Interfacing relational frame theory with cognitive neuroscience: Semantic priming, the implicit association test, and event related potentials;Conectando la relational frame theory con la neurociencia cognitiva: Priming semántico, el test de asociación Implícita, y los potenciales de evento

International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 215-240

  Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^a   Staunton, Carmel ^a   Barnes Holmes, Yvonne ^a   Whelan, Robert ^a,b,c,d   Stewart, Ian ^b   Commins, Sean ^a   Walsh, Derek ^a   Smeets, Paul M ^c   Dymond, Simon ^d  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive neuroscience; Event related potentials; Implicit association test; Relational Frame Theory; Semantic priming

Indexed keywords

EID: 26444477995     PISSN: 15777057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Anderson, J.R. (1976). Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Anderson, J.R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Balota, D.A. & Lorch, R.F.Jr. (1986). Depth of automatic spreading activation: Mediated priming effects in pronunciation but not in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 336-345.
4. Barnes, D. & Hampson, P.J. (1993). Stimulus equivalence and connectionism: Implications for behavior analysis in cognitive science. The Psychological Record, 43, 617-638.
5. Barnes, D. & Hampson, P.J. (1997). Connectionist models of arbitrarily applicable relational responding: A possible role for the hippocampal system. In J. Donahoe & V.P. Dorsel (Eds.) Neuralnetwork models of cognition (pp. 496-521). North-Holland: Elsevier.
6. Barnes, D. & Holmes, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19-31.
7. Barnes, D., McCullagh, P.D., & Keenan, M. (1990). Equivalence class formation in non-hearing impaired children and hearing impaired children. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 19-30.
8. Barnes-Holmes, D. & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2000). Explaining complex behavior: Two perspectives on the concept of generalized operant classes? The Psychological Record, 50, 251-265.
9. Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Smeets, P.M., Cullinan, V., & Leader, G. (this volume). Relational frame theory and stimulus equivalence: Conceptual and procedural issues. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, xx, xxx-xxx.
10. Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayes, S.C., & Dymond, S. (2001). Self and self-directed rules. In S.C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & Roche, B. (Eds.), Relational Frame Theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 119-139). New York: Plenum.
11. Barsalou, L.W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behaviour and Brain Science, 22, 577-660.
12. Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., & Wood, C.C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 343-358.
13. Boroojerdi, B., Phipps, M., Kopylev, L., Wharton, C.M., Cohen, L.G., & Grafman, J. (2001). Enhancing analogic reasoning using rTMS over the left prefrontal cortex. Neurology, 56, 526-528.
14. Branch, M.N. (1994). Stimulus generalization, stimulus equivalence, and response hierarchies. In S.C. Hayes, L.J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behaviour analysis of language and cognition (pp. 51-70). Reno, NV: Context Press.
15. Collins, A.M. & Loftus, E.F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 4007-428.
16. Cullinan, V.A., Barnes, D., Hampson, P.J., & Lyddy, F. (1994). A transfer of explicitly and non-explicitly trained sequence responses through equivalence relations: An experimental demonstration and connectionist model. The Psychological Record, 44, 559-585.
17. Dasgupta, N., Greenwald, A.G., & Banaji, M.R (2003). The first ontological challenge to the I.A.T: Attitude or mere familiarity? Psychological Inquiry, 14, 238-243.
18. Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species. Penguin: London.
19. De Groot, A.M.B. (1983). The range of automatic spreading activation in word priming. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 22, 417-436.
20. De Rose, J.C., De Souza, D.G., Rossito, A.L., & De Rose, T.M. (1998). Stimulus equivalence and generalization in reading after matching to sample by exclusion. In S.C. Hayes & L.J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations. Reno, NV: The Context Press.
21. Devany, J.M., Hayes, S.C., & Nelson, R.O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243-257.
22. Dickins, D.W., Singh, K.D., Roberts, N., Burns, P., Downes, J., Jimmieson, P., & Bentall, R.P. (2001). An fMRI study of stimulus equivalence. Neuroreport, 12, 2-7.
23. DiFore, A., Dube, W.V., Oross III, S. Wilkinson, K., Deutsch, C.K., & Mcilvane, W.J. (2000). Studies of brain activity correlates of behavior in individuals with and without developmental disabilities. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 18, 33-35.
24. Dugdale, N. & Lowe, C.F. (2000). Testing for symmetry in the conditional discrimination of language trained chimpanzees. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 5-22.
25. Fields, L. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317-332.
26. García, A. & Benjumea, S. (2001). Pre-requisitos ontogenéticos para la emergencia de relaciones si métricas. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 1, 115-135.
27. Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
28. Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A., & Banaji, M.R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
29. Hayes, S.C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational Frame Theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.
30. Hayes, S.C., & Bisset, R.T. (1998). Derived stimulus relations produce mediated and episodic priming. The Psychological Record, 48, 617-630.
31. Hayes, S.C., & Hayes, L.J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evaluation of behavioural analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383-1395.
32. Hill, R., Strube, M., Roesch-Ely, D., & Weisbrod, M. (2002). Automatic vs. controlled processing in semantic priming-differentiation by event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 44, 197-218.
33. Holcomb, P.J. (1988). Automatic and attentional processing: An event-related brain potential analysis of semantic priming. Brain and Language, 35, 66-85.
34. Holcomb, P.J. & Anderson, J. E. (1993). Cross-modal semantic priming: A time-course analysis using event-related potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 379-411.
35. Holcomb, P.J. & Neville, H.J. (1991). Natural speech processing: An analysis using event-related brain potentials. Psychobiology, 19, 286-300.
36. Horne, P.J. & Lowe, C.F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185-241, 341-353.
37. Kolb, B., & Whiteshaw, I.Q. (2001). An introduction to brain and behaviour. NY: Worth Publishers.
38. Karpinski, A. & Hilton, J.L. (2004). Attitudes and the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 774-788.
39. Kounios, S.A. & Holcomb, P.J. (1992). Structure and process in semantic memory: evidence from event-related potentials and reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 121, 460-480.
40. Kutas, M. (1993). In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for simple-word and sentence context effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 533-578.
41. Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S.A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 1161-1163.
42. Leslie, J.C., & Blackman, D.E. (2000). Experimental and applied analysis of human behavior. Reno, NV: Context Press.
43. Lipkens, R., Hayes, S.C., & Hayes, L.J. (1993). Longitudinal study of the development of derived relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 201-239.
44. Luciano, M.C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Early development history and equivalence relations. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 1, 137-149.
45. McClelland, J.L. & Rumelhart, D.E. (1988). Explorations in parallel distributed processing: A handbook of models, programs, and exercises. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. McNamara, T.P. & Altarriba, J. (1988). Depth of spreading activation revisited: semantic mediated priming occurs in lexical decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 545-559.
47. Meyer, D.E. & Schvaneveldt, R.W. (1971). Facilitation in recognition pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.
48. Neely, J.H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G.W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processing in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Neely, J.H., Keefe, D.F., & Ross, F. (1989). Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectations and retrospection semantic matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1003-1019.
50. Phelps, E.A., O'Connor, K.J., Cunningham, W.A., Funayama, E.S., Gatenby, J.C., Gore, J.C., & Banaji, M.R. (2000). Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 729-738.
51. Reese, H.W. (1991). Mentalistic approaches to verbal behavior. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 151-177). Reno, NV: Context Press.
52. Regan, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., Stewart, I., Whelan, R., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Dymond, S., & Mohr-Pulvermüller, B. (2004). Testing the RFT model of analogical reasoning: Reaction times and event related potentials. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour Group, London, England.
53. Shusterman, R.J. & Kastak, D. (1993). A california sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823-839.
54. Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5-13.
55. Sidman, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M.D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Sidman, M. (1994). Stimulus Equivalence: A Research Story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
57. Smeets, P.M., & Barnes, D. (1997). Emergent conditional discrimination in children and adults: Stimulus equivalence derived from simple discriminations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 64-84.
58. Stewart, I. & Barnes-Holmes, D. (this volume). Relational frame theory and analogical reasoning: Empirical investigations. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, xx, xxx-xxx.
59. Weisbrod, M., Kiefer, M., Winkler, S., Maier, S., Hill, R., Roesch-Ely, D., & Spitzer, M. (1999). Electrophysiological correlates of direct versus indirect semantic priming in normal volunteers. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 289-298.
60. Wharton, C.M., Grafman, J., Flitaman, S.S., Hansen, E.K., Brauner, J., Marks, A., & Honda, M. (2000). Towards neuroanatomical models of analogy: A positron emission tomography study of analogical mapping. Cognitive Psychology, 40, 173-197.
61. Wilkinson, D. & Halligan, P. (2004). The relevance of behavioural measures for functional-imaging studies of cognition. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 5, 67-73.