A behavioral database for masked form priming

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1052-1067

  Adelman, James S ^a   Johnson, Rebecca L ^b   McCormick, Samantha F ^c   McKague, Meredith ^d   Kinoshita, Sachiko ^e   Bowers, Jeffrey S ^f   Perry, Jason R ^g   Lupker, Stephen J ^g   Forster, Kenneth I ^h   Cortese, Michael J ⁱ   Scaltritti, Michele ^j   Aschenbrenner, Andrew J ^j   Coane, Jennifer H ^k   White, Laurence ^l   Yap, Melvin J ^m   Davis, Chris ⁿ   Kim, Jeesun ⁿ   Davis, Colin J ^c,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b SKIDMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^e MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

^j WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^k Colby College   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^m NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

ⁿ WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

more..

Author keywords

Lexical decision; Megastudies; Orthographic priming; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING;

EXPERIMENTAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; LEXICAL DECISION; LEXICAL DECISION TASKS; MEGASTUDIES; ORTHOGRAPHIC PRIMING; QUANTITATIVE MODELING; VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION;

TELECOMMUNICATION;

EID: 84933280134     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0442-y     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adelman, J. S. (2011). Letters and time in retinotopic space. Psychological Review, 118, 570–582.
2. Adelman, J. S., & Brown, G. D. A. (2007). Phonographic neighbors, not orthographic neighbors, determine word naming latencies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 455–459.
3. Adelman, J. S., & Brown, G. D. A. (2008a). Methods of testing and diagnosing models: Single and dual route cascaded models of word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 524–544.
4. Adelman, J. S., & Brown, G. D. A. (2008b). Modeling lexical decision: The form of frequency and diversity effects. Psychological Review, 114, 214–227.
5. Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D. A., & Quesada, J. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17, 814–823.
6. Andrews, S. (2008). Lexical expertise and reading skill. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 49, 249–281.
7. Andrews, S., & Hersch, J. (2010). Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 299–318.
8. Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2012). Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: Individual differences in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 152–163.
9. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
10. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. I., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., et al. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459.
11. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., & Cortese, M. J. (2012). Megastudies: What do millions (or so) of trials tell us about lexical processing? In J. S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition (Models and methods, orthography and phonology, Vol. 1, pp. 90–115). Hove: Psychology Press.
12. Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990.
13. Burgess, C. (1998). From simple associations to the building blocks of language: Modeling meaning in memory with the HAL model. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 30, 188–198.
14. Burt, J. S., & Tate, H. (2002). Does a reading lexicon provide orthographic representations for spelling? Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 518–543.
15. Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359.
16. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornič (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Damian, M. F. (2010). Does variability in human performance outweigh imprecision in response devices such as computer keyboards? Behavior Research Methods, 42, 205–211.
18. Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713–758.
19. Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2006). Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 535–557.
20. Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 668–687.
21. Estes, W. K., Allemeyer, D. H., & Reder, S. M. (1976). Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 1–15.
22. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680–698.
23. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 211–251.
24. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 35, 116–124.
25. Grainger, J., Granier, J. P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 865–884.
26. Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. pp. 1–pp. 24). New York: Nova Science.
27. Guerrera, C., & Forster, K. (2008). Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 117–142.
28. Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517–560.
29. Hutchison, K. A., Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., & Watson, J. M. (2007). Predicting semantic priming at the item level. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1036–1066.
30. Hutchison K. A, Balota D. A, Neely J. H, Cortese M. J, Cohen-Shikora E. R, Tse C. -S, Buchanan E, (2014). The semantic priming project. Behavior Research Methods. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0304-z
31. Kinoshita, S. (2006). Additive and interactive effects of word frequency and masked repetition in the lexical decision task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 668–673.
32. Lupker, S. J., & Davis, C. J. (2009). Sandwich priming: A method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competitor effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 618–639.
33. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.
34. Norris, D., & Kinoshita, S. (2012). Reading through a noisy channel: Why there’s nothing special about the perception of orthography. Psychological Review, 119, 517–545.
35. Norris, D., Kinoshita, S., & van Casteren, M. (2010). A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 254–271.
36. Pashler, H., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 528–530.
37. Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1997). Orthographic and phonological neighborhoods in naming: Not all neighbors are equally influential in orthographic space. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 382–410.
38. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 97–120). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
39. Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53, 97–145.
40. Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367.
41. Shipley, W. C. (1940). A self-administering scale for measuring intellectual impairment and deterioration. The Journal of Psychology, 9, 371–377. doi:10.1080/00223980.1940.9917704
42. Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science, 8, 411–416.
43. Ulrich, R., & Giray, M. (1989). Time resolution of clocks: Effects on reaction time measurement—good news for bad clocks. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 1–12.
44. Van Assche, E., & Grainger, J. (2006). A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 399–415.
45. Yap, M. J., Balota, D. A., Sibley, D. E., & Ratcliff, R. (2012). Individual differences in visual word recognition: Insights from the English Lexicon Project. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 53–79.
46. Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971–979.