Role of parents and annotation sharing in children's learning behavior and achievement using E-readers

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 292-307

  Hwang, Wu Yuin ^a   Liu, Yi Fan ^a   Chen, Hon Ren ^b   Huang, Jian Wun ^a   Li, Jin Yi ^c  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAICHUNG UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Taiwan)

^c Chyau Zhong Elementary School   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Annotatable multimedia e readers (AMEs); Annotation sharing; English learning; Learning behavior; Learning time

Indexed keywords

EID: 84936770125     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adelman, Nancy E. (1996). The Uses of time for teaching and learning. Volume I: Findings and conclusions.Studies of education reform. Washington, DC:Institute of Education Sciences.
2. Bergin, D. A. (1996). Adolescents'out-of-school learning strategies. Journal of Experimental Education, 64(4), 309-323.
3. Black, Susan. (2002). Time for learning. American School Board Journal, 189(9), 58-62.
4. Bohay, M., Blakely, D. P., Tamplin, A. K., & Radvansky, G. A. (2011). Note taking, review, memory, and comprehension. American Journal of Psychology, 124(1), 63-73.
5. Chen, C. J., &Liu, P. L. (2012). Comparisons of learner-generated versus instructor-provided multimedia annotations. Turkish online journal of educational technology, 11(4), 72-83.
6. Chen, Y. C., Hwang, R. H., & Wang, C. Y. (2012). Development and evaluation of a Web 2.0 annotation system as a learning tool in an e-learning environment. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1094-1105. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.017
7. Cordon-Garcia, J. A., & Lopes, C. A. (2012). The e-book: Invariances and transformations. Profesional De LaInformacion, 21(1), 83-90. doi: 10.3145/epi.2012.ene.11
8. Dairianathan, A., & Subramaniam, R. (2011). Learning about inheritance in an out-of-school setting. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1079-1108. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.494185
9. Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model of empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA, USA.
10. Desforges, C., & Abouchaar, A. (2003). The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievement and adjustment: A literature review.Nottingham, UK: The Department for Education and Skills.
11. Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students'academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1-22. doi: 10.1023/A:1009048817385
12. Fisher, Douglas. (2009). The use of instructional time in the typical high school classroom. The Educational Forum, 73(2), 168-176.
13. Floyd, L. O., & Vernon-Dotson, L. J. (2009). Using home learning tool kits to facilitate family involvement. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(3), 160-166. doi: 10.1177/1053451208326049
14. Gettinger, M., & Walter, M.J. (2012). Classroom strategies to enhance academic engaged time. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 653-673.
15. Gettinger, Maribeth. (1985). Time allocated and time spent relative to time needed for learning as determinants of achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 3-11.
16. Gonzalez-DeHass, A. R., Willems, P. A., & Holbein, M. F. D. (2005). Examining the relationship between parental involvement and student motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 95-119. doi: 10.1007/s10648-005-3949-7
17. Hanna, D., Ulrich, T., Oliver, L., Marko, N., Alois, N., & Inge, S. (2011). Does parental homework involvement mediate the relationship between family background and educational outcomes? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(1), 55-69.
18. Huang, Y. M., Liang, T. H., Su, Y. N., &Chen, N. S. (2012). Empowering personalized learning with an interactive e-book learning system for elementary school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(4), 703-722. doi: 10.1007/s11423-012-9237-6
19. Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., Shadiev, R., & Li, J. S. (2011). Effects of reviewing annotations and homework solutions on math learning achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 1016-1028. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01126.x
20. Hwang, W. Y., Liu, Y. F., Liu, H. H., & Huang, Y. M. (2011b, November). A study of e-readers with multimedia annotation to help elementary school students learning with parental involvement. Paper presented at the19th International Conference on Computers in Education,Chiang Mai,Thailand.
21. Hwang, W. Y., & Hsu, G. L. (2011). The effects of pre-reading and haring mechanisms on learning with the use of annotations. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 234-249.
22. Hwang, W. Y., Shadiev, R., & Huang, S. M. (2011a). A study of a multimedia web annotation system and its effect on the EFL writing and speaking performance of junior high school students. Recall, 23, 160-180. doi: 10.1017/ S0958344011000061
23. Hwang, W. Y., Wang, C. Y., & Sharples, M. (2007). A study of multimedia annotation of Web-based materials. Computers & Education, 48(4), 680-699. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.020
24. Korat, O. (2010). Reading electronic books as a support for vocabulary, story comprehension and word reading in kindergarten and first grade. Computers & Education, 55(1), 24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.014
25. Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2012). Direct and indirect teaching: Using e-books for supporting vocabulary, word reading, and story comprehension for young children. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(2), 135-152. doi: 10.2190/Ec.46.2.B
26. Krumm, Volker. (1996). Parent involvement in Austria and Taiwan: Results of a comparative study. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(1), 9-24. doi: 10.1016/0883-0355(96)82038-6
27. Lee, C. H., Lee, G. G., & Leu, Y. (2009). The effectiveness of an intelligent annotation sharing system on e-learning. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 5733-5740. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.111
28. Li, L. Y., Chen, G. D., & Yang, S. J. (2013). Construction of cognitivemaps to improve e-book reading and navigation. Computers & Education, 60(1), 32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.010
29. Noam, Gil G, Biancarosa, Gina, & Dechausay, Nadine. (2003). Afterschool Education: Approaches to an Emerging Field: ERIC. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
30. Peverly, S. T., Vekaria, P. C., Reddington, L. A., Sumowski, J. F., Johnson, K. R., & Ramsay, C. M. (2013). The relationship of handwriting speed, working memory, language comprehension and outlines to lecture note-takingand test-taking among college students. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 115-126. doi: 10.1002/Acp.2881
31. Quade, Ann M. (1996). An assessment of retention and depth of processing associated with notetaking using traditional pencil and paper and an on-line notepad during computer-delivered instruction.Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
32. Sartor, C. E., & Youniss, J. (2002). The relationship between positive parental involvement and identity achievement during adolescence. Adolescence, 37(146), 221-234.
33. Shamir, A., Korat, O., & Fellah, R. (2012). Promoting vocabulary, phonological awareness and concept about print among children at risk for learning disability: Can e-books help? Reading and Writing, 25(1), 45-69. doi: 10.1007/s11145-010-9247-x
34. Shih, B. Y., Chen, T. H., Cheng, M. H., Chen, C. Y., & Chen, B. W. (2013). How to manipulate interactive e-book on learning natural catastrophe: An example of structural mechanics using power machine. Natural Hazards, 65(3), 1637-1652. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0413-0
35. Shurtz, S., & von Isenburg, M. (2011). Exploring e-readers to support clinical medical education: Two case studies. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 99(2), 110-117. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.99.2.002
36. Siegenthaler, E., Bochud, Y., Bergamin, P., & Wurtz, P. (2012). Reading on LCD vs. e-ink displays: Effects on fatigue and visual strain. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 32(5), 367-374. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00928.x
37. Siegenthaler, E., Wurtz, P.,Bergamin, P., & Groner, R. (2011). Comparing reading processes on e-ink displays and print. Displays, 32(5), 268-273. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2011.05.005
38. Su, A. Y. S., Yang, S. J. H., Hwang, W. Y., & Zhang, J. (2010). A Web 2.0-based collaborative annotation system for enhancing knowledge sharing in collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(2), 752-766. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.008
39. Tran, N. A. (2011). The relationship between students'connections to out-of-school experiences and factors associated with science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 33(12), 1625-1651. doi: 10.1080/09500693. 2010.516030
40. Venkatesh, V.,& Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186-204.
41. Wright, S., Fugett, A., & Caputa, F. (2013). Using e-readers and Internet resources to support comprehension. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 367-379.
42. Wyne, Marvin D, & Stuck, Gary B. (1982). Time and learning: Implications for the classroom teacher. The Elementary School Journal, 83(1), 67-75.
43. Xu, J. Z. (2004). Family help and homework management in urban and rural secondary schools. Teachers College Record, 106(9), 1786-1803.
44. Yang, C. C., Tseng, S. S., Shih, W. C., & Liang, T. (2012). A cross-text annotation sharing mechanism for enhancing students'comprehension of poetry. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 13-24.
45. Yang, S. J. H., Zhang, J., Su, A. Y. S., & Tsai, J. J. P. (2011). A collaborative multimedia annotation tool for enhancing knowledge sharing in CSCL. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(1), 45-62. doi: 10.1080/10494820. 2011.528881