Short-term effects of microstructured surfaces: Role in cell differentiation toward a contractile phenotype

Journal of Applied Biomaterials and Functional Materials

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2015, Pages E92-E99

  Boccafoschi, Francesca ^a   Rasponi, Marco ^b   Ramella, Martina ^a   Ferreira, Ana Marina ^c   Vesentini, Simone ^b   Cannas, Mario ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN PIEDMONT   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^c POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

C2C12 differentiation; Cell adhesion; Microscale topography; Myf5; Myogenin; Myosin heavy chain; Vinculin

Indexed keywords

CELL CULTURE; CELL DEATH; CELL ENGINEERING; CELL SIGNALING; CHAINS; COMPLEX NETWORKS; ELECTROPHORESIS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HISTOLOGY; MICROSTRUCTURE; SUBSTRATES; TISSUE; TISSUE REGENERATION; TOPOGRAPHY;

C2C12 DIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS ADHESION; MICRO-STRUCTURED SURFACES; MICROSCALE TOPOGRAPHY; MYF5; MYOGENIN; MYOSIN HEAVY CHAIN; SUBSTRATE TOPOGRAPHY; VINCULIN;

CELL ADHESION;

FOCAL ADHESION KINASE; MYOGENIC FACTOR 5; MYOGENIN; MYOSIN HEAVY CHAIN; VINCULIN; MUSCLE PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITOMETRY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; MOUSE; MYOBLAST; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; WESTERN BLOTTING; ANIMAL; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUE; CELL LINE; CYTOLOGY; DEVICES; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; MICE; MUSCLE PROTEINS; MYOBLASTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84941204149     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22808000     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/JABFM.5000186     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Nikkhah M, Edalat F, Manoucheri S, Khademhosseini A. Engineering microscale topographies to control the cellsubstrate interface. Biomaterials. 2012; 33(21): 5230-5246.
2. Fletcher DA, Mullins RD. Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature. 2010; 463(7280): 485-492.
3. Eyckmans J, Boudou T, Yu X, Chen CS. A hitchhiker’s guide to mechanobiology. Dev Cell. 2011; 21(1): 35-47.
4. Galbraith CG, Sheetz MP. Forces on adhesive contacts affect cell function. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998; 10(5): 566-571.
5. Burton K, Park JH, Taylor DL. Keratocytes generate traction forces in two phases. Mol Biol Cell. 1999; 10(11): 3745-3769.
6. Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science. 1997; 276(5317): 1425-1428.
7. Li B, Lin M, Tang Y, Wang B, Wang JHC. A novel functional assessment of the differentiation of micropatterned muscle cells. J Biomech. 2008; 41(16): 3349-3353.
8. Jean C, Gravelle P, Fournie JJ, Laurent G. Influence of stress on extracellular matrix and integrin biology. Oncogene. 2011; 30(24): 2697-2706.
9. Stricker J, Aratyn-Schaus Y, Oakes PW, Gardel ML. Spatiotemporal constraints on the force-dependent growth of focal adhesions. Biophys J. 2011; 100(12): 2883-2893.
10. Goodman SL, Sims PA, Albrecht RM. Three-dimensional extracellular matrix textured biomaterials. Biomaterials. 1996; 17(21): 2087-2095.
11. Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealey PF, Franco M, Murphy CJ. Nanoscale topography of the basement membrane underlying the corneal epithelium of the rhesus macaque. Cell Tissue Res. 2000; 299(1): 39-46.
12. Pamuła E, De Cupere V, Dufrene YF, Rouxhet PG. Nanoscale organization of adsorbed collagen: influence of substrate hydrophobicity and adsorption time. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2004; 271(1): 80-91.
13. Park TH, Shuler ML. Integration of cell culture and microfabrication technology. Biotechnol Prog. 2003; 19(2): 243-253.
14. Bettinger CJ, Langer R, Borenstein JT. Engineering substrate topography at the micro- and nanoscale to control cell function. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009; 48(30): 5406-5415.
15. Kim DH, Wong PK, Park J, Levchenko A, Sun Y. Microengineered platforms for cell mechanobiology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2009; 11(1): 203-233.
16. Hoffman-Kim D, Mitchel JA, Bellamkonda RV. Topography, cell response, and nerve regeneration. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2010; 12(1): 203-231.
17. le Digabel J, Ghibaudo M, Trichet L, Richert A, Ladoux B. Microfabricated substrates as a tool to study cell mechanotransduction. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010; 48(10): 965-976.
18. Moraes C, Sun Y, Simmons CA. (Micro)managing the mechanical microenvironment. Integr Biol (Camb). 2011; 3(10): 959-971.
19. Rajnicek A, Britland S, McCaig C. Contact guidance of CNS neurites on grooved quartz: influence of groove dimensions, neuronal age and cell type. J Cell Sci. 1997; 110(Pt 23): 2905-2913.
20. Turner AM, Dowell N, Turner SW, et al. Attachment of astroglial cells to microfabricated pillar arrays of different geometries. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2000; 51(3): 430-441.
21. Ghibaudo M, Trichet L, Le Digabel J, Richert A, Hersen P, Ladoux B. Substrate topography induces a crossover from 2D to 3D behavior in fibroblast migration. Biophys J. 2009; 97(1): 357-368.
22. Wang L, Murthy SK, Fowle WH, Barabino GA, Carrier RL. Influence of micro-well biomimetic topography on intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cell phenotype. Biomaterials. 2009; 30(36):6825-6834.
23. Wan Y, Wang Y, Liu Z, et al. Adhesion and proliferation of OCT-1 osteoblast-like cells on micro- and nano-scale topography structured poly(L-lactide). Biomaterials. 2005; 26(21): 4453-4459.
24. Le Saux G, Magenau A, Bocking T, Gaus K, Gooding JJ. The relative importance of topography and RGD ligand density for endothelial cell adhesion. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(7): e21869.
25. Discher DE, Mooney DJ, Zandstra PW. Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells. Science. 2009; 324(5935): 1673-1677.
26. Critchley DR. Focal adhesions: the cytoskeletal connection. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000; 12(1): 133-139.
27. Cabodi S, del Pilar Camacho-Leal M, Di Stefano P, Defilippi P. Integrin signalling adaptors: not only figurants in the cancer story. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010; 10(12): 858-870.
28. Ghibaudo M, Di Meglio JM, Hersen P, Ladoux B. Mechanics of cell spreading within 3D-micropatterned environments. Lab Chip. 2011; 11(5): 805-812.
29. Wang P-Y, Yu H-T, Tsai W-B. Modulation of alignment and differentiation of skeletal myoblasts by submicron ridges/grooves surface structure. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2010; 106(2): 285-294.
30. Shimizu K, Fujita H, Nagamori E. Micropatterning of single myotubes on a thermoresponsive culture surface using elastic stencil membranes for single-cell analysis. J Biosci Bioeng. 2010; 109(2): 174-178.
31. Patz TM, Doraiswamy A, Narayan RJ, et al. Three-dimensional direct writing of B35 neuronal cells. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006; 78(1): 124-130.
32. Charest JL, Jennings JM, King WP, Kowalczyk AP, Garcia AJ. Cadherin-mediated cell-cell contact regulates keratinocyte differentiation. J Invest Dermatol. 2009; 129(3): 564-572.
33. Guo WH, Frey MT, Burnham NA, Wang YL. Substrate rigidity regulates the formation and maintenance of tissues. Biophys J. 2006; 90(6): 2213-2220.
34. Kaibuchi K, Kuroda S, Amano M. Regulation of the cytoskeleton and cell adhesion by the Rho family GTPases in mammalian cells. Annu Rev Biochem. 1999; 68(1): 459-486.
35. Clemente CF, Corat MA, Saad ST, Franchini KG. Differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts is critically regulated by FAK signaling. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005; 289(3): R862-R870.
36. Jansen KM, Pavlath GK. Molecular control of mammalian myoblast fusion. Methods Mol Biol. 2008; 475: 115-133.
37. Yoshida N, Yoshida S, Koishi K, Masuda K, Nabeshima Y. Cell heterogeneity upon myogenic differentiation: downregulation of MyoD and Myf-5 generates ‘reserve cells’. J Cell Sci. 1998; 111(Pt 6): 769-779.
38. Kitzmann M, Fernandez A. Crosstalk between cell cycle regulators and the myogenic factor MyoD in skeletal myoblasts. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2001; 58(4): 571-579.
39. Nemir S, West JL. Synthetic materials in the study of cell response to substrate rigidity. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010; 38(1): 2-20.
40. Lee JB, Gwon HR, Lee SH, Cho M. Wetting transition characteristics on microstructured hydrophobic surfaces. Mater Trans. 2010; 51(9): 1709-1711.