Attitudes to genetically modified food over time: How trust in organizations and the media cycle predict support

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 601-618

  Marques, Mathew D ^a   Critchley, Christine R ^b   Walshe, Jarrod ^b  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

attitudes; genetically modified food; media and science; public opinion; trust

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ATTITUDE; AUSTRALIA; GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD; GOVERNMENT; ORGANIZATION; PLANT; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLISHING; SCIENCE; TRUST;

ANIMALS; ATTITUDE; AUSTRALIA; FOOD, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; GOVERNMENT; JOURNALISM; ORGANIZATIONS; PLANTS; PUBLIC OPINION; SCIENCE; TRUST;

EID: 84931263802     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662514542372     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aerni P.Stakeholder attitudes towards the risks and benefits of genetically modified crops in South Africa.Environmental Science & Policy. 2005;8 (5): 464-476
2. (Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 2004) Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 3rd edn.Lenexa, KS: AAPOR.Lenexa, KS: AAPOR; 2004:
3. Anderson K,Jackson LA.Why are US and EU policies toward GMOs so different?.AgBioForum. 2003;6 (3): 95-100
4. Augoustinos M,Crabb S,Shepherd R.Genetically modified food in the news: Media representations of the GM debate in the UK.Public Understanding of Science. 2009;19:98-114
5. Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991. 2012;:
6. . 2000;:
7. Bauer MW,Durant J,Gaskell G,Midden CJH.Europe ambivalent on biotechnology.Nature. 1997;387 (26): 845-847
8. Breusch J.Vic canola in GM contamination scare.The Australian Financial Review. 2005;:26
9. Connor M,Siegrist M.Factors influencing people’s acceptance of gene technology: The role of knowledge, health expectations, naturalness, and social trust.Science Communication. 2010;32 (4): 514-538
10. Cormick C.Public attitudes towards GM crops and food.Agricultural Science. 2007;21 (2): 24-30
11. Critchley CR.Public opinion and trust in scientists: The role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers.Public Understanding of Science. 2008;17:309-327
12. Dietrich H,Schibeci R.Beyond public perceptions of gene technology: Community participation in public policy in Australia.Public Understanding of Science. 2003;12 (4): 381-401
13. Eagly AH,Chaiken SThe Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers; 1993:
14. Einsiedel EF,Jelsoe E,Breck T.Publics at the technology table: The consensus conference in Denmark; 2001Canada, and Australia; 2001. 83.
15. Final review of the Séralini et al. (2012a) publication on a 2-year rodent feeding study with glyphosate formulations and GM maize NK603 as published online on 19 September 2012 in Food and Chemical Toxicology.EFSA Journal. 2012;10 (11): 2986-2995
16. Evensen C,Hoban T,Woodrum E.Technology and morality: Influences on public attitudes toward biotechnology.Knowledge, Technology & Policy. 2000;13 (1): 43-57
17. Finucane ML,Holup JL.Psychosocial and cultural factors affecting the perceived risk of genetically modified food: An overview of the literature.Social Science & Medicine. 2005;60 (7): 1603-1612
18. Flipse SM,Osseweijer P.Media attention to GM food cases: An innovation perspective.Public Understanding of Science. 2013;22 (2): 185-202
19. Frewer LJ,Miles S.Temporal stability of the psychological determinants of trust: Implications for communication about food risks.Health Risk & Society. 2003;5 (3): 259-271
20. Frewer LJ,Shepherd R.Ethical concerns and risk perceptions associated with different applications of genetic engineering: Interrelationships with the perceived need for regulation of the technology.Agriculture and Human Values. 1995;12 (1): 48-57
21. Frewer LJ,Hedderley D,Howard C,Shepherd R.‘Objection’ mapping in determining group and individual concerns regarding genetic engineering.Agriculture and Human Values. 1997;14 (1): 67-79
22. Frewer LJ,Howard C,Shepherd R.Public concerns in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: Risk, benefit, and ethics.Science Technology & Human Values. 1997;22 (1): 98-124
23. Frewer LJ,Howard C,Hedderley D,Shepherd R.What determines trust in information about food related risks? Underlying psychological constructs.Risk Analysis. 1996;16 (4): 473-486
24. Frewer LJ,Howard C,Hedderley D,Shepherd R.Reactions to information about genetic engineering: Impact of source characteristics, perceived personal relevance, and persuasiveness.Public Understanding of Science. 1999;8 (1): 35-50
25. Frewer LJ,Lassen J,Kettlitz B,Scholderer J,Beekman V,Berdal KG.Societal aspects of genetically modified foods.Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2004;42 (7): 1181-1193
26. Frewer LJ,Miles S,Marsh R.The media and genetically modified foods: Evidence in support of social amplification of risk.Risk Analysis. 2002;22 (4): 701-711
27. Gaskell G,Allum N,Bauer M,Durant J,Allansdottir A,Bonfadelli H, et al.Biotechnology and the European public.Nature Biotechnology. 2000;18 (9): 935-938
28. Gaskell G,Allum N,Wagner W,Kronberger N,Torgersen H,Hampel J, et al.GM foods and the misperception of risk perception.Risk Analysis. 2004;24 (1): 185-194
29. Gaskell G,Bauer MW,Durant J,Allum NC.Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the US.Science. 1999;285 (5426): 384-387
30. Godfray HCJ,Beddington JR,Crute IR,Haddad L,Lawrence D,Muir JF, et al.Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people.Science. 2010;327 (5967): 812-818
31. Gutteling J,Hanssen L,van der Veer N,Seydel E.Trust in governance and the acceptance of genetically modified food in the Netherlands.Public Understanding of Science. 2006;15 (1): 103-112
32. Hossain F,Onyango B.Product attributes and consumer acceptance of nutritionally enhanced genetically modified foods.International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2004;28 (3): 255-267
33. Huang J,Pray C,Rozelle S.Enhancing the crops to feed the poor.Nature. 2002;418 (6898): 678-684
34. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA) (2013) GM approval database. Available at: http://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/default.asp (accessed 30 May 2013).
35. Jayaraman K,Jia H.GM phobia spreads in South Asia.Nature Biotechnology. 2012;30 (11): 1017-1019
36. Kelley JPublic perceptions of genetic engineering: Australia, 1994. Canberra, ACT, Australia: International Social Science Survey, Australia; 1995:
37. Knight AJ.Intervening effects of knowledge, morality, trust, and benefits on support for animal and plant biotechnology applications.Risk Analysis. 2007;27 (6): 1553-1563
38. Knight AJ.Perceptions, knowledge and ethical concerns with GM foods and the GM process.Public Understanding of Science. 2009;18 (2): 177-188
39. Lang JT,Hallman WK.Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States.Risk Analysis. 2005;25 (5): 1241-1252
40. Lapan HE,Moschini GC.Innovation and trade with endogenous market failure: The case of genetically modified products.American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2004;86 (3): 634-648
41. Li Q,Curtis K,McCluskey J,Wahl T.Consumer attitudes toward genetically modified foods in Beijing, China.AgBioForum. 2003;5 (4): 145-152
42. Lobb AE,Mazzocchi M,Traill WB.Modelling risk perception and trust in food safety information within the theory of planned behaviour.Food Quality and Preference. 2007;18 (2): 384-395
43. Lockie S,Lawrence G,Lyons K,Grice J.Factors underlying support or opposition to biotechnology among Australian food consumers and implications for retailer-led food regulation.Food Policy. 2005;30 (4): 399-418
44. Macer D,Ng MAC.Changing attitudes to biotechnology in Japan.Nature Biotechnology. 2000;18 (9): 945-947
45. Mewett O,Emslie KR,Johnson H,Lizzio J,Dibley KL,Murby EJ, et alMaintaining Product Integrity in the Australian Seed and Grain Supply Chain—The Role of Sampling and Testing for GM Events. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian Government Bureau of Rural Sciences; 2008:
46. Biotechnology Public Awareness Survey: Final Report. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Biotechnology Australia; 2001:
47. Biotechnology Public Awareness Survey. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Biotechnology Australia; 2003:
48. Mohr P,Harrison A,Wilson C,Baghurst KI,Syrette J.Attitudes, values, and socio-demographic characteristics that predict acceptance of genetic engineering and applications of new technology in Australia.Biotechnology Journal. 2007;2 (9): 1169-1178
49. (Muthén LK,Muthén BOMplus User’s Guide. 2012) Mplus User’s Guide, 7th edn.Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2012:
50. National Intelligence Council (2012) Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds. National Intelligence Council. Available at: http://www.dni.gov/index.php/about/organization/national-intelligence-council-global-trends
51. Norton J,Lawrence G,Wood G.The Australian public’s perception of genetically-engineered foods.Australasian Biotechnology. 1998;8:172-181
52. Pardo R,Engelhard M,Hagen K,Jørgensen R,Rehbinder E,Schnieke A, et al.The role of means and goals in technology acceptance.EMBO Reports. 2009;10 (10): 1069-1075
53. Priest SH,Bonfadelli H,Rusanen M.The “trust gap” hypothesis: Predicting support for biotechnology across national cultures as a function of trust in actors.Risk Analysis. 2003;23 (4): 751-766
54. Schmidt CW.The yuck factor when disgust meets discovery.Environmental Health Perspectives. 2008;116 (12): A524-A527
55. Siegrist M.A causal model explaining the perception and acceptance of gene technology.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1999;29 (10): 2093-2106
56. Siegrist M.The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology.Risk Analysis. 2000;20 (2): 195-204
57. Sinemus K,Egelhofer M.Transparent communication strategy on GMOs: Will it change public opinion?.Biotechnology Journal. 2007;2 (9): 1141-1146
58. Swinburne National Science and Technology Monitor (2003–2012) Available at: http://www.swinburne.edu.au/lss/spru/spru-monitor.html (accessed 11 December 2013).
59. Thompson PBFood Biotechnology in Ethical Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007:
60. Townsend E.Affective influences on risk perceptions of, and attitudes toward, genetically modified food.Journal of Risk Research. 2006;9 (2): 125-139
61. Townsend E,Campbell S.Psychological determinants of willingness to taste and purchase genetically modified food.Risk Analysis. 2004;24 (5): 1385-1393
62. Walls J,Rogers-Hayden T,Mohr A,O’Riordan T.Seeking citizens’ views on GM crops: Experiences from the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand.Environment. 2005;47 (7): 22-36
63. WillinghamE (2012) Séralini paper influences Kenya Ban of GMO imports. Forbes, 12September. Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywillingham/2012/12/09/seralini-paper-influences-kenya-ban-of-gmo-imports/
64. Wolfenbarger LL,Phifer PR.The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants.Science. 2000;290 (5499): 2088-2093
65. Public Attitudes towards Biotechnology. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Biotechnology Australia; 1999:
66. Yuan KH,Bentler PM.Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data.Sociological Methodology. 2000;30 (1): 165-200