Using Toulmin's framework for the analysis of everyday argumentation: Some methodological considerations

Argumentation

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 185-202

  Simosi, Maria ^a  

^a NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Argumentation analysis; Conflict resolution; Ordinary argumentation; Toulmin

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248707971     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024059024337     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Antaki, C.: 1994, Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organization of Accounts, Sage, London.
2. Antaki, C. and I. Leudar: 1992, 'Explaining in Conversation: Towards an Argument Model', European Journal of Social Psychology 11, 181-194.
3. Ball, W. J.: 1994, 'Using Virgil to Analyze Public Policy Arguments: A System Based on Toulmin's Informal logic', Social Science Computer Review 12(1), 26-37.
4. Berelson, B.: 1952, Content Analysis in Communication Research, Free Press, Glencoe, Ill.
5. Boulding, K.: 1963, Conflict and Defense, Harper and Row, New York.
6. Burelson, B. R.: 1992, 'On the Analysis and Criticism of Arguments: Some Theoretical and Methodological Considerations', in W. L. Benoit, D. Hample and P. J. Benoit (eds.), Readings in Argumentation, Foris, Berlin, pp. 259-277.
7. Canary, D. J. and A. L. Si liars: 1992, 'Argument in Satisfied and Dissatisfied Married Couples', in W. L. Benoit, D. Hample and P. J. Benoit (eds.), Readings in Argumentation, Foris, Berlin, pp. 737-764.
8. Chambliss, M. J.: 1995, 'Text Cues and Strategies Successful Readers Use to Construct the Gist of Lengthy Written Arguments', Reading Research Quarterly 30(4), 778-807.
9. Dijk, T. A. van: 1997. 'The Study of Discourse', in T. A. van Dijk. (ed.), Discourse as Structure and Process, Sage, London, pp. 1-34.
10. Dunn, W. N.: 1981, Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
11. Eemeren, F. H. van, R. Grootendorst and T. Kruiger: 1987, Handbook of Argumentation Theory, Foris. Dordrecht.
12. Eemeren, F. H. van, R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson and S. Jacobs: 1997, 'Argumentation', in T. A. van Dijk. (ed.), Discourse as Structure and Process, Sage, London, pp. 208-229.
13. Freeman, J. B.: 1991, Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments, Foris, Berlin.
14. Govier, T.: 1987, Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation, Foris, Dordrecht.
15. Kneupper, C. W.: 1978, 'On Argument and Diagrams', Journal of the American Forensic Association 14, 181-186.
16. Kolb, D. M. and L. L. Putnam: 1992, 'Introduction: The Dialectics of Disputing', in D. M. Kolb and D. M. Bartunek (eds.), Hidden Conflict in Organizations: Uncovering Behind-the-Scenes Disputes, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 1-31.
17. Krippendorff, K.: 1980, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, Sage, London.
18. Mishler, E. G: 1986, Research Interviewing, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
19. Personal Narratives Group: 1989, 'Truths', in Personal Narratives Group (ed.), Interpreting Women's Lives: Feminist Theory and Personal Narratives. Indiana University Press, Indianapolis, pp. 261-264.
20. Riessman, C. K.: 1993, Narrative Analysis, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
21. Toulmin, S.: 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, London.
22. Toulmin, S., R. RIEKE and A. JANIK: 1984, An Introduction to Reasoning, 2nd edition, Macmillan, New York.
23. TRIANDIS. H. C. and V. Vassiliou: 1972, 'A Comparative Analysis of Subjective Culture', in H. C. Triandis et al. (eds.), The Analysis of Subjective Culture, Wiley, New York, pp. 299-335.
24. Weber, A. L., J. H. Harvey and T. L. Orbuch: 1992, 'What Went Wrong: Communicating Accounts of Relationship Conflict', in M. L. McLaughlin et al. (eds.), Explaining One's Self to Others, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 261-280.
25. Wenzel, J. W.: 1992, 'Perspectives on Argument', in W. L. Benoit, D. Hample and P. J. Benoit (eds), Readings in Argumentation, Foris, Berlin, pp. 121-143.
26. Willard, C. A.: 1976, 'On the Utility of Descriptive Diagrams for the Analysis and Criticism of Arguments', Communication Monographs 43, 308-319.