Identifying temporal and causal contributions of neural processes underlying the Implicit Association Test (IAT)

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue NOVEMBER 2012, 2012, Pages

  Forbes, Chad E ^a   Cameron, Katherine A ^b   Grafman, Jordan ^c   Barbey, Aron K ^d   Solomon, Jeffrey ^e   Ritter, Walter ^f   Ruchkin, Daniel ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b Criminal Justice and Applied Social and Political Sciences Department   (United States)

^c KESSLER FOUNDATION   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^e Expert Image Analysis LLC   (United States)

^f ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Automaticity; EEG Coherence; Event Related Brain Potentials; Extra Striate Visual Cortex; Gender stereotypes; Implicit Association Test; Prefrontal Cortex; Traumatic brain injuries

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ARTICLE; CINGULATE GYRUS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST; INSULA; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NORMAL HUMAN; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; RESPONSE TIME; STEREOTYPY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84933674181     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00320     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Agerstrom, J., & Rooth, DO. (2011). The role of automatic obesity stereotypes in real hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 790-805.
2. Banfield, J. F., van der Lugt, A. H., & Munte, T. F. (2006). Juicy fruit and creepy crawlies: An electrophysiological study of the implicit Go/NoGo association task. NeuroImage, 31(4), 1841-1849.
3. Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R.S.W. Jr. (Ed.), The automaticity of everyday life: Advances in social cognition (pp. 1-61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayden, E., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2008). The implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) as a response-time and event-related potentials methodology for testing natural verbal relations: a preliminary study. The Psychological Record, 58, 497-516.
5. Barnes-Holmes, D., Staunton, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Whelan, R., Stewart, I., Commins, S. et al. (2004). Interfacing relational frame theory with cognitive neuroscience: semantic priming, the implicit association test, and event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4(2), 215-240.
6. Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). The development of implicit attitudes: Evidence of race evaluations from ages 6 and 10 and adulthood. Psychol Sci, 17(1), 53-58. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citati on&list_uids=16371144
7. Bartholow, B. D., & Dickter, C. L. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience of person perception: a selective review focused on the event-related brain potential. In E. Harmon-Jones & P. Winkeilman (Eds.), Social neuroscience: Integrating biological and psychological explanations of social behavior (pp. 376-400). New York: Guilford Press.
8. Berg, P., & Scherg, M. (1994). A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 90, 229-241.
9. Blair, I. V., & Banaji, M. R. (1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1142-1163.
10. Blanton, H., & Jaccard, J. (2006). Arbitrary metrics in psychology. American Psychologist, 61(1), 27-41.
11. Bluemke, M., & Friese, M. (2006). Do features of stimuli influence IAT effects? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 163-176.
12. Brazier, M. A. B. (1977). Electrical Activity of the Nervous System (Fourth ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
13. Coates, M. A. (2011). Event-Related Potential Measures of Task Switching in the Implicit Association Task (PhD Psychology, University of Ottawa).
14. Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 800-814.
15. De Houwer, J., Beckers, T., & Moors, A. (2007). Novel attitudes can be faked on the implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 972-978.
16. De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., & Moors, A. (2009). Implicit measures: a normative analysis and review. Psychol Rev, 135(1), 347-368.
17. Edwards-Lee, T., Miller, B. L., Benson, D. F., Cummings, J. L., Russell, G. L., Boone, K., et al. (1997). The temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 120(Pt 6), 1027-1040.
18. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit Measures in Social Cognition Research: Their Meaning and Use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
19. Gozzi, M., Raymont, V., Solomon, J., Koenigs, M., & Grafman, J. (2009). Dissociable effects of prefrontal and anterior temporal cortical lesions on stereotypical gender attitudes. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2125-2132.
20. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychol Rev, 109(1), 3-25. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citati on&list_uids=11863040
21. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol, 74(6), 1464-1480. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citati on&list_uids=9654756
22. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. J Pers Soc Psychol, 85(2), 197-216. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citati on&list_uids=12916565
23. Gregg, A. P., Seibt, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. J Pers Soc Psychol, 90(1), 1-20. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citati on&list_uids=16448307
24. He, Y., Johnson, M. K., Dovidio, J. F., & McCarthy, G. (2009). The relation between race-related implicit associations and scalp-recorded neural activity evoked by faces from different races. Social Neuroscience, 4(5), 426-442.
25. Kim, D. Y. (2003). Voluntary controllability of the implicit association test (IAT). Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 83-96.
26. Kleist, K. (1922). Geistes und nervenkrankheiten Leipzig: Verlag von Johann Ambrosius Barth.
27. Knutson, K. M., Mah, L., Manly, C. F., & Grafman, J. (2007). Neural correlates of automatic beliefs about gender and race. Human Brain Mapping, 28(10), 915-930. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20320
28. Lane, K. A., Banaji, M. R., Nosek, B. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2007). Understanding and using the implicit association test: IV What we know (so far) about the method. In B.W.N. Schwarz (Ed.), Implicit Measures of Attitudes (pp. 59-102). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29. Lins, O. G., Picton, T. W., Berg, P., & Scherg, M. (1993a). Ocular artifacts in recording EEGs and event-related potentials: I--Scalp topography. Brain Topography, 6, 51-63.
30. Lins, O. G., Picton, T. W., Berg, P., & Scherg, M. (1993b). Ocular artifacts in recording EEGs and event-related potentials: II--Source dipoles and source components. Brain Topography, 6, 65-78.
31. Luo, Q., Holroyd, T., Majestic, C., Cheng, X., Schechter, J., & Blair, R. J. (2010). Emotional automaticity is a matter of timing. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(17), 5825-5829.
32. Miller, B. L., Seeley, W.W., Mychack, P., Rosen, H. J., Mena, I., & Boone, K. (2001). Neuroanatomy of the self: Evidence from patients with frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 57(5), 817-821.
33. Mitchell, J. P., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Contextual variations in implicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(3), 455-469.
34. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106(3), 226-254.
35. Nolte, G., Bai, O., Wheaton, L., Mari, Z., Vorbach, S., & Hallet, M. (2004). Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 2292-2307.
36. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002a). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and stereotypes from a demonstration website. Group Dynamics, 6(1), 101-115.
37. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002b). Math = male, me = female, therefore math not equal to me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 44-59.
38. Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 31(2), 166-180. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citati on&list_uids=15619590
39. Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Lindner, N. M., Ranganath, K. A. et al. (2007). Persuasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. Europen Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36-88.
40. O'Toole, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2009). Electrophysiological activity generated during the implicit association test: a study using event-related potentials. The Psychological Record, 59, 207-220.
41. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975a). Attention and cognitive control. In R. Solso (Ed.), Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Ploghaus, A., Tracey, I., Gati, J.S., Clare, S., Menon, R.S., Matthews, P.M., Rawlins, J., & Nicholas, P. (1999). Dissociating pain from its anticipation in the human brain. Science, 284, 1979-1981.
43. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975b). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P.M.A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and Performance V (pp. 669-682). New York: Academic Press.
44. Raymont, V., Salazar, A. M., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2011). Studying injured minds-the Vietnam head injury study and 40 years of brain injury research. Frontiers in Neurology 2, 1-13.
45. Regan, D. (1989). Human Brain Electrophysiology: Evoked Potentials and Evoked Magnetic Fields in Science and Medicine New York: Elsevier.
46. Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2001). Figure-ground asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Z Exp Psychol, 48(2), 94-106. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citati on&list_uids=11392986
47. Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the implicit association test: dissociating salience from associations. J Exp Psychol Gen, 133(2), 139-165. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citati on&list_uids=15149248
48. Ruchkin, D. S., Berndt, R. S., Johnson, R., Jr., Ritter, W., Grafman, J., & Canoune, H. L. (1997). Modality-specific processing streams in verbal working memory: Evidence from spatio-temporal patterns of brain activity. Cognitive Brain Research, 6, 95-113.
49. Rudman, L. A., Greenwald, A. G., & McGhee, D. E. (2001). Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(9), 1164-1178.
50. Rudman, L. A., & Kilianski, S. E. (2000). Implicit and explicit attitudes towards female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1315-1328.
51. Shi, C.J., & Davis, M. (1999). Pain pathways involved in fear conditioning measured with fear-potentiated startle: Lesion studies. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 420-430.
52. Steffens, M. C., & Plewe, I. (2001). Items' cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the implicit association test. Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie, 48(2), 123-134.
53. Williams, J. K., & Themanson, J. R. Neural correlates of the implicit association test: evidence for semantic and emotional processing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, (in press).
54. Zahn, R., Moll, J., Krueger, F., Huey, E. D., Garrido, G., & Grafman, J. (2007). Social concepts are represented in the superior anterior temporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104, 6430-6435.
55. Zahn, R., Moll, J., Paiva, M., Garrido, G., Krueger, F., Huey, E. D., et al. (2009). The neural basis of human social values: Evidence from functional MRI. Cerebral Cortex 19, 276-283.