Role Preferences of People with Multiple Sclerosis: Image-Revised, Computerized Self-Administered Version of the Control Preference Scale

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2013, Pages

  Solari, Alessandra ^a   Giordano, Andrea ^a   Kasper, Jurgen ^b   Drulovic, Jelena ^c   van Nunen, An ^d   Vahter, Liina ^e   Viala, Frederique ^f   Pietrolongo, Erika ^g   Pugliatti, Maura ^h   Antozzi, Carlo ^a   Radice, Davide ⁱ   Köpke, Sascha ^j   Heesen, Christoph ^b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF NEUROSURGERY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^d National Multiple Sclerosis Center   (Belgium)

^e WEST TALLINN CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Estonia)

^f CHU PURPAN   (France)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^h UNIVERSITY OF SASSARI   (Italy)

ⁱ EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^j UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CONTROL PREFERENCE SCALE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; EDUCATION; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; GERMAN; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; ITALIAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; COMPUTER; CONTROL; GERMANY; ITALY; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROLE PLAYING;

COMPUTERS; GERMANY; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; ITALY; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROLE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84879151434     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066127     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, et al. (2011) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10: CD001431.
2. Institute of Medicine (2001) Committee on Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington: National Academy Press.
3. European Commission (2007) Together for health: a strategic approach for the EU 2008-2013. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_overview/Documents/strategy_wp_en.pdf. Accessed 2013 January 15.
4. Involving patients and the public in healthcare (2012) UK Department of Health website. Available: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk//www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/Browsable/DH_5217301. Accessed 2013 January 15.
5. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T, O'Brien MA, (2006) Cultural influences on the physician-patient encounter: The case of shared treatment decision-making. Patient Educ Couns 63: 262-267.
6. Terry K, (1994) Telling patients more will save you time. Med Econ 71: 40-52.
7. Levinson W, (1994) Physician-patient communication. A key to malpractice prevention. JAMA 272: 1619-1620.
8. Wallberg B, Michelson H, Nystedt M, Bolund C, Degner LF, et al. (2000) Information needs and preferences for participation in treatment decisions among Swedish breast cancer patients. Acta Oncol 39: 467-476.
9. Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA, (2005) Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med 20: 531-535.
10. Arora NK, Mc Horney CA, (2000) Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate? Med Care 38: 335-341.
11. Mansell D, Poses RM, Kazis L, Duefield CA, (2000) Clinical factors that influence patient's desire for participation in decisions about illness. Arch Intern Med 160: 2991-2996.
12. Bruce JM, Lynch SG, (2011) MS treatment adherence-how to keep patients on medication? Nat Rev Neurol 7: 421-422.
13. Heesen C, Solari A, Giordano A, Kasper J, Köpke S, (2011) Decisions on multiple sclerosis immunotherapy: New treatment complexities urge patient engagement. J Neurological Sci 306: 192-197.
14. Yadav V, Bourdette D, (2012) New Disease-Modifying Therapies and New Challenges for MS. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 12: 489-491.
15. Kasper J, Köpke S, Mühlhauser I, Nübling M, Heesen C, (2008) Informed shared decision making about immunotherapy for patients with multiple sclerosis (ISDIMS): a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Neurol 15: 1345-1352.
16. Pietrolongo E, Giordano A, Kleinefeld M, Confalonieri P, Lugaresi A, et al. (2013) Decision-making in multiple sclerosis consultations in Italy: third observer and patient assessments. PLoS One 8: e60721 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060721.
17. Melbourne E, Roberts S, Durand MA, Newcombe R, Légaré F, et al. (2011) Dyadic OPTION: Measuring perceptions of shared decision-making in practice. Patient Educ Couns 83: 55-57.
18. Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P, (1997) The Control Preferences Scale. Can J Nurs Res 29: 21-43.
19. Kryworuchko J, Stacey D, Bennett C, Graham ID, (2008) Appraisal of primary outcome measures used in trials of patient decision support. Patient Educ Couns 73: 497-503.
20. Giordano A, Mattarozzi K, Pucci E, Leone M, Casini F, et al. (2008) Participation in medical decision-making: attitudes of Italians with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 275: 86-91.
21. Heesen C, Kasper J, Segal J, Köpke S, Mühlhauser I, (2004) Decisional role preferences, risk knowledge and information interests in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 10: 643-650.
22. Landis JR, Koch GG, (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159-174.
23. Hosmer DW, Lomeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
24. Kremer H, Ironson G, (2008) Measuring the Involvement of People with HIV in Treatment Decision Making Using the Control Preferences Scale. Med Decis Making 28: 899-908.
25. Berry DL, Halpenny B, Hong F, Wolpin S, Lober WB, et al. (2011) The Personal Patient Profile-Prostate decision support for men with localized prostate cancer: A multi-center randomized trial. Urol Oncol doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.10.004.
26. Davison BJ, Goldenberg SL, Gleave ME, Degner LF, (2003) Provision of individualized information to men and their partners to facilitate treatment decision making in prostate cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 30: 107-114.
27. Davison BJ, Goldenberg SL, Wiens KP, Gleave ME, (2007) Comparing a generic and individualized information decision support intervention for men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs 30: E7-E15.
28. Berry DL, Halpenny B, Wolpin S, Davison BJ, Ellis WJ, et al. (2010) Development and Evaluation of the Personal Patient Profile-Prostate (P3P), a Web-Based Decision Support System for Men Newly Diagnosed with Localized Prostate Cancer. J Med Internet Res 12: e67.
29. Coons SJ, Gwaltney CJ, Hays RD, Lundy JJ, Sloan JA, et al. (2009) Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health 12: 419-429.
30. Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Urowitz S, Sharpe N, (2007) Do people want to be autonomous patients? Preferred roles in treatment decision-making in several patient populations. Health Expect 10: 248-258.
31. Solari A, Acquarone N, Pucci E, Martinelli V, Marrosu MG, et al. (2007) Communicating the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis- a qualitative study. Mult Scler 13: 763-769.
32. Hamann J, Bieber C, Elwyn G, Wartner E, Hörlein E, et al. (2012) How do patients from western and eastern Germany compare with regard to their preferences for shared decision making? Eur J Public Health 22: 469-473.
33. Yennurajalingam S, Parsons HA, Duarte ER, Palma A, Bunge S, et al. (2012) Decisional control preferences of hispanic patients with advanced cancer from the United States and Latin America. J Pain Symptom Manage. doi:pii: S0885-3924(12)00495-2. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.08.015.
34. Frosch DL, Légaré F, Fishbein M, Elwyn G, (2009) Adjuncts or adversaries to shared decision-making? Applying the integrative model of behaviour to the role and design of decision support interventions in healthcare. Implement Sci 4: 73.
35. Kagawa-Singer M, (2006) Population science is science only if you know the population. J Cancer Educ 21: S22-S31.
36. Kasper J, Köpke S, Fischer K, Schäffler N, Backhus I, et al. (2012) Applying the theory of planned behaviour to multiple sclerosis patients' decisions on disease modifying therapy - questionnaire concept and validation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 12: 60 doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-60.