Correction: Force Field Benchmark of Organic Liquids. 2. Gibbs Energy of Solvation (J. Chem. Inf. Model. (2015) 55:6 (1192-1201) DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00106);Force Field Benchmark of Organic Liquids. 2. Gibbs Energy of Solvation

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1192-1201

  Zhang, Jin ^a,b   Tuguldur, Badamkhatan ^b,c   Van Der Spoel, David ^b  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF MONGOLIA   (Mongolia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GIBBS FREE ENERGY; MOLECULES; SOLVENTS; STATISTICS;

AMBER FORCE-FIELD; CONDUCTOR LIKE SCREENING MODELS; ENERGY OF SOLVATION; MOLECULAR SIMULATIONS; ORGANIC MOLECULES; QUANTITATIVE PREDICTION; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-PROPERTY RELATIONS; THERMODYNAMICS INTEGRATIONS;

SOLVATION;

ORGANIC COMPOUND; SOLVENT;

CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; INFORMATION SCIENCE; PROCEDURES; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; THERMODYNAMICS;

BENCHMARKING; INFORMATICS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SOLVENTS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84935011482     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00081     Document Type: Erratum

References (84)

1. Jorgensen, W. L.; Tirado-Rives, J. Potential Energy Functions for Atomic-Level Simulations of Water and Organic and Biomolecular Systems Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 6665 - 6670
2. Wang, J.; Wolf, R. M.; Caldwell, J. W.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A. Development and Testing of a General AMBER Force Field J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1157 - 1174
3. Caleman, C.; van Maaren, P. J.; Hong, M.; Hub, J. S.; Costa, L. T.; van der Spoel, D. Force Field Benchmark of Organic Liquids: Density, Enthalpy of Vaporization, Heat Capacities, Surface Tension, Compressibility, Expansion Coefficient and Dielectric Constant J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 61 - 74
4. Shirts, M. R.; Pitera, J. W.; Swope, W. C.; Pande, V. S. Extremely Precise Free Energy Calculations of Amino Acid Side Chain Analogs: Comparison of Common Molecular Mechanics Force Fields for Proteins J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 5740 - 5761
5. Hess, B.; van der Vegt, N. F. A. Hydration Thermodynamic Properties of Amino Acid Analogues: A Systematic Comparison of Biomolecular Force Fields and Water Models J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 17616 - 17626
6. Mobley, D. L.; Bayly, C. I.; Cooper, M. D.; Dill, K. A. Predictions of Hydration Free Energies from All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulations J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 4533 - 4537
7. Mobley, D. L.; Bayly, C. I.; Cooper, M. D.; Shirts, M. R.; Dill, K. A. Small Molecule Hydration Free Energies in Explicit Solvent: An Extensive Test of Fixed-Charge Atomistic Simulations J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 350 - 358
8. Mobley, D. L.; Bayly, C. I.; Cooper, M. D.; Shirts, M. R.; Dill, K. A. Correction to Small Molecule Hydration Free Energies in Explicit Solvent: An Extensive Test of Fixed-Charge Atomistic Simulations J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 1347 - 1347
9. Oostenbrink, C.; Villa, A.; Mark, A. E.; Van Gunsteren, W. F. A Biomolecular Force Field Based on the Free Enthalpy of Hydration and Solvation: The GROMOS Force-Field Parameter Sets 53A5 and 53A6 J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1656 - 1676
10. Hansen, N.; van Gunsteren, W. F. Practical Aspects of Free-Energy Calculations: A Review J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 2632 - 2647
11. Hetenyi, C.; Paragi, G.; Maran, U.; Timar, Z.; Karelson, M.; Penke, B. Combination of a Modified Scoring Function with Two-Dimensional Descriptors for Calculation of Binding Affinities of Bulky, Flexible Ligands to Proteins J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1233 - 1239
12. Cailliez, F.; Pernot, P. Statistical Approaches to Forcefield Calibration and Prediction Uncertainty in Molecular Simulation J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 054124
13. Ponder, J. W.; Wu, C.; Ren, P.; Pande, V. S.; Chodera, J. D.; Schnieders, M. J.; Haque, I.; Mobley, D. L.; Lambrecht, D. S.; DiStasio, R. A., Jr.; Head-Gordon, M.; Clark, G. N. I.; Johnson, M. E.; Head-Gordon, T. Current Status of the AMOEBA Polarizable Force Field J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 2549 - 2564
14. Lopes, P. E. M.; Huang, J.; Shim, J.; Luo, Y.; Li, H.; Roux, B.; MacKerell, J.; Alexander, D. Polarizable Force Field for Peptides and Proteins Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator J. Chem. Theory Comput 2013, 9, 5430 - 5449
15. Mobley, D. L.; Dumont, E.; Chodera, J. D.; Dill, K. A. Comparison of Charge Models for Fixed-Charge Force Fields: Small-Molecule Hydration Free Energies in Explicit Solvent J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 2242 - 2254
16. Mobley, D. L.; Dumont, E.; Chodera, J. D.; Dill, K. A. Comparison of Charge Models for Fixed-Charge Force Fields: Small Molecule Hydration Free Energies in Explicit Solvent J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 1329 - 1332
17. Martins, S. A.; Sousa, S. F.; Ramos, M. J.; Fernandes, P. A. Prediction of Solvation Free Energies with Thermodynamic Integration Using the General Amber Force Field J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 3570 - 3577
18. Knight, J. L.; Yesselman, J. D.; Brooks, C. L. Assessing the Uality of Absolute Hydration Free Energies Among CHARMM-Compatible Ligand Parameterization Schemes J. Comput. Chem. 2013, 34, 893 - 903
19. Kaminski, G.; Duffy, E. M.; Matsui, T.; Jorgensen, W. L. Free Energies of Hydration and Pure Liquid Properties of Hydrocarbons from the OPLS All-Atom Model J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 13077 - 13082
20. Udier-Blagovic, M.; Tirado, P. M. D.; Pearlman, S. A.; Jorgensen, W. L. Accuracy of Free Energies of Hydration Using CM1 and CM3 Atomic Charges J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1322 - 1332
21. Shivakumar, D.; Williams, J.; Wu, Y.; Damm, W.; Shelley, J.; Sherman, W. Prediction of Absolute Solvation Free Energies using Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Perturbation and the OPLS Force Field J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6, 1509 - 1519
22. Shivakumar, D.; Harder, E.; Damm, W.; Friesner, R. A.; Sherman, W. Improving the Prediction of Absolute Solvation Free Energies Using the Next Generation OPLS Force Field J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 2553 - 2558
23. Wallin, G.; Nervall, M.; Carlsson, J.; Åqvist, J. Charges for Large Scale Binding Free Energy Calculations with the Linear Interaction Energy Method J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 380 - 395
24. Horta, B. A. C.; Fuchs, P. F. J.; van Gunsteren, W. F.; Hunenberger, P. H. New Interaction Parameters for Oxygen Compounds in the GROMOS Force Field: Improved Pure-Liquid and Solvation Properties for Alcohols, Ethers, Aldehydes, Ketones, Carboxylic Acids, and Esters J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 1016 - 1031
25. Fuchs, P. F. J.; Hansen, H. S.; Hünenberger, P. H.; Horta, B. A. C. A GROMOS Parameter Set for Vicinal Diether Functions: Properties of Polyethyleneoxide and Polyethyleneglycol J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 3943 - 3963
26. van der Spoel, D.; van Buuren, A. R.; Tieleman, D. P.; Berendsen, H. J. C. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Peptides from BPTI: A Closer Look at Amide-Aromatic Interactions J. Biomol. NMR 1996, 8, 229 - 238
27. van der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E. Brute-Force Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Villin Headpiece: Comparison with NMR Parameters J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 11178 - 11187
28. Katritzky, A. R.; Oliferenko, A. A.; Oliferenko, P. V.; Petrukhin, R.; Tatham, D. B.; Maran, U.; Lomaka, A.; Acree, W. E. A general Treatment of Solubility. 1. The QSPR Correlation of Solvation Free Energies of Single Solutes in Series of Solvents J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 1794 - 1805
29. Katritzky, A. R.; Oliferenko, A. A.; Oliferenko, P. V.; Petrukhin, R.; Tatham, D. B.; Maran, U.; Lomaka, A.; Acree, W. E. A General Treatment of Solubility. 2. QSPR Prediction of Free Energies of Solvation of Specified Solutes in Ranges of Solvents J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 1806 - 1814
30. Katritzky, A. R.; Tulp, I.; Fara, D. C.; Lauria, A.; Maran, U.; Acree, W. E. A General Treatment of Solubility. 3. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of the Solubilities of Diverse Solutes in Diverse Solvents J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 913 - 923
31. Klamt, A. Conductor-like Screening Model for Real Solvents: A New Approach to the Quantitative Calculation of Solvation Phenomena J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 2224 - 2235
32. Klamt, A.; Jonas, V.; Bürger, T.; Lohrenz, J. C. W. Refinement and Parametrization of COSMO-RS J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 5074 - 5085
33. Battino, R. The Ostwald coefficient of gas solubility Fluid Phase Equilib. 1984, 15, 231 - 240
34. Beutler, T. C.; Mark, A. E.; van Schaik, R. C.; Gerber, P. R.; van Gunsteren, W. F. Avoiding Singularities and Numerical Instabilities in Free Energy Calculations Based on Molecular Simulations Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 222, 529 - 539
35. Shirts, M. R.; Pande, V. S. Comparison of Efficiency and Bias of Free Energies Computed by Exponential Averaging, the Bennett Acceptance Ratio, and Thermodynamic Integration J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 144107
36. Berendsen, H. J. C.; van der Spoel, D.; van Drunen, R. GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation Comput. Phys. Commun. 1995, 91, 43 - 56
37. Lindahl, E.; Hess, B.; Van Der Spoel, D. GROMACS 3.0: a Package for Molecular Simulation and Trajectory Analysis J. Mol. Model 2001, 7, 306 - 317
38. van der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E.; Hess, B.; Groenhof, G.; Mark, A. E.; Berendsen, H. J. C. GROMACS: Fast, Flexible and Free J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1701 - 1718
39. Hess, B.; Kutzner, C.; Van der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4, 435 - 447
40. Pronk, S.; Páll, S.; Schulz, R.; Larsson, P.; Bjelkmar, P.; Apostolov, R.; Shirts, M. R.; Smith, J. C.; Kasson, P. M.; van der Spoel, D.; Hess, B.; Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4.5: a High-Throughput and Highly Parallel Open Source Molecular Simulation Toolkit Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 845 - 854
41. van der Spoel, D.; van Maaren, P. J.; Caleman, C. GROMACS Molecule & Liquid Database Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 752 - 753
42. Jorgensen, W. L.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Madura, J. D.; Impey, R. W.; Klein, M. L. Comparison of Simple Potential Functions for Simulating Liquid Water J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 926 - 935
43. Schuettelkopf, A. W.; van Aalten, D. M. F. PRODRG-a Tool for High-Throughput Crystallography of Protein-Ligand Complexes Act. Crystallogr. D 2004, 60, 1355 - 1363
44. Schaftenaar, G.; Noordik, J. H. Molden: a Pre- and Post-Processing Program for Molecular and Electronic Structures J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des. 2000, 14, 123 - 134
45. Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 03, revision C.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2004.
46. Krishnan, R.; Binkley, J. S.; Seeger, R.; Pople, J. A. Self-consistent Molecular-orbital Methods. 20. Basis Set for Correlated Wave-functions J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 650 - 654
47. McLean, A. D.; Chandler, G. S. Contracted Gaussian-basis Sets for Molecular Calculations. 1. 2nd Row Atoms, Z=11-18 J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 5639 - 5648
48. Wang, J.; Wang, W.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A. Antechamber, an Accessory Software Package for Molecular Mechanical Calculations J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 25, 1157 - 1174
49. Bayly, C. I.; Cieplak, P.; Cornell, W. D.; Kollman, P. A. A Well-Behaved Electrostatic Potential Based Method Using Charge Restraints for Deriving Atomic Charges-the RESP Model J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 10269 - 10280
50. Mobley, D. L.; Chodera, J. D.; Dill, K. A. On the Use of Orientational Restraints and Symmetry Corrections in Alchemical Free Energy Calculations J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 84902
51. van Gunsteren, W. F.; Berendsen, H. J. C. A Leap-Frog Algorithm for Stochastic Dynamics Mol. Sim. 1988, 1, 173 - 185
52. Hess, B.; Bekker, H.; Berendsen, H. J. C.; Fraaije, J. G. E. M. LINCS: A Linear Constraint Solver for Molecular Simulations J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 18, 1463 - 1472
53. Hess, B. P-LINCS: A Parallel Linear Constraint Solver for Molecular Simulation J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4, 116 - 122
54. Parrinello, M.; Rahman, A. Polymorphic Transitions in Single Crystals: A New Molecular Dynamics Method J. Appl. Phys. 1981, 52, 7182 - 7190
55. Allen, M. P.; Tildesley, D. J. Computer Simulation of Liquids; Oxford Science Publications: Oxford, 1987.
56. Essmann, U.; Perera, L.; Berkowitz, M. L.; Darden, T.; Lee, H.; Pedersen, L. G. A Smooth Particle Mesh Ewald Method J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 8577 - 8592
57. Pye, C. C.; Ziegler, T.; van Lenthe, E.; Louwen, J. N. An Implementation of the Conductor-Like Screening Model of Solvation within the Amsterdam Density Functional Package-Part II. COSMO for Real Solvents 1 Can. J. Chem. 2009, 87, 790 - 797
58. Mullins, E.; Oldland, R.; Liu, Y. A.; Wang, S.; Sandler, S. I.; Chen, C.-C.; Zwolak, M.; Seavey, K. C. Sigma-Profile Database for Using COSMO-Based Thermodynamic Methods Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 4389 - 4415
59. Mullins, E.; Liu, Y. A.; Ghaderi, A.; Fast, S. D. Sigma Profile Database for Predicting Solid Solubility in Pure and Mixed Solvent Mixtures for Organic Pharmacological Compounds with COSMO-Based Thermodynamic Methods Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 1707 - 1725
60. Phillips, K. L.; Sandler, S. I.; Greene, R. W.; Toro, D. M. D. Quantum Mechanical Predictions of the Henry's Law Constants and Their Temperature Dependence for the 209 Polychlorinated Biphenyl Congeners Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 8412 - 8418
61. Truchon, J.-F.; Bayly, C. I. Evaluating Virtual Screening Methods: Good and Bad Metrics for the "Early Recognition" Problem J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 488 - 508
62. Swamidass, S. J.; Azencott, C.-A.; Daily, K.; Baldi, P. A CROC Stronger than ROC: Measuring, Visualizing and Optimizing Early Retrieval Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 1348 - 1356
63. Haider, N. Functionality Pattern Matching as an Efficient Complementary Structure/Reaction Search Tool: an Open-Source Approach Molecules 2010, 15, 5079 - 5092
64. R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2015.
65. Li, J.; Zhu, T.; Hawkins, G. D.; Winget, P.; Liotard, D. A.; Cramer, C. J.; Truhlar, D. G. Extension of the Platform of Applicability of the SM5.42R Universal Solvation Model Theor. Chem. Acc. 1999, 103, 9 - 63
66. Caleman, C.; Hub, J. S.; van Maaren, P. J.; van der Spoel, D. Atomistic Simulation of Ion Solvation in Water Explains Surface Preference of Halides Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108, 6838 - 6842
67. Hub, J. S.; Caleman, C.; van der Spoel, D. Organic Molecules on the Surface of Water Droplets an Energetic Perspective Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 9537 - 9545
68. Hub, J. S.; Wolf, M. G.; Caleman, C.; van Maaren, P. J.; Groenhof, G.; van der Spoel, D. Thermodynamics of Hydronium and Hydroxide Surface Solvation Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 1745 - 1749
69. Ahmed, A.; Sandler, S. I. Hydration Free Energies of Multifunctional Nitroaromatic Compounds J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 2774 - 2785
70. Singh, U. C.; Kollman, P. A. An Approach to Computing Electrostatic Charges for Molecules J. Comput. Chem. 1984, 5, 129 - 145
71. Besler, B. H.; Merz, K. M., Jr.; Kollman, P. A. Atomic Charges Derived from Semiempirical Methods J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 431 - 439
72. Francl, M. M.; Carey, C.; Chirlian, L. E.; Gange, D. M. Charges Fit to Electrostatic Potentials. 2. Can Atomic Charges be Unambiguously Fit to Electrostatic Potentials? J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 367 - 383
73. Francl, M. M.; Chirlian, L. E. The Pluses and Minuses of Mapping Atomic Charges to Electrostatic Potentials Rev. Comput. Chem. 2000, 14, 1 - 31
74. Sigfridsson, E.; Ryde, U. Comparison of Methods for Deriving Atomic Charges from the Electrostatic Potential and Moments J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 377 - 395
75. Wang, J.; Tingjun, H. Application of Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Molecular Property Prediction. 1. Density and Heat of Vaporization J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 2151 - 2165
76. Duffy, E.; Jorgensen, W. Prediction of Properties from Simulations: Free Energies of Solvation in Hexadecane, Octanol, and Water J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2878 - 2888
77. Case, D. A.; Cheatham, T. E., III; Darden, T.; Gohlke, H.; Luo, R.; Merz, K. M., Jr.; Onufriev, A.; Simmerling, C.; Wang, B.; Woods, R. J. The Amber Biomolecular Simulation Programs J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1668 - 1688
78. Lundborg, M.; Lindahl, E. Automatic GROMACS Topology Generation and Comparisons of Force Fields for Solvation Free Energy Calculations J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 810 - 823
79. Marten, B.; Kim, K.; Cortis, C.; Friesner, R. A.; Murphy, R. B.; Ringnalda, M. N.; Sitkoff, D.; Honig, B. New Model for Calculation of Solvation Free Energies: Correction of Self-Consistent Reaction Field Continuum Dielectric Theory for Short-Range Hydrogen-Bonding Effects J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 11775 - 11788
80. Horta, B. A. C.; Lin, Z.; Huang, W.; Riniker, S.; van Gunsteren, W. F.; Hünenberger, P. H. Reoptimized Interaction Parameters for the Peptide-Backbone Model Compound N-methylacetamide in the GROMOS Force Field: Influence on the Folding Properties of Two Beta-Peptides in Methanol J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 1907 - 1917
81. Wang, W.; Skeel, R. D. Fast evaluation of polarizable forces J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 164107
82. Yu, H. B.; van Gunsteren, W. F. Accounting for polarization in molecular simulation Comput. Phys. Commun. 2005, 172, 69 - 85
83. Wensink, E. J. W.; Hoffmann, A. C.; van Maaren, P. J.; van der Spoel, D. Dynamic Properties of Water/Alcohol Mixtures Studied by Computer Simulation J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 7308 - 7317
84. Halgren, T. A. The representation of van der Waals (vdW) interactions in molecular mechanics force fields: potential form, combination rules, and vdW parameters J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7827 - 7843