From weakness to power with the ESDP?

European Foreign Affairs Review

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 453-471

  Rummel, Reinhardt ^a  

^a GERMAN INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AND SECURITY AFFAIRS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937382916     PISSN: 13846299     EISSN: 18758223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.54648/eerr2002005     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Javier Solana, 'The view from Europe: Sympathy, co-operation and concern', International Herald Tribune, 10 September 2002, p. 6.
2. emptive action when necessary to defend our liberty and to defend our lives' (George W. Bush, Remarks by the President at the 2002 Graduation Exercise of the United States Military Academy West Point, New York, 1 June 2002).
3. See also The White House, The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, September 2002 (Excerpts of recent speeches of the President) .
4. NATO Secretary General Robertson, interview with Süddeutsche Zeitung, 31 January 2002, p. 9.
5. North Atlantic Assembly, , 13 November 1998).
6. R. Kagan, 'Power and Weakness' (2002) 113 Policy Review.
7. P. Hassner, 'The United States: the empire of force or the force of empire?'(2002) 54 Chaillot Papers, p. 48.
8. With respect to the history of the creation of the ESDP and the mission statement of the 'autonomous action' of the EU, see D. Groves, 'The European Union's Common Foreign, Security, and Defence Policy'(2000) 3 BITS Research Report.
9. A. Falke, 'The EU-US Conflict over Sanctions Policy: Confronting the Hegemon' (2000) 2 EFA Rev, pp. 139-163.
10. E. Lübkemeier, 'European Security and Defence Policy: A Key Project for the European Union' (2001) 12 RUSI Journal, pp.19-24.
11. For an anthologised collection of the basic documents for the development of ESDP, see M. Rutten, 'From St. Malo to Nice. European defence. Core documents' (2001) 47 Chaillot Papers.
12. Macedonia. See 'Die EU sucht ein aktives Krisenmanagement - Verstärktes Engangement in Bosnien und Mazedonien?', in Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 26 January 2002, p. 5.
13. J.B. Collester, 'How Defence “Spilled Over” into the CFSP: Western European Union (WEU) and the European Security and Defence Identity (ESDI)' in M. Green and M. Smith (eds), The State of the European Union - Risks, Reform, Resistance, and Revival (Oxford, 2000), pp. 369-389.
14. The European Convention, The Secretariat, Working Groups: Second Wave, CONV 206/02 (17 July 2002).
15. G. Verheugen, 'The enlargement of the European Union' (2000) 5 EFA Rev, pp. 439-444.
16. A. Missiroli (ed.), 'Bigger EU, Wider CFSP, Stronger ESDP? The View from Central Europe' (2002) 34 EU-ISS Occasional Paper.
17. D. Mahncke, 'Russia's Attitude to the European Security and Defence Policy' (2001) 4 EFA Rev, pp. 427-436.
18. S. Duke, 'CESDP: Nice's Overtrumped Success?' (2001) 2 EFA Rev, pp. 155-175.
19. S. Keukeleire, 'Directorates in the CFSP/CESDP of the European Union. A Plea for “Restricted Crisis Management Groups”' (2001) 2 EFA Rev, pp. 75-101.
20. was dodged by a few of the other EU Member States. See 'It's my party but I just can't do what I want', Financial Times, 6 November 2001, p. 3.
21. See the analysis and the policy suggestions in A. Missiroli, 'European Security Policy. The Challenge of Coherence' (2001) 2 EFA Rev, pp. 177-196.
22. J. Howorth, 'European defence and the changing politics of the European Union. Hanging together or hanging separately?' (2001) 4 Journal of Common Market Studies, pp. 765-789.
23. circumstances legitimating their use, for example, to the role of the United Nations.' (L. Dini, European Defence, CONV 301/02, 26 September 2002, p. 6).
24. For an analysis of the limited use of the present practice of common strategies, see C. Spencer, 'The EU and common strategies. The revealing case of the Mediterranean' (2001) 1 EFA Rev, pp. 31-51.
25. The EU is still at the beginning of the development of a strategic culture. See P. Cornish, G. Edwards, 'Beyond the EU/NATO dichotomy. The beginnings of a European strategic culture' (2001) 3 International Affairs, pp. 587-603.
26. R. Gomez, J. Peterson, 'The EU's impossibly busy foreign ministers. “No one is in control”' (2001) 1 EFA Rev, pp. 53-74.
27. See U. Schneckener, 'Developing and applying EU crisis management - test case Macedonia', European Centre for Minority Issues, Working Paper 15 (Flensburg, January 2002).
28. C. Piana, 'The EU's decision-making process in the Common Foreign and Security Policy. The case of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia' (2002) 2 EFA Rev, pp. 209-226.
29. An impulse with slightly similar meanings for the consideration of the future of NATO assumes a series of other factors. See K.D. Schwarz, 'Bush's “Revolution in Military Affairs”', SWP-Studie (Berlin, September 2001), p. 26.
30. M. Alamir, 'Die Europäische Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik (ESVP) - ein Spaltpilz für die NATO?', (2001) 3 Österreichische militärische Zeitschrift, pp. 357-362.
31. H. Gärtner, 'European security, transatlantic link, and crisis management' in A. Hyde-Price and E. Reiter (eds), Europe's new security challenges (Boulder, Colorado 2001), pp. 125-148.
32. 2002). See also the end session of the European Council of Laeken (14/15 December 2001): .
33. K. Schake, 'Constructive Duplication: Reducing the EU reliance on US military assets', Centre for European Reform, Working Paper (London, January 2002).
34. G. Adams et al., 'Between Co-operation and Competition: The Transatlantic Defence Market' (2001) 44 Chaillot Papers 44.
35. st Century (London, 2001), pp. 145-160.
36. the competition with the US. M. Dembinski, 'Von der Partnerschaft zur Konkurrenz? Die europäische Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik und die Zukunft der NATO', in Die Zukunft der transatlantischen Beziehungen. Ost-West-Kolleg der Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung (Bonn, 2001) pp. 99-109.
37. T. Tiilikainen, 'To Be or Not to Be? An Analysis of the Legal and Political Elements of Statehood in the EU's External Identity' (2001) 2 EFA Rev, pp. 223-241.
38. S. Anderson, 'The Changing Nature of Diplomacy: the European Union, the CFSP and Korea' (2001) 4 EFA Rev, pp. 465-482.
39. Only those risks that emanate from the possession of biological, chemical or nuclear weapons by rogue states and terrorists would cause a widening of the ESDP's mission. S. Duke, 'CESDP and the EU response to 11 September: Identifying the weakest link' (2002) 2 EFA Rev, pp. 153-169.
40. See also A. Kelle and A. Achaper, 'Bio- und Nuklearterrorismus - Eine kritische Analyse der Risiken nach dem 11 September 2001', HSFK Report 10 (Frankfurt a.M. 2001).
41. E. Thiel, 'Das Engagement der EU nach dem 11. September - Katalysator der Integration und für die Euro-Atlantische Partnerschaft?' SWP-Aktuell 26 (Berlin, December 2001).
42. J. Howorth, 'Britain, NATO and CESDP: Fixed Strategy, Changing Tactics' (2000) 3 EFA Rev, pp. 377-396.
43. A. Krause, 'Mehr als ein Papiertiger? Die Konfliktbearbeitungspolitik der GASP in Afrika', Report der HSFK (Frankfurt a.M. 2001).
44. R.H. Ginsberg, The European Union in International Politics - Baptism by Fire (Oxford 2001), and R. de Wijk, 'Convergence Criteria: Measuring Input or Output?' (2000) 3 EFA Rev, pp. 397-417.