Factors influencing people's acceptance of gene technology: The role of knowledge, health expectations, naturalness, and social trust

Science Communication

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 514-538

  Connor, Melanie ^a   Siegrist, Michael ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

acceptability; consumer attitudes; gene technology; knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651063691     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: 15528545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547009358919     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bundesamt für Statistik. (2009). Statistik Des Jährlichen Bevölkerungsstandes (Espop) Und Der Natürlichen Bevölkerungsbewegung (Bevnat) 2008. Provisorische Ergebnisse. [Swiss Federal Department of Statistics. Annual population data according to census results 2008. Temporary results.] Neuchâtel, Switzerland: Author.
2. Bonfadelli, H., Dahinden, U., & Leonarz, M. (2002). Biotechnology in Switzerland: High on the public agenda, but only moderate support. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 113-130.
3. Bonfadelli, H., Hieber, P., Leonarz, M., Meier, W.A., Schanne, M., & Wessels, H.-P. (1998). Switzerland. In J. Durant, W. Bauer Martin, & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Biotechnology in the public sphere (144-160). London: Science Museum.
4. Bredahl, L. (1999). Consumers' cognitions with regard to genetically modified foods: results of a qualitative study in four countries. Appetite, 33, 343-360.
5. Christoph, I.B., Bruhn, M., & Roosen, J. (2007). Knowledge, attitudes towards and acceptability of genetic modification in Germany. Appetite, 51, 58-68.
6. Costa-Font, M., Gil, J.M., & Traill, W.B. (2008). Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy. Food Policy, 33, 99-111.
7. Cuite, C.L., Aquino, H.L., & Hallman, W.K. (2005). An empirical investigation of the role of knowledge in public opinion about GM food. International Journal of Biotechnology, 7(1-3), 178-194.
8. Davidson, D.J., & Freudenberg, W.R. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns. Environment and Behavior, 28, 302-339.
9. Einsele, A. (2007). The gap between science and perception: The case of plant biotechnology in Europe. In T. Scheper (Ed.), Greene gene technology, research in an area of social conflict. Berlin: Springer.
10. Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4, 57-74.
11. Frewer, L.J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1995). Genetic engineering and food: What determines consumer acceptance? British Food Journal, 97(8), 31-36.
12. Frewer, L.J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1996a). Effective communication about genetic engineering and food. British Food Journal, 98(415), 48-52.
13. Frewer, L.J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1996b). The influence of realistic product exposure on attitudes towards genetic engineering of food. Food Quality and Preference, 7, 61-67.
14. Frewer, L.J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1997). Public concerns in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: Risk, benefit, and ethics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 22, 98-124.
15. Frewer, L.J., & Shepherd, R. (1995). Ethical concerns and risk perception associated with different applications of genetic engineering: Interrelationships with the perceived need for regulation of the technology. Agriculture and Human Values, 12, 48-57.
16. Ganiere, P., Chern, W.S., & Hahn, D. (2006). A continuum of consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods in the US. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 31, 129-149.
17. Gaskell, G. (1998). Public perceptions of biotechnology in 1996. In J. Durant, W. Bauer Martin, & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Biotechnology in the public sphere (189-213). London: Science Museum.
18. Gaskell, G., Allum, N., Bauer, M., Durant, J., Allansdottir, A., Bonfadelli, H.,et al.(2000). Biotechnology and the European public. Nature Biotechnology, 18, 935-938.
19. Gaskell, G., & Bauer Martin, W. (2006). Genomics and society, legal, ethical & social dimensions. London: Earthscan.
20. Gaskell, G., Bauer, M.W., Durant, J., & Allum, N.C. (1999). Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S. Science, 285, 384-387.
21. Gaskell, G., Stares, S., Allansdottir, A., Allum, N., Corchero, C., Fischler, C.,et al.(2006). Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and trends. Retrieved January 8, 2010, from http://ec.europa.eu/research/press/2006/pdf/pr1906_eb_64_3_final_report-may2006_en.pdf.
22. Hallman, W.K., Hebden, W.C., Aquino, H.L., Cuite, C.L., & Lang, J.T. (2003). Public perceptions of genetically modified foods: A national study of American knowledge and opinion. New Brunswick, NJ: Food Policy Institute, Cook College, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
23. Hamstra, A.M., & Smink, C. (1996). Consumers and biotechnology in the Netherlands. British Food Journal, 98(4/5), 34-38.
24. Hayes, B.C., & Tariq, V.N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 433-447.
25. Hoban, T.J.I.V. (1996). Anticipating public reaction to the use of genetic engineering in infant nutrition. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 63, 657S-662S.
26. Hoban, T.J. (1998). Trends in consumer attitudes about agricultural biotechnology. AgBioForum, 1(1), 3-7.
27. Hossain, F., Onyango, B., Schilling, B., Hallman, W., & Adelaja, A. (2003). Product attributes, consumer benefits and public approval of genetically modified foods. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27, 353-365.
28. House, L., Lusk, J., Jaeger, S., Traill, W.B., Moore, M., Valli, C.,et al.(2004). Objective and subjective knowledge: Impacts on consumer demand for genetically modified foods in the United States and the European Union. AgBioForum, 7(3), 113-123.
29. Huotilainen, A., & Tuorila, H. (2005). Social representation of new foods has a stable structure based on suspicion and trust. Quality and Preference, 16, 565-572.
30. Irani, T., Sinclair, J., & O'Malley, M. (2002). The importance of being accountable: The relationship between perceptions of accountability, knowledge, and attitude toward plant genetic engineering. Science Communication, 23, 225-241.
31. Klerck, D., & Sweeney, J.C. (2007). The effect of knowledge types on consumer-perceived risk and adoption of genetically modified foods. Psychology & Marketing, 24, 171-193.
32. Maeseele, P.A., & Schuurman, D. (2008). Biotechnology and the popular press in Northern Belgium: A case study of hegemonic media discourses and the interpretive struggle. Science Communication, 29, 435-471.
33. Magnusson, M.K., & Hursti Koivisto, U.-K. (2002). Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods. Appetite, 39, 9-24.
34. McInerney, C., Bird, N., & Nucci, M. (2004). The flow of scientific knowledge from lab to the lay public: The case of genetically modified food. Science Communication, 26, 44-74.
35. Miles, S., Ueland, O., & Frewer, L.J. (2005). Public attitudes towards genetically modified food. British Food Journal, 107, 246-262.
36. Millstone, E., & Lang, T. (2008). The atlas of food. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37. Priest, S.H. (1995). Information equity, public understanding of science, and biotechnology debate. Journal of Communication, 45, 39-54.
38. Prokop, P., Leskova, A., Kubiatko, M., & Diran, C. (2007). Slovakian students' knowledge of and attitudes toward biotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 895-907.
39. Qin, W., & Brown, J.L. (2006). Consumer opinions about genetically engineered salmon and information effect on opinions: A qualitative approach. Science Communication, 28, 243-272.
40. Scholderer, J., & Frewer, L.J. (2003). The biotechnology communication paradox: Experimental evidence and the need for a new strategy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26, 125-157.
41. Siegrist, M. (1998). Belief in gene technology: The influence of environmental attitudes and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 861-866.
42. Siegrist, M. (2000). The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis, 20, 195-204.
43. Siegrist, M. (2003). Perception of gene technology, and food risks: Results of a survey in Switzerland. Journal of Risk Research, 6, 45-60.
44. Siegrist, M. (2008). Factors influencing public acceptance of innovative food technologies and products. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 19, 603-608.
45. Siegrist, M., & Cvetkovich, G. (2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 20, 713-720.
46. Siegrist, M., Keller, C., & Kiers, H.A.L. (2005). A new look at the psychometric paradigm of perception of hazards. Risk Analysis, 25, 211-222.
47. Siegrist, M., Stampfli, N., Kastenholz, H., & Keller, C. (2008). Perceived risks and benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging. Appetite, 51, 283-290.
48. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-287.
49. Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E., & Macgregor, D.G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24, 311-322.
50. Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: Reevaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 55-74.
51. Tenbült, P., De Vries, N.K., Dreezens, E., & Martijn, C. (2005). Perceived naturalness and acceptance of genetically modified food. Appetite, 45, 47-50.
52. Verdurme, A., & Viaene, J. (2003). Consumer beliefs and attitude towards genetically modified food: Basis for segmentation and implications for communication. Agribusiness, 19, 91-113.
53. Visschers, V.H.M., Meertens, R.M., Passchier, W.F., & Devries, N.K. (2007). How does the general public evaluate risk information? The impact of associations with other risks. Risk Analysis, 27, 715-727.