Nano-QSPR modelling of carbon-based nanomaterials properties

Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 15, Issue 18, 2015, Pages 1868-1886

  Salahinejad, Maryam ^a  

^a NSTIR   (Iran)

Author keywords

Fullerenes; Graphene; MWNTs; Nano QSPR; Physiochemical properties; SWNTs

Indexed keywords

CARBON NANOPARTICLE; CARBON NANOTUBE; DOUBLE WALLED NANOTUBE; FULLERENE; GRAPHENE; MULTI WALLED NANOTUBE; SINGLE WALLED NANOTUBE; CARBON; NANOMATERIAL;

ACCURACY; ADSORPTION; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPUTER PREDICTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; INFORMATION SYSTEM; K NEAREST NEIGHBOR; LINEAR SOLVATION ENERGY RELATIONSHIP; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICAL VARIABLE; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR DESCRIPTOR; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NANOCHEMISTRY; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION; PARTITION COEFFICIENT; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE PROPERTY RELATION; QUANTUM CHEMISTRY; QUANTUM MECHANICS; SCANNING TUNNELING MICROSCOPY; SIMPLIFIED MOLECULAR INPUT LINE ENTRY SYSTEM; SOLUBILITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; CHEMISTRY; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

CARBON; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 84934765526     PISSN: 15680266     EISSN: 18734294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/1568026615666150506145017     Document Type: Article

References (155)

1. Ku, S. H.; Lee, M.; Park, C. B. Carbon‐Based Nanomaterials for Tissue Engineering. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 2013, 2, 244-260.
2. Lim, D. J.; Sim, M.; Oh, L.; Lim, K.; Park, H. Carbon-based drug delivery carriers for cancer therapy. Arch. Pharm. Res., 2014, 37, 43-52.
3. Cha, C.; Shin, S. R.; Annabi, N.; Dokmeci, M. R.; Khademhosseini, A. Carbon-based nanomaterials: multifunctional materials for biomedical engineering. ACS Nano, 2013, 7, 2891-2897.
4. Avouris, P.; Chen, Z.; Perebeinos, V. Carbon-based electronics. Nat. Nanotech., 2007, 2, 605-615.
5. Raj, S.; Jose, S.; Sumod, U.; Sabitha, M. Nanotechnology in cosmetics: Opportunities and challenges. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci., 2012, 4, 186.
6. Ramanathan, T.; Abdala, A.; Stankovich, S.; Dikin, D.; Herrera- Alonso, M.; Piner, R.; Adamson, D.; Schniepp, H.; Chen, X.; Ruoff, R. Functionalized graphene sheets for polymer nanocomposites. Nat. Nanotech., 2008, 3, 327-331.
7. Ng, Y. H.; Ikeda, S.; Matsumura, M.; Amal, R. A perspective on fabricating carbon-based nanomaterials by photocatalysis and their applications. Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 9307-9318.
8. Mauter, M. S.; Elimelech, M. Environmental applications of carbon-based nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Tech., 2008, 42, 5843-5859.
9. Haddon, R. C.; Brus, L. E.; Raghavachari, K., Electronic structure and bonding in icosahedral C60. Chem. Phys. Lett., 1986, 125, 459.
10. Dinadayalane, T.; Leszczynski, J. Fundamental Structural, Electronic, and Chemical Properties of Carbon Nanostructures: Graphene, Fullerenes, Carbon Nanotubes, and Their Derivatives. In Handbook of Computational Chemistry, Leszczynski, J., Ed. Springer Netherlands: 2014; pp 793-867.
11. Geim, A. K.; Novoselov, K.S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater., 2007, 6, 183-191.
12. Galano, A., Carbon nanotubes: promising agents against free radicals. Nanoscale, 2010, 2, 373-380.
13. Terrones, M.; Terrones, H., The carbon nanocosmos: novel materials for the twenty-first century. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 2003, 361, 2789-2806.
14. Tropsha, A. Best Practices for QSAR Model Development, Validation, and Exploitation. Mol. Inform., 2010, 29, 476-488.
15. Puzyn, T.; Leszczynska, D.; Leszczynski, J., Toward the Development of “Nano-QSARs”: Advances and Challenges. Small, 2009, 5, 2494-2509.
16. Clark, K. A.; White, R. H.; Silbergeld, E. K. Predictive models for nanotoxicology: current challenges and future opportunities. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 2011, 59, 361-363.
17. Le, T.; Epa, V. C.; Burden, F. R.; Winkler, D.A. Quantitative structure–property relationship modeling of diverse materials properties. Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 2889-2919.
18. Tantra, R.; Oksel, C.; Puzyn, T.; Wang, J.; Robinson, K. N.; Wang, X. Z.; Ma, C. Y.; Wilkins, T. Nano (Q) SAR: Challenges, pitfalls and perspectives. Nanotoxicology, 2014, 1-7.
19. Epa, V.; Winkler, D.; Tran, L. Chapter 5 - Computational Approaches. In Adverse Effects of Engineered Nanomaterials, Shvedova, B. F. P. A., Ed. Academic Press: Boston, 2012; pp 85-96.
20. Worth, A. In Computational nanotoxicology–towards a structure-activity based paradigm for investigationg the activity of nanoparticles, Icon Workshop. Towards Predicting Nano-Bio Interactions, Zurich, Switzerland, 2007.
21. Winkler, D. A.; Mombelli, E.; Pietroiusti, A.; Tran, L.; Worth, A.; Fadeel, B.; McCall, M. J. Applying quantitative structure–activity relationship approaches to nanotoxicology: Current status and future potential. Toxicology, 2013, 313, 15-23.
22. Katritzky, A. R.; Kuanar, M.; Slavov, S.; Hall, C. D.; Karelson, M.; Kahn, I.; Dobchev, D. A. Quantitative correlation of physical and chemical properties with chemical structure: utility for prediction. Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 5714-5789.
23. Berhanu, W. M.; Pillai, G. G.; Oliferenko, A. A.; Katritzky, A. R. Quantitative structure–activity/property relationships: The ubiquitous links between cause and effect. ChemPlusChem, 2012, 77, 507-517.
24. Dudek, A. Z.; Arodz, T.; Galvez, J. Computational methods in developing quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR): a review. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening, 2006, 9, 213-228.
25. Katritzky, A. R.; Lobanov, V. S.; Karelson, M. QSPR: the correlation and quantitative prediction of chemical and physical properties from structure. Chem. Soc. Rev., 1995, 24, 279-287.
26. Golbraikh, A.; Tropsha, A. Predictive QSAR modeling based on diversity sampling of experimental datasets for the training and test set selection. Mol. Dversity, 2000, 5, 231-243.
27. Xia, X. R.; Monteiro-Riviere, N. A.; Mathur, S.; Song, X.; Xiao, L.; Oldenberg, S. J.; Fadeel, B.; Riviere, J. E., Mapping the surface adsorption forces of nanomaterials in biological systems. ACS Nano, 2011, 5, 9074-9081.
28. Fourches, D.; Pu, D.; Tassa, C.; Weissleder, R.; Shaw, S. Y.; Mumper, R. J.; Tropsha, A., Quantitative nanostructure- activity relationship modeling. ACS Nano, 2010, 4, 5703-5712.
29. Rasulev, B.; Gajewicz, A.; Puzyn, T.; Leszczynska, D.; Leszczynski, J. Nano-QSAR: Advances and Challenges. In Towards Efficient Designing of Safe Nanomaterials: Innovative Merge of Computational Approaches and Experimental Techniques, 2012; p 220.
30. Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V., Handbook of molecular descriptors. John Wiley & Sons: 2008.
31. Borders, T. L.; Fonseca, A. F.; Zhang, H.; Cho, K.; Rusinko III, A. Developing Descriptors To Predict Mechanical Properties of Nanotubes. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2013, 53, 773-782.
32. Barnard, A. S., How can ab initio simulations address risks in nanotech? Nat. Nanotech., 2009, 4, 332-335.
33. Lindahl, E., Molecular Dynamics Simulations. In Molecular Modeling of Proteins, Kukol, A., Ed. Humana Press: 2008; Vol. 443, pp 3-23.
34. Poater, A.; Saliner, A. G.; Solà, M.; Cavallo, L.; Worth, A. P. Computational methods to predict the reactivity of nanoparticles through structure-property relationships. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv., 2010, 7, 295-305.
35. Ashrafi, A. R.; Loghman, A. PI index of zig-zag polyhex nanotubes. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 2006, 55, 447-452.
36. Ashrafi, A.; Ghorbani, M.; Jalali, M., The vertex PI and Szeged indices of an infinite family of fullerenes. J. Theor. Comput. Chem., 2008, 7, 221-231.
37. Toropov, A. A.; Toropova, A. P.; Benfenati, E.; Leszczynska, D.; Leszczynski, J., Additive InChI-based optimal descriptors: QSPR modeling of fullerene C60 solubility in organic solvents. J. Math. Chem., 2009, 46, 1232-1251.
38. Toropov, A. A.; Rasulev, B. F.; Leszczynska, D.; Leszczynski, J. Multiplicative SMILES-based optimal descriptors: QSPR modeling of fullerene C60 solubility in organic solvents. Chem. Phys. Lett., 2008, 457, 332-336.
39. Toropov, A. A.; Rasulev, B. F.; Leszczynska, D.; Leszczynski, J. Additive SMILES based optimal descriptors: QSPR modeling of fullerene C60 solubility in organic solvents. Chem. Phys. Lett., 2007, 444, 209-214.
40. Abou-Hamad, E.; Babaa, M. R.; Bouhrara, M.; Kim, Y.; Saih, Y.; Dennler, S.; Mauri, F.; Basset, J. M.; Goze-Bac, C.; Wagberg, T. Structural properties of carbon nanotubes derived from 13C NMR. Phys. Rev. B, 2011, 84, 165417.
41. Odom, T. W.; Huang, J. L.; Kim, P.; Lieber, C. M. Structure and electronic properties of carbon nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2000, 104, 2794-2809.
42. Li, J.; Stevens, R.; Delzeit, L.; Ng, H. T.; Cassell, A.; Han, J.; Meyyappan, M. Electronic properties of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in an embedded vertical array. Appl. Phys.. Let., 2002, 81, 910-912.
43. Topliss, J. G.; Edwards, R. P., Chance factors in studies of quantitative structure-activity relationships. J. Med. Chem., 1979, 22, 1238-1244.
44. Gupta, N. "Feature Selection" From QSARWorld--A Strand Life Sciences Web Resource. http://www.qsarworld.com/qsar-ml-feature-selection.php.
45. Gao, H.; Lajiness, M. S.; Drie, J.V. Enhancement of binary QSAR analysis by a GA-based variable selection method. J. Mol. Graph. Model., 2002, 20, 259-268.
46. Sun, M.; Chen, J.; Cai, J.; Cao, M.; Yin, S.; Ji, M. Simultaneously Optimized Support Vector Regression Combined With Genetic Algorithm for QSAR Analysis of KDR/VEGFR-2 Inhibitors. Chem. Bio. Drug Des., 2010, 75, 494-505.
47. Leardi, R., Application of genetic algorithm-PLS for feature selection in spectral data sets. J. Chemometr., 2000, 14, 643-655.
48. Mercader, A. G.; Duchowicz, P. R.; Fernández, F. M.; Castro, E. A., Replacement Method and Enhanced Replacement Method Versus the Genetic Algorithm Approach for the Selection of Molecular Descriptors in QSPR/QSAR Theories. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2010, 50, 1542-1548.
49. Mercader, A. G.; Duchowicz, P. R.; Fernández, F. M.; Castro, E.A. Advances in the Replacement and Enhanced Replacement Method in QSAR and QSPR Theories. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2011, 51, 1575-1581.
50. Arauro, M. C. U.; Saldanha, T. C. B.; Galvao, R. K. H.; Yoneyama, T.; Chame, H. C.; Visani, V. The successive projections algorithm for variable selection in spectroscopic multicomponent analysis. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst., 2001, 57, 65-73.
51. Baroni, M.; Costantino, G.; Cruciani, G.; Riganelli, D.; Valigi, R.; Clementi, S. Generating Optimal Linear PLS Estimations (GOLPE): An Advanced Chemometric Tool for Handling 3DQSAR Problems. Quant. Struct-Act Rel., 1993, 12, 9-20.
52. Bi, J.; Bennett, K.; Embrechts, M.; Breneman, C.; Song, M., Dimensionality reduction via sparse support vector machines. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 2003, 3, 1229-1243.
53. Burden, F.; Winkler, D., Optimal sparse descriptor selection for QSAR using bayesian methods. QSAR Comb Sci., 2009, 28, 645-653.
54. Burden, F. R.; Winkler, D. A., An Optimal Self‐Pruning Neural Network and Nonlinear Descriptor Selection in QSAR. QSAR Comb Sci., 2009, 28, 1092-1097.
55. Lin, D.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Calhoun, V. D.; Deng, H.-W.; Wang, Y.-P., Group sparse canonical correlation analysis for genomic data integration. BMC Bioinformatics, 2013, 14, 245.
56. Goodarzi, M.; Dejaegher, B.; Heyden, Y. V., Feature selection methods in QSAR studies. J. AOAC Int., 2012, 95, 636-651.
57. Gonzalez, M. P.; Teran, C.; Saíz-Urra, L.; Teijeira, M. Variable selection methods in QSAR: an overview. Cur. Top. Med. Chem., 2008, 8, 1606-1627.
58. Eklund, M.; Norinder, U.; Boyer, S.; Carlsson, L. Choosing feature selection and learning algorithms in QSAR. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2014, 54, 837-843.
59. Næs, T.; Martens, H. Principal component regression in NIR analysis: Viewpoints, background details and selection of components. J. Chemometr., 1988, 2, 155-167.
60. Geladi, P.; Kowalski, B. Partial leastsquares regression: A tutorial. Anal. Chim. Acta, 1986, 185, 1-17.
61. Wold, S.; Sjostrom, M.; Eriksson, L., PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst., 2001, 58, 109-130.
62. Despagne, F. e. e.; Massart, D. L., Neural networks in multivariate calibration. Analyst, 1998, 123, 157R-178R.
63. Cheng, B.; Titterington, D. M., Neural Networks: A Review from a Statistical Perspective. Statist. Sci., 1994, 9, 2-30.
64. Hart, P.; Cover, T., Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 1988, 13, 21-27.
65. Ajmani, S.; Jadhav, K.; Kulkarni, S. A., Three-dimensional QSAR using the k-nearest neighbor method and its interpretation. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2006, 46, 24-31.
66. Cortes, C. V. Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn., 1995, 20, 273-297.
67. Ivanciuc, O. Applications of Support Vector Machines in Chemistry. In: Reviews in Computational Chemistry. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim: 2007; Vol. 23.
68. Liu, P.; Long, W., Current mathematical methods used in QSAR/QSPR studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2009, 10, 1978-1998.
69. Burden, F. R.; Winkler, D. A., Robust QSAR models using Bayesian regularized neural networks. J. Med. Chem., 1999, 42, 3183-3187.
70. Gramatica, P., Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external. QSAR Comb Sci., 2007, 26, 694-701.
71. Golbraikh, A.; Tropsha, A., Beware of q2! Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, 2002, 20, 269-276.
72. Lindgren, F.; Hansen, B.; Karcher, W.; Sjöström, M.; Eriksson, L., Model validation by permutation tests: Applications to variable selection. J. Chemometr., 1996, 10, 521-532.
73. Schü ü rmann, G.; Ebert, R.-U.; Chen, J.; Wang, B.; Kü hne, R., External Validation and Prediction Employing the Predictive Squared Correlation Coefficient -Test Set Activity Mean vs Training Set Activity Mean. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2008, 48, 2140-2145.
74. He, L.; Jurs, P. C., Assessing the reliability of a QSAR model's predictions. J. Mol. Graph. Model., 2005, 23, 503-523.
75. Tarasova, A.; Burden, F.; Gasteiger, J.; Winkler, D. A., Robust modelling of solubility in supercritical carbon dioxide using Bayesian methods. J. Mol. Graph. Model., 2010, 28, 593-597.
76. Consonni, V.; Ballabio, D.; Todeschini, R., Comments on the Definition of the Q2 Parameter for QSAR Validation. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2009, 49, 1669-1678.
77. Gramatica, P., Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external. QSAR Combi. Sci., 2007, 694-701.
78. Rofouei, M.; Salahinejad, M.; Ghasemi, J. B., An Alignment Independent 3D-QSAR Modeling of Dispersibility of Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes in Different Organic Solvents. Fuller. Nanotub. Car. N., 2014, 22, 605-617.
79. Savjani, K. T.; Gajjar, A. K.; Savjani, J. K., Drug solubility: importance and enhancement techniques. ISRN Pharm., 2012, 2012.
80. Salahinejad, M.; Le, T. C.; Winkler, D. A., Aqueous solubility prediction: do crystal lattice interactions help? Mol. Pharm., 2013, 10, 2757-2766.
81. Mitchell, B. E.; Jurs, P.C. Prediction of aqueous solubility of organic compounds from molecular structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1998, 38, 489-496.
82. Wang, J.; Hou, T. Recent advances on aqueous solubility prediction. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening, 2011, 14, 328-338.
83. Hansen, C. M.; Smith, A. L., Using Hansen solubility parameters to correlate solubility of C60 fullerene in organic solvents and in polymers. Carbon, 2004, 42, 1591-1597.
84. Huang, J.-C., Multiparameter solubility model of fullerene C60. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2005, 237, 186-192.
85. Kamlet, M. J.; Abboud, J. L. M.; Abraham, M. H.; Taft, R. W., Linear solvation energy relationships. 23. A comprehensive collection of the solvatochromic parameters,.pi.*,.alpha., and.beta., and some methods for simplifying the generalized solvatochromic equation. J. Org. Chem., 1983, 48, 2877-2887.
86. Sivaraman, N.; Dhamodaran, R.; Kaliappan, I.; Srinivasan, T.; Rao, P.V.; Mathews, C. Solubility of C60 in organic solvents. J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 6077-6079.
87. Danauskas, S. M.; Jurs, P. C., Prediction of C60 solubilities from solvent molecular structures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2001, 41, 419-424.
88. Gharagheizi, F.; Alamdari, R.F. A Molecular‐Based Model for Prediction of Solubility of C60 Fullerene in Various Solvents. Fuller. Nanotub. Car. N., 2008, 16, 40-57.
89. Kiss, I. Z.; Mándi, G.; Beck, M.T. Artificial neural network approach to predict the solubility of C60 in various solvents. J. Phys. Chem. A, 2000, 104, 8081-8088.
90. Liu, H.; Yao, X.; Zhang, R.; Liu, M.; Hu, Z.; Fan, B. Accurate quantitative structure-property relationship model to predict the solubility of C60 in various solvents based on a novel approach using a least-squares support vector machine. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 20565-20571.
91. Benfenati, E.; Toropov, A. A.; Toropova, A. P.; Manganaro, A.; Gonella Diaza, R. CORAL software: QSAR for anticancer agents. Chem. Bio. Drug Des., 2011, 77, 471-476.
92. Karelson, M.; Maran, U.; Wang, Y.; Katritzky, A.R. QSPR and QSAR models derived using large molecular descriptor spaces. A review of CODESSA applications. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun., 1999, 64, 1551-1571.
93. Martin, D.; Maran, U.; Sild, S.; Karelson, M., QSPR modeling of solubility of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and fullerene in 1-octanol and n-heptane. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2007, 111, 9853-9857.
94. Petrova, T.; Rasulev, B. F.; Toropov, A. A.; Leszczynska, D.; Leszczynski, J., Improved model for fullerene C60 solubility in organic solvents based on quantum-chemical and topological descriptors. J. Nanopart. Res., 2011, 13, 3235-3247.
95. Sivaraman, N.; Srinivasan, T.; Vasudeva Rao, P.; Natarajan, R. QSPR modeling for solubility of fullerene (C60) in organic solvents. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2001, 41, 1067-1074.
96. Toropov, A. A.; Leszczynska, D.; Leszczynski, J., QSPR study on solubility of fullerene C60 in organic solvents using optimal descriptors calculated with SMILES. Chem. Phys. Lett., 2007, 441, 119-122.
97. Abboud, J. L.; Kamlet, M. J.; Taft, R., Regarding a generalized scale of solvent polarities. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1977, 99, 8325-8327.
98. Kamlet, M. J.; Abboud, J. L. M.; Abraham, M. H.; Taft, R. W., Linear solvation energy relationships. 23. A comprehensive collection of the solvatochromic parameters,.pi.*,.alpha., and.beta., and some methods for simplifying the generalized solvatochromic equation. Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1983, 48, 2877-2887.
99. Lee, L.-H. Correlation between Lewis acid-base surface interaction components and linear solvation energy relationship solvatochromic α and β parameters. Langmuir, 1996, 12, 1681-1687.
100. Marcus, Y.; Kamlet, M.; Taft, R., Linear solvation energy relationships: standard molar Gibbs free energies and enthalpies of transfer of ions from water into nonaqueous solvents. J. Phys. Chem., 1988, 92, 3613-3622.
101. Abraham, M. H.; Ibrahim, A.; Zissimos, A. M., Determination of sets of solute descriptors from chromatographic measurements. J. Chromatogr. A, 2004, 1037, 29-47.
102. Ruoff, R.; Tse, D. S.; Malhotra, R.; Lorents, D.C. Solubility of fullerene (C60) in a variety of solvents. J. Phys. Chem., 1993, 97, 3379-3383.
103. Abraham, M. H.; Green, C. E.; Acree, W. E., Correlation and prediction of the solubility of Buckminsterfullerene in organic solvents; estimation of some physicochemical properties. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2., 2000, 281-286.
104. Flunt, R.; Makitra, R.; Makohon, O.; Pyrih, J., Quantitative Treatment of Fullerene C60 Solubility Data. Org. React. Tartu, 1997, 31, 21-26.
105. Makitra, R. G.; Pristanskii, R. E.; Flyunt, R. I., Solvent Effects on the Solubility of C60 fullerene. Rus. J. Gen. Chem., 2003, 73, 1227-1232.
106. Marcus, Y., Solubilities of buckminsterfullerene and sulfur hexafluoride in various solvents. J. Phys. Chem. B, 1997, 101, 8617-8623.
107. Marcus, Y.; Smith, A. L.; Korobov, M.; Mirakyan, A.; Avramenko, N.; Stukalin, E., Solubility of C60 fullerene. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 2499-2506.
108. Yousefinejad, S.; Honarasa, F.; Abbasitabar, F.; Arianezhad, Z., New LSER Model Based on Solvent Empirical Parameters for the Prediction and Description of the Solubility of Buckminsterfullerene in Various Solvents. J. Sol. Chem., 2013, 42, 1620-1632.
109. Barton, A. F., CRC handbook of solubility parameters and other cohesion parameters. CRC press: 1991.
110. Hansen, C. M., 50 Years with solubility parameters-past and future. Prog. Org. Coat., 2004, 51, 77-84.
111. Thomas, E. R.; Newman, B. A.; Nicolaides, G. L.; Eckert, C. A., Limiting activity coefficients from differential ebulliometry. J. Chem. Eng. Data, 1982, 27, 233-240.
112. Pourbasheer, E.; Riahi, S.; Ganjali, M. R.; Norouzi, P., Prediction of solubility of fullerene C60 in various organic solvents by genetic algorithm-multiple linear regression. Fuller. Nanotub. Car. N., 2011, 19, 585-598.
113. Toropova, A. P.; Toropov, A. A.; Benfenati, E.; Gini, G.; Leszczynska, D.; Leszczynski, J., CORAL: QSPR models for solubility of [C60] and [C70] fullerene derivatives. Mol. Dversity, 2011, 15, 249-256.
114. Ghasemi, J. B.; Salahinejad, M.; Rofouei, M., Alignment Independent 3D-QSAR Modeling of Fullerene (C60) Solubility in Different Organic Solvents. Fuller. Nanotub. Car. N., 2013, 21, 367-380.
115. Cruciani, G.; Carosati, E.; Clementi, S., 25 - Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships. In The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry (Second Edition), Camille, G. W., Ed. Academic Press: London, 2003; pp 405-416.
116. Langer, T.; Bryant, S. D., Chapter 29 - 3D Quantitative Structure– Property Relationships. In The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry (Third Edition), Camille Georges, W., Ed. Academic Press: New York, 2008; pp 587-604.
117. Pastor, M.; Cruciani, G.; McLay, I.; Pickett, S.; Clementi, S., GRid-INdependent descriptors (GRIND): a novel class of alignment-independent three-dimensional molecular descriptors. J. Med. Chem., 2000, 43, 3233-3243.
118. Cruciani, G.; Crivori, P.; Carrupt, P.-A.; Testa, B., Molecular fields in quantitative structure–permeation relationships: the VolSurf approach. J. Mol. Struct., 2000, 503, 17-30.
119. Galvao, R. K. H.; Araujo, M. C. U.; Fragoso, W. D.; Silva, E. C.; Jose, G. E.; Soares, S. F. C.; Paiva, H.M. A variable elimination method to improve the parsimony of MLR models using the successive projections algorithm. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst., 2008, 92, 83-91.
120. Leardi, R.; Boggia, R.; Terrile, M., Genetic algorithms as a strategy for feature selection. J. Chemometr., 1992, 6, 267-281.
121. Geckeler, K.; Premkumar, T., Carbon nanotubes: are they dispersed or dissolved in liquids? Nanoscale Res. Lett., 2011, 6, 136.
122. Bergin, S. D.; Sun, Z.; Rickard, D.; Streich, P. V.; Hamilton, J. P.; Coleman, J. N., Multicomponent Solubility Parameters for Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube-Solvent Mixtures. ACS Nano, 2009, 3, 2340-2350.
123. Giordani, S.; Bergin, S. D.; Nicolosi, V.; Lebedkin, S.; Kappes, M. M.; Blau, W. J.; Coleman, J. N., Debundling of single-walled nanotubes by dilution: observation of large populations of individual nanotubes in amide solvent dispersions. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 15708-15718.
124. Landi, B. J.; Ruf, H. J.; Worman, J. J.; Raffaelle, R. P., Effects of Alkyl Amide Solvents on the Dispersion of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, 108, 17089-17095.
125. Ham, H. T.; Choi, Y. S.; Chung, I. J., An explanation of dispersion states of single-walled carbon nanotubes in solvents and aqueous surfactant solutions using solubility parameters. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2005, 286, 216-223.
126. Detriche, S.; Zorzini, G.; Colomer, J. F.; Fonseca, A.; Nagy, J. B., Application of the Hansen Solubility Parameters Theory to Carbon Nanotubes. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2008, 8, 6082-6092.
127. Bergin, S. D.; Sun, Z.; Rickard, D.; Streich, P. V.; Hamilton, J. P.; Coleman, J. N. Multicomponent solubility parameters for single-walled carbon nanotube- solvent mixtures. Acs Nano, 2009, 3, 2340-2350.
128. Cheng, Q.; Debnath, S.; Gregan, E.; Byrne, H. J., Effect of Solvent Solubility Parameters on the Dispersion of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 20154-20158.
129. Cheng, Q.; Debnath, S.; O’Neill, L.; Hedderman, T. G.; Gregan, E.; Byrne, H. J. Systematic study of the dispersion of SWNTs in organic solvents. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114, 4857-4863.
130. Torrens, F., Calculations of organic-solvent dispersions of single-wall carbon nanotubes. Int. J. Quantum Chem., 2006, 106, 712-718.
131. Torrens, F., Partition of solvents and co-solvents of nanotubes: proteins and cyclopyranoses. Front. Drug Des. Discovery, 2005, 1, 231-266.
132. Toropov, A. A.; Leszczynska, D.; Leszczynski, J., Predicting water solubility and octanol water partition coefficient for carbon nanotubes based on the chiral vector. Comput. Bio. Chem., 2007, 31, 127-128.
133. Wiegand, R. E., Performance of using multiple stepwise algorithms for variable selection. Stat. Med., 2010, 29, 1647-1659.
134. Salahinejad, M.; Zolfonoun, E., QSAR studies of the dispersion of SWNTs in different organic solvents. J. Nanopart. Res., 2013, 15, 1-9.
135. Barman, S. N.; Pan, D.; Vosgueritchian, M.; Zoombelt, A. P.; Galli, G.; Bao, Z. Dispersion of single walled carbon nanotubes in amidine solvents. Nanotechnology, 2012, 23, 344011.
136. Wildman, S. A.; Crippen, G. M. Prediction of Physicochemical Parameters by Atomic Contributions. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1999, 39, 868-873.
137. Li, X.; Cai, W.; Jung, I. H.; An, J. H.; Yang, D.; Velamakanni, A.; Piner, R.; Colombo, L.; Ruoff, R. S. Synthesis, characterization, and properties of large-area graphene films. ECS Trans., 2009, 19, 41-52.
138. Wang, J., Preparation of Graphene Dispersion: A Review. Curr. Phys. Chem., 2013, 3, 255-268.
139. Hernandez, Y.; Lotya, M.; Rickard, D.; Bergin, S. D.; Coleman, J. N., Measurement of multicomponent solubility parameters for graphene facilitates solvent discovery. Langmuir, 2009, 26, 3208-3213.
140. Yousefinejad, S.; Hemmateenejad, B., A chemometrics approach to predict the dispersibility of graphene in various liquid phases using theoretical descriptors and solvent empirical parameters. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 2014, 441, 766-775.
141. Pan, B.; Xing, B., Adsorption mechanisms of organic chemicals on carbon nanotubes. Environ. Sci. Tech., 2008, 42, 9005-9013.
142. Chen, W.; Duan, L.; Zhu, D., Adsorption of polar and nonpolar organic chemicals to carbon nanotubes. Environ. Sci. Tech., 2007, 41, 8295-8300.
143. Yang, K.; Zhu, L.; Xing, B. Adsorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by carbon nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Tech., 2006, 40, 1855-1861.
144. Yang, K.; Wu, W.; Jing, Q.; Zhu, L., Aqueous adsorption of aniline, phenol, and their substitutes by multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Environ. Sci. Tech., 2008, 42, 7931-7936.
145. Xia, X.-R.; Monteiro-Riviere, N. A.; Riviere, J. E., An index for characterization of nanomaterials in biological systems. Nat. Nanotech., 2010, 5, 671-675.
146. Apul, O. G.; Wang, Q.; Shao, T.; Rieck, J. R.; Karanfil, T., Predictive model development for adsorption of aromatic contaminants by multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Environ. Sci. Tech., 2013, 47, 2295-2303.
147. Apul, O. G.; Xuan, P.; Luo, F.; Karanfil, T., Development of a 3D QSPR model for adsorption of aromatic compounds by carbon nanotubes: comparison of multiple linear regression, artificial neural network and support vector machine. RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 23924-23934.
148. Zhao, Q.; Yang, K.; Li, W.; Xing, B. Concentration-dependent polyparameter linear free energy relationships to predict organic compound sorption on carbon nanotubes. Sci. Rep., 2014, 4.
149. Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Chen, X.; Zheng, J.; Wang, G.; Liang, G., Insights into the adsorption of simple benzene derivatives on carbon nanotubes. RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 58036-58046.
150. Katritzky, A. R.; Dobchev, D. A.; Slavov, S.; Karelson, M. Legitimate utilization of large descriptor pools for QSPR/QSAR models. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2008, 48, 2207-2213.
151. Shokrieh, M. M.; Rafiee, R., A review of the mechanical properties of isolated carbon nanotubes and carbon nanotube composites. Mech Compos Mater, 2010, 46, 155-172.
152. Greaves, G. N.; Greer, A.; Lakes, R.; Rouxel, T. Poisson's ratio and modern materials. Nat. Mater., 2011, 10, 823-837.
153. Goodarzi, M.; Mohammadinasab, E., Theoretical Investigation of Relationship between Quantum Chemical Descriptors, Topological Indices, Energy and Electric Moments of Zig-zag Polyhex Carbon Nanotubes TUHC6 [2p, q] with Various Circumference [2p] and Fixed Lengths. Fuller. Nanotub. Car. N., 2013, 21, 102-112.
154. Taherpour, A. Quantitative relationship study of mechanical structure properties of empty fullerenes. Fuller. Nanotub. Car. N., 2008, 16, 196-205.
155. Taherpour, A.; Mahdizadeh, N. Theoretical and Quantitative Structural Relationship Study on Fullerenes Polarizabilities on the basis of Monopole-Dipole Interactions Theorem. Orient. J. Chem., 2012, 28, 247.