Probing anomalous ttZ interactions with rare meson decays

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Brod, Joachim ^a   Greljo, Admir ^b   Stamou, Emmanuel ^c   Uttayarat, Patipan ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b JO EF STEFAN INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

^c WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^d SRINAKHARINWIROT UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Effective field theories; Rare Decays

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923668334     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2015)141     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. −1ofs=7$$ \sqrt{s}=7 $$TeV pp collision data collected by the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2012-126 (2012).
2. CMS collaboration, Measurement of associated production of vector bosons and top quark-antiquark pairs ats=7$$ \sqrt{s}=7 $$TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 172002 [arXiv:1303.3239] [INSPIRE].
3. R. Röntsch and M. Schulze, Constraining couplings of top quarks to the Z boson intt¯+Z$$ t\overline{t}+Z $$production at the LHC, JHEP07 (2014) 091 [arXiv:1404.1005] [INSPIRE].
4. −penguin amplitude, Phys. Rev.D 76 (2007) 074027 [arXiv:0706.2054] [INSPIRE].
5. −) as an electroweak precision test, Phys. Lett.B 724 (2013) 63 [arXiv:1302.3909] [INSPIRE].
6. X.-Q. Li, Y.-D. Yang and X.-B. Yuan, Anomalous tqZ coupling effects in rare B- and K-meson decays, JHEP03 (2012) 018 [arXiv:1112.2674] [INSPIRE].
7. −decays, JHEP05 (2013) 062 [arXiv:1301.7535] [INSPIRE].
8. J. Drobnak, S. Fajfer and J.F. Kamenik, Interplay of t → bW decay andBd,s−B¯d,s$$ {B}_{d,s}-{\overline{B}}_{d,s} $$meson mixing in minimal flavor violating models, Phys. Lett.B 701 (2011) 234 [arXiv:1102.4347] [INSPIRE].
9. J. Drobnak, S. Fajfer and J.F. Kamenik, Probing anomalous tWb interactions with rare B decays, Nucl. Phys.B 855 (2012) 82 [arXiv:1109.2357] [INSPIRE].
10. J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra, A minimal set of top anomalous couplings, Nucl. Phys.B 812 (2009) 181 [arXiv:0811.3842] [INSPIRE].
11. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian, JHEP10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
12. G. D’Ambrosio, G.F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: an effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys.B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036] [INSPIRE].
13. A. Denner, Techniques for calculation of electroweak radiative corrections at the one loop level and results for W physics at LEP-200, Fortschr. Phys.41 (1993) 307 [arXiv:0709.1075] [INSPIRE].
14. M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, S. Mishima and L. Silvestrini, Electroweak precision observables, new physics and the nature of a 126 GeV Higgs boson, JHEP08 (2013) 106 [arXiv:1306.4644] [INSPIRE].
15. F. del Aguila, M. Pérez-Victoria and J. Santiago, Observable contributions of new exotic quarks to quark mixing, JHEP09 (2000) 011 [hep-ph/0007316] [INSPIRE].
16. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the inclusive and fiducial cross-section of single top-quark t-channel events in pp collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2014-007 (2014).
17. tb| CKM matrix element in pp collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV, JHEP06 (2014) 090 [arXiv:1403.7366] [INSPIRE].
18. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators II: Yukawa dependence, JHEP01 (2014) 035 [arXiv:1310.4838] [INSPIRE].
19. R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators III: gauge coupling dependence and phenomenology, JHEP04 (2014) 159 [arXiv:1312.2014] [INSPIRE].
20. G. Altarelli, R. Barbieri and S. Jadach, Toward a model independent analysis of electroweak data, Nucl. Phys.B 369 (1992) 3 [Erratum .B 376 (1992) 444] [INSPIRE].
21. F. Larios, M.A. Perez and C.P. Yuan, Analysis of tbW and ttZ couplings from CLEO and LEP/SLC data, Phys. Lett.B 457 (1999) 334 [hep-ph/9903394] [INSPIRE].
22. F. Larios, E. Malkawi and C.P. Yuan, Probing the electroweak symmetry breaking sector with the top quark, hep-ph/9704288 [INSPIRE].
23. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, A new constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector, Phys. Rev. Lett.65 (1990) 964 [INSPIRE].
24. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev.D 46 (1992) 381 [INSPIRE].
25. B. Grinstein and M.B. Wise, Operator analysis for precision electroweak physics, Phys. Lett.B 265 (1991) 326 [INSPIRE].
26. W. Skiba, TASI lectures on effective field theory and precision electroweak measurements, arXiv:1006.2142 [INSPIRE].
27. G. Altarelli, R. Barbieri and F. Caravaglios, Nonstandard analysis of electroweak precision data, Nucl. Phys.B 405 (1993) 3 [INSPIRE].
28. E. Malkawi and C.P. Yuan, A global analysis of the top quark couplings to gauge bosons, Phys. Rev.D 50 (1994) 4462 [hep-ph/9405322] [INSPIRE].
29. R.S. Gupta, A. Pomarol and F. Riva, BSM primary effects, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 035001 [arXiv:1405.0181] [INSPIRE].
30. M. Ciuchini et al., Update of the electroweak precision fit, interplay with Higgs-boson signal strengths and model-independent constraints on new physics, arXiv:1410.6940 [INSPIRE].
31. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Group collaborations, S. Schael et al., Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rept.427 (2006) 257 [hep-ex/0509008] [INSPIRE].
32. −with the CMS experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 101804 [arXiv:1307.5025] [INSPIRE].
33. −decays at the LHCb experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 101805 [arXiv:1307.5024] [INSPIRE].
34. −in the standard model with reduced theoretical uncertainty, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 101801 [arXiv:1311.0903] [INSPIRE].
35. −effective lifetime, Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 041801 [arXiv:1204.1737] [INSPIRE].
36. G. Buchalla and A.J. Buras, QCD corrections to thes¯dZ$$ \overline{s}dZ $$vertex for arbitrary top quark mass, Nucl. Phys.B 398 (1993) 285 [INSPIRE].
37. G. Buchalla and A.J. Buras, QCD corrections to rare K and B decays for arbitrary top quark mass, Nucl. Phys.B 400 (1993) 225 [INSPIRE].
38. M. Misiak and J. Urban, QCD corrections to FCNC decays mediated by Z penguins and W boxes, Phys. Lett.B 451 (1999) 161 [hep-ph/9901278] [INSPIRE].
39. −, JHEP12 (2013) 097 [arXiv:1311.1347] [INSPIRE].
40. −, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 034023 [arXiv:1311.1348] [INSPIRE].
41. −beyond leading logarithms, Nucl. Phys.B 412 (1994) 106 [hep-ph/9308272] [INSPIRE].
42. −: an update, Nucl. Phys.B 548 (1999) 309 [hep-ph/9901288] [INSPIRE].
43. G. Isidori, F. Mescia and C. Smith, Light-quark loops inK→πνν¯$$ K\to \pi \nu \overline{\nu} $$, Nucl. Phys.B 718 (2005) 319 [hep-ph/0503107] [INSPIRE].
44. J. Brod, M. Gorbahn and E. Stamou, Two-loop electroweak corrections for theK→πνν¯$$ K\to \pi \nu \overline{\nu} $$decays, Phys. Rev.D 83 (2011) 034030 [arXiv:1009.0947] [INSPIRE].
45. M. Gorbahn and U. Haisch, Effective Hamiltonian for non-leptonic |ΔF | = 1 decays at NNLO in QCD, Nucl. Phys.B 713 (2005) 291 [hep-ph/0411071] [INSPIRE].
46. A.J. Buras, M. Gorbahn, U. Haisch and U. Nierste, The rare decayK+→π+νν¯$$ {K}^{+}\to {\pi}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu} $$at the next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.95 (2005) 261805 [hep-ph/0508165] [INSPIRE].
47. A.J. Buras, M. Gorbahn, U. Haisch and U. Nierste, Charm quark contribution toK+→π+νν¯$$ {K}^{+}\to {\pi}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu} $$at next-to-next-to-leading order, JHEP11 (2006) 002 [Erratum .11 (2012) 167] [hep-ph/0603079] [INSPIRE].
48. J. Brod and M. Gorbahn, Electroweak corrections to the charm quark contribution toK+→π+νν¯$$ {K}^{+}\to {\pi}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu} $$, Phys. Rev.D 78 (2008) 034006 [arXiv:0805.4119] [INSPIRE].
49. ℓ3decays, Phys. Rev.D 76 (2007) 034017 [arXiv:0705.2025] [INSPIRE].
50. −, arXiv:0711.0148 [INSPIRE].
51. G. Buchalla and A.J. Buras, K→πνν¯$$ K\to \pi \nu \overline{\nu} $$and high precision determinations of the CKM matrix, Phys. Rev.D 54 (1996) 6782 [hep-ph/9607447] [INSPIRE].
52. A.J. Buras, M. Jamin, M.E. Lautenbacher and P.H. Weisz, Effective Hamiltonians for ΔS = 1 and ΔB = 1 nonleptonic decays beyond the leading logarithmic approximation, Nucl. Phys.B 370 (1992) 69 [Addendum .B 375 (1992) 501] [INSPIRE].
53. M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, G. Martinelli and L. Reina, The ΔS = 1 effective Hamiltonian including next-to-leading order QCD and QED corrections, Nucl. Phys.B 415 (1994) 403 [hep-ph/9304257] [INSPIRE].
54. E949 collaboration, A.V. Artamonov et al., New measurement of theK+→π+νν¯$$ {K}^{+}\to {\pi}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu} $$branching ratio, Phys. Rev. Lett.101 (2008) 191802 [arXiv:0808.2459] [INSPIRE].
55. LHCb collaboration, Implications of LHCb measurements and future prospects, Eur. Phys. J.C 73 (2013) 2373 [arXiv:1208.3355] [INSPIRE].
56. A.S. Kronfeld et al., Project X: physics opportunities, arXiv:1306.5009 [INSPIRE].
57. TLEP Design Study Working Group collaboration, M. Bicer et al., First look at the physics case of TLEP, JHEP01 (2014) 164 [arXiv:1308.6176] [INSPIRE].
58. CMS collaboration, Search for flavor-changing neutral currents in top-quark decays t → Zq in pp collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 171802 [arXiv:1312.4194] [INSPIRE].
59. J.L. Hewett et al., Fundamental physics at the intensity frontier, arXiv:1205.2671 [INSPIRE].
60. T. Aushev et al., Physics at Super B factory, arXiv:1002.5012 [INSPIRE].