Building bridges between doctors and patients: The design and pilot evaluation of a training session in argumentation for chronic pain experts Curriculum development

BMC Medical Education

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Zanini, Claudia ^a,b   Sarzi Puttini, Piercarlo ^c   Atzeni, Fabiola ^c   Di Franco, Manuela ^d   Rubinelli, Sara ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUCERNE   (Switzerland)

^b SWISS PARAPLEGIC RESEARCH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^d SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHRONIC PAIN; CURRICULUM; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PILOT STUDY; PROCEDURES;

CHRONIC PAIN; COMMUNICATION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; HUMANS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PILOT PROJECTS;

EID: 84935898406     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726920     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-015-0374-6     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Stewart M. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Ass J. 1995;152:1423-33.
2. Lipkin M, Putnam S, Lazare A. The medical interview. Clinical care, education, and research. New York: Springer; 1995.
3. Travaline JM, Ruchinskas R, D'Alonzo GE. Patient-Physician Communication: Why and How. JAOA. 2005;105(1):13-8.
4. Deveugele M, Derese A, Maesschalck SD, Willems S, Driel MV, Maeseneer JD. Teaching communication skills to medical students, a challenge in the curriculum? Patient Educ Couns. 2005;58(3):265-70.
5. Von Fragstein M, Silverman J, Cushing A, Quilligan S, Salisbury H, Wiskin C. UK consensus statement on the content of communication curricula in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2008;42(11):1100-7.
6. Roter D, Hall J. Doctors talking with patients/patients talking with doctors: improving communication in medical visits. Westport Connecticut: Auburn house; 1992.
7. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681-92.
8. Wirtz V, Cribb A, Barber N. Patient-doctor decision-making about treatment within the consultation - A critical analysis of models. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(1):116-24.
9. Zanini C, Rubinelli S. Using argumentation theory to identify the communication challenges of shared decision-making when the doctor and the patient have a difference of opinion. J Public Health Res. 2012;2(1), e26.
10. Rubinelli S, Zanini C. Teaching argumentation theory to doctors: Why and what. J Argumentation Context. 2012;1(1):66-80.
11. van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R. A systematic theory of argumentation: the pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
12. Jiménez-Aleixandre M, Erduran S. Argumentation in science education: an overview. In: Erduran S, Jiménez-Aleixandre M, editors. Argumentation in Science Education. Volume 35. Netherlands: Springer; 2007. p. 3-27.
13. Reznitskaya A, Kuo LJ, Clark AM, Miller B, Jadallah M, Anderson RC, et al. Collaborative reasoning: a dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge J Educ. 2009;39(1):29-48.
14. Bench-Capon T, Prakken H, Sartor G. Argumentation in legal reasoning. In: Simari G, Rahwan I, editors. Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. US: Springer; 2009. p. 363-82.
15. Walton DN. Legal argumentation and evidence. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press; 2002.
16. Lauerbach G. Argumentation in political talk show interviews. J Pragmatics. 2007;39(8):1388-419.
17. Walton DN. Use of ad hominem argument in political discourse: the Battalino Case from the impeachment trial of President Clinton. Argumentation Advocacy. 2000;36(4):179-95.
18. Bench-Capon TJM, Dunne PE. Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artif Intell. 2007;171(10-15):619-41.
19. Rahwan I, Simari GR. Argumentation in artificial intelligence. London, UK: Springer; 2009.
20. Snoeck Henkemans AF, Mohammed D. Institutional constraints on the strategic maneuvering in shared medical decision-making. J Argumentation Context. 2012;1(1):19-31.
21. Labrie N. Strategic maneuvering in treatment decision-making discussions: two cases in point. Argumentation. 2012;26(2):171-99.
22. Labrie N. Strategically eliciting concessions from patients in treatment decision-making discussions. J Argumentation Context. 2013;2(3):322-41.
23. Snoeck Henkemans AF. Shared medical decision-making: Strategic maneuvering by doctors in the presentation of their treatment preferences to patients. In: International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation 2010; Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 2010: 1811-1818
24. Rubinelli S. Argumentation as rational persuasion in doctor-patient communication. Philos Rhetoric. 2013;46(4):550-69.
25. Rubinelli S, Schulz PJ. "Let Me Tell You Why!". When argumentation in doctor-patient interaction makes a difference. Argumentation. 2006;20(3):353-75.
26. Labrie N, Schulz PJ. Does argumentation matter? A systematic literature review on the role of argumentation in doctor-patient communication. Health Commun. 2014;29(10):996-1008.
27. Glattacker M, Heyduck K, Meffert C. Illness beliefs, treatment beliefs and information needs as starting points for patient information. Evaluation of an intervention for patients with chronic back pain. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86(3):378-89.
28. McClung H, Murray R, Heitlinger L. The internet as a source for current patient information. Pediatrics. 1998;101, e2.
29. Sommerhalder K, Abraham A, Caiata Zufferey M, Barth J, Abel T. Internet information and medical consultations: experiences from patients' and physicians' perspectives. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77:266-71.
30. Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Aikens JE, Krein SL, Fitzgerald JT, Nwankwo R, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of an empowerment-based self-management consultant intervention: results of a two-year randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;1(1):3-11.
31. Kim SP, Knight SJ, Tomori C, Colella KM, Schoor RA, Shih L, et al. Health literacy and shared decision making for prostate cancer patients with low socioeconomic status. Cancer Invest. 2001;19(7):684-91.
32. Mancuso CA, Rincon M. Asthma patients' assessments of health care and medical decision making: the role of health literacy. J Asthma. 2006;43(1):41-4.
33. Johansson E, Hamberg K, Lindgreen G, Westmann G. "I have been crying my way": qualitative analysis of a group of female patients' consultation experiences. Fam Pract. 1996;13:498-503.
34. Korsch B, Gozzi E, Francis V. Gaps in doctor patient communication: I doctor-patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Pediatrics. 1968;42:855-71.
35. Fahnestock J, Secor M. A rhetoric of argument: a text and reader. New York, USA: McGraw Hill; 2004.
36. van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R, Snoeck Henkemans FA. Argumentation, analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002.
37. Groarke LA, Tindale CW, Little FJ. Good reasining matters! A constructive approach to critical thinking. Fifthth ed. Toronto, CA: Oxford University Press; 2013.
38. Rubinelli S. Rational versus unreasonable persuasion in doctor-patient communication: a normative account. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;92(3):296-301.
39. Snoeck Henkemans F. Argumentation, explanation and causality. In: Sanders T, Joost S, Spooren W, editors. Text representation: linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins; 2001.
40. Sandman L, Munthe C. Shared decision making, paternalism and patient choice. Health Care Anal. 2010;18(1):60-84.
41. Labrie NH, Schulz PJ. The effects of general practitioners' use of argumentation to support their treatment advice: Results of an experimental study using video-vignettes. Health Commun. 2014;25:1-11.
42. Rubinelli S. Ars Topica. The classical technique of constructing arguments from Aristotle to Cicero, vol. 15. London, UK: Springer; 2009.
43. Walton D, Reed C, Macagno F. Argumentation schemes. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
44. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA, US: Sage Publications; 1985.
45. Quill TE, Brody H. Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125(9):763-9.
46. Zanini C, Sarzi-Puttini P, Atzeni F, Di Franco M, Rubinelli S. Doctors' insights into the patient perspective: a qualitative study in the field of chronic pain. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:6.
47. Entwistle V, Carter S, Cribb A, McCaffery K. Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinician-patient relationships. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(7):741-5.
48. Bickenbach J. Argumentation and informed consent in the doctor-patient relationship. J Argumentation Context. 2012;1(1):5-18.
49. Parle M, Maguire P, Heaven C. The development of a training model to improve health professionals' skills, self-efficacy and outcome expectancies when communicating with cancer patients. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(2):231-40.
50. Braun VCV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psy. 2006;3:77-101.
51. Tuckett AG. Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: a researcher's experience. Contemp Nurse. 2005;19(1-2):75-87.
52. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage; 1990.
53. Katz J. The Silent World of Doctor and Patient. New York: Free Press; 1984.
54. Halpern J. Empathy and patient-physician conflict. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:696-700.
55. Studdert D, Burns J, Mello M, Puopolo A, Truog R, Brennan T. Nature of conflict in the care of pediatric intensive care patients with prolonged stay. Pediatrics. 2003;112:553-8.
56. Wolf S. Conflict between doctor and patient. Law Med Health Care. 1988;16:197-203.
57. Emanuel E, Emanual L. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992;267(16):2221-6.
58. Back A, Arnold R. Dealing with conflict in caring for the seriously ill: "it was just out of the question". JAMA. 2005;293(11):1374-81.
59. Weitzman P, Weitzman E. Promoting communication with older adults: protocols for resolving interpersonal conflicts and for enhancing interactions with doctors. Clin Psychol Rev. 2003;23:523-35.
60. Adler S, McGraw S, McKinlay J. Patient assertiveness in ethnically diverse older women with breast cancer: challenging stereotypes of the elderly. J Aging Stud. 1998;12(4):331-50.
61. Rosser A, McCracker L, Velleman S, Boichat C, Eccleston C. Concerns about medication and medication adherence in patients with chronic pain recruited from general practice. Pain. 2011;152:1201-5.
62. Peräkylä A. Authority and accountability: the delivery of diagnosis in primary health care. Soc Psychol Quart. 1998;61(4):301-20.
63. Kuhn D. Teaching and learning science as argument. Sci Educ. 2010;94:810-24.
64. Michaels S, O'Connor C, Resnick L. Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Stud Philos Educ. 2008;27(4):283-97.
65. Ford M. Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Sci Educ. 2008;92(3):404-23.
66. Muller Mirza N, Perret-Clermont A-N. Argumentation and education: theoretical foundations and practices. London: Springer; 2009.
67. Chin J. Doctor-patient relationship: from medical paternalism to enhanced autonomy. Singapore Med J. 2002;43(3):152-5.
68. Lamiani G, Meyer EC, Rider EA, Browning DM, Vegni E, Mauri E, et al. Assumptions and blind spots in patient-centredness: action research between American and Italian health care professionals. Med Educ. 2008;42(7):712-20.
69. Meinero S, Alloatti S, Triolo G, Guarnieri A, Inguaggiato P, Bainotti S, et al. Non avvio o sospensione del trattamento dialitico cronico nell'adulto: considerazioni cliniche, relazionali, bioetiche e legislative. G Ital Nefrol. 2007;24(1):43-50.
70. Tinè F. Patient's preferences for health scenarios associated with hepatitis C and its treatment. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2009;3:363-70.
71. Giordano A, Mattarozzi K, Pucci E, Leone M, Casini F, Collimedaglia L, et al. Participation in medical decision-making: attitudes of Italians with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2008;275(1-2):86-91.
72. Solari A, Giordano A, Kasper J, Drulovic J, van Nunen A, Vahter L, et al. Role preferences of people with multiple sclerosis: image-revised, computerized self-administered version of the control preference scale. PLoS One. 2013;8(6), e66127.
73. Anderson R, Funnell M. Patient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:153-7.
74. Ericsson AK. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):988-94.