Enhanced neuronal cell differentiation combining biomimetic peptides and a carbon nanotube-polymer scaffold

Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 621-632

  Scapin, Giorgia ^a   Salice, Patrizio ^a   Tescari, Simone ^a   Menna, Enzo ^a   De Filippis, Vincenzo ^a   Filippini, Francesco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Biomimetic peptides; Carbon nanotube scaffold; L1; LINGO1; Neuronal differentiation

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMIMETICS; FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS; LACTIC ACID; MULTIWALLED CARBON NANOTUBES (MWCN); NANOTUBES; NEURONS; PEPTIDES;

BIOMIMETIC PEPTIDES; COMPOSITE SCAFFOLDS; ELECTRICAL STIMULI; LINGO1; NANOCOMPOSITE SCAFFOLDS; NEURONAL DIFFERENTIATION; POLYMER SCAFFOLDS; SYNTHETIC PEPTIDE;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

BIOMIMETIC PEPTIDE; L1 PROTEIN; LINGO1 PROTEIN; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; MULTI WALLED NANOTUBE; NANOCOMPOSITE; POLYLACTIC ACID; SYNTHETIC PEPTIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; BIOMIMETIC MATERIAL; CARBON NANOTUBE; LACTIC ACID; LINGO1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; NERVE PROTEIN; PEPTIDE; POLYMER;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOINFORMATICS; BIOMIMETICS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISPERSION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; NANOFABRICATION; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NERVE CELL GROWTH; PEPTIDE SYNTHESIS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; METABOLISM; NERVE CELL;

BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; HUMANS; LACTIC ACID; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; NANOTUBES, CARBON; NERVE TISSUE PROTEINS; NEURONS; PEPTIDES; POLYMERS;

EID: 84933509664     PISSN: 15499634     EISSN: 15499642     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2014.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Harrison B.S., Atala A. Carbon nanotube applications for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2007, 28(2):344-353.
2. Saracino G.A., Cigognini D., Silva D., Caprini A., Gelain F. Nanomaterials design and tests for neural tissue engineering. Chem Soc Rev 2013, 42(1):225-262.
3. Dai H.J., Wong E.W., Lieber C.M. Probing electrical transport in nanomaterials, conductivity of individual carbon nano-tubes. Science 1996, 272:523-526.
4. Wong E.W., Sheehan P.E., Lieber C.M. Nanobeam mechanics: elasticity, strength, and toughness of nanorods and nanotubes. Science 1997, 277:1971-1975.
5. Mattson M.P., Haddon R.C., Rao A.M. Molecular functionalization of carbon nanotubes and use as substrates for neuronal growth. J Mol Neurosci 2000, 14(3):175-182.
6. Hu H., Ni Y., Montana V., Haddon R.C., Parpura V. Chemically functionalized carbon nanotubes as substrates for neuronal growth. Nano Lett 2004, 4(3):507-511.
7. Chao T.I., Xiang S., Chen C.S., Chin W.C., Nelson A.J., Wang C., et al. Carbon nanotubes promote neuron differentiation from human embryonic stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009, 384(4):426-430.
8. Fabbro A., Prato M., Ballerini L. Carbon nanotubes in neuroregeneration and repair. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2013, 65(15):2034-2044.
9. Chua J.S., Chng C.P., Moe A.A., Tann J.Y., Goh E.L., Chiam K.H., et al. Extending neurites sense the depth of the underlying topography during neuronal differentiation and contact guidance. Biomaterials 2014, 35(27):7750-7761. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.008.
10. Resende R.R., Fonseca E.A., Tonelli F.M., Sousa B.R., Santos A.K., Gomes K.N., et al. Scale/topography of substrates surface resembling extracellular matrix for tissue engineering. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2014, 10(7):1157-1193.
11. Boccafoschi F., Rasponi M., Ramella M., Ferreira A.M., Vesentini S., Cannas M. Short-term effects of microstructured surfaces: role in cell differentiation toward a contractile phenotype. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2014, 18. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.5301/JABFM.5000186.
12. Bokara K.K., Kim J.Y., Lee Y.I., Yun K., Webster T.J., Lee J.E. Biocompatibility of carbon nanotubes with stem cells to treat CNS injuries. Anat Cell Biol 2013, 46(2):85-92.
13. Mazzatenta A., Giugliano M., Campidelli S., Gambazzi L., Businaro L., Markram H., et al. Interfacing neurons with carbon nanotubes: electrical signal transfer and synaptic stimulation in cultured brain circuits. J Neurosci 2007, 27(26):6931-6936.
14. Liopo A.V., Stewart M.P., Hudson J., Tour J.M., Pappas T.C. Biocompatibility of native and functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes for neuronal interface. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2006, 6(5):1365-1374.
15. Lovat V., Pantarotto D., Lagostena L., Cacciari B., Grandolfo M., Righi M., et al. Carbon nanotube substrates boost neuronal electrical signaling. Nano Lett 2005, 5(6):1107-1110.
16. Cellot G., Toma F.M., Varley Z.K., Laishram J., Villari A., Quintana M., et al. Carbon nanotube scaffolds tune synaptic strength in cultured neural circuits: novel frontiers in nanomaterial-tissue interactions. J Neurosci 2011, 31(36):12945-12953.
17. Fabbro A., Sucapane A., Toma F.M., Calura E., Rizzetto L., Carrieri C., et al. Adhesion to carbon nanotube conductive scaffolds forces action-potential appearance in immature rat spinal neurons. PLoS One 2013, 8(8):e73621.
18. Malarkey E.B., Fisher K.A., Bekyarova E., Liu W., Haddon R.C., Parpura V. Conductive single-walled carbon nanotube substrates modulate neuronal growth. Nano Lett 2009, 9(1):264-268.
19. Cui H.F., Vashist S.K., Al-Rubeaan K., Luong J.H., Sheu F.S. Interfacing carbon nanotubes with living mammalian cells and cytotoxicity issues. Chem Res Toxicol 2010, 23(7):1131-1147.
20. Prato M., Kostarelos K., Bianco A. Functionalized carbon nanotubes in drug design and discovery. Acc Chem Res 2008, 41(1):60-68.
21. Matsumoto K., Sato C., Naka Y., Kitazawa A., Whitby R.L., Shimizu N. Neurite outgrowths of neurons with neurotrophin-coated carbon nanotubes. J Biosci Bioeng 2007, 103(3):216-220.
22. Chen H., Yuan L., Song W., Wu Z., Li D. Biocompatible polymer materials: role of protein-surface interactions. Prog Polym Sci 2008, 33:1059-1087.
23. Haspel J., Grumet M. The L1CAM extracellular region: a multi-domain protein with modular and cooperative binding modes. Front Biosci 2003, 8:s1210-s1225.
24. Kenwrick S., Watkins A., De Angelis E. Neural cell recognition molecule L1: relating biological complexity to human disease mutations. Hum Mol Genet 2000, 9(6):879-886.
25. Gouveia R.M., Gomes C.M., Sousa M., Alves P.M., Costa J. Kinetic analysis of L1 homophilic interaction: role of the first four immunoglobulin domains and implications on binding mechanism. J Biol Chem 2008, 283(42):28038-28047.
26. Zhao X., Yip P.M., Siu C.H. Identification of a homophilic binding site in immunoglobulin-like domain 2 of the cell adhesion molecule L1. J Neurochem 1998, 71(3):960-971.
27. Mi S., Lee X., Shao Z., Thill G., Ji B., Relton J., et al. LINGO-1 is a component of the Nogo-66 receptor/p75 signaling complex. Nat Neurosci 2004, 7(3):221-228.
28. Petrinovic M.M., Duncan C.S., Bourikas D., Weinman O., Montani L., Schroeter A., et al. Neuronal Nogo-A regulates neurite fasciculation, branching and extension in the developing nervous system. Development 2010, 137(15):2539-2550.
29. Jepson S., Vought B., Gross C.H., Gan L., Austen D., Frantz J.D., et al. LINGO-1, a transmembrane signaling protein, inhibits oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelination through intercellular self-interactions. J Biol Chem 2012, 287(26):22184-22195.
30. Stein T., Walmsley A.R. The leucine-rich repeats of LINGO-1 are not required for self-interaction or interaction with the amyloid precursor protein. Neurosci Lett 2012, 509(1):9-12.
31. Inoue H., Lin L., Lee X., Shao Z., Mendes S., Snodgrass-Belt P., et al. Inhibition of the leucine-rich repeat protein LINGO-1 enhances survival, structure, and function of dopaminergici neurons in Parkinson's disease models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104(36):14430-14435.
32. Mi S., Pepinsky R.B., Cadavid D. Blocking LINGO-1 as a therapy to promote CNS repair: from concept to the clinic. CNS Drugs 2013, 27(7):493-503.
33. Fernandez-Enright F., Andrews J.L., Newell K.A., Pantelis C., Huang X.F. Novel implications of Lingo-1 and its signaling partners in schizophrenia. Transl Psychiatry 2014, 4:e348. 10.1038/tp.2013.121.
34. Ji B., Li M., Wu W.T., Yick L.W., Lee X., Shao Z., et al. LINGO-1 antagonist promotes functional recovery and axonal sprouting after spinal cord injury. Mol Cell Neurosci 2006, 33(3):311-320.
35. Gheith M.K., Sinani V.A., Wicksted J.P., Matts R.L., Kotov N.A. Single-walled carbon nanotube polyelectrolyte multilayers and freestanding films as a biocompatible platform for neuroprosthetic implants. Adv Mater 2005, 17:2663-2667.
36. Yang F., Murugan R., Ramakrishna S., Wang X., Ma Y.X., Wang S. Fabrication of nano-structured porous PLLA scaffold intended for nerve tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2004, 25(10):1891-1900.
37. Koh H.S., Yong T., Chan C.K., Ramakrishna S. Enhancement of neurite outgrowth using nano-structured scaffolds coupled with laminin. Biomaterials 2008, 29(26):3574-3582.
38. Gertz C.C., Leach M.K., Birrell L.K., Martin D.C., Feldman E.L., Corey J.M. Accelerated neuritogenesis and maturation of primary spinal motor neurons in response to nanofibers. Dev Neurobiol 2010, 70(8):589-603.
39. Furtado C.A., Kim U.J., Gutierrez H.R., Pan L., Dickey E.C., Eklund P.C. Debundling and dissolution of single-walled carbon nanotubes in amide solvents. J Am Chem Soc 2004, 126(19):6095-6105.
40. Salice P., Fenaroli D., De Filippo C.C., Menna E., Gasparini G., Maggini M. Efficient functionalization of carbon nanotubes: an opportunity enabled by flow chemistry. Chim Oggi 2012, 30(6):37-39.
41. Salice P., Fabris E., Sartorio C., Fenaroli D., Figà V., Casaletto M.P., et al. An insight into the functionalisation of carbon nanotubes by diazonium chemistry: towards a controlled decoration. Carbon 2014, 74:73-82.
42. D'Este M., De Nardi M., Menna E. A co-functionalization approach to soluble and functional single-walled carbon nanotubes. Eur J Org Chem 2006, 11:2517-2522.
43. Alberts P., Rudge R., Hinners I., Muzerelle A., Martinez-Arca S., Irinopoulou T., et al. Cross talk between tetanus neurotoxin-insensitive vesicle-associated membrane protein-mediated transport and L1-mediated adhesion. Mol Biol Cell 2003, 14(10):4207-4220.
44. Brahms S., Brahms J. Determination of protein secondary structure in solution by vacuum ultraviolet circular dichroism. J Mol Biol 1980, 138(2):149-178.
45. Soroka V., Kiryushko D., Novitskaya V., Ronn L.C., Poulsen F.M., Holm A., et al. Induction of neuronal differentiation by a peptide corresponding to the homophilic binding site of the second Ig module of the neural cell adhesion molecule. J Biol Chem 2002, 277(27):24676-24683.
46. Abney J.R., Meliza C.D., Cutler B., Kingma M., Lochner J.E., Scalettar B.A. Real-time imaging of the dynamics of secretory granules in growth cones. Biophys J 1999, 77(5):2887-2895.
47. Dent E.W., Gupton S.L., Gertler F.B. The growth cone cytoskeleton in axon outgrowth and guidance. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2011, 3(3).
48. Singh A., Rokes C., Gireud M., Fletcher S., Baumgartner J., Fuller G., et al. Retinoic acid induces REST degradation and neuronal differentiation by modulating the expression of SCF(β-TRCP) in neuroblastoma cells. Cancer 2011, 117(22):5189-5202.
49. Mikulak J., Negrini S., Klajn A., D'Alessandro R., Mavilio D., Meldolesi J. Dual REST-dependence of L1CAM: from gene expression to alternative splicing governed by Nova2 in neural cells. J Neurochem 2012, 120(5):699-709.
50. Puttagunta R., Schmandke A., Floriddia E., Gaub P., Fomin N., Ghyselinck N.B., et al. RA-RAR-β counteracts myelin-dependent inhibition of neurite outgrowth via Lingo-1 repression. J Cell Biol 2011, 193(7):1147-1156.