
117. R. Alonso, H.-M. Chang, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and B. Shotwell, Renormalization group evolution of dimension-six baryon number violating operators, Phys. Lett.B 734 (2014) 302 [arXiv:1405.0486] [INSPIRE].
118. A. Alloul, B. Fuks and V. Sanz, Phenomenology of the Higgs Effective Lagrangian via FeynRules, JHEP04 (2014) 110 [arXiv:1310.5150] [INSPIRE].
119. M. Trott, On the consistent use of Constructed Observables, JHEP02 (2015) 046 [arXiv:1409.7605] [INSPIRE].
120. P. Artoisenet et al., A framework for Higgs characterisation, JHEP11 (2013) 043 [arXiv:1306.6464] [INSPIRE].
121. F. Demartin, F. Maltoni, K. Mawatari, B. Page and M. Zaro, Higgs characterisation at NLO in QCD: CP properties of the top-quark Yukawa interaction, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 3065 [arXiv:1407.5089] [INSPIRE].
122. F. Maltoni, K. Mawatari and M. Zaro, Higgs characterisation via vector-boson fusion and associated production: NLO and parton-shower effects, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 2710 [arXiv:1311.1829] [INSPIRE].
123. LHC Higgs Cross section Working Group collaboration, A. David et al., LHC HXSWG interim recommendations to explore the coupling structure of a Higgs-like particle, arXiv:1209.0040 [INSPIRE].
124. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: Going Beyond, JHEP06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [INSPIRE].
125. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [INSPIRE].
126. DELPHES 3 collaboration, J. de Favereau et al., DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP02 (2014) 057 [arXiv:1307.6346] [INSPIRE].
127. A. Biekoetter, A. Knochel, M. Kraemer, D. Liu and F. Riva, Vices and Virtues of Higgs EFTs at Large Energy, arXiv:1406.7320 [INSPIRE].
128. M. Beneke, D. Boito and Y.-M. Wang, Anomalous Higgs couplings in angular asymmetries of H → Zℓ+ℓ−and e+e− → HZ, JHEP11 (2014) 028 [arXiv:1406.1361] [INSPIRE].
129. B. Henning, X. Lu and H. Murayama, What do precision Higgs measurements buy us?, arXiv:1404.1058 [INSPIRE].
130. M. Gorbahn, J.M. No and V. Sanz, Benchmarks for Higgs Effective Theory: Extended Higgs Sectors, arXiv:1502.07352 [INSPIRE].
131. J.F. Gunion and H.E. Haber, The CP conserving two Higgs doublet model: The approach to the decoupling limit, Phys. Rev.D 67 (2003) 075019 [hep-ph/0207010] [INSPIRE].
132. M. Carena, I. Low, N.R. Shah and C.E.M. Wagner, Impersonating the Standard Model Higgs Boson: Alignment without Decoupling, JHEP04 (2014) 015 [arXiv:1310.2248] [INSPIRE].
133. E. Massó and V. Sanz, Limits on anomalous couplings of the Higgs boson to electroweak gauge bosons from LEP and the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 033001 [arXiv:1211.1320] [INSPIRE].
134. A. Djouadi, V. Driesen, W. Hollik and A. Kraft, The Higgs photon-Z boson coupling revisited, Eur. Phys. J.C 1 (1998) 163 [hep-ph/9701342] [INSPIRE].