Not just 'for' but 'with': Health advocacy as a partnership process

Medical Education

Volumn 49, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 796-804

  Hubinette, Maria ^a   Dobson, Sarah ^b   Regehr, Glenn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COOPERATION; GROUNDED THEORY; HEALTH CENTER; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGY;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; GROUNDED THEORY; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE;

EID: 84935444857     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12755     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Frank JR. The CanMEDS 2005 Physician Competency Framework. Ottawa, ON: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada 2005.
2. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Common Program Requirements. Effective 1 July 2013. http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRs2013.pdf. [Accessed 10 November 2014.]
3. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors: Outcomes and Standards for Undergraduate Medical Education. London: GMC 2009. http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/undergraduate/tomorrows_doctors_2009.asp. [Accessed 10 November 2014.]
4. Cumming A, Ross M. Learning outcomes/competences for undergraduate medical education in Europe. The Tuning Project (Medicine). 2007. http://www.tuning-medicine.com/pdf/booklet.pdf. [Accessed 10 November 2014.]
5. Verma S, Flynn L, Seguin R. Faculty's and residents' perceptions of teaching and evaluating the role of health advocate: a study at one Canadian university. Acad Med 2005;80 (1):103-8.
6. Stafford S, Sedlak T, Fok MC, Wong RY. Evaluation of resident attitudes and self-reported competencies in health advocacy. BMC Med Educ 2010;10 (1):82.
7. Chou S, Cole G, McLaughlin K, Lockyer J. CanMEDS evaluation in Canadian postgraduate training programmes: tools used and programme director satisfaction. Med Educ 2008;42:879-86.
8. Hubinette MM, Ajjawi R, Dharamsi S. Family physician preceptors' conceptualisations of health advocacy: implications for medical education. Acad Med 2014;89 (11):1502-9.
9. Dobson S, Voyer S, Regehr G. Perspective: agency and activism: rethinking health advocacy in the medical profession. Acad Med 2012;87 (9):1161-4.
10. Kanter SL. On physician advocacy. Acad Med 2011;86 (9):1059-60.
11. Huddle TS. Perspective: medical professionalism and medical education should not involve commitments to political advocacy. Acad Med 2011;86 (3):378-83.
12. Hubinette M, Dobson S, Towle A, Whitehead C. Shifts in the interpretation of health advocacy: a textual analysis. Med Educ 2014;48:1235-43.
13. Hubinette M, Dobson S, Voyer S, Regehr G. 'We' not 'I': health advocacy is a team sport. Med Educ 2014;48: 895-901.
14. Towle A, Godolphin W, Grams G, Lamarre A. Putting informed and shared decision making into practice. Health Expect 2006;9 (4):321-32.
15. Dobson S, Voyer S, Hubinette M, Regehr G. From the clinic to the community: the activities and abilities of effective health advocates. Acad Med 2015;90 (2):214-20.
16. Oandasan IF, Barker KK. Educating for advocacy: exploring the source and substance of community-responsive physicians. Acad Med 2003;78 (10 Suppl):16-9.
17. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications 2006.
18. Dey I. Grounding Grounded Theory: Guidelines for Qualitative Inquiry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press 1999.
19. Oandasan IF. Health advocacy: bringing clarity to educators through the voices of physician health advocates. Acad Med 2005;80 (10):38-41.