Model-independent precision constraints on dimension-6 operators

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Falkowski, Adam ^a   Riva, Francesco ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Effective field theories; Higgs Physics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922613738     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2015)039     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
2. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
3. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys.B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
4. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian, JHEP10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
5. A. Pomarol and F. Riva, Towards the ultimate SM fit to close in on Higgs physics, JHEP01 (2014) 151 [arXiv:1308.2803] [INSPIRE].
6. J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol, Higgs windows to new physics through D = 6 operators: constraints and one-loop anomalous dimensions, JHEP11 (2013) 066 [arXiv:1308.1879] [INSPIRE].
7. T. Corbett, O.J.P. Eboli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile and M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Robust determination of the Higgs couplings: power to the data, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 015022 [arXiv:1211.4580] [INSPIRE].
8. J. de Blas, Electroweak limits on physics beyond the standard model, EPJ Web Conf.60 (2013) 19008 [arXiv:1307.6173] [INSPIRE].
9. B. Dumont, S. Fichet and G. von Gersdorff, A Bayesian view of the Higgs sector with higher dimensional operators, JHEP07 (2013) 065 [arXiv:1304.3369] [INSPIRE].
10. S. Willenbrock and C. Zhang, Effective field theory beyond the standard model, arXiv:1401.0470 [INSPIRE].
11. J. Ellis, V. Sanz and T. You, Complete Higgs sector constraints on dimension-6 operators, JHEP07 (2014) 036 [arXiv:1404.3667] [INSPIRE].
12. R.S. Gupta, A. Pomarol and F. Riva, BSM primary effects, arXiv:1405.0181 [INSPIRE].
13. E. Masso, An effective guide to beyond the standard model physics, JHEP10 (2014) 128 [arXiv:1406.6376] [INSPIRE].
14. J. de Blas et al., Global Bayesian analysis of the Higgs-boson couplings, arXiv:1410.4204 [INSPIRE].
15. M. Ciuchini et al., Update of the electroweak precision fit, interplay with Higgs-boson signal strengths and model-independent constraints on new physics, arXiv:1410.6940 [INSPIRE].
16. J. Ellis, V. Sanz and T. You, The effective standard model after LHC run I, arXiv:1410.7703 [INSPIRE].
17. R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators III: gauge coupling dependence and phenomenology, JHEP04 (2014) 159 [arXiv:1312.2014] [INSPIRE].
18. Z. Han and W. Skiba, Effective theory analysis of precision electroweak data, Phys. Rev.D 71 (2005) 075009 [hep-ph/0412166] [INSPIRE].
19. G. Cacciapaglia, C. Csáki, G. Marandella and A. Strumia, The minimal set of electroweak precision parameters, Phys. Rev.D 74 (2006) 033011 [hep-ph/0604111] [INSPIRE].
20. F. del Aguila and J. de Blas, Electroweak constraints on new physics, Fortsch. Phys.59 (2011) 1036 [arXiv:1105.6103] [INSPIRE].
21. H.K. Dreiner, H.E. Haber and S.P. Martin, Two-component spinor techniques and Feynman rules for quantum field theory and supersymmetry, Phys. Rept.494 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0812.1594] [INSPIRE].
22. G.F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The strongly-interacting light Higgs, JHEP06 (2007) 045 [hep-ph/0703164] [INSPIRE].
23. R. Contino, M. Ghezzi, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Spira, Effective Lagrangian for a light Higgs-like scalar, JHEP07 (2013) 035 [arXiv:1303.3876] [INSPIRE].
24. −, Nucl. Phys.B 282 (1987) 253 [INSPIRE].
25. K. Hagiwara, S. Ishihara, R. Szalapski and D. Zeppenfeld, Low-energy effects of new interactions in the electroweak boson sector, Phys. Rev.D 48 (1993) 2182 [INSPIRE].
26. A. De Rujula, M.B. Gavela, P. Hernández and E. Masso, The selfcouplings of vector bosons: does LEP-1 obviate LEP-2?, Nucl. Phys.B 384 (1992) 3 [INSPIRE].
27. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group and SLD Heavy Flavour Group collaborations, S. Schael et al., Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rept.427 (2006) 257 [hep-ex/0509008] [INSPIRE].
28. Gfitter Group collaboration, M. Baak et al., The global electroweak fit at NNLO and prospects for the LHC and ILC, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 3046 [arXiv:1407.3792] [INSPIRE].
29. CDF and D0 collaborations, 2012 update of the combination of CDF and D0 results for the mass of the W boson, arXiv:1204.0042 [INSPIRE].
30. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of particle physics (RPP), Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 010001 [INSPIRE].
31. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL and LEP Electroweak collaborations, S. Schael et al., Electroweak measurements in electron-positron collisions at W -boson-pair energies at LEP, Phys. Rept.532 (2013) 119 [arXiv:1302.3415] [INSPIRE].
32. J.D. Wells, TASI lecture notes: introduction to precision electroweak analysis, hep-ph/0512342 [INSPIRE].
33. C. Grojean, W. Skiba and J. Terning, Disguising the oblique parameters, Phys. Rev.D 73 (2006) 075008 [hep-ph/0602154] [INSPIRE].
34. M. Trott, On the consistent use of constructed observables, arXiv:1409.7605 [INSPIRE].
35. J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
36. G. Brooijmans et al., Les Houches 2013 — physics at TeV colliders: new physics working group report, arXiv:1405.1617 [INSPIRE].
37. F. Riva et al., Physical implications of the SM EFT, in preparation.
38. −cross section in pp collisions ats=7$$ \sqrt{s}=7 $$TeV and limits on anomalous WWγ and WWZ couplings, Eur. Phys. J.C 73 (2013) 2610 [arXiv:1306.1126] [INSPIRE].
39. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the W γ and Zγ inclusive cross sections in pp collisions ats=7$$ \sqrt{s}=7 $$TeV and limits on anomalous triple gauge boson couplings, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 092005 [arXiv:1308.6832] [INSPIRE].
40. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the W W + W Z cross section and limits on anomalous triple gauge couplings using final states with one lepton, missing transverse momentum and two jets with the ATLAS detector ats=7$$ \sqrt{s}=7 $$TeV, arXiv:1410.7238 [INSPIRE].
41. A. Biekoetter, A. Knochel, M. Kraemer, D. Liu and F. Riva, Vices and virtues of Higgs EFTs at large energy, arXiv:1406.7320 [INSPIRE].
42. G. Isidori, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Probing the nature of the Higgs-like boson viah→Vℱ$$ h\to V\mathrm{\mathcal{F}} $$decays, Phys. Lett.B 728 (2014) 131 [arXiv:1305.0663] [INSPIRE].