How Individual Scholars Can Reduce the Rigor-Relevance Gap in Management Research

Business Research

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 178-196

  Wolf, Joachim ^a   Rosenberg, Timo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

empirical research; M10; management; practical relevance; rigor

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930900572     PISSN: 21983402     EISSN: 21982627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03342737     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Abrahamson, Eric (1991): Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations, Academy of Management Review, 16 (3): 586–612.
2. Adler, Nancy J. and Anne-Wil Harzing (2009): When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8 (1): 72–95.
3. Amabile, Teresa M., Chelley Patterson, Jennifer Mueller, Tom Wojcik, Steven J. Kramer, Paul W. Odomirok, and Mel Marsh (2001): Academic-Practitioner Collaboration in Management Research: A Case of Cross-Profession Collaboration, Academy of Management Journal, 44 (2): 418–431.
4. Anderson, Neil, Peter Herriot, and Gerald P. Hodgkinson (2001): The Practitioner-Researcher Divide in Industrial, Work, and Organisational (IWO) Psychology: Where Are We Now, and Where Do We Do From Here?, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74 (4): 391–411.
5. Astley, W. Graham and Raymond F. Zammuto (1992): Organization Science, Managers, and Language Games, Organization Science, 3 (4): 443–460.
6. Avenier, Marie-José (2010): Shaping a Constructivist View of Organizational Design Science, Organization Studies, 31 (09/10): 1229–1255.
7. Baldridge, David C., Steven W. Floyd, and Lívia Markóczy (2004): Are Managers From Mars and Academicians From Venus? Toward an Understanding of the Relationship Between Academic Quality and Practical Relevance, Strategic Management Journal, 25 (11): 1063–1074.
8. Bartlett, Christopher A. and Sumantra Ghoshal (1989): Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
9. Bartunek, Jean M., Sara L. Rynes, and R. Duane Ireland (2006): What Makes Management Research Interesting, and Why Does It Matter?, Academy of Management Journal, 49 (1): 9–15.
10. Belfiore, Eleonora and Oliver Bennett (2008): The Social Impact of the Arts: An Intellectual History, Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY.
11. Benbasat, Izak and Robert W. Zmud (1999): Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance, MIS Quarterly, 23 (1): 3–16.
12. Berry, William L., Jay E. Klompmaker, Curtis P. McLaughlin, and Terry Hill (1991): Linking Strategy Formulation in Marketing and Operations: Empirical Research, Journal of Operations Management, 10 (3): 294–302.
13. Bettis, Richard A. (1991): Strategic Management and the Straight-jacket: An Editorial Essay, Organization Science, 2 (3): 315–319.
14. Beyer, Janice M. and Harrison M. Trice (1982): The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings, Administrative Science Quarterly, 27 (4): 591–622.
15. Burgelman, Robert A. (1983): A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (2): 223–244.
16. Burke, Lisa A. and Barbara Rau (2010): The Research-Teaching Gap in Management, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9 (1): 132–143.
17. Chang, Yi-Ying, Yaping Gong, and Mike W. Peng (2012): Expatriate Knowledge Transfer, Absorptive Capacity, and Subsidiary Performance, Academy of Management Journal, 55 (4): 927–948.
18. Cheng, Joseph L.C. and William McKinley (1983): Toward an Integration of Organization Research and Practice: A Contingency Study of Bureaucratic Control and Performance in Scientific Settings, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (1): 85–100.
19. Colquitt, Jason A. and Cindy P. Zapata-Phelan (2007): Trends in Theory Building and Theory Testing: A Five-Decade Study of the Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Journal, 50 (6): 1281–1303.
20. Cooper, Harris M. (1982): Scientific Guidelines for Conducting Integrative Research Reviews, Review of Educational Research, 52 (2): 291–302.
21. Corley, Kevin G. and Dennis A. Gioia (2011): Building Theory About Theory Building: What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?, Academy of Management Review, 36 (1): 12–32.
22. rd ed., Sage: Los Angeles, CA et al.
23. Czinkota, Michael R. and Ilkka A. Ronkainen (2009): Trends and Indications in International Business: Topics for Future Research, Management International Review, 49 (2): 249–265.
24. Daft, Richard L. and Arie Y. Lewin (1990): Can Organization Studies Begin to Break out of the Normal Science Straithjacket? An Editorial Essay, Organization Science, 1 (1): 1–9.
25. Daft, Richard L. and Arie Y. Lewin (2008): Rigor and Relevance in Organization Studies: Idea Migration and Academic Journal Evolution, Organization Science, 19 (1): 177–183.
26. Donaldson, Lex (1985): In Defence of Organization Theory: A Reply to the Critics, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
27. Donaldson, Lex (1995): American Anti-Management Theories of Organization: A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
28. Dovidio, John F., Anja Eller, and Miles Hewstone (2011): Improving Intergroup Relations Through Direct, Extended and Other Forms of Indirect Contact, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14 (2): 147–160.
29. Edström, Anders and Jay R. Galbraith (1977): Transfer of Managers as a Coordination and Control Strategy in Multinational Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 22 (2): 248–263.
30. Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989): Building Theories from Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 532–550.
31. Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. and Melissa E. Graebner (2007): Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges, Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1): 25–32.
32. Ford, Eric W., W. Jack Duncan, Arthur G. Bedeian, Peter M. Ginter, Matthew D. Rousculp, and Alice M. Adams (2005): Mitigating Risks, Visible Hands, Inevitable Disasters, and Soft Variables: Management Research That Matters to Managers, Academy of Management Executive, 19 (4): 24–38.
33. Frey, Bruno S. (2007): Evaluierungen, Evaluierungen … Evaluitis, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 8 (3): 207–220.
34. Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1975): Truth and Method, Seabury Press: New York, NY.
35. Gardner, Heidi K., Francesca Gino, and Bradley R. Staats (2012): Dynamically Integrating Knowledge in Teams: Transforming Resources into Performance, Academy of Management Journal, 55 (4): 998–1022.
36. Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow (1994): The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage: London et al.
37. Gopinath, C. and Richard C. Hoffman (1995): A Comment on the Relevance of Strategy Research, in: Paul Shrivastava and Charles Stubbart (eds.): Challenges From Within the Mainstream, Greenwich, 93–110.
38. Gordon, Michael E., Lawrence S. Kleiman, and Charles A. Hanie (1978): Industrial-Organizational Psychology: “Open the Ears, o House of Israel”, American Psychologist, 33 (10): 893–905.
39. Grey, Christopher (2001): Re-imagining Relevance: A Response to Starkey and Madan, British Journal of Management, 12 (Special Issue): 27–32.
40. Gulati, Ranjay (2007): Tent Poles, Tribalism, and Boundary Spanning: The Rigor-Relevance Debate in Management Research, Academy of Management Journal, 50 (4): 775–782.
41. Hambrick, Donald C. (1994): 1993 Presidential Address: What if the Academy Actually Mattered?, Academy of Management Review, 19 (1): 11–16.
42. Hambrick, Donald C. (2007): The Field of Management’s Devotion to Theory: Too Much of a Good Thing?, Academy of Management Journal, 50 (6): 1346–1352.
43. Hennart, Jean-François (2007): The Theoretical Rationale for a Multinationality-Performance Relationship, Management International Review, 47 (3): 423–452.
44. Hodgkinson, Gerard P. and Denise M. Rousseau (2009): Bridging the Rigour-Relevance Gap in Management Research: It’s Already Happening!, Journal of Management Studies, 46 (3): 534–546.
45. Hughes, Tim, David Bence, Louise Grisoni, Nicholas O’Regan, and David Wornham (2011): Scholarship That Matters: Academic Practitioner Engagement in Business and Management, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10 (1): 40–57.
46. Jarzabkowski, Paula, Susan Albers Mohrman, and Andreas Georg Scherer (2010): Organization Studies as Applied Science: The Generation and Use of Academic Knowledge About Organizations — Introduction to the Special Issue, Organization Studies, 31 (9/10): 1189–1207.
47. Kelemen, Mihaela and Pratima Bansal (2002): The Conventions of Management Research and Their Relevance to Management Practice, British Journal of Management, 13 (2): 97–108.
48. Keller, Robert T. (2001): Cross-Functional Project Groups in Research and New Product Development: Diversity, Communications, Job Stress, and Outcomes, Academy of Management Journal, 44 (3): 547–555.
49. Kieser, Alfred (2010): Unternehmen Wissenschaft?, Leviathan, 38 (3): 347–367.
50. Kieser, Alfred and Lars Leiner (2009): Why the Rigour-Relevance Gap in Management Research is Unbridgeable, Journal of Management Studies, 46 (3): 516–533.
51. Kilduff, Martin and Mihaela Kelemen (2001): The Consolations of Organization Theory, British Journal of Management, 12 (Special Issue): 55–59.
52. Lewin, Arie Y., Carmen B. Weigelt, and James B. Emery (2004): Adaptation and Selection in Strategy and Change: Perspectives on Strategic Change in Organizations, in: Marshall S. Poole and Andrew H. Van de Ven (eds.): Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 108–160.
53. Lichtenthaler, Ulrich (2009): Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes, Academy of Management Journal, 52 (4): 822–846.
54. Luhmann, Niklas (1982): The Differentiation of Society, Columbia University Press: New York, NY.
55. Luhmann, Niklas (1995): Social Systems, Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA.
56. Lyles, Marjorie A. (1990): A Research Agenda for Strategic Management in the 1990s, Journal of Management Studies, 27 (4): 363–375.
57. Manly, Bryan F. J. (1992): The Design and Analysis of Research Studies, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
58. March, James G., Lee S. Sproull, and Michal Tamuz (1991): Learning from Samples of One and Fewer, Organization Science, 2 (1): 1–13.
59. March, James G. and Robert I. Sutton (1997): Organization Performance as a Dependent Variable, Organization Science, 8 (6): 698–706.
60. Marcus, Alfred A., Robert S. Goodman, and David N. Grazman (1995): The Diffusion of Strategic Management Frameworks, in: Paul Shrivastava and Charles Stubbart (eds.): Challenges From Within the Mainstream, Greenwich, 115–145.
61. Maurer, Indre and Mark Ebers (2006): Dynamics of Social Capital and Their Performance Implications: Lessons From Biotechnology Start-Ups, Administrative Science Quarterly, 51 (2), 262–292.
62. McKelvey, Bill (2006): Van de Ven and Johnson’s “Engaged Scholarship”: Nice Try, But …, Academy of Management Review, 31 (4): 822–829.
63. th ed., Sage: Newbury Park, CA et al.
64. Mintzberg, Henry (1973): The Nature of Managerial Work, Harper & Row: New York, NY.
65. th ed., Harcourt College Publishers: Fort Worth, TX et al.
66. Mohrman, Susan Albers, Cristina B. Gibson, and Allan M. Mohrman Jr. (2001): Doing Research That Is Useful to Practice: A Model and Empirical Exploration, Academy of Management Journal, 44 (2): 357–375.
67. Nicolai, Alexander T. (2004): Der “trade-off” zwischen “rigour” und “relevance” und seine Konsequenzen für die Management-Wissenschaften, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 74 (2): 99–118.
68. Nicolai, Alexander T. and Alfred Kieser (2002): Trotz eklatanter Erfolglosigkeit: Die Erfolgsfaktorenforschung weiter auf Erfolgskurs, Die Betriebswirtschaft, 62 (6): 579–596.
69. Nicolai, Alexander T. and David Seidl (2010): That’s Relevant! Different Forms of Practical Relevance in Management Science, Organization Studies, 31 (09/10): 1257–1285.
70. Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons (2001): Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Polity Press: Cambridge, UK et al.
71. Oesterle, Michael-Jörg (2006): Wahrnehmung betriebswirt-schaftlicher Fachzeitschriften durch Praktiker, Die Betriebswirt-schaft, 66 (3): 307–325.
72. Pettigrew, Andrew M. (2001): Management Research After Modernism, British Journal of Management, 12 (Special Issue): 61–70.
73. Pinto, Mary Beth, Jeffrey K. Pinto, and John E. Prescott (1993): Antecedents and Consequences of Project Team Cross-Functional Cooperation, Management Science, 39 (10): 1281–1297.
74. Polzer, Jeffrey T., Ranjay Gulati, Rakesh Khurana, and Michael L. Tushman (2009): Crossing Boundaries to Increase Relevance in Organizational Research, Journal of Management Inquiry, 18 (4): 280–286.
75. Rasche, Andreas and Michael Behnam (2009): As If It Were Relevant: A Systems Theoretical Perspective on the Relation Between Science and Practice, Journal of Management Inquiry, 18 (3): 243–255.
76. Rynes, Sara L., Jean M. Bartunek, and Richard L. Daft (2001): Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfer Between Practitioners and Academics, Academy of Management Journal, 44 (2): 340–355.
77. Shapiro, Debra L., Bradley L. Kirkman, and Hugh G. Courtney (2007): Perceived Causes and Solutions of the Translation Problem in Management Research, Academy of Management Journal, 50 (2): 249–266.
78. Shepherd, Dean A., Holger Patzelt, and Marcus Wolfe (2011): Moving Forward From Project Failure: Negative Emotions, Affective Commitment, and Learning From the Experience, Academy of Management Journal, 54 (6): 1229–1259.
79. Shin, Shung J., Tae-Yeol Kim, Jeong-Yeon Lee, and Lin Bian (2012): Cognitive Team Diversity and Individual Team Member Creativity: A Cross-Level Interaction, Academy of Management Journal, 55 (1): 197–212.
80. Shrivastava, Paul (1987): Rigor and Practical Usefulness of Research in Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 8 (1): 77–92.
81. Siggelkow, Nicolaj (2007): Persuasion With Case Studies, Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1): 20–24.
82. Singh, Kulwant, Siah Hwee Ang, and Siew Meng Leong (2003): Increasing Replication for Knowledge Accumulation in Strategy Research, Journal of Management, 29 (4): 533–549.
83. Sørensen, Jesper B. (2002): The Strength of Corporate Culture and the Reliability of Firm Performance, Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 (1): 70–91.
84. Starkey, Ken and Paula Madan (2001): Bridging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the Future of Management Research, British Journal of Management, 12 (Special Issue): S3–S26.
85. Thomas, Kenneth W. and Walter G. Tymon Jr. (1982): Necessary Properties of Relevant Research: Lessons From Recent Criticisms of the Organizational Sciences, Academy of Management Review, 7 (3): 345–352.
86. Van de Vall, Mark, Cheryl Bolas, and Tai S. Kang (1976): Applied Social Research in Industrial Organizations: An Evaluation of Functions, Theory, and Methods, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12 (2): 158–177.
87. Van de Ven, Andrew H. and Paul E. Johnson (2006): Knowledge for Theory and Practice, Academy of Management Review, 31 (4): 802–821.
88. Varadarajan, P. Rajan (2003): Musings on Relevance and Rigor of Scholarly Research in Marketing, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (4): 368–376.
89. Vermeulen, Freek (2005): On Rigor and Relevance: Fostering Dialectic Progress in Management Research, Academy of Management Journal, 48 (6): 978–982.
90. rd ed. Sage: New-bury Park, CA et al.
91. Zahra, Shaker A. and John A. Pearce (1992): Priorities of CEOs and Strategic Management Professors for Future Academic Research, Journal of Management Issues, 14 (2): 171–189.
92. Zmud, Robert W. (1996): Editor’s Comments: On Rigor and Relevancy, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 20 (3): 37.