Impact of demographic trends on future development patterns and the loss of open space in the California Mojave Desert

Environmental Management

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 305-324

  Gomben, Peter ^a   Lilieholm, Robert ^b   Gonzalez Guillen, Manuel ^c  

^a Cleveland National Forest   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^c Colegio de Postgraduados ^*  (Mexico)

Author keywords

Demographic futures; Land use change; Logistic regression; Open space; Sustainable development; Urban growth models

Indexed keywords

CALIFORNIA; CENSUS BUREAU; DEMOGRAPHIC FUTURES; DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS; GROWTH PATTERNS; HISPANICS; LAND CONVERSION; LAND USE CHANGE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION; MOJAVE DESERT; OPEN SPACE; POPULATION GROWTH; SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY , CALIFORNIA; SCENARIO MODELS; SPATIALLY EXPLICIT;

DATA HANDLING; LANDFORMS; LOGISTICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GROWTH;

POPULATION STATISTICS;

CENSUS; DEMOGRAPHIC TREND; FUTURE PROSPECT; LAND USE CHANGE; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; POPULATION GROWTH; SETTLEMENT PATTERN; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TREND ANALYSIS; URBANIZATION;

CITY PLANNING; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DESERT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ETHNICITY; FAMILY SIZE; HOUSEHOLD; HOUSING; LAND USE; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION GROWTH; PROCESS MODEL; RESIDENTIAL AREA; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; REVIEW; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TREND STUDY; UNITED STATES; URBANIZATION;

CALIFORNIA; CITIES; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DESERT CLIMATE; ETHNIC GROUPS; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POPULATION GROWTH;

CALIFORNIA; MOJAVE DESERT; SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84856972348     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: 14321009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9749-6     Document Type: Review

References (93)

1. Agarwal C, Green GM, Grove JM, Evans TP, Schweik CM (2001) A review and assessment of land-use change models. Dynamics of space, time, and human choice. Bloomington and South Burlington, Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change, Indiana University and USDA Forest Service, CIPEC collaborative report series 1
2. Alberti M (2008) Advances in urban ecology: integrating humans and ecological processes in urban ecosystems. Springer, New York
3. RJ Alig JD Kline M Lichtenstein 2004 Urbanization on the U.S. landscape: looking ahead in the 21st century Landscape and Urban Planning 69 219 234 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.07.004 (Pubitemid 38537100)
4. Anderson DG, Berglund E (eds) (2003) Ethnographies of conservation: environmentalism and the distribution of privilege. Berghahn Books, New York
5. JP Baker DW Hulse SV Stanley D White J Van Sickle PA Berger D Dole NH Schumaker 2004 Alternative futures for the Willamette River Basin, Oregon Ecological Applications 14 313 324 10.1890/02-5011 (Pubitemid 38370896)
6. Battie M, Xie Y (2005) Urban growth using cellular automata. In: Macguire D, Batty M, Goodchild M (eds) GIS, spatial analysis and modeling. ESRI Press, Redlands, pp 151-172
7. GJ Borjas 1994 The economics of migration Journal of Economic Literature 32 1667 1717
8. H Briassoulis 2008 Land-use policy and planning, theorizing, and modeling: lost in translation, found in complexity? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 35 16 33 10.1068/b32166 (Pubitemid 351447919)
9. D Brown 2001 Sprawl in rural America: what it is and how it affects communities Small Town 2001 4 11
10. Bruegmann R (2005) Sprawl: a compact history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
11. Burchell RW, Downs A, McCann B, Mukherji S (2005) Sprawl costs: economic impacts of unchecked development. Island Press, Washington
12. California Department of Finance (2002) Population projections for California and San Bernardino County. http://www.dof.ca.gov. Accessed 22 Aug 2004
13. C Carrion-Flores E Irwin 2004 Determinants of residential land-use conversion and sprawl at the rural-urban fringe American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 889 904 10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00641.x (Pubitemid 39454862)
14. T Chow R Sadler 2010 The consensus of local stakeholders and outside experts in suitability modeling for future camp development Landscape and Urban Planning 94 9 19 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.013
15. KC Clarke LJ Gaydos 1998 Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12 699 714 10.1080/136588198241617 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38rosVyksA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29038803)
16. KC Clarke S Hoppen LJ Gaydos 1997 A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 24 247 261 10.1068/b240247 (Pubitemid 127642330)
17. Collins S, Larry E (2007) Caring for our natural assets: an ecosystem service perspective. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-733
18. Colorado Public Interest Research Foundation (2002) Down the drain: the impact of sprawl on Colorado's water supply. Colorado Public Interest Research Foundation, Denver
19. Coyne W (2003) The fiscal cost of sprawl: how sprawl contributes to local governments' budget woes. Environment Colorado Research and Policy Center, Denver
20. Cramer JS (2003) Logit models from economics and other fields. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
21. CS Cronan RJ Lilieholm J Tremblay T Glidden 2010 A retrospective assessment of land conservation patterns in Maine based on spatial analysis of ecological and socio-economic indicators Environmental Management 45 1076 1095 10.1007/s00267-010-9481-7
22. De la Barra T (2001) Integrated land use and transport modeling: the TRANUS experience. In: Brail RK, Klosterman RE (eds) Planning support systems: integrating geographic information systems, models and visualization tools. ESRI Press, Redlands, pp 129-156
23. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2001) Model ordinance language for open space. http://www.epa.gov/owow/nps/ordinance/mol3.htm. Accessed 22 Aug 2004
24. FJ Escobedo J Wagner DJ Nowak CL de la Maza M Rodrigues DE Crane 2008 Analyzing the cost-effectiveness of Santiago, Chile's policy of using urban forests to improve air quality Journal of Environmental Management 86 148 157 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.029 (Pubitemid 350047426)
25. C Fausold RJ Lilieholm 1999 The economic value of open space: a review and synthesis Environmental Management 23 307 320 10.1007/s002679900188 (Pubitemid 29115610)
26. Goldman T (2001) Consequences of sprawl: threats to California's natural environment and human health. University of California Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Working Paper 2001-06
27. Gonzalez M (2001) Future scenarios of land use in the California Mojave Desert. Doctoral dissertation, Utah State University, Logan
28. H Henriksen P Rasmussen G Brandt D von Bulow F Jensen 2007 Public participation modeling using Bayesian networks in management of groundwater contamination Environmental Modelling Software 22 1101 1113 10.1016/j.envsoft. 2006.01.008 (Pubitemid 46507842)
29. Hill LE, Johnson HP (2002) Understanding the future of Californians' fertility: the role of immigrants. Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco, p 57
30. Hopkins LD, Zapata MA (eds) (2007) Engaging the future: forecasts, scenarios, plans and projects. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA
31. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley series in probability and statistics, New York
32. LM Hunter MJ Gonzalez M Stevenson KS Karish RE Toth TC Edwards RJ Lilieholm M Cablk 2003 Population and land use change in the California Mojave: natural habitat implications of alternative futures Population Research and Policy Review 22 373 397 10.1023/A:1027311225410 (Pubitemid 37546515)
33. EG Irwin 2010 New directions for urban economic models of land use change: incorporating spatial dynamics and heterogeneity Journal of Regional Science 50 65 91 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00655.x
34. CA Jantz SJ Goetz D Donato P Claggett 2010 Designing and implementing a regional urban modeling system using the SLEUTH cellular urban model Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34 1 16 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.08.003
35. HP Johnson 2000 Movin' out: domestic migration to and from California in the 1990s California Counts: Population Trends and Profiles 2 1 15
36. RE Klosterman CJ Pettit 2005 An update on planning support systems Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32 477 484 10.1068/b3204ed (Pubitemid 40945698)
37. Klosterman RE, Siebert L, Hoque MA, Kim JW, Parveen A (2003) Using an operational planning support system to evaluate farmland preservation policies. In: Geertman S, Stillwell J (eds) Planning support systems in practice. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 391-407
38. Knott JL, Natoli N (2004) Compatible use buffers: a new weapon to battle encroachment. Engineer October-December:12-15
39. V Kocabas S Dragicevic 2007 Enhancing a GIS cellular automata model of land use change: Bayesian networks, influence diagrams and causality Transactions in GIS 11 681 702 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2007.01066.x (Pubitemid 47617920)
40. Landis J (2001) CUF, CUF II, and CURBA: a family of spatially explicit urban growth and land-use policy simulation models. In: Brail RK, Klosterman RE (eds) Planning support systems: integrating geographic information systems, models and visualization tools. ESRI Press, Redlands, pp 157-200
41. Lautso K (2003) The SPARTACUS system for defining and analyzing sustainable land use and transport policies. In: Geertman S, Stillwell J (eds) Planning support systems in practice. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 453-463
42. RJ Lilieholm RE Toth TC Edwards 2005 Alternative future growth scenarios for Utah's Wasatch Front: identifying future conflicts between development and the protection of environmental quality and public health Ecology and the Environment 84 1079 1088
43. Lilieholm RJ, Irland LC, Hagan JM (2010) Changing socio-economic conditions for private woodland protection. In: Trombulak SC, Baldwin RF (eds) Landscape-scale conservation planning. Springer, New York, pp 67-98
44. L Ma T Arentze A Borgers H Timmermans 2007 Modelling land-use decisions under conditions of uncertainty Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 31 461 476 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2007.02.002 (Pubitemid 47046543)
45. Mackun PJ, Wilson SR (2000) Population trends in metropolitan areas and central cities. U.S. Census Bureau Population Report P25-1133
46. B Marcot J Steventon G Sutherland R McCann 2006 Guidelines for developing and updating Bayesian belief networks applied to ecological modeling and conservation Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36 3063 3074 10.1139/x06-135 (Pubitemid 46866357)
47. Matyas R (2004) Email from Ron Matyas, Land Use Services Department, San Bernardino County, Aug 4 2004
48. JT McCloskey RJ Lilieholm CS Cronan 2011 Using Bayesian Belief Networks to identify future compatibilities and conflicts between development and landscape conservation Landscape and Urban Planning 101 2 190 203 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.011
49. McConnell V, Walls M (2005) The value of open space: evidence from studies of nonmarket benefits. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Working Paper, Cambridge, MA
50. Minami M (2000) Using ArcMap. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands
51. Mouat DA (2009) The regional context of MCB Camp Pendleton and MCAS Miramar. In: Shearer AW et al (eds) Land use scenarios: environmental consequences of development. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 43-60
52. D Myers 2001 Demographic futures as a guide to planning: California's Latinos and the compact city Journal of the American Planning Association 67 383 397 10.1080/01944360108976247 (Pubitemid 33087349)
53. Myers D, Pitkin J (2001) Demographic futures for California. Population Dynamics Group; School of Policy, Planning, and Development. University of Southern California, Los Angeles
54. Myers D, Pitkin J, Park J (2005) California demographic futures: projections to 2030, by nativity, immigrant generations, and time of arrival in the U.S. Population Dynamics Research Group; School of Policy, Planning, and Development. University of Southern California, Los Angeles
55. NJD Nagelkerke 1991 A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination Biometrika 78 691 692 10.1093/biomet/78.3.691
56. GC Nelson D Hellerstein 1997 Do roads cause deforestation? Using satellite images in econometric analysis of land use American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 80 88 10.2307/1243944
57. Nowak DJ, Stein SM, Randler PB, Greenfield EJ, Comas SJ, Alig RJ (2010) Sustaining America's urban trees and forests: a Forests on the Edge report. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report NRS-62
58. HM Parent 2008 BRAC to the future: managing past encroachment, present growth, and future land use around military installations Planning and Environmental Law 60 3 12 10.1080/15480750802400116
59. S Park S Jeon S Kim C Choi 2011 Prediction and comparison of urban growth by land suitability index mapping using GIS and RS in South Korea Landscape and Urban Planning 99 104 114 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.09.001
60. DC Parker SM Manson MA Janssen MJ Hoffmann P Deadman 2003 Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: a review Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 314 337 10.1111/1467-8306.9302004 (Pubitemid 41716665)
61. Persky J, Wiewel W (1996) Central city and suburban development: who pays and who benefits? Great Cities Institute Working Paper, College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs, University of Chicago, Chicago
62. Pitkin J (2001) Projecting the population of California by nativity and period of arrival to 2020. California Demographic Futures Working Paper
63. R Platt 2004 Toward ecological cities: adapting to the 21st century metropolis Environment 46 11 27 10.1080/00139150409604388
64. Pourret O, Naim P, Marcot B (2008) Bayesian networks: a practical guide to applications. Wiley, West Sussex
65. Press D (2002) Saving open space: the politics of local preservation in California. University of California Press, Berkeley, p 302
66. Proctor EK (1992) The use of logistic regression in social work research. In: Gillespie DF, Glisson C (eds) Quantitative methods in social work: state of the art. The Haworth Press, New York
67. Public Policy Institute of California (2002a) Just the facts: California's population. http://www.ppic.org. Accessed 14 June 2002
68. Public Policy Institute of California (2002b) Just the facts: cities and growth in California. http://www.ppic.org. Accessed 29 Apr 2002
69. Putnam SH, Shih-Liang C (2001) The METROPILUS planning support system: urban models and GIS. In: Brail RK, Klosterman RE (eds) Planning support systems: integrating geographic information systems, models and visualization tools. ESRI Press, Redlands, pp 99-128
70. V Radeloff S Stewart T Hawbaker U Gimmi A Pidgeon C Flather R Hammer D Helmers 2010 Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 107 940 945 10.1073/pnas.0911131107 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtV2is7c%3D
71. Rhodenbaugh RK (1998) Suburbanization and wilderness parks: an Orange County, California case study. MS thesis, California State University, Long Beach
72. M Rouget R Cowling R Pressey D Richardson 2003 Identifying spatial components of ecological and evolutionary processes for regional conservation planning in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa Diversity and Distributions 9 191 210 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00025.x (Pubitemid 36599716)
73. M Rouget R Cowling A Lombard A Knight G Kerley 2006 Designing large-scale conservation corridors for pattern and process Conservation Biology 20 549 561 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00297.x
74. San Bernardino County (2007) General plan. Public Services Group, Land Use Services Division, San Bernardino
75. J Sandoval H Johnson S Tafoya 2002 Who's your neighbor?: residential segregation and diversity in California California Counts: Population Trends and Profiles 4 1 20
76. I Sante AM Garcia D Miranda R Crecente 2010 Cellular automata models for the simulation of real-world urban processes: a review and analysis Landscape and Urban Planning 96 108 122 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.03.001
77. SAS Institute Inc. (1995) Logistic regression examples using the SAS system, v 6. SAS, Cary
78. Shearer AW (2009) Scenario-based studies of military installations and their regions. In: Shearer et al (eds) Land use scenarios: environmental consequences of development. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 27-42
79. Smart Growth Network (2009) This is smart growth. Smart Growth Network, Butte
80. C Smith A Howes B Price C McAlpine 2007 Using a Bayesian belief network to predict suitable habitat of an endangered mammal-the Julia Creek dunnart (Sminthopsis douglasi) Biological Conservation 139 333 347 10.1016/j.biocon. 2007.06.025 (Pubitemid 47384700)
81. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) (2004) Southern California Association of Governments Census data. http://www.scag.ca.gov/ census/index.htm. Accessed 24 Apr 2007
82. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) (2011) Southern California Association of Governments Census data. http://www.scag.ca.gov/ census/index.htm. Accessed 22 Feb 2011
83. Stein S, McRoberts RE, Alig RJ, Nelson MD, Theobald DM, Eley M, Dechter M, Carr M (2005) Forests on the edge: housing development on America's private forests. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-636
84. Stein S, Alig RJ, White EM, Comas SJ, Carr M, Eley M, Elverum K, O'Donnell M, Theobald DM, Cordell K, Haber J, Beauvais TW (2007) National Forests on the edge: development pressures on America's National Forests and Grasslands. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-728
85. Steinitz C, Flaxman M, Mouat D, Arias H, Goode T, Peiser R, Bassett S, Maddock T, Shearer A (2003) Alternative futures for changing landscapes: the Upper San Pedro River Basin in Arizona and Sonora. Island Press, Washington, p 202
86. Steventon J (2008) Conservation of marbled murrelets in British Columbia. In: Pourret O, Naim P, Marcot B (eds) Bayesian networks: a practical guide to applications. Wiley, West Sussex, pp 127-148
87. Therrien M, Ramirez R (2001) The Hispanic population in the United States. U.S. Census Bureau Population Report P20-535
88. U.S. Census Bureau (2004) The American Factfinder. http://factfinder. census.gov/home/saff/main.html?-lang=en. Accessed 15 Nov 2004
89. U.S. Census Bureau (2011) The American Factfinder. http://factfinder. census.gov/home/saff/main.html?-lang=en. Accessed 16 Mar 2011
90. PH Verburg PP Schot MJ Dijst A Veldkamp 2004 Land use change modeling: current practice and research priorities GeoJournal 61 309 324 10.1007/s10708-004-4946-y (Pubitemid 41127048)
91. Waddell P (2005) Between politics and planning: UrbanSim as a decision-support system for metropolitan planning. In: Brail RK, Klosterman RE (eds) Planning support systems: integrating geographic information systems, models and visualization tools. ESRI Press, Redlands, pp 201-228
92. White EM, Alig RJ, Stein S, Mahal L, Theobald D (2009) A sensitivity analysis of "Forests on the Edge: housing development on America's private forests." USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-792
93. N Wu EA Silva 2010 Artificial intelligence solutions for urban land dynamics: a review Journal of Planning Literature 24 246 265 10.1177/0885412210361571