Why are US and EU policies toward GMOs so different?

AgBioForum

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 95-100

  Anderson, Kym ^a,b   Jackson, Lee Ann ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b WORLD BANK   (United States)

^c WTO Secretariat   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Biotechnology; General equilibrium; Political economy; Standards; Trade policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 2942650626     PISSN: 1522936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Bernauer, T., & Meins, E. (2001). Scientific revolution meets policy and the market: Explaining cross-national differences in agricultural biotechnology regulation (Discussion Paper No. 0144). Adelaide, Australia: University of Adelaide Centre for International Economic Studies.
2. European Commission. (2003). Questions and answers on the regulation of GMOs in the EU (Memo/02/160-REV). Brussels: European Commission.
3. Foster, M., Berry, T., & Hogan, J. (2003). Market access issues for GM products: Implications for Australia (ABARE e-report 03.13). Canberra, Australia: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry -Australia
4. Harrison, W.J., & Pearson, K.R. (1996). Computing solutions for large general equilibrium models using GEMPACK. Computational Economics, 9, 83-172.
5. Hertel, T. (Ed.). (1998). Global trade analysis: Modeling and applications. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Hillman, A.L. (1989). The political economy of protection. New York: Harwood Academic Publishers.
7. Stigler, G.S. (1975). The citizen and the state: Essays on regulation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Stone, S., Matysek, A., & Dolling, A. (2002). Modelling possible impacts of GM crops on Australian trade (Staff Research Paper). Canberra, Australia: Productivity Commission.
9. United States Department of Agriculture. (2003). Brazil oilseeds and products annual 2003 (FAS GAIN Report BR2023). Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.