The pluses and minuses of mapping atomic charges to electrostatic potentials

Reviews in Computational Chemistry

Volumn 14, Issue , 2000, Pages 1-31

  Francl, Michelle Miller ^a   Chirlian, Lisa Emily ^a  

^a BRYN MAWR COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034424016     PISSN: 10693599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. J. P. Bowen and N. L. Allinger, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1991, Vol. 2, pp. 81-97.
2. Molecular Mechanics: The Art and Science of Parameterization. I. Pettersson and T. Liljefors, Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York: 1996, Vol. 9, pp. 167-189. Molecular Mechanics Calculated Conformational Energies of Organic Molecules: A Comparison of Force Fields.
3. S. M. Bachrach, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1994, Vol. 5, pp. 171-227. Population Analysis and Electron Densities from Quantum Mechanics.
4. R. S. Mulliken, J. Chem. Phys., 23, 1833 (1955). Electronic Population Analysis on LCAO-MO Molecular Wavefunctions. I.
5. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, T. Keith, G. A. Petersson, J. A. Montgomery, K. Raghavachari, M. A. Al-Laham, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. V. Ortiz, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, B. B. Stefanov, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, C. Y. Peng, P. Y. Ayala, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, E. S. Replogle, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, J. S. Binkley, D. J. DeFrees, J. Baker, J. P. Stewart, M. Head-Gordon, C. Gonzalez, and J. A. Pople, Gaussian, Inc., Carnegie Office Park, Building 6, Suite 230, Carnegie, PA 15106.
6. Spartan, Wavefunction, Inc., 18401 Von Karman Ave., Suite 370, Irvine, CA 92612.
7. C. C. Chambers, G. D. Hawkins, C. J. Cramer, and D. G. Truhlar, J. Phys. Chem., 100, 16385 (1996). Models for Aqueous Solvation Based on Class IV Atomic Charges and First Solvation Shell Effects.
8. One such algorithm uses data from X-ray diffraction experiments to compute a molecular electrostatic potential to which charges are fit. See: Z. Su, J. Comput. Chem. 14, 1036 (1993). New Method for the Derivation of Net Atomic Charges from the Electrostatic Potential.
9. R. F. W. Bader, Chem. Rev., 91, 893 (1991).
10. A Quantum Theory of Molecular Structure and Its Applications. R. F. W. Bader, P. L. A. Popelier, and T. A. Keith, Angew. Chem., Intl. Ed. Engl., 33, 620 (1994). Theoretical Definition of a Functional Group and the Molecular Orbital Paradigm.
11. P. Politzer and J. S. Murray, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1991, Vol. 2, pp. 273-312.
12. Molecular Electrostatic Potentials and Chemical Reactivity. D. E. Williams, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1991, Vol. 2, pp. 219-271. Net Atomic Charge and Multipole Models for the Ab Initio Molecular Electric Potential.
13. E. Scrocco and J. Tomasi, Top. Curr. Chem., 42, 95 (1973). The Electrostatic Molecular Potential as a Tool for the Interpretation of Molecular Properties.
14. P. A. Kollman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100, 2974 (1978). A Method of Describing the Charge Distribution in Simple Molecules.
15. F. A. Momany, J. Phys. Chem., 82, 592 (1978). Determination of Partial Atomic Charges from Ab Initio Molecular Electrostatic Potentials. Application to Formamide, Methanol, and Formic Acid.
16. S. R. Cox and D. E. Williams, J. Comput. Chem., 2, 304 (1981). Representation of the Molecular Electrostatic Potential by a Net Atomic Charge Model.
17. L. E. Chirlian and M. M. Francl, J. Comput. Chem., 8, 894 (1987). Atomic Charges Derived from Electrostatic Potentials: A Detailed Study.
18. C. Carey, L. E. Chirlian, D. Gange, and M. M. Francl, J. Comput. Chem., 17, 167 (1996). Charges Fit to Electrostatic Potentials. II. Can Atomic Charges Be Unambiguously Fit to Electrostatic Potentials?
19. C. M. Breneman and K. B. Wiberg, J. Comput. Chem., 11, 361 (1990). Determining Atom-Centered Monopoles from Molecular Electrostatic Potentials. The Need for High Sampling Density in Formamide Conformational Analysis.
20. B. H. Besler, K. M. Merz, and P. A. Kollman, J. Comput. Chem., 11, 431 (1990). Atomic Charges Derived from Semiempirical Methods.
21. P. G. Mezey, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1990, Vol. 1, pp. 265-294. Molecular Surfaces.
22. R. J. Woods, M. Khalil, W. Pell, S. H. Moffat, and V. H. Smith Jr., J. Comput. Chem., 11, 297 (1990). Derivation of Net Atomic Charges from Molecular Electrostatic Potentials.
23. J. S. Binkley, M. J. Frisch, R. Krishnan, D. J. DeFrees, H. B. Schlegel, R. A. Whiteside, E. M. Fluder, R. Seeger, and J. A. Pople, Gaussian 82, Carnegie Mellon University, 1982.
24. M. W. Schmidt, J. A. Boatz, K. K. Baldridge, S. Koseki, M. S. Gordon, S. T. Elbert, and B. Lam, QCPE Bull., 7, 115 (1987). GAMESS.
25. D. E. Williams, J. Comput. Chem., 9, 745 (1981). Representation of the Molecular Electrostatic Potential by Atomic Multipole and Bond Dipole Models.
26. W. L. Jorgensen and J. Gao, J. Am. Chem., Soc., 110, 4212 (1988). Cis-trans Energy Difference for the Peptide Bond in the Gas Phase and in Aqueous Solution.
27. P. Cieplak and P. A. Kollman, J. Comput. Chem., 12, 1232 (1991). On the Use of Electrostatic Potential Derived Charges in Molecular Mechanics Force Fields: Relative Solvation Free Energy of cis- and trans-N-Methylacetamide.
28. D. E. Williams, Biopolymers, 29, 1367 (1990). Alanyl Dipeptide Potential-Derived Net Atomic Charges and Bond Dipoles, and Their Variation with Molecular Conformation.
29. T. R. Stouch and D. E. Williams, J. Comput. Chem., 13, 622 (1992). Conformational Dependence of Electrostatic Potential Derived Charges of a Lipid Headgroup: Glycerylphosphorylcholine.
30. J. J. Urban and G. R. Famini, J. Comput. Chem., 14, 353 (1993). Conformational Dependence of the Electrostatic Potential-Derived Charges of Dopamine: Ramifications in Molecular Force Field Calculations in the Gas Phase and in Aqueous Solution.
31. T. R. Stouch and D. E. Williams, J. Comput. Chem., 14, 858 (1993). Conformational Dependence of Electrostatic Potential-Derived Charges: Studies of the Fitting Procedure.
32. See, e.g.: (a) G. H. Golub and C. F. van Loan, Matrix Computations, 3rd ed., Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1996.
33. (b) C. L. Lawson and R. J. Hanson, Solving Least Squares Problems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1974.
34. (c) W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986.
35. See Ref. 29(a), p. 80.
36. + A. See also Ref. 29(b), pp. 36-38, and R. Penrose, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 51, 406 (1955). A Generalized Inverse for Matrices.
37. See Ref. 29(a), pp. 590-591.
38. C. I. Bayly, P. Cieplak, W. D. Cornell, and P. A. Kollman, J. Phys. Chem., 97, 10269 (1993). A Well-Behaved Electrostatic Potential Based Method Using Charge Restraints for Deriving Atomic Charges: The RESP Model.
39. E. Sigfridsson and U. Ryde, J. Comput. Chem., 19, 377 (1998). Comparison of Methods for Deriving Atomic Charges from the Electrostatic Potential and Moments.
40. K. Hinsen and B. Roux, J. Comput. Chem., 18, 368 (1997). A Potential Function for Computer Simulation Studies of Proton Transfer in Acetylacetone.
41. R. J. Hanson and C. L. Lawson, Math. Comp., 23, 787 (1969). Extensions and Applications of the Householder Algorithm for Solving Linear Least Squares Problems.
42. M. M. Francl, unpublished work, 1998.