A CROC stronger than ROC: Measuring, visualizing and optimizing early retrieval

Bioinformatics

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1348-1356

  Swamidass, S Joshua ^a,b   Azencott, Chloé Agathe ^a,b   Daily, Kenny ^a,b   Baldi, Pierre ^a,b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; METHODOLOGY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; AREA UNDER CURVE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DRUG DISCOVERY; MODELS, STATISTICAL; ROC CURVE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 77952832818     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq140     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Azencott, C. et al. (2007) One- to four-dimensional kernels for small molecules and predictive regression of physical, chemical, and biological properties. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47, 965-974.
2. Baldi, P. et al. (2000) Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: an overview. Bioinformatics, 16, 412-424.
3. Clark, R.D. and Webster-Clark, D.J. (2008) Managing bias in ROC curves. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 22, 141-146.
4. Hassan, M. et al. (2006) Cheminformatics analysis and learning in a data pipelining environment. Mol. Divers., 10, 283-299.
5. Hert, J. et al. (2004) Comparison of fingerprint-based methods for virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 44, 1177-1185.
6. Hert, J. et al. (2005) Enhancing the effectiveness of similarity-based virtual screening using nearest-neighbor information. J. Med. Chem., 48, 7049-54.
7. Holliday, J.D.e t al. (2002) Grouping of coefficients for the calculation of inter-molecular similarity and dissimilarity using 2D fragment bit-strings. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen., 5, 155-66.
8. Leach, A.R. and Gillet, V.J. (2005) An Introduction to Chemoinformatics. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
9. Mahé, P. et al. (2006) The pharmacophore kernel for virtual screening with support vector machines. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, 2003-2014.
10. Seifert, M.H.J. (2006) Assessing the discriminatory power of scoring functions for virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, 1456-1465.
11. Sheridan, R. et al. (2001) Protocols for bridging the peptide to nonpeptide gap in topological similarity searches. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 41, 1395-1406.
12. Swamidass, S. et al. (2009) The Influence Relevance Voter: An Accurate And Interpretable Virtual High Throughput Screening Method. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 49, 756.
13. Swamidass, S.J. and Baldi, P. (2007) Bounds and algorithms for exact searches of chemical fingerprints in linear and sub-linear time. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47, 302-317.
14. Swamidass, S.J. et al. (2005a) Kernels for small molecules and the predicition of mutagenicity, toxicity, and anti-cancer activity. Bioinformatics, 21 (Suppl. 1), 359.
15. Swamidass, S.J. et al. (2005b) Kernels for small molecules and the prediction of mutagenicity, toxicity, and anti-cancer activity. Bioinformatics, 21 (Suppl. 1), i359-368.
16. Truchon, J.F. and Bayly, C.I. (2007) Evaluating virtual screening methods: Good and bad metrics for the "early recognition" problem. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47, 488-508.
17. Zhao, W. et al. (2009) A statistical framework to evaluate virtual screening. BMC bioinformatics, 10, 225.