Higgs windows to new physics through d = 6 operators: Constraints and one-loop anomalous dimensions

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 11, 2013, Pages

  Elias Miro J ^a   Espinosa, J R ^a,b   Masso, E ^a   Pomarol, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Beyond standard model; Higgs physics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892381791     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2013)066     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. CMS collaboration, Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson decaying into two photons in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 403 [arXiv:1202.1487] [INSPIRE].
2. -1 of pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV with ATLAS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 111803 [arXiv:1202.1414] [INSPIRE].
3. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
4. A. Pomarol and F. Riva, Towards the ultimate SM fit to close in on Higgs physics, arXiv:1308.2803 [INSPIRE].
5. G. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The strongly-interacting light Higgs, JHEP 06 (2007) 045 [hep-ph/0703164] [INSPIRE].
6. R. Contino, M. Ghezzi, C. Grojean, M. Mühlleitner and M. Spira, Effective Lagrangian for a light Higgs-like scalar, JHEP 07 (2013) 035 [arXiv:1303.3876] [INSPIRE].
7. C. Grojean, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group scaling of Higgs operators and Γ(h → γγ), JHEP 04 (2013) 016 [arXiv:1301.2588] [INSPIRE].
8. J. Elias-Miró, J. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol, Renormalization of dimension-six operators relevant for the Higgs decays h → γγ, γZ, JHEP 08 (2013) 033 [arXiv:1302.5661] [INSPIRE].
9. K. Hagiwara, S. Ishihara, R. Szalapski and D. Zeppenfeld, Low-energy constraints on electroweak three gauge boson couplings, Phys. Lett. B 283 (1992) 353 [INSPIRE].
10. K. Hagiwara, S. Ishihara, R. Szalapski and D. Zeppenfeld, Low-energy effects of new interactions in the electroweak boson sector, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 2182 [INSPIRE].
11. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884 ] [INSPIRE].
12. C. Arzt, M. Einhorn and J. Wudka, Patterns of deviation from the Standard Model, Nucl. Phys. B 433 (1995) 41 [hep-ph/9405214] [INSPIRE].
13. J. Aguilar-Saavedra, Effective four-fermion operators in top physics: a roadmap, Nucl. Phys. B 843 (2011) 638 [Erratum ibid. B 851 (2011) 443] [arXiv:1008.3562] [INSPIRE].
14. G. D'Ambrosio, G. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: an effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036] [INSPIRE] and references therein.
15. O. Domenech, A. Pomarol and J. Serra, Probing the SM with dijets at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 074030 [arXiv:1201.6510] [INSPIRE].
16. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, A new constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 964 [INSPIRE].
17. R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi and A. Strumia, Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2, Nucl. Phys. B 703 (2004) 127 [hep-ph/0405040] [INSPIRE].
18. M. Farina, C. Grojean, F. Maltoni, E. Salvioni and A. Thamm, Lifting degeneracies in Higgs couplings using single top production in association with a Higgs boson, JHEP 05 (2013) 022 [arXiv:1211.3736] [INSPIRE].
19. A. De Rújula, M. Gavela, P. Hernández and E. Masso, The selfcouplings of vector bosons: does LEP-1 obviate LEP-2?, Nucl. Phys. B 384 (1992) 3 [INSPIRE].
20. See for example A. Falkowski, F. Riva and A. Urbano, Higgs at last, arXiv:1303.1812 [INSPIRE].
21. LEP, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL and LEP TGC collaborations, A combination of preliminary results on gauge boson couplings measured by the LEP experiments, LEPEWWG/TGC/2003-01, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2004).
22. - production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector and limits on anomalous WWZ and WWγ couplings, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 112001 [arXiv:1210.2979] [INSPIRE].
23. - cross section in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV and limits on anomalous WWγ and WWZ couplings, arXiv:1306.1126 [INSPIRE].
24. For reviews see for example ATLAS and CMS collaborations, V. Lombardo, Diboson production cross section at LHC, talk at QCD Moriond, La Thuille Italy (2013) [arXiv:1305.3773] [INSPIRE].
25. J. Stark, Electroweak physics, talk at EPS HEP 2013 conference, Stockholm Sweden July 2013.
26. us| and precise tests of the Standard Model from world data on leptonic and semileptonic kaon decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 69 (2010) 399 [arXiv:1005.2323] [INSPIRE].
27. CMS collaboration, Search for new physics in final states with a lepton and missing transverse energy in pp collisions at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 072005 [arXiv:1302.2812] [INSPIRE].
28. ATLAS collaboration, Combination of the ATLAS and CMS measurements of the W -boson polarization in top-quark decays, ATLAS-CONF-2013-033, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
29. CMS collaboration, LHC combination note: W helicities, CMS-PAS-TOP-12-025, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2012).
30. -1 of √s = 7 TeV pp collision data collected by the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2012-126, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2012).
31. CMS collaboration, Measurement of associated production of vector bosons and tt̄ at √s = 7 TeV, CMS-TOP-12-014, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
32. N. Vignaroli, ΔF = 1 constraints on composite Higgs models with LR parity, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 115011 [arXiv:1204.0478] [INSPIRE].
33. T. Corbett, O. Éboli, J. González-Fraile and M. González-García, Robust determination of the Higgs couplings: power to the data, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 015022 [arXiv:1211.4580] [INSPIRE].
34. S. Alam, S. Dawson and R. Szalapski, Low-energy constraints on new physics revisited, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 1577 [hep-ph/9706542] [INSPIRE].
35. R. Barbieri, B. Bellazzini, V.S. Rychkov and A. Varagnolo, The Higgs boson from an extended symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 115008 [arXiv:0706.0432 ] [INSPIRE].
36. A. Pomarol and J. Serra, Top quark compositeness: feasibility and implications, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 074026 [arXiv:0806.3247] [INSPIRE].
37. See for example R.S. Gupta, M. Montull and F. Riva, SUSY faces its Higgs couplings, JHEP 04 (2013) 132 [arXiv:1212.5240] [INSPIRE].
38. M.B. Einhorn and J. Wudka, Effective β-functions for effective field theory, JHEP 08 (2001) 025 [hep-ph/0105035] [INSPIRE].
39. K. Agashe, R. Contino, L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, A custodial symmetry for Zbb̄, Phys. Lett. B 641 (2006) 62 [hep-ph/0605341] [INSPIRE].