Classroom strategies to enhance academic engaged time

Handbook of Research on Student Engagement

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 653-673

  Gettinger, Maribeth ^a   Walter, Martha J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899626814     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_31     Document Type: Chapter

References (95)

1. Adelman, N. E., Haslam, M. B., & Pringle, B. A. (1996). The uses of time for teaching and learning (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates, Inc.
2. Anderson, L. W. (Ed.). (1984). Time and school learning: Theory, research and practice. New York: St. Martin's Press.
3. Anderson, L. W. (Ed.). (1985). Perspectives on school learning: Selected writings of John B. Carroll. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Aronson, J., Zimmerman, J., & Carlos, L. (1999). Improving student achievement by extending school: Is it just a matter of time? San Francisco: WestEd.
5. Bandura, A., Martinez-Pons, M., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29 663-674.
6. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effects of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61 213-238.
7. Ben-Peretz, M., & Bromme, R. (Eds.). (1990). The nature of time in schools: Theoretical concepts, practitioner perceptions. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Berliner, D. (1990a). What's all the fuss about instructional time? In M. Ben-Peretz & R. Bromme (Eds.), The nature of time in schools: Theoretical concepts, practitioner perceptions (pp. 3-35). New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Berliner, D. (1990b). The place of process-product research in developing the agenda for research on teaching thinking. Educational Psychologist, 24 325-344.
10. Black, S. (2002). Time for learning. American School Board Journal, 189 58-62.
11. Blatchford, P., Russell, A., Bassett, P., Brown, P., & Martin, C. (2007). The effect of class size on the teaching of pupils aged 7-11 years. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(2), 147-172.
12. Block, J. H. (Ed.). (1971). Mastery learning: Theory and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
13. Block, J. H. (1983). Learning rates and mastery learning. Outcomes, 2 (3), 18-23.
14. Block, J. H., & Anderson, L. W. (1975). Mastery learning in classroom instruction. New York: Macmillan.
15. Bloom, B. S. (1974). Time and learning. American Psychologist, 29, 682-688.
16. Borkowski, J. G., & Muthukrishna, N. (1992). Moving metacognition into the classroom: "Working models" and effective strategy teaching. In M. Pressley, K. R. Harris, & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in school (pp. 477-501). San Diego, CA: Academic.
17. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and selfregulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65 245-281.
18. Caldwell, J. H., Huitt, W. G., & Graeber, A. O. (1982). Time spent in learning: Implications from research. The Elementary School Journal, 82 471-480.
19. Carr, S. C., & Punzo, R. P. (1993). The effects of selfmonitoring of academic accuracy and productivity on the performance of students with behavioral disorders. Behavior Disorders, 18 241-250.
20. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64 723-733.
21. Carroll, J. B. (1984). The model of school learning: Progress of an idea. In L. W. Anderson (Ed.), Time and school learning: Theory, research and practice (pp. 15-46). New York: St. Martin's Press.
22. Carroll, J. B. (1989). The Carroll model: A 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Educational Researcher, 18 26-31.
23. Chuska, K. (1995). Improving classroom questions: A teacher's guide to increasing student motivation, participation, and higher level thinking. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
24. Cole, C. L., & Bambara, L. M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Theory and practice. In E. S. Shapiro & T. R. Kratochwill (Eds.), Behavioral assessment in schools: Theory, research, and clinical foundations (2nd ed., pp. 202-232). New York: Guilford Press.
25. Cole, C. L., Marder, T., & McCann, L. (2000). Selfmonitoring. In E. S. Shapiro & T. R. Kratochwill (Eds.), Conducting school-based assessments of child and adolescent behavior (pp. 121-149). New York: Guilford Press.
26. Cooley, W. W., & Leinhardt, G. (1976). The application of a model for investigating classroom processes. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research & Development Center.
27. Cooley, W. W., & Leinhardt, G. (1980). The instructional dimensions study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2, 7-26.
28. Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76 1-62.
29. Daly, P. M., & Ranalli, P. (2003). Using Countoons to teach self-monitoring skills. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(5), 30-35.
30. Dawson, P. (2007). Best practices in managing homework. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 1073-1084). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
31. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25 54-67.
32. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182-185.
33. Denham, C., & Lieberman, A. (Eds.). (1980). Time to learn. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.
34. DuPaul, G. J., & Stoner, G. (2003). ADHD in the schools: Assessment and intervention strategies. New York: Guilford Press.
35. Fisher, C. W., & Berliner, D. C. (1985). Perspectives on instructional time. New York: Longman.
36. Fisher, D. (2009). The use of instructional time in the typical high school classroom. The Educational Forum, 73, 168-173.
37. Fowler, W. (1995). School size and student outcomes. Advances in Educational Productivity, 5 3-26.
38. Fredrick, W. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1980). Learning as a function of time. The Journal of Educational Research, 73, 183-194.
39. Frieberg, H. J., & Driscoll, A. (2000). Universal teaching strategies (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
40. Gall, M. (1984). Synthesis of research on teachers' questioning. Educational Leadership, 42 40-47.
41. Gettinger, M. (1984). Individual differences in time needed for learning: A review of the literature. Educational Psychologist, 19 15-29.
42. Gettinger, M. (1985). Time allocated and time spent relative to time needed for learning as determinants of achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 3-11.
43. Gettinger, M. (1989). Effects of maximizing time spent and minimizing time needed on pupil achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 26 73-91.
44. Gettinger, M., & Ball, C. (2007). Best practices in increasing academic engaged time. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 1043-1075). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
45. Gettinger, M., & Kohler, K. (2006). Process-outcome approaches to classroom management and effective teaching. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 73-96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Gettinger, M., & Stoiber, K. (2009). Effective teaching and effective schools. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (4th ed., pp. 769-790). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
47. Gijselaers, W. H., & Schmidt, H. G. (1995). Effects of quantity of instruction on time spent on learning and achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 1, 183-201.
48. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2003). Looking in classrooms (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
49. Goodman, L. (1990). Time and learning in the special education classroom. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
50. Guskey, T. R. (2001). Mastery learning. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (pp. 9372-9377). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
51. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403-424). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. Haertel, G. D., Walberg, H. F., & Weinstein, T. (1983). Psychological models of educational performance: A theoretical synthesis of constructs. Review of Educational Research, 53 75-91.
53. Harmin, M., & Toth, M. (2006). Inspiring active learning: A complete handbookfortoday's teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
54. Harnishfeger, A., & Wiley, D. (1976). The teaching-learning process in elementary schools: A synoptic view. Curriculum Inquiry, 6 5-43.
55. Harnishfeger, A., & Wiley, D. (1985). Origins of active learning time. In C. W. Fisher & D. C. Berliner (Eds.), Perspectives on instructional time (pp. 133-156). New York: Longman.
56. Hollywood, T. M., Salisbury, C. I., Rainforth, B., & Palombaro, M. (1995). Use of instructional time in classrooms serving students with and without severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 61 242-254.
57. Huitt, W. (1995). A systems model of the teaching/learning process. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: College of Education, Valdosta State University. Retrieved March, 2010, from http://teach. valdosta. edu/whuitt/materials/tchlrnmd. html
58. Karweit, N. (1989). Time and learning: A review. In R. E. Slavin (Ed.), School and classroom organization (pp. 69-95). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59. Karweit, N., & Slavin, R. E. (1981). Measurement and modeling choices in studies of time and learning. American Educational Research Journal, 18 151-171.
60. Kauchak, D. P., & Eggen, P. D. (2003). Learning and teaching: Research-based methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
61. Kelshaw-Levering, K., Sterling-Turner, H. E., Henry, J. R., & Skinner, C. H. (2000). Randomized interdependent group contingencies. Psychology in the Schools, 37 523-534.
62. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119 254-284.
63. Kubitschek, W. N., Hallinan, M. T., Arnett, S. M., & Galipeau, K. S. (2005). High school schedule changes and the effect of lost instructional time on achievement. High School Journal, 89 63-71.
64. Leinhardt, G. (1978). Applying a classroom process model to instructional evaluation. Curriculum Inquiry, 8, 155-176.
65. Levendoski, L. S., & Cartledge, G. (2000). Self-monitoring for elementary school children with emotional disturbances: Classroom application for increased academic responding. Behavioral Disorders, 25 211-224.
66. Litow, L., & Pumroy, D. (1975). A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8 341-347.
67. Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37 153-184.
68. Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
69. Mory, E. H. (1992). The use of informational feedback in instruction: Implications for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40 5-20.
70. Moxley, R. A. (1998). Treatment-only designs and student self-recording as strategies for public school teachers. Education and Treatment of Children, 21 37-61.
71. Mulholland, R., & Cepello, M. (2006). What teacher candidates need to know about academic learning time. International Journal of Special Education, 21, 63-73.
72. National Education Commission on Time and Learning (NECTL). (1994). Prisoners of time: Report of the National Commission on Time and Learning. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office. (reprinted in 2005).
73. Odden, A. R., & Archibald, S. J. (2009). Doubling student performance. . . and finding the resources to do it. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
74. Ostrosky, M. M., Jung, E. Y., Hemmeter, M. L., & Thomas, D. (2003). Helping children make transitions between activities. Washington, DC: Center on the Social and Emotional Foundations for Early Learning.
75. Prater, M. A. (1992). Increasing time-on-task in the classroom: Suggestions for improving the amount of time learners spend in on-task behaviors. Intervention in School and Clinic, 28 22-27.
76. Rangel, E. S. (2007). Time to learn. Research Points, 5(2), 104.
77. Reid, R. (1996). Research in self-monitoring with students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29 317-331.
78. Rock, M. L. (2005). Use of strategic self-monitoring to enhance academic engagement, productivity, and accuracy of students with and without disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7 3-17.
79. Rosenshine, B. (1995). Advances in research on instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 88, 262-268.
80. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55 68-78.
81. Shapiro, E. S., & Cole, C. L. (1994). Behavior change in the classroom: Self-management interventions. New York: Guilford Press.
82. Shimabukuro, S. M., Prater, M. A., Jenkins, A., & Edelen-Smith, P. (1999). The effects of self-monitoring of academic performance on students with learning disabilities and ADD/ADHD. Education and Treatment of Children, 22, 397-414.
83. Smith, B. A. (2000). Quantity matters: Annual instruction time in an urban school system. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36 652-682.
84. Squires, D., Huitt, W., & Segars, J. (1983). Effective classrooms and schools: A research-based perspective. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
85. Stanley, S. O., & Greenwood, C. R. (1981). CISSAR: Code for instructional structure and student academic response. Observer's manual. Kansas City, KS: University of Kansas, Bureau of Child Research, Juniper Gardens Children's Project.
86. Stichter, J. P., Stormont, M., & Lewis, T. J. (2008). Instructional practices and behavior during reading: A descriptive summary and comparison of practices in Title I and non-Title I elementary schools. Psychology in the Schools, 46 172-183.
87. Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Differentiating instruction for academic diversity. In M. Cooper (Ed.), Classroom teaching skills (7th ed., pp. 134-165). New York: Houghton Mifflin.
88. Trammel, D. L., Schloss, P. T., & Alper, S. (1994). Using self-recording, evaluation, and graphing to increase completion of homework assignments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 75-81.
89. van den Hurk, M., Wolfhagen, H., Dolmans, D., & van der Vleuten, C. (1998). The relation between time spent on individual study and academic achievement in a problem-based curriculum. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 3, 43-49.
90. Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63 249-294.
91. Wehmeyer, M. L., Agran, M., Hughes, C., Martin, J. E., Mithaug, D. E., & Palmer, S. B. (2007). Promoting self-determination in students with developmental disabilities. New York: Guilford Press.
92. Wiley, D. E., & Harnishfeger, A. (1974). Explosion of a myth: Quantity of schooling and exposure to instruction: Major educational vehicles. Educational Researcher, 3, 7-11.
93. Woelfel, K. (2005). Learning takes time for at-risk students. Education Digest, 71(4), 28-30.
94. Wyne, M., & Stuck, G. (1982). Time and learning: Implications for the classroom teacher. The Elementary School Journal, 83 67-75.
95. Zimmerman, B., Greenberg, D., & Weinstein, C. (1994). Self-regulating academic study time: A strategy approach. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 181-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.