Alternative future analysis for assessing the potential impact of climate change on urban landscape dynamics

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 532, Issue , 2015, Pages 48-60

  He, Chunyang ^a   Zhao, Yuanyuan ^b   Huang, Qingxu ^a   Zhang, Qiaofeng ^c   Zhang, Da ^a  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b BEIJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative future analysis; Beijing Tianjin Tangshan megalopolis cluster area; Climate change; Scenario modeling; Urban landscape

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC LOGIC DEVICES; MOBILE SECURITY;

ALTERNATIVE FUTURE ANALYSIS; CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS; INTEGRATED MODELING; POTENTIAL IMPACTS; SCENARIO MODELING; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; TIANJIN; URBAN LANDSCAPE;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; CELLULAR AUTOMATON; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FUTURE PROSPECT; PLANNING METHOD; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN AREA; URBAN PLANNING;

ALTERNATIVE FUTURE ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; CELLULAR AUTOMATA MODEL; CHINA; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; LAND USE; LANDSCAPE; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEM DYNAMICS MODEL; URBAN AREA; URBAN LANDSCAPE DYNAMICS; URBAN POPULATION; WATER SUPPLY;

BEIJING [BEIJING (ADS)]; BEIJING [CHINA]; CHINA; HEBEI; TANGSHAN; TIANJIN;

EID: 84930685915     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.103     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Al-shalabi M., Billa L., Pradhan B., Mansor S., Al-Sharif A.A. Modelling urban growth evolution and land-use changes using GIS based cellular automata and SLEUTH models: the case of Sana'a metropolitan city, Yemen. Environ. Earth Sci. 2013, 70:425-437.
2. Baker J.P., Hulse D.W., Gregory S.V., White D., Van Sickle J., Berger P.A., Dole D., Schumaker N.H. Alternative futures for the Willamette river basin, Oregon. Ecol. Appl. 2004, 14:313-324.
3. Berling-Wolff S., Wu J. Modeling urban landscape dynamics: a case study in Phoenix, USA. Urban Ecosyst. 2004, 7:215-240.
4. Bierwagen B.G., Theobald D.M., Pyke C.R., Choate A., Groth P., Thomas J.V., Morefield P. National housing and impervious surface scenarios for integrated climate impact assessments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107:20887-20892.
5. Bloom D.E. 7 billion and counting. Science 2011, 333:562-569.
6. Bryan B.A., Crossman N.D., King D., Meyer W.S. Landscape futures analysis: assessing the impacts of environmental targets under alternative spatial policy options and future scenarios. Environ. Model Softw. 2011, 26:83-91.
7. Cadenasso M.L., Pickett S.T.A., Schwarz K. Spatial heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: reconceptualizing land cover and a framework for classification. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2007, 5:80-88.
8. Chen J., Gong P., He C., Luo W., Tamura M., Shi P. Assessment of the urban development plan of Beijing by using a CA-based urban growth model. Photogramm. Eng. Remote. Sens. 2002, 68:1063-1072.
9. Clarke K.C., Gaydos L.J. Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 1998, 12:699-714.
10. Dale V.H. The relationship between land-use change and climate change. Ecol. Appl. 1997, 7:753-769.
11. Field C.B. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2012, Cambridge University Press.
12. Forrester J.W. Urban Dynamics 1969, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge.
13. Gao X., Wang M., Giorgi F. Climate change over China in the 21st century as simulated by BCC_CSM1.1-RegCM4.0. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. Lett. 2013, 6:381-386.
14. Gao Y., Fu J.S., Drake J.B., Lamarque J.F., Liu Y. The impact of emission and climate change on ozone in the United States under representative concentration pathways (RCPs). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13:9607-9621.
15. Georgescu M., Miguez-Macho G., Steyaert L.T., Weaver C.P. Climatic effects of 30years of landscape change over the Greater Phoenix, Arizona, region: 2. Dynamical and thermodynamical response. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2009, 114:D05111.
16. Gomben P., Lilieholm R., Gonzalez-Guillen M. Impact of demographic trends on future development patterns and the loss of open space in the California Mojave Desert. Environ. Manag. 2012, 49:305-324.
17. Good P., Gregory J., Lowe J., Andrews T. Abrupt CO2 experiments as tools for predicting and understanding CMIP5 representative concentration pathway projections. Clim. Dyn. 2013, 40:1041-1053.
18. Grimm N.B., Faeth S.H., Golubiewski N.E., Redman C.L., Wu J., Bai X., Briggs J.M. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 2008, 319:756-760.
19. Guo H., Liu L., Huang G., Fuller G., Zou R., Yin Y. A system dynamics approach for regional environmental planning and management: a study for the Lake Erhai Basin. J. Environ. Manag. 2001, 61:93-111.
20. Han J., Hayashi Y., Cao X., Imura H. Application of an integrated system dynamics and cellular automata model for urban growth assessment: a case study of Shanghai, China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2009, 91:133-141.
21. Hansen H.S. Modelling the future coastal zone urban development as implied by the IPCC SRES and assessing the impact from sea level rise. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2010, 98:141-149.
22. Hay J., Mimura N. Supporting climate change vulnerability and adaptation assessments in the Asia-Pacific region: an example of sustainability science. Sustain. Sci. 2006, 1:23-35.
23. He C., Shi P., Chen J., Li X., Pan Y., Li J., Li Y., Li J. Developing land use scenario dynamics model by the integration of system dynamics model and cellular automata model. Sci. China. Ser. D Earth Sci. 2005, 48:1979-1989.
24. He C., Okada N., Zhang Q., Shi P., Zhang J. Modeling urban expansion scenarios by coupling cellular automata model and system dynamic model in Beijing, China. Appl. Geogr. 2006, 26:323-345.
25. He C., Okada N., Zhang Q., Shi P., Li J. Modelling dynamic urban expansion processes incorporating a potential model with cellular automata. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 86:79-91.
26. He C., Zhao Y., Tian J., Shi P. Modeling the urban landscape dynamics in a megalopolitan cluster area by incorporating a gravitational field model with cellular automata. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 113:78-89.
27. Heimgartner C. System Dynamic Modeling of Transport and Land use: A First Model Draft, The First Swiss Transport Research Conference 2001, Monte Verità/Ascona.
28. Herold M., Goldstein N.C., Clarke K.C. The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003, 86:286-302.
29. Huang Q., He C., Liu Z., Shi P. Modeling the impacts of drying trend scenarios on land systems in northern China using an integrated SD and CA model. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2014, 57:839-854.
30. Hulse D., Branscomb A., Enright C., Bolte J. Anticipating floodplain trajectories: a comparison of two alternative futures approaches. Landsc. Ecol. 2009, 24:1067-1090.
31. Hunter L., Gonzalez G.M., Stevenson M., Karish K., Toth R., Edwards T., Lilieholm R., Cablk M. Population and land use change in the California Mojave: natural habitat implications of alternative futures. Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 2003, 22:373-397.
32. Jenerette G.D., Wu J. Analysis and simulation of land-use change in the central Arizona - Phoenix region, USA. Landsc. Ecol. 2001, 16:611-626.
33. Kawase H., Nagashima T., Sudo K., Nozawa T. Future changes in tropospheric ozone under Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs). Geophys. Res. Lett. 2011, 38:L05801.
34. Kuang W. Simulating dynamic urban expansion at regional scale in Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan Metropolitan Area. J. Geogr. Sci. 2011, 21:317-330.
35. Lauf S., Haase D., Hostert P., Lakes T., Kleinschmit B. Uncovering land-use dynamics driven by human decision-making - a combined model approach using cellular automata and system dynamics. Environ. Model Softw. 2012, 27-28:71-82.
36. Lee J.-W., Hong S.-Y., Chang E.-C., Suh M.-S., Kang H.-S. Assessment of future climate change over East Asia due to the RCP scenarios downscaled by GRIMs-RMP. Clim. Dyn. 2014, 42:733-747.
37. Li X., Yeh A.G.-O. Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2002, 16:323-343.
38. Li X., Lao C., Liu X., Chen Y. Coupling urban cellular automata with ant colony optimization for zoning protected natural areas under a changing landscape. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2010, 25:575-593.
39. Li X., Lao C., Liu Y., Liu X., Chen Y., Li S., Ai B., He Z. Early warning of illegal development for protected areas by integrating cellular automata with neural networks. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 130:106-116.
40. Liu Y., Lv X., Qin X., Guo H., Yu Y., Wang J., Mao G. An integrated GIS-based analysis system for land-use management of lake areas in urban fringe. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 82:233-246.
41. Liu X., Li X., Shi X., Wu S., Liu T. Simulating complex urban development using kernel-based non-linear cellular automata. Ecol. Model. 2008, 211:169-181.
42. Liu J., Kuang W., Zhang Z., Xu X., Qin Y., Ning J., Zhou W., Zhang S., Li R., Yan C., Wu S., Shi X., Jiang N., Yu D., Pan X., Chi W. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns, and causes of land-use changes in China since the late 1980s. J. Geogr. Sci. 2014, 24:195-210.
43. Long T.-r., Jiang W.-c., He Q. Water resources carrying capacity: new perspectives based on eco-economic analysis and sustainable development. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2004, 38-45.
44. Luck M., Wu J. A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landsc. Ecol. 2002, 17:327-339.
45. Ministry of Science and Technology of China National Assessment Report on Climate Change 2007, Science Press, Beijing.
46. Moss R.H., Edmonds J.A., Hibbard K.A., Manning M.R., Rose S.K., van Vuuren D.P., Carter T.R., Emori S., Kainuma M., Kram T., Meehl G.A., Mitchell J.F.B., Nakicenovic N., Riahi K., Smith S.J., Stouffer R.J., Thomson A.M., Weyant J.P., Wilbanks T.J. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 2010, 463:747-756.
47. National Climate Center of China, 2012. Data instruction for dataset of future climate scenario over China (version 3.0), Beijing.
48. National Statistics Bureau of China China City Statistical Yearbook 2012, China Statistics Press, Beijing.
49. Özbayrak M., Papadopoulou T.C., Akgun M. Systems dynamics modelling of a manufacturing supply chain system. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2007, 15:1338-1355.
50. Pocewicz A., Nielsen-Pincus M., Goldberg C., Johnson M., Morgan P., Force J., Waits L., Vierling L. Predicting land use change: comparison of models based on landowner surveys and historical land cover trends. Landsc. Ecol. 2008, 23:195-210.
51. Rounsevell M.D.A., Reginster I., Araújo M.B., Carter T.R., Dendoncker N., Ewert F., House J.I., Kankaanpää S., Leemans R., Metzger M.J., Schmit C., Smith P., Tuck G. A coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 114:57-68.
52. Saeed K. Development Planning and Policy Design: A System Dynamics Approach 1994, Brookfield, Avebury.
53. Sánchez-Rodríguez R. Science Plan: Urbanization and Global Environmental Change 2005, International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change.
54. Santé I., García A.M., Miranda D., Crecente R. Cellular automata models for the simulation of real-world urban processes: a review and analysis. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2010, 96:108-122.
55. Seto K.C., Fragkias M., Güneralp B., Reilly M.K. A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e23777.
56. Shen Q., Chen Q., Tang B.-s., Yeung S., Hu Y., Cheung G. A system dynamics model for the sustainable land use planning and development. Habitat Int. 2009, 33:15-25.
57. Shen L., Kyllo J., Guo X. An integrated model based on a hierarchical indices system for monitoring and evaluating urban sustainability. Sustainability 2013, 5:524-559.
58. Skamarock W.C., Klemp J.B. A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric model for weather research and forecasting applications. J. Comput. Phys. 2008, 227:3465-3485.
59. Solecki W.D., Oliveri C. Downscaling climate change scenarios in an urban land use change model. J. Environ. Manag. 2004, 72:105-115.
60. Solomon S. Climate Change 2007-The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC 2007, Cambridge University Press.
61. Song X.-m., Kong F.-z., Zhan C.-s. Assessment of water resources carrying capacity in Tianjin City of China. Water Resour. Manag. 2011, 25:857-873.
62. Stocker T.F., Qin D., Plattner G.-K., Tignor M., Allen S.K., Boschung J., Nauels A., Xia Y., Bex V., Midgley P.M. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) 2013, Cambridge Univ Press, New York.
63. Stockhause M., Höck H., Toussaint F., Lautenschlager M. Quality assessment concept of the World Data Center for Climate and its application to CMIP5 data. Geosci. Model Dev. 2012, 5:1023-1032.
64. Tan M., Li X., Xie H., Lu C. Urban land expansion and arable land loss in China-a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Land Use Policy 2005, 22:187-196.
65. Theobald D.M., Gross M.D. EML: a modeling environment for exploring landscape dynamics. Comput. Environ. Urban. Syst. 1994, 18:193-204.
66. Thomson A.M., Calvin K.V., Smith S.J., Kyle G.P., Volke A., Patel P., Delgado-Arias S., Bond-Lamberty B., Wise M.A., Clarke L.E., Edmonds J.A. RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100. Climate Change 2011, 109:s77-s94.
67. van Vuuren D., Edmonds J., Kainuma M., Riahi K., Thomson A., Hibbard K., Hurtt G., Kram T., Krey V., Lamarque J.-F., Masui T., Meinshausen M., Nakicenovic N., Smith S., Rose S. The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim. Chang. 2011, 109:5-31.
68. Verburg P.H., de Nijs T.C.M., Ritsema van Eck J., Visser H., de Jong K. A method to analyse neighbourhood characteristics of land use patterns. Comput. Environ. Urban. Syst. 2004, 28:667-690.
69. Verburg P., Berkel D., Doorn A., Eupen M., Heiligenberg H.R.M. Trajectories of land use change in Europe: a model-based exploration of rural futures. Landsc. Ecol. 2010, 25:217-232.
70. Verburg P.H., Tabeau A., Hatna E. Assessing spatial uncertainties of land allocation using a scenario approach and sensitivity analysis: a study for land use in Europe. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 127(Supplement):S132-S144.
71. Wang Z., Huang K., Yang S., Yu Y. An input-output approach to evaluate the water footprint and virtual water trade of Beijing, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 42:172-179.
72. Ward D.P., Murray A.T., Phinn S.R. A stochastically constrained cellular model of urban growth. Comput. Environ. Urban. Syst. 2000, 24:539-558.
73. White R., Engelen G. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environ. Plan. A 1993, 25:1175-1199.
74. White R., Engelen G. Cellular automata as the basis of integrated dynamic regional modelling. Environ. Plan. B 1997, 24:235-246.
75. Wu J. Hierarchy and scaling: extrapolating information along a scaling ladder. Can. J. Remote. Sens. 1999, 25:367-380.
76. Wu F. Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: the application to rural-urban land conversions. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2002, 16:795-818.
77. Wu J. Urban sustainability: an inevitable goal of landscape research. Landsc. Ecol. 2010, 25:1-4.
78. Wu J. Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landsc. Ecol. 2013, 28:999-1023.
79. Wu J., David J.L. A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications. Ecol. Model. 2002, 153:7-26.
80. Wu J., Thompson J. Quantifying impervious surface changes using time series planimetric data from 1940 to 2011 in four central Iowa cities, U.S.A. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 120:34-47.
81. Wu J., Vankat J.L., Barlas Y. Effects of patch connectivity and arrangement on animal metapopulation dynamics: a simulation study. Ecol. Model. 1993, 65:221-254.
82. Xiang W.-N., Stuber R.M.B., Meng X. Meeting critical challenges and striving for urban sustainability in China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011, 100:418-420.
83. Xie G., Zhou H., Zhen L., Xiao Y. Carrying capacity of water resources for China's development. Res. Sci. 2005, 27:2-7.
84. XU Chong-Hai X.Y. The projection of temperature and precipitation over China under RCP scenarios using a CMIP5 multi-model ensemble. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. 2012, 5:527-533.
85. Xu J., Chen Y., Lu F., Li W., Zhang L., Hong Y. The Nonlinear trend of runoff and its response to climate change in the Aksu River, western China. Int. J. Climatol. 2011, 31:687-695.
86. Yue T.X., Fan Z.M., Liu J.Y. Changes of major terrestrial ecosystems in China since 1960. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2005, 48:287-302.
87. Yue T.X., Fan Z.M., Liu J.Y. Scenarios of land cover in China. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2007, 55:317-342.
88. Zeng Z., Liu J., Savenije H.H.G. A simple approach to assess water scarcity integrating water quantity and quality. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 34:441-449.
89. Zhai Y., Wang J., Teng Y., Zuo R. Water demand forecasting of Beijing using the time series forecasting method. J. Geogr. Sci. 2012, 22:919-932.
90. Zhang Z., Shi M., Yang H. Understanding Beijing's water challenge: a decomposition analysis of changes in Beijing's water footprint between 1997 and 2007. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46:12373-12380.
91. Zhang C., Wu J., Grimm N.B., McHale M., Buyantuyev A. A hierarchical patch mosaic ecosystem model for urban landscapes: model development and evaluation. Ecol. Model. 2013, 250:81-100.